CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06135012PANCUTUpdated Nov 18, 2023

Influence of Pancreatic Transection With CUSA on Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Incidence (PANCUT)

An interventional study of Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) and Scalpel in Pancreatic Fistula, sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana. Recruiting at 1 site in Slovenia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-18.

Sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2023; still recruiting 3 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective: To compare the outcomes after elective pancreatic resections using cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) and selective closure of small blood vessels and branch pancreatic ducts versus surgical scalpel or stapler for the transection of pancreatic tissue.

Study design: A randomized controlled, single centre trial.

Study population: Two groups of 80 patients (160 in total) scheduled for elective open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for any indication.

Intervention: Transection of pancreatic tissue with CUSA.

Control: Standard transection of pancreatic tissue with surgical scalpel (in PD) or stapler (in DP)

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resections. There is no predominant surgical technique of pancreatic stump closure in distal pancreatectomy (DP) or formation of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) proven to prevent/lower POPF incidence. Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) selectively removes tissue parenchyma, evading blood vessels and pancreatic ducts which could consequently be selectively ligated. Such technique could anull pancreatic juice drainage from branch ducts and provide better (skeletonised) view of the main duct to from an anastomosis (or to ligate it in DP) and thus lower the incidence of POPF formation.

Objective: To compare transection of pancreatic tissue with CUSA and selective closure of small blood vessels and branch pancreatic ducts with transection with surgical scalpel or stapler in elective pancreatic resections regarding the incidence of POPF.

Study design: A randomized controlled, single centre trial. The study protocol was designed according to the SPIRIT guidelines.

Study population: Two groups of 80 patients (160 in total) scheduled for elective open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for any indication.

Intervention: Transection of pancreatic tissue with CUSA.

Control: Standard transection of pancreatic tissue with surgical scalpel (in PD).

Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is the incidence of POPF. Main secondary outcomes are intraoperative outcomes (such as blood loss and operative time), postoperative outcomes (such as complications, time to functional recovery and hospital stay).

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Fistula

Keywords

  • Pancreatic surgery
  • Pancreas transection
  • Postoperative complications
  • POPF
03

In context

Pancreatic Fistula

125 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Fistula; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 110 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Fistula.

Browse Pancreatic Fistula studies →

Lead sponsor

University Medical Centre Ljubljana is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years or more
  • Patients capable of understanding the provided information about the study
  • Patients with signed informed consent
  • Planned elective pancreaticoduodenectomy for any indication

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged less than 18
  • Patient incapable of understanding the provided information about the study
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous surgical procedures on pancreas
  • Immunosuppressive therapy
  • Preoperative radiotherapy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transection with CUSA

    Transection of pancreatic tissue using cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) and using metal clips for closing small intraparenchymal blood vessels and pancreatic branch ducts.

    Device: Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA)

  • Sham comparator
    Transection with scalpel/stapler

    Standard transection of pancreatic tissue with a surgical scalpel without selective closure of small blood vessels and branch pancreatic ducts (in pancreaticoduodenectomy).

    Other: Scalpel

Interventions

  • DeviceCavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA)

    Transection of pancreatic tissue with cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA).

  • OtherScalpel

    Transection of pancreatic tissue with scalpel.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pancreatic fistula incidence

    Evaluation and incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative septic complications

    Intraabdominal collections, antibiotic treatment

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Number of postoperative interventions

    Percutaneous drain placement or reoperations

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Hospital stay

    Days in hospital

    Time frame: 90 days

  4. Volume of intraoperative blood loss

    Blood loss during surgery

    Time frame: 1 day

  5. Operative time

    Time spent for pancreas transection

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
    Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
    • David Badovinac · Contact · david.badovinac@kclj.si · +38615224788
    • Benjamin Hadžialjević · Contact · benjamin.hadzialjevic@kclj.si
    • David Badovinac · Principal investigator
    • Aleš Tomažič · Sub investigator
    • Benjamin Hadžialjević · Sub investigator
    • Hana Zavrtanik · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06135012
Lead sponsor
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 18, 2023
Start date
Jul 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 18, 2023

Study contacts

David Badovinac
Contact
david.badovinac@kclj.si
+38615224788
Benjamin Hadžialjević
Contact
benjamin.hadzialjevic@kclj.si
+38615224788
David Badovinac
principal investigator · Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion