ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06140940OLIPHANTUpdated Jul 24, 2025

Motor Imagery in Aphantasia

An interventional study of High-definition transcranial direct current (HD-tDCS), active condition and High-definition transcranial direct current (HD-tDCS), sham condition in Aphasia, sponsored by Hôpital le Vinatier. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-24.

Sponsored by Hôpital le Vinatier · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 15 studies in Aphasia with a site in France — 4 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Aphasia · France.

Planned enrollment
3rd of 10
40 · median 22
Started
2024
the only one that year
No phase
9 of 15
3 open now
Registered
13th of 15
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 15
Hôpital le Vinatier

Among the 15 studies in Aphasia with a site in France, this one is the 3rd largest by planned enrollment of the 10 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2024, is one of 9 with no phase, and was the 13th registered.

Aphasia

338 studies on the registry are indexed under Aphasia; 94 are open to participants now.

Browse Aphasia studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 15 studies in Aphasia with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 4 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 67 Aphasia studies recruiting now, 30 (45%) set no upper age limit and 11 (16%) stop at 75 or younger; 1 takes children under 18; 16 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 15 studies in Aphasia with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The present study aims to characterize and modulate motor imagery abilities in individuals with aphantasia. The investigators will characterize the neurophysiological and physiological underpinnings of mental imagery abilities in participants with aphantasia by investigating several indices of motor imagery abilities and comparing them to participants with typical mental imagery abilities. The investigators will investigate whether non-invasive brain stimulation applied to the primary motor cortex improves mental imagery abilities in participants with aphantasia.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will recruit 20 participants with aphantasia and 20 participants with typical mental imagery capacities (no-aphantasia groups). Participants in both groups will complete a 3-hour visit for inclusion and baseline measurements (Visit 1) which will include neurophysiological, autonomic nervous system, cognitive and behavioral measures.

Participants in the aphantasia group will complete 2 additional visits to receive active and sham tDCS sessions (Visit 2 and 3), according to a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover design. Mental training will be done concurrently with tDCS using a sequential finger tapping-task (Truong et al., 2022). Participants will receive the instructions of trying to imagine themselves performing the motor task, by feeling their fingers moving as if they were actually moving it (kinesthetic modality of motor imagery).

Visits will be separated by at least 7 days.

03

Conditions studied

  • Aphasia

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • For the aphantasia group only: congenital aphantasia defined as a life-long inability to generate mental imagery (confirmed by a total score of 32 or less on the VVIQ, which is the gold standard questionnaire for aphantasia)
  • For the no-aphantasia group only: typical mental imagery capacities (confirmed by a total score of more than 32 on the VVIQ)
  • Covered by public health insurance
  • Understanding the French language
  • Signed written after being informed about the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence or history of a somatic, neurologic, or mental illness
  • Actual pain or musculoskeletal disorders at the upper limb
  • Having a regular musical activity (more than once a week) because of high manual dexterity
  • for noninvasive brain stimulation including the presence of ferromagnetic or magnetic sensitive metal objects implanted in the head or in close proximity (e.g., brain stent, clip, cochlear implants, or stimulator)
  • Pregnancy (controlled by urine pregnancy test in females without reported )
  • Active seizure disorder or history of seizures
  • Participants under curatorship/guardianship
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    active stimulation group: 20 participants with aphantasia will receive a session of active HD-tDCS

    Participants will receive a session of active HD-tDCS at a current intensity of 4 mA for a duration of 15min. The placement of electrodes will be determined to specifically target the primary motor cortex (4 x 1 montage with the anode over C4). During the stimulation, participants will be engaged in a mental training task (sequential finger tapping-task).

    Procedure: High-definition transcranial direct current (HD-tDCS), active condition

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo stimulation group: 20 participants with aphantasia will receive a session of sham HD-tDCS

    High-definition transcranial direct current (HD-tDCS), sham condition. Participants will receive a session of sham HD-tDCS, which will be delivered following the same procedures as active HD-tDCS but the intensity of the current will be set at 4mA during the 30 first seconds at the beginning of the 15-min period of the stimulation, and equal to 0 mA for the reminding period of stimulation to simulate the tingling sensation often experienced by individuals during active stimulation. The placement of electrodes will be determined to specifically target the primary motor cortex (4 x 1 montage with the anode over C4). During the stimulation, participants will be engaged in a mental training task (sequential finger tapping-task).

