ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06140199LA POPAUpdated Aug 29, 2024

Comparing Minimally Invasive Treatments for Pilonidal Disease: LA POPA Trial (Laser And Pit-picking OR Pit-picking Alone)

An interventional study of Pit-picking surgery and Pit-picking surgery with Sinus Laser assisted Closure in Pilonidal Sinus, Pilonidal Disease and Pilonidal Sinus of Natal Cleft, sponsored by dr. IJM Han-Geurts. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-29.

Sponsored by dr. IJM Han-Geurts · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
482
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to establish the efficacy of 'pit picking with laser therapy' versus 'pit picking alone' on both short and long-term outcomes in patients of 12 years and older with primary pilonidal sinus disease.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • The overall success rate of treatment which is defined as: closure of all pits at 12 months of follow-up.
  • Secondary endpoints: succes rat eof treatment during long-term follow-up, wound closure time, pain scores, complication rate, work rehabilitation, time to return to daily activities, quality of life, persisting complaints, patient satisfaction, costs and the need for secondary or revision surgery.

Participants will allocated to pit picking alone or combined with lasertherapy.

The extra burden for participating patients is expected to be minimal to moderate. Participants will have two extra hospital visits in casethey are enrolled in our study: 6 and 12 months after enrolment. Postoperatively the normal scheme of follow up appointments wil be used: 2 and 6 weeks after treatment at the outpatient clinic of the treating surgeon. A telephone appointment with the researcher will be scheduled 4 weeks after treatment. Patients are asked to complete questionnaires at various time points, which will be sentto them by email and will take approximately 5-10 minutes each time. The content includes general and disease specific Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires. The investigators do not expect any extra adverse reactions or events in respect to participation in the study because both procedures are considered standard of care in the participating clinics. However, because both interventions are surgical procedures a small percentage of adverse events or postoperative complications can be expected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pilonidal Sinus
  • Pilonidal Disease
  • Pilonidal Sinus of Natal Cleft
  • Pilonidal Disease of Natal Cleft
  • Pilonidal Sinus Without Abscess

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pit-picking
  • Laser-assisted therapy
  • SiLaC
  • Minimally invasive surgery
03

In context

Pilonidal Sinus

109 studies on the registry are indexed under Pilonidal Sinus; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 482 is above the median of 80 across 72 interventional studies indexed under Pilonidal Sinus.

Browse Pilonidal Sinus studies →

Lead sponsor

dr. IJM Han-Geurts is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients aged 12 years and older who present with primary pilonidal sinus disease; Type 1b and 3 of the Dutch staging system
  • Obtained written by the patient and/or legal representative/parent
  • Sufficient understanding of the Dutch written language (reading and writing)
  • Eligible for questionnaires sent by e-mail

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Asymptomatic (Type 1a), recurrent (Type 4; except those patients who only have had drainage of their abscess and no other surgical treatment), or chronic wounds (hypergranulating) after PSD surgery (Type 5) of the Dutch staging system
  • Patients with known underlying or concomitant medical conditions that may interfere with normal wound healing (e.g. systemic skin and connective tissue diseases, any kind of congenital defect of metabolism including insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, Cushing syndrome or disease, scurvy, chronic hypothyroidism, congenital or acquired condition, chronic renal failure, or chronic hepatic dysfunction ( class B or C), severe malnutrition, or other concomitant illness which, in the opinion of the investigator, has the potential to significantly delay wound healing)
  • Severe drug abuse (and therefore protocol deviation can be expected)
  • Patients expected not to comply with the study protocol (including patients with severe cognitive dysfunction/impairment and severe psychiatric disorders)
  • Patients with insufficient knowledge of the Dutch written language who are thus unable to answer the questionnaires
  • Patients that are unable or not willing to give full
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
482 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pit-picking surgery

    Procedure: Pit-picking surgery

  • Experimental
    Pit-picking surgery with Sinus Laser assisted Closure

    Procedure: Pit-picking surgery with Sinus Laser assisted Closure

Interventions

  • ProcedurePit-picking surgery

    Patients are placed in left-side position. After shaving, cleaning and scrubbing of the skin with alcoholic chlorhexidine, double strong tape is placed on the right buttock in order to increase exposure. Local anaesthesia is administered before incision with 20 ml xylocaine or lidocaine 1-2%. In principle, all sinusoidal pits are cut out with a margin of at least 1 mm with a biopsy core punch (4 mm, 6 mm or 8 mm depending on pit size) or an oval excision of the pits is performed. Hair and debris is removed from the sinus tracts with a small surgical spoon or mosquito clamp. Rigorous de-epithelialisation of the underlying sinus is performed with the spoon through every pit, whilst removing even more debris and hairs. At the end of the procedure a debris washout is performed with saline solution, the wounds are left open for secondary healing and sterile dressings are applied.

  • ProcedurePit-picking surgery with Sinus Laser assisted Closure

    The pit picking procedure is described above. Subsequently, a radial diode laser probe at 1470 nm wavelength is used for delivering homogeneous (360 degrees) energy to the surrounding epithelium. The laser energy is 13 Joule, given continuously. First, a 'preparatory laser treatment' is performed to extract any missed hairs or debris, after which the sinus tracts are cleansed with a surgical spoon again. During the following definitive procedure, the probe is withdrawn at an approximate speed of 1 cm per three seconds, causing the small sinus tracts to shrink and close. Large sinus tracts remain open because very large sinus tracts or cavities cannot be closed with the 3mm laser fibre. The injury to the endothelium will cause granulation and create oedema for collapsing of the tract. The remaining open wounds are left open for secondary healing and sterile dressings are applied.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Succes rate of treatment

    Success rate of treatment, defined as closure of all pits at 1 year follow-up. Closure of the pits will be assessed by the treating surgeon by means of an extensive physical examination.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Success rate of treatment at long-term follow-up

    Success rate of treatment at 3 and 5 years follow up

    Time frame: 3-5 years

  2. Pain score

    Pain scores in the period after surgery (VAS). VAS score scale: 0-10, higher score meaning a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Patient reported outcome measures

    PROMs, defined as persisting complaints: itching, wound fluid leakage, blood loss, pus, pain, social burden (shame/embarrassment). PROMs will be scored on a scale: 1-5, with a higher score meaning a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 5 years

  4. Wound healing and complications

    Wound and complications

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Work rehabilation

    Work rehabilitation; number of days

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  6. Return to daily activities

    Time until return to daily activities; number of days

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  7. Recurrence rate

    Recurrence rate at 1, 3 and 5 years of follow-up

    Time frame: 5 years

  8. Need for secondary or revision surgery

    Need for seondary or revision surgery for pilonidal disease

    Time frame: 5 years

  9. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction with treatment (scored on a likert scale 0-10, with a higher score meaning a better outcome)

    Time frame: 5 years

  10. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs)

    Quality of life after treatment (Eq-5d-5l; will be converted to Quality adjusted life years (QALYs; range 0-1, with 1 the highest score and the better outcome)

    Time frame: 5 years

  11. Absence of symptoms

    Absence of symptoms at 1-yars follow-up: participants will be asked a dichotomous question during their 1-year follow-up appointment. At that moment, do they feel their symptoms from pilonidal sinus disease are: A) cured or improved when compared with before treatment? or B) unchanged or worse when compared with before treatment?

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sluckin TC, Hazen SJA, Smeenk RM, Schouten R. Sinus laser-assisted closure (SiLaC(R)) for pilonidal disease: results of a multicentre cohort study. Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Feb;26(2):135-141. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02550-4. Epub 2022 Jan 7. PubMed 34993686 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — On reasonable request.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2024; primary completion for May 2027, 33 months later.

Of 35 interventional studies with no phase under Pilonidal Sinus, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 33 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 14, 2023
First posted
Nov 18, 2023
StartEst.
Aug 28, 2024
Primary completionEst.
May 2027
CompletionEst.
May 2032
Last update
Aug 29, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06140199
Lead sponsor
dr. IJM Han-Geurts
Collaborators
Flevoziekenhuis, Proctos Kliniek, Sint Jans Gasthuis Weert, UMC Utrecht, Ziekenhuis Amstelland, Treant ziekenhuis, Albert Schweitzer Hospital
Responsible party
dr. IJM Han-Geurts (Local investigator, Proctos Kliniek) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 18, 2023
Start date
Aug 28, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 29, 2024

Study contacts

Justin Youp van Oostendorp, MD MSc
Contact
j.vanoostendorp@proctoskliniek.nl
+31613780223
Robert Smeenk, MD PhD
Contact
r.m.smeenk@asz.nl
Robert Smeenk, MD PhD
principal investigator · Albert Schweitzer Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion