An observational study in Multiple Myeloma and Multiple Myeloma Without Mention of Remission, sponsored by All4Cure. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-03.
Sponsored by All4Cure · Observational
All4Cure is partnering with community oncology practices participating in the Quality Cancer Care Alliance (QCCA) and Exigent Research to develop a clinical pathway that standardizes the evaluation, treatment and ongoing management of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who wish to achieve and maintain MRD negativity.
This is a longitudinal retrospective study that will collect data from three separate cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The cohorts classify patients based on whether care is delivered under an intention to adhere to an MRD-targeted clinical pathway, and if so, whether the implementation of that clinical pathway occurs through participation in the All4Cure platform vs. through written documentation. The three cohorts are labeled: Platform, Documentation, and Off-Pathway.
The study will employ two implementations of an MRD-targeted pathway one that disseminates pathway guidance through written documentation, and another that leverages the All4Cure platform to support pathway adherence through direct engagement of other experts, and through integration of elements of the MRD-targeted pathway into the structured components of the platform. The study also includes a comparator cohort of patients not being treated according to the clinical pathway. Analysis under the primary objective will evaluate outcomes between patients being treated following written pathway documentation and patients being treated off pathway. The primary endpoints are the proportion of patients with achievement of VGPR or better (≥VGPR), and the proportion of patients with a CR or better (≥CR), within 12 months. Secondary endpoints include MRD negativity, pathway adherence, time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and obstacles to getting daratumumab treatment. Sustained MRD negativity is an exploratory endpoint.
Data will be collected retrospectively, through stratified random sampling by race within cohort, with patients accrued over a 12-month period. All patients will be followed over time after accrual, with minimum available follow-up of 12 months. Accordingly, the estimated period from first accrual to last follow-up will be approximately 24 months.
3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 450 is above the median of 140 across 468 observational studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.
Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →All4Cure is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients seen in a community oncology setting.
Diagnosis of multiple myeloma
Patients in the Documentation Cohort must meet the following additional inclusion criteria.
In addition to the inclusion criteria for the documentation cohort, patients in the Platform Cohort must meet the following additional inclusion criteria.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients in this cohort are participating in the All4Cure platform and there has been an established intention to treat according to the clinical pathway. Additionally, the patient's primary physician will also be a participant in the All4Cure platform.
Other: Multiple Myeloma Pathway · Other: All4Cure Platform
Patients in this cohort are not participating in the All4Cure platform but there has been an established intention to treat according to the clinical pathway.
Other: Multiple Myeloma Pathway · Other: Documentation Pathway
Patients in this cohort are not participating in the All4Cure platform and there has not been in intention to treat according to the clinical pathway that has been established by a landmark time period.
Use and adherence to a multiple myeloma pathway.
Participant in the All4Cure platform.
Use of multiple myeloma pathway through written documentation.
To compare rate of tumor response and complete tumor response (≥VGPR and ≥CR) within 12 months of start of front-line therapy between the Documentation and Off-Pathway COHORT groups.
Tumor response will be a binary classification indicating the best tumor response documented through 12 months following start of front-line therapy, based on response assessment of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD) and not evaluable / not evaluated (NE). Given that the standard of care is to achieve at least a VGPR in the frontline setting, VGPR + sCR + CR will be defined as a tumor response, and other values will be interpreted as nonresponse for the purpose of this objective. Separately, sCR + CR will be interpreted as a complete tumor response, and other values will be interpreted as incomplete (VGPR) or nonresponse (PR, SD or PD). The proportion of patients who achieve VGPR or better any point within 12 months, and separately the proportion of patients who achieve a CR or better, will be compared between the Documentation and Off-Pathway COHORT groups.
Time frame: 24 months
To compare pathway adherence between the Platform and Documentation COHORT group implementations of the MRD-targeted clinical pathway.
Pathway adherence will be quantified based on the adherence score, which reflects a sum of points credited for pathway-specified activities that are carried out during the 12-month period beginning from the start of treatment. The adherence score will be calculated at 3, 6 and 12-month periods with a minimum possible score of 0 points during all time periods. The maximum possible score will be 30 points during the 3 and 6-month time points and a maximum possible score of 40 points during the 12-month time point. The higher point scores indicate more adherence to the pathway.
Time frame: 24 months
To compare rate of tumor response and complete tumor response (≥VGPR and ≥CR) within 12 months of start of front-line therapy between PATHWAY groups (On-Pathway vs. Off-Pathway).
Time frame: 12 months
To compare rate of tumor response and complete tumor response (≥VGPR and ≥CR) within 12 months of start of front-line therapy between the Platform and Off-Pathway COHORT groups.
Time frame: 12 months
: To compare rate of tumor response and complete tumor response (≥VGPR and ≥CR) within 12 months of start of front-line therapy between the Documentation and Off-Pathway COHORT groups.
This will exclude Off-Pathway patients who received daratumumab as part of their front-line regimen.
Time frame: 12 months
To assess rates of MRD negativity (at 10-5 and 10-6 thresholds) at any point through 12 months after start of front-line therapy between the Platform and Documentation COHORT group implementations of the MRD-targeted clinical pathway.
MRD negativity will be assessed separately based on 10-5 (1/100,000) and 10-6 (1/1,000,000) thresholds, with rates of MRD negativity compared across the Platform and Documentation COHORT groups for each MRD negativity endpoint. Indication of MRD negativity at any point within 12 months of start of front-line therapy under each of the thresholds will be deemed to constitute MRD-negative status for that threshold endpoint, irrespective of evidence of MRD-positive status at other assessments.
Time frame: 12 months
To compare progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) between the Documentation and Off-Pathway COHORT groups.
This will be done from a landmark at 6 months after start of front-line therapy, and to compare PFS, TTNT, and OS between the Platform and Documentation COHORT groups from that same landmark time point. To assess the sensitivity of the results to the selection of landmark timepoint, the analysis will also evaluate outcomes as measured from 3-month and 12-month landmarks.
Time frame: 12 months
To describe the frequency of patients that encountered obstacles reported in the record to accessing D-RVd for induction therapy or for accessing Dara-R for maintenance therapy from third-party payers.
If more than one obstacle type is reported per patient, each that is documented in the record will be endorsed. The frequency of patients who encountered each obstacle type, and the frequency of patients who encountered any obstacle (i.e., at least one obstacle), will be reported from among patients whom the record indicates attempted to get treatment with Daratumumab, Revlimid, Velcade, Dexamethasone (D-RVd) or Daratumumab, Revlimid (Dara-R), by COHORT group.
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the percentage of patients that encountered obstacles reported in the record to accessing D-RVd for induction therapy or for accessing Daratumumab, Revlimid (Dara-R) for maintenance therapy from third-party payers.
If more than one obstacle type is reported per patient, each that is documented in the record will be endorsed. The percentage of patients who encountered each obstacle type, and the percentage of patients who encountered any obstacle (i.e., at least one obstacle), will be reported from among patients whom the record indicates attempted to get treatment with Daratumumab, Revlimid, Velcade, Dexamethasone (D-RVd) or Daratumumab, Revlimid (Dara-R), by COHORT group.
Time frame: 24 months
To estimate the percentage of all patients with NDMM to whom care was provided within the QCCA/Exigent network from the date of the first patient enrolled to the date of the last patient enrolled.
This objective requires analysis of the enrolled patient sample as a subset of the underlying eligible population within the QCCA/Exigent network, and will be conducted through analysis of case screening data, without formal data collection from the underlying population of unaccrued eligible patients.
Time frame: 24 months
To examine the rate of tumor response and complete tumor response (≥VGPR and ≥CR) within 12 months of the start of front-line therapy as a function of pathway adherence, controlling demographic and clinical characteristics.
* This exploratory objective considers the possibility that some patients and providers for whom there is a documented intent to adhere to the clinical pathway may not adhere very well, and this may attenuate the observed difference between the Documentation and Off-Pathway cohorts. If this occurs, analysis under this objective should isolate the effect of adherence more directly. * Note that analysis under this objective is not considered a substitute for cohort comparisons, because measurement of adherence in this study will be limited to a set of indicators that are likely to be documented in the electronic medical record (EMR).
Time frame: 24 months
To describe the rates of sustained MRD negativity (at 10-5 and 10-6 thresholds) observed during the study period across the Platform and Documentation COHORT group implementations of the MRD-targeted clinical pathway.
* Sustained MRD negativity will be defined as evidence of MRD negativity (at 10-5 and 10-6 thresholds) at least 6 months after a previous finding of MRD negativity, without an intervening finding of MRD positivity. * Note that patients will have variable durations of follow-up, and variable opportunity for observation of sustained MRD negativity. Consequently, this analysis under this objective will be descriptive only.
Time frame: 24 months
This exploratory objective will consider whether it is of interest to explore further analysis under those objectives with the subset of patients who are transplant eligible.
Specifications of the research questions for this subset would be as stated under each of the Objectives 1 through 7, above.
Time frame: 24 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.