    Procedure: High-definition transcranial direct current (HD-tDCS), sham condition

Interventions

  • ProcedureHigh-definition transcranial direct current (HD-tDCS), active condition

    Participants will receive a session of active HD-tDCS at a current intensity of 4 mA for a duration of 15min. The placement of electrodes will be determined to specifically target the primary motor cortex (4 x 1 montage with the anode over C4). During the stimulation, participants will be engaged in a mental training task (sequential finger tapping-task).

  • ProcedureHigh-definition transcranial direct current (HD-tDCS), sham condition

    Participants will receive a session of sham HD-tDCS, which will be delivered following the same procedures as active HD-tDCS but the intensity of the current will be set at 4mA during the 30 first seconds at the beginning of the 15-min period of the stimulation, and equal to 0 mA for the reminding period of stimulation to simulate the tingling sensation often experienced by individuals during active stimulation. The placement of electrodes will be determined to specifically target the primary motor cortex (4 x 1 montage with the anode over C4). During the stimulation, participants will be engaged in a mental training task (sequential finger tapping-task).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gains in motor performance following mental training

    Gains in motor performance following mental training combined with tDCS will be measured using a sequential finger tapping-task. Gains following training will be expressed as a percentage of the baseline performance.

    Time frame: 2 times: immediately before tDCS (baseline) and immediately after tDCS

Secondary outcomes

  1. Motor corticospinal excitability at rest and during kinesthetic motor imagery

    Motor corticospinal excitability will be assessed with single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the primary motor cortex representation of the non-dominant hand. Using electromyography, we will measure the peak-to-peak mean amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs, measured in mV) in the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle both at rest and during kinesthetic motor imagery.

    Time frame: 1 time at baseline (Visit 1), in both groups

  2. Heart rate variability

    Heart rate variability, including respiratory sinus arrhythmia measures, expressed in milliseconds (ms), will be assessed at rest and during kinesthetic motor imagery by recording the heart rate using three electrodes placed in the left chest area. These electrodes will be connected to the Biopac MP150 system and monitored with the Acqknowledge software

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month

  3. Skin conductance

    Amplitude of electrodermal response will be measured at rest, during actual movements and during kinesthetic motor imagery using the Biopac MP150 system with the Acqknowledge software. The ratio between amplitudes during imagined/actual movements will be computed (expressed in percent).

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month

  4. Mental imagery abilities

    Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ; range 16-80)

    Time frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups

  5. Mental imagery abilities

    Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ; range 20-100).

    Time frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups

  6. Mental imagery abilities

    Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised (MIQ-R; range 14-98)

    Time frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups

  7. Mental imagery abilities

    Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: the Test of Ability in Movement Imagery (TAMI; range 0-24)

    Time frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups

  8. Mental imagery abilities

    Mental imagery abilities in different sensory modalities will be measured as scores at the following questionnaires: Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi-Q; range 0-70)

    Time frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups

  9. Source monitoring performance

    Source monitoring performance will be evaluated using a specific source monitoring task . Source-monitoring accuracy scores (range 0-100) will be calculated as proportions of accurate source attributions for each source

    Time frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups

  10. Implicit motor imagery capacities

    Implicit motor imagery capacities will be measured using a hand laterality judgment task . The percentage of correct response at the task will be calculated (range 0-100%).

    Time frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups

  11. Performance of time-to-contact estimation

    Performance will be measured using a specific time-to-contact (TTC) task. A TTC task involves temporal prediction in that the task requires a participant to predict the moment at which an event will occur given past sensory information (e.g., an auditory stimuli). The estimation of TTC requires determining the moment of contact (TTCa). The analysis of performance is based on BIAS quantification, which measures the average difference between individual estimation and TTCa

    Time frame: 1 time at baseline, in both groups

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 33 months after the start.

Of 183 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Aphasia, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 33 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 185 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 57.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 13, 2023
First posted
Nov 21, 2023
StartActual
Mar 28, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2028
Last update
Jul 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06140940
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 21, 2023
Start date
Mar 28, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2025

Study contacts

Lydie SARTELET
Contact
lydie.sartelet@ch-le-vinatier.fr
0 437915531 ext. +33
Marine MONDINO, PhD
principal investigator · CH le Vinatier

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion