ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06153121VAL_PPT_HUpdated Jun 25, 2025

Validity of an Upper Extremity Physical Performance Test Battery in Healthy Athletes

An interventional study of Physical performance test - Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) and Physical performance test - modified Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (m-CKCUEST) in Athletic Injuries, sponsored by University Ghent. Recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-25.

Sponsored by University Ghent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
12 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project comprises two studies; a cross-sectional study and a prospective study.

  1. The cross-sectional study aims to develop and validate a new sport-specific test battery (PROMs, analytical and physical performance tests) in healthy tennis players and swimmers.The construct validity of this upper extremity test battery will be examined through two different methods.

    1. Firstly, the performance on the test battery will be correlated to sport performance (sprint time at 100m freestyle in swimming and serve speed/accuracy in tennis)
    2. Secondly, the correlation between test battery performance and upper limb/trunk kinematics in a tennis serve (measured via inertial measurement units (IMUs)) will be examined.
  2. In the prospective study, the predictive validity of the test battery will be evaluated. Healthy swimmers and tennis players will be tested at baseline using the same test battery as mentioned above. The athletes will be followed for one year and new injuries will be recorded via a weekly questionnaire. Performance on the test battery will be associated with the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries.
Read the detailed description

Upper extremity physical performance tests (PPTs) of the upper limb are physically challenging tests and are supposed to be sport-specific and mimic the sport specific movements or load.

Currently, there is no strong evidence for the validity of many upper extremity physical performance tests, although these tests are widely used in the return-to-sport phase after upper limb injuries. There is a clear need for a validating test physical performance tests.

Validation of these PPTs is possible in several ways, e.g. correlation to an analytical construct such as strength. However, it is important that these tests are sport-specific. For this reason, the correlation between physical performance tests on the one hand and sports performance (in swimming and tennis) and upper limb kinematics during a tennis serve on the other hand will be evaluated in this study. However, a single PPT is unlikely to correlate strongly with sport performance or tennis serve kinematics, as previous studies have shown a weak to moderate association when a single PPT was correlated with sport performance or another construct. Therefore, a cluster of tests will be assessed; four PPTs per sport and three analytical tests measuring strength and mobility of shoulder and hand, since these are the cornerstone of testing protocols in sports rehabilitation.

In addition, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), questionnaires that measure physical and psychosocial factors, are becoming increasingly important in sports. Recent studies show that these factors influence sports performance and rehabilitation outcomes. Therefore, these questionnaires can be very useful in the return-to-sport phase and injury risk screening. The PROMs that will be used in this study are the following: Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC-SES), Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) and the general self-efficacy scale.

To conclude, the test battery consists of PPTs, analytical tests (strength and mobility) and PROMs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Athletic Injuries

Browse trials for

03

In context

Athletic Injuries

258 studies on the registry are indexed under Athletic Injuries; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 44 across 164 interventional studies indexed under Athletic Injuries.

Browse Athletic Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University Ghent is the lead sponsor of 350 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • In good general health
  • Play tennis or swim competitively, at least 3 hours per week (training + competition)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of shoulder dislocation in dominant and/or nondominant shoulder
  • History of upper extremity surgery
  • At the moment of participation, participants should not report a substantial injury (defined by the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre questionnaire on health problems) in the past two months. A substantial injury is defined as a moderate or severe reduction in training volume or reduction in sports performance or complete inability to participate in sport as substantial injuries and illnesses.
  • Neurological symptoms in any extremity
  • Suffering from a systemic disease (such as diabetes, lupus, arthrosis,.. )
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Adult tennis players

    tennis players between the age of 18 and 40

    Other: Physical performance test - Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) · Other: Physical performance test - Seated Seated Single Arm Shot Put Test (SSASPT) · Other: Physical performance test - Upper Limb Rotation Test (ULRT) · Other: Physical performance test - Shoulder endurance test (SET) · Other: Analytical test - Hand Grip Strength · Other: Analytical test - Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) · Other: PROM - Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC-SES) · Other: PROM - Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) · Other: PROM - General elf-efficacy scale (GSES).

  • Experimental
    Adult swimmers

    swimmers between the age of 18 and 40

    Other: Physical performance test - Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST) · Other: Physical performance test - Seated Seated Single Arm Shot Put Test (SSASPT) · Other: Physical performance test - Upper Limb Rotation Test (ULRT) · Other: Physical performance test - Posterior shoulder endurance test (PSET) · Other: Analytical test - Shoulder Strength · Other: Analytical test - Hand Grip Strength · Other: Analytical test - Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) · Other: PROM - Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC-SES) · Other: PROM - Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) · Other: PROM - General elf-efficacy scale (GSES).

  • Experimental
    Adolescent tennis players

    tennis players between the age of 12 and 18

    Other: Physical performance test - modified Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (m-CKCUEST) · Other: Physical performance test - Seated Seated Single Arm Shot Put Test (SSASPT) · Other: Physical performance test - Upper Limb Rotation Test (ULRT) · Other: Physical performance test - Shoulder endurance test (SET) · Other: Analytical test - Shoulder Strength · Other: Analytical test - Hand Grip Strength · Other: Analytical test - Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) · Other: PROM - Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC-SES) · Other: PROM - Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) · Other: PROM - General elf-efficacy scale (GSES).

  • Experimental
    Adolescent swimmers

    swimmers between the age of 12 and 18

    Other: Physical performance test - modified Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (m-CKCUEST) · Other: Physical performance test - Seated Seated Single Arm Shot Put Test (SSASPT) · Other: Physical performance test - Upper Limb Rotation Test (ULRT) · Other: Physical performance test - Posterior shoulder endurance test (PSET) · Other: Analytical test - Shoulder Strength · Other: Analytical test - Hand Grip Strength · Other: Analytical test - Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) · Other: PROM - Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC-SES) · Other: PROM - Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) · Other: PROM - General elf-efficacy scale (GSES).

Interventions

  • OtherPhysical performance test - Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST)

    The test is performed in a pushup position with the hands placed 91.4 cm apart on strips of athletic tape. The person reaches with alternating hands across the body to touch the piece of tape under the opposing hand. The number of cross-body touches performed in 15 seconds is recorded. In total, three 15-s test trials were performed, with 45 s rest between each trial.

  • OtherPhysical performance test - modified Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (m-CKCUEST)

    The test is performed in a pushup position with the hands one half-arm span apart on strips of athletic tape. The person reaches with alternating hands across the body to touch the piece of tape under the opposing hand. The number of cross-body touches performed in 15 seconds is recorded. In total, three 15-s test trials were performed, with 45 s rest between each trial.

  • OtherPhysical performance test - Seated Seated Single Arm Shot Put Test (SSASPT)

    Set up requires that the subject is placed in a seated position with their back against the wall, and a 2kg medicine ball held in a shot put position. When ready, the subject will perform a shot put motion to project the medicine ball as far as possible. The average of three trials is recorded for each arm.

  • OtherPhysical performance test - Upper Limb Rotation Test (ULRT)

    Participants starts in a modified (on elbows) push-up position. Participants are positioned next to a wall in order to allow the shoulder, the elbow epicondyle, the greater trochanter and the lateral malleolus of the ankle to touch the wall. Participants are asked to perform a trunk rotation, coupled with an external rotation of the shoulder in a 90°-90° position (90° abduction, 90° external rotation) touching the tape placed vertically on the wall as quickly as possible for 15 s. Finally, three 15-s test trials were performed, with 45 s rest between each trial.

  • OtherPhysical performance test - Shoulder endurance test (SET)

    Participants were instructed to stand up straight with their back against a wall. The tested arm was placed in a 90°forward flexion holding a 1-m long thera-band® fixed at shoulder height on a graduated stick. Participants were asked to pull the thera-band® from the starting position 90°forward flexion-to a 90° external rotation and 90° abduction (90°90°position) at an alternated cadence given by a metronome. Males are asked to pull a green thera-band (2.1 kg) and females a red thera-band (1.7 kg). Repetitions are performed until the participant is fatigued.

  • OtherPhysical performance test - Posterior shoulder endurance test (PSET)

    The participant is positioned prone, with the test shoulder off the table and the arm perpendicular to the floor. A bar on a stick is adjusted for each patient and fixed at the point that the participant's shoulder reaches 90° of horizontal abduction, the point at which the participant was to hold the arm at the top of the arc of motion for 1 second. The participant held a weight equal to 2% of his body weight (rounded to the nearest 0.5 kg). Starting with the arm perpendicular to the floor, the participant horizontally abducted his arm to 90 degrees at a cadence of 30 beats per minute. Repetitions are performed until the participant is fatigued.

  • OtherAnalytical test - Shoulder Strength

    shoulder external rotation and internal rotation measured with a hand held dynanometer

  • OtherAnalytical test - Hand Grip Strength

    Hand grip strength measured with a JAMAR Hand Dynamometer

  • OtherAnalytical test - Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)

    Passive external rotation in supine position with arm in 90° abduction - passive internal rotation in supine position with arm in 90° abduction.

  • OtherPROM - Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC-SES)

    The KJOC-SES survey is composed of ten 10-point questions to evaluate specifically the performance of overhead athletes, with the highest performance score of 100.

  • OtherPROM - Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2)

    The Competitive State Anxiety Inventory scale contains 27 items. It a psychometric scale that asks the volunteer to rate, on a 4-point Likert scale, their coping skills for sports performance.

  • OtherPROM - General elf-efficacy scale (GSES).

    The GSES measures (10 statements) how a person deals with stressors/difficult situations in life. The scale is about a person's self-confidence that his or her actions are responsible for successful outcomes or, in other words, that one has control over challenging demands imposed by the environment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sports performance

    For tennis players: serve performance test (12 serves), consisting of serve velocity and accuracy * serve velocity: Peak SV was measured with a Stalker Professional sports radar Pro II+ * serve accuracy: serve accuracy is evaluated based on a scoring system. Two points are awarded if the serve lands in the target area (target of 2x2 m down the "T"), only one point when serving into the serve box, and balls landing outside the serve box results in zero points. The score of every individual serve was summed up to a total score of a maximum of 24 points. * the average velocity and the total accuracy score is used for analysis For swimmers: time on 100m freestyle during competition event is used for analysis

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. New musculoskeletal injuries

    New musculoskeletal injuries registered by the OSTRC-H2 (The Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Questionnaire on Health Problems)

    Time frame: During the 1 year follow-up after baseline measurements

Secondary outcomes

  1. Range of motion, velocity and acceleration of the upper extremity during the tennis serve

    Range of motion, velocity and acceleration of the upper extremity (wrist, elbow, shoulder, trunk) measured with inertial measurement units (IMUs) during the tennis serve

    Time frame: Baselline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06153121
Lead sponsor
University Ghent
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2023
Start date
Nov 22, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 25, 2025

Study contacts

Jasper Stubbe
Contact
jasper.stubbe@hotmail.be
09 332 26 33
Ann Cools
principal investigator · University Ghent

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion