CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06128525Updated Nov 28, 2025Results posted

Prostate Resection After Microwave Ablation (PRAMA)

An interventional study of Biospecimen Collection and Microwave Ablation in Prostate Carcinoma, sponsored by University of Southern California. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-28.

Sponsored by University of Southern California · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This phase I trial tests the safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ ultrasound (US) fusion guided transperineal targeted microwave ablation (TMA) before a radical prostatectomy (RP) and how well it works in treating patients with prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men and most will never become aggressive. Despite this, most men choose to undergo treatment which may include surgery. Removing the prostate gland and sometimes the lymph nodes (radical prostatectomy) is an invasive treatment for prostate cancer that can have a significant negative on quality of life. TMA is a less invasive procedure that uses high temperatures given through the skin between the scrotum and the rectum (transperineal). Using focused high energy and heating tumor cells to several degrees above normal body temperature may kill them without affecting the surrounding tissue. Using multiparametric (mp)MRI/US to create a 3-dimensional picture of the tumor may help in planning and preventing damage to healthy tissue. Giving MRI/US fusion guided transperineal TMA prior to radical prostatectomy may kill tumor cells, and may improve the quality of life in patients with prostate cancer.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the feasibility of transperineal targeted microwave ablation of an MRI-identified index prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. KOELIS Trinity ability to plan and guide treatment needles and ablations in the prostate index lesion.

II. Impact of treatments on functional outcomes and quality of life. III. Predictability of Medwaves Avecure microwave ablation charts. IV. Predictability of post microwave ablation mpMRI.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo MRI/US fusion guided transperineal targeted TMA and then undergo standard of care RP same day or at 30 days post-TMA on study. Patients undergo planning mpMRI of prostate prior to TMA. Patients also undergo blood sample collection at screening and post RP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Carcinoma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,397 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 58 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southern California is the lead sponsor of 773 studies on the registry; 135 are open to participants now.

Of its 68 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 32 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult men diagnosed with prostate cancer and undergoing prostatectomy as treatment of choice
  • Index lesion visible on multiparametric MRI confirmed by targeted biopsies using KOELIS Trinity (registered trademark)
  • Patient suitable for intravenous (IV) sedation or general anesthesia and TMA
  • Free, informed, and written consent, dated and signed before the enrollment and before any exam required by the trial

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Past medical history of prostate surgery
  • Past medical history of radiotherapy or pelvic trauma
  • Past treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) (radiation, ablation, androgen deprivation therapy [ADT], chemotherapy)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment (TMA, radical prostatectomy)

    Patients undergo MRI/US fusion guided transperineal targeted TMA and then undergo standard of care RP same day or at 30 days post-TMA on study. Patients may undergo planning mpMRI of prostate prior to TMA. Patients also undergo blood sample collection at screening and post RP.

    Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Device: Microwave Ablation · Device: Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging · Other: Questionnaire Administration · Procedure: Radical Prostatectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureBiospecimen Collection

    Undergo blood sample collection

    Also known as: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection

  • DeviceMicrowave Ablation

    Undergo transperineal MRI/US fusion guided transperineal targeted microwave ablation

    Also known as: Ablation, Microwave

  • DeviceMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Undergo planning mpMRI of prostate

    Also known as: MP-MRI, mpMRI, Multi-parametric MRI, Multiparametric MRI

  • OtherQuestionnaire Administration

    Ancillary studies

  • ProcedureRadical Prostatectomy

    Undergo RP

    Also known as: Prostatovesiculectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Area of the Transperineal Targeted Microwave Ablation (TMA) Induced Tissue Death Assessed by Triphenyltetrazolium Chloride (TTC) Staining

    The excised prostate will be sliced at 4 mm intervals. Each slice will be embedded, and a pathologist will examine the slides corresponding to each slice. The pathologist will be blinded to MR and ultrasound imaging results. TTC staining is performed to determine the dead tissue induced by the TMA.

    Time frame: At time of radical prostatectomy (RP) immediately after TMA

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Adverse Events

    All adverse events graded according to the Clavien Dindo Classification

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after RP

  2. Duration of Targeted Microwