CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06144775Updated Nov 22, 2023

A Kinematic Analysis of Motor Planning and Movement Execution of Children With Autism Spectrum Condition

An observational study in Autism and Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by Istituto per la Ricerca e l'Innovazione Biomedica. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 13 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-22.

Sponsored by Istituto per la Ricerca e l'Innovazione Biomedica · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2024, 2 years ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2022; still recruiting 4 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60
Ages
7 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC) is a behavioral syndrome characterized by a severe organizational disorder of thinking and major functions that regulate human adaptation. It is to be considered as a functional disorder, or of executive functions, whose dysfunction is expressed in the difficulty of making voluntary movements, sequentially coordinated with each other according to a purpose, and of initiating an action, planning and monitoring it by inhibiting inappropriate responses such as gesture perseveration. Literature studies suggest that, compared to children with typical development (TD) and regardless of cognitive status, children with ASC have pervasive motor dysfunction that results in universal difficulties in several aspects of motor function, including - (1) fine motricity, (2) some aspects of praxis while performing tasks based on imitation of sequences, (3) simultaneous coordination of both sides of the body during rhythmic tasks of the upper limbs, and́ (4) interpersonal coordination and synchrony. The hypothesis of the study is that by comparing these aspects in 2 groups of children with ASC and children with TD using A.I. systems, it will be possible to extract objective markers of motor deficits found in autism, facilitating the validation of measurements acquired with clinical scales. The objective of the study is to investigate the characteristics of manual motor planning and performance difficulties in children with ASC using kinematic measurements. 30 ASC children with medium-high functioning and 30 TD children, aged 7 to 13 years, IQ > 80, in the absence of motor deficits due to another clinical condition, will be recruited. The protocol will take place in a single session during which children will be video-recorded performing simple and complex rhythmic upper limb actions with a social partner. The presence of characteristic fine motor behaviors, practice errors, perseverations, movement variability, and interpersonal synchrony will be observed. The study will involve the use of 3 tasks contained in NEPSY-II: Finger tapping, Visual-motor precision, and Imitation of manual motor sequences. The videos will be recorded simultaneously and the different angles will allow hand kinematics to be extracted and analyzed with A.I. algorithms to measure displacement, velocity, acceleration, frequency and any other kinematic parameters highlighted. Thus, it is expected to identify objective markers of motor deficits found in children with ASC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autism
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

  • autism spectrum condition
  • motor planning
  • kinematic analysis
  • children
03

In context

Autistic Disorder

1,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 334 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 102 across 267 observational studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Istituto per la Ricerca e l'Innovazione Biomedica is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Thirty children with ASD and 30 typically developing (TD) children will participate in the study. The children with ASD will be recruited and tested at the clinical facilities of the Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation of the National Research Council of Italy (IRIB-CNR) in Messina. To be included in the study the child needs to have an ASD diagnosis based on the DSM-5 criteria from a licensed clinical child neuropsychiatrist but no established intellectual disability (ID) diagnosis. The TD children will recruit through advertisements in schools located close to the Institute. Informed consent will obtain from all subjects involved in the study.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of Autism
  • QI ≥ 80.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Motor deficits due to another clinical condition
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Children with autism spectrum condition

    Thirty ASC children with medium-high functioning, aged 7 to 13 years, IQ \> 80, in the absence of motor deficits due to another clinical condition.

    Other: Kinematics measures

  • Children with typical development

    Thirty TD children, aged 7 to 13 years, IQ \> 80, in the absence of motor deficits due to clinical condition.

    Other: Kinematics measures

Interventions

  • OtherKinematics measures

    In a single session each child will be video-recorded while performing simple and complex rhythmic actions of the upper limbs with a social partner. The presence of characteristic motor behaviors, practice errors, perseverations, and movement variability will be observed. The study involves the use of three blocks of tasks of the neuropsychological battery (NEPSY-II): Finger Tapping, Visuo-Motor Precision, and Manual Motor Sequences. The order within each block will be randomized.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reaction time and latency

    In a single session the children will be video-recorded while performing simple and complex rhythmic actions of the upper limbs with a social partner. The presence of characteristic motor behaviors, practice errors, perseverations, and movement variability will be observed. During the execution of the three blocks of tasks (finger tapping, visuo-motor precision, and manual motor sequences) four GOPRO cameras, mounted on tripods in different angles of the room, record videos simultaneously. The videos will be analyzed through Artificial Intelligence algorithms to determine the movement's reaction time and latency in seconds (s).

    Time frame: The recording session needs approximately 20 minutes to complete.

  2. Speed

    In a single session the children will be video-recorded while performing simple and complex rhythmic actions of the upper limbs with a social partner. The presence of characteristic motor behaviors, practice errors, perseverations, and movement variability will be observed. During the execution of the three blocks of tasks (finger tapping, visuo-motor precision, and manual motor sequences) four GOPRO cameras, mounted on tripods in different angles of the room, record videos simultaneously. The videos will be analyzed through Artificial Intelligence algorithms to determine the movement's speed in millimeter per second (mm/s).

    Time frame: The recording session needs approximately 20 minutes to complete.

  3. Quantity of motion

    In a single session the children will be video-recorded while performing simple and complex rhythmic actions of the upper limbs with a social partner. The presence of characteristic motor behaviors, practice errors, perseverations, and movement variability will be observed. During the execution of the three blocks of tasks (finger tapping, visuo-motor precision, and manual motor sequences) four GOPRO cameras, mounted on tripods in different angles of the room, record videos simultaneously. The videos will be analyzed through Artificial Intelligence algorithms to determine the quantity of motion.

    Time frame: The recording session needs approximately 20 minutes to complete.

  4. Frequency

    In a single session the children will be video-recorded while performing simple and complex rhythmic actions of the upper limbs with a social partner. The presence of characteristic motor behaviors, practice errors, perseverations, and movement variability will be observed. During the execution of the three blocks of tasks (finger tapping, visuo-motor precision, and manual motor sequences) four GOPRO cameras, mounted on tripods in different angles of the room, record videos simultaneously. The videos will be analyzed through Artificial Intelligence algorithms to determine the frequency in Hertz (Hz) of the movements.

    Time frame: The recording session needs approximately 20 minutes to complete.

  5. Acceleration

    In a single session the children will be video-recorded while performing simple and complex rhythmic actions of the upper limbs with a social partner. The presence of characteristic motor behaviors, practice errors, perseverations, and movement variability will be observed. During the execution of the three blocks of tasks (finger tapping, visuo-motor precision, and manual motor sequences) four GOPRO cameras, mounted on tripods in different angles of the room, record videos simultaneously. The videos will be analyzed through Artificial Intelligence algorithms to determine the movement's acceleration in millimeter per square second (mm/s2).

    Time frame: The recording session needs approximately 20 minutes to complete.

  6. Angular speed

    In a single session the children will be video-recorded while performing simple and complex rhythmic actions of the upper limbs with a social partner. The presence of characteristic motor behaviors, practice errors, perseverations, and movement variability will be observed. During the execution of the three blocks of tasks (finger tapping, visuo-motor precision, and manual motor sequences) four GOPRO cameras, mounted on tripods in different angles of the room, record videos simultaneously. The videos will be analyzed through Artificial Intelligence algorithms to determine the movement's angular speed in radians per second (rad/s).

    Time frame: The recording session needs approximately 20 minutes to complete.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence - Second Edition (WASI-II)

    The WASI-II is a general intelligence, or IQ test designed to assess specific and overall cognitive capabilities in clinical, educational, and research settings and is individually administered to children, adolescents and adults (ages 6-89). It is a battery of four subtests: Vocabulary (31-item), Block Design (13-item), Similarities (24-item) and Matrix Reasoning (30-item). In addition to assessing general, or Full Scale (range T Scores min 80 - max 320), intelligence, the WASI-II is also designed to provide estimates of Verbal (range T Scores min 40 - max 160) and Performance (range T Scores min 40 - max 160) intelligence consistent with other Wechsler tests. For each scale higher score corresponds to better performance.

    Time frame: The evaluation session will be scheduled before of kinematics measurements. The test needs approximately 25-40 minutes to complete.

  2. Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition (MABC-2)

    The MABC-2 identifies and describes impairments in motor performance of children and adolescents 3 through 16 years of age. The MABC-2 consists of 2 components: * 24 tests divided into 8 tasks for 3 age groups (3-6; 7-10; 11-16), for 3 areas (Manual dexterity, Aiming and grasping, Balance). There is a total score (TS) and separate scores for the 3 areas. Age-and percentile-adjusted standardized scores are provided for each section of the test and for the TS: TS\>67 or a percentile \>15th indicates performance in the normal range; 57 \<TS\> 67 or 6th \<percentile \>15th defines an "at risk" category with the need for close monitoring; TS ≤56 or percentile ≤5th indicates the presence of a significant motor problem. The test allows to draw a qualitative description of the ways in which the child performs each task; * An observation checklist consisting of 43 items divided into 3 sections to be completed by an adult who has the opportunity to observe the child in his daily motor activities.

    Time frame: The evaluation session will be scheduled before of kinematics measurements. The test needs approximately 20-40 minutes. The checklist needs approximately 10 minutes.

  3. Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)

    The BRIEF-2 is a set of questionnaires for parents and teachers designed to evaluate executive function. The BRIEF-2 now uses 10 clinical scales: Inhibit; Self-Monitor; Shift; Emotional Control; Initiate; Task Completion; Working Memory; Plan/Organize; Task-Monitor; Organization of Materials. T scores (min 31 - max \>99) and percentile score (min 3 - max \>99) are provided for three broad indexes (Behavior Regulation, Emotion Regulation, and Cognitive Regulation) and for the Total Score. Higher score corresponds to better performance.

    Time frame: The evaluation session will be scheduled before of kinematics measurements. Questionnaires take 10 minutes to administer.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB) - National Research Council (CNR)
    Messina, 98164, Italy
    • Flavia Marino · Contact · flavia.marino@irib.cnr.it · +393395798263
    • Giovanni Pioggia · Contact · giovanni.pioggia@irib.cnr.it · +393203390892
    • Flavia Marino · Principal investigator
    • Ileana Scarcella · Sub investigator
    • Antonio Cerasa · Sub investigator
    • Gennaro Tartarisco · Sub investigator
    • Roberta Bruschetta · Sub investigator
    • Simona Campisi · Sub investigator
    • Chiara Failla · Sub investigator
    • Noemi Vetrano · Sub investigator
    • Germana Doria · Sub investigator
    • Roberta Minutoli · Sub investigator
    • Paola Chilà · Sub investigator
    • Serena Previti · Sub investigator
    • Giovanni Pioggia · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Backstrom A, Johansson AM, Rudolfsson T, Ronnqvist L, von Hofsten C, Rosander K, Domellof E. Motor planning and movement execution during goal-directed sequential manual movements in 6-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder: A kinematic analysis. Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Aug;115:104014. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104014. Epub 2021 Jun 24. PubMed 34174471 ↗
  • Foster NC, Bennett SJ, Causer J, Elliott D, Bird G, Hayes SJ. Getting Off to a Shaky Start: Specificity in Planning and Feedforward Control During Sensorimotor Learning in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autism Res. 2020 Mar;13(3):423-435. doi: 10.1002/aur.2214. Epub 2019 Oct 29. PubMed 31661192 ↗
  • Glazebrook CM, Elliott D, Lyons J. A kinematic analysis of how young adults with and without autism plan and control goal-directed movements. Motor Control. 2006 Jul;10(3):244-64. doi: 10.1123/mcj.10.3.244. PubMed 17106133 ↗
  • Kaur M, M Srinivasan S, N Bhat A. Comparing motor performance, praxis, coordination, and interpersonal synchrony between children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Jan;72:79-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Nov 6. PubMed 29121516 ↗
  • Grace N, Johnson BP, Rinehart NJ, Enticott PG. Are Motor Control and Regulation Problems Part of the ASD Motor Profile? A Handwriting Study. Dev Neuropsychol. 2018;43(7):581-594. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2018.1504948. Epub 2018 Aug 20. PubMed 30124332 ↗
  • Vivanti G, Trembath D, Dissanayake C. Mechanisms of imitation impairment in autism spectrum disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 Nov;42(8):1395-405. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9874-9. PubMed 24736983 ↗
  • Zampella CJ, Wang LAL, Haley M, Hutchinson AG, de Marchena A. Motor Skill Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Clinically Focused Review. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021 Aug 13;23(10):64. doi: 10.1007/s11920-021-01280-6. PubMed 34387753 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06144775
Lead sponsor
Istituto per la Ricerca e l'Innovazione Biomedica
Collaborators
Messina, Italy
Responsible party
Flavia Marino (Head of Unit, Istituto per la Ricerca e l'Innovazione Biomedica) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 22, 2023
Start date
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 22, 2023

Study contacts

Ileana Scarcella
Contact
ileana.scarcella@irib.cnr.it
+393408322948
Giovanni Pioggia
Contact
giovanni.pioggia@irib.cnr.it
+393203390892
Flavia Marino
principal investigator · Istituto per la Ricerca e l'Innovazione Biomedica

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion