An interventional study of Perturbation training and Exercise in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Istanbul Arel University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-31.
Sponsored by Istanbul Arel University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Nonspecific low back pain is defined as low back pain that cannot be associated with a specific identified pathology. Many methods such as patient education, medical treatment, physical modalities, exercise, manual therapy, massage, traction and cognitive behavioral therapy are used in the treatment of nonspecific low back pain. Spinal stabilization exercises, which are among the therapeutic exercises, aim to improve and improve muscle control to compensate for any loss of muscle movement caused by degenerative changes or injury. Perturbation training, which is among the neuromuscular exercises, is an intervention that aims to improve the control of rapid balance reactions and involves repetitive postural distortions. In perturbation training, the surface is moved in multiple directions with different forces and moments. The aim of this exercise is to develop the stabilization response that will be created by stresses applied from different directions. It is believed that the number of motor units participating in contraction and proprioceptive input will increase with perturbation exercise. Although the number of studies on low back pain is quite limited, it has been stated that applications that provide perturbation can reduce the incidence of low back pain and provide improvement in neuromuscular control of spinal stability. In the light of these data, the aim of this study is to investigate the effects of perturbation training given in addition to the exercise program on trunk muscle endurance, pain, disability, functionality, fear avoidance beliefs and quality of life parameters in individuals with nonspecific low back pain.
Nonspecific low back pain is defined as low back pain that cannot be associated with a specific identified pathology. Many methods such as patient education, medical treatment, physical modalities, exercise, manual therapy, massage, traction and cognitive behavioral therapy are used in the treatment of nonspecific low back pain. In current guidelines, it has been reported that patient education and therapeutic exercises are treatment methods with a high level of evidence. Spinal stabilization exercises, which are among the therapeutic exercises, aim to improve and improve muscle control to compensate for any loss of muscle movement caused by degenerative changes or injury. With stabilization exercises, deep muscles are activated while excessive activity of superficial muscles is reduced. Thus, correcting muscle abnormalities and ensuring the correct function of the muscles supports the spine. Perturbation training, which is among the neuromuscular exercises, is an intervention that aims to improve the control of rapid balance reactions and involves repetitive postural distortions. In perturbation training, the surface is moved in multiple directions with different forces and moments. The aim of this exercise is to develop the stabilization response that will be created by stresses applied from different directions. It is believed that the number of motor units participating in contraction and proprioceptive input will increase with perturbation exercise. Previous studies have shown that the effects of perturbation training were mostly investigated in geriatric and neurological patient groups. However, current studies show that perturbation training is also applied to some orthopedic problems such as anterior cruciate ligament injury, shoulder pain, ankle instability and makes positive contributions to the healing process.
Although the number of studies on low back pain is quite limited, it has been stated that applications that provide perturbation can reduce the incidence of low back pain and provide improvement in neuromuscular control of spinal stability. In the light of these data, the aim of this study is to investigate the effects of perturbation training given in addition to the exercise program on trunk muscle endurance, pain, disability, functionality, fear avoidance beliefs and quality of life parameters in individuals with nonspecific low back pain.
2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 44 is below the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.
Browse Back Pain studies →Istanbul Arel University is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Exercise program with progressive perturbation conditions
Other: Perturbation training
Exercise program
Other: Exercise
The exercise program will be applied 2 days/week for 8 weeks, with the addition of progressive perturbation conditions.
The exercise program will be applied 2 days/week for 8 weeks.
Trunk extensor endurance test
Individuals are asked to hang their trunks from the bed starting from the spina iliaca anterior superior and cross both arms on the shoulders. The legs are fixed by the practitioner over the gastrocnemius muscle. The test is started when the individuals maintain the horizontal position and the time they maintain the position is recorded in seconds.
Time frame: At baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention
Trunk flexor endurance test
The participant is positioned by the tester with the knees and hips at 90 degrees, the body at 60 degrees, the hands in a crossed position on both shoulders, and the soles of the feet firmly on the ground. The time this position can be maintained is recorded in seconds.
Time frame: At baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention
Bilater side bridge endurance test
For the left lateral plank test, the participants' feet are placed on top of each other, the right arm is perpendicular to the ground, the elbow is on the mat, the left arm is at chest level, and the left hand is on the right shoulder. When the individual is ready, he is asked to lift his hips with support from his elbows and feet. As soon as the test position is taken in which the shoulders, hips and feet are in the same direction, the time is started by the researcher. The period ends when the individual cannot maintain the position and body swings forward and backward.
Time frame: At baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention
Pain intensity
The pain felt by the participants at rest, during activity and at night will be questioned with the "0-10 cm" Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). On VAS, 0 means "no pain" and 10 means "worst pain ever felt".
Time frame: At baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention
Disability
The disability levels of the participants will be evaluated with the 'Oswestry Disability Index (ODS)'. The survey contains 10 questions on 10 topics with 6 options. The increase in the total score is proportional to the increase in activity limitation.
Time frame: At baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention
Timed Up and Go Test
The 3-meter area in front of the chair is determined. The patient is asked to get up from the chair, walk this distance and sit down again. The elapsed time gives the result of the test and the time is recorded in seconds. The test is performed twice with a 1-minute interval and the average time is taken.
Time frame: At baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention
The Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
The Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) is a patient reported questionnaire which specifically focuses on how a patient's fear avoidance beliefs about physical activity and work may affect and contribute to their low back pain and resulting disability. The questionnaire consists of 16 items in which a patient rates their agreement with each statement on a 7-point Likert scale. Where 0= completely disagree, 6=completely agree. There is a maximum score of 96. A higher score indicates more strongly held fear avoidance beliefs. \[2\] There are two subscales within the FABQ; the work subscale (FABQw) with 7 questions (maximum score of 42) and the physical activity subscale (FABQpa) with 4 questions (maximum score of 24).
Time frame: At baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention
Health-related quality-of-life
Individuals' health-related quality of life will be evaluated with Short Form-12/SF-12. With SF-12, two subscores are obtained: physical component summary (PBS) and mental component summary (MBS). While the FBÖ-12 score is obtained from the sub-dimensions of general health, physical functionality, physical role and body pain, the MBÖ-12 score is obtained from the social functionality, emotional role, mental health and energy sub-dimensions. Both FBÖ-12 and MBÖ-12 scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing better health.
Time frame: At baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction with the treatment will be evaluated with the Global Rating of Change scale. Participants will be asked to rate their condition compared to baseline after an 8-week intervention period, indicating whether they had significantly improved, slightly improved, remained unchanged, slightly deteriorated, or significantly worsened in this study.
Time frame: After 8 weeks of intervention
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Istanbul Arel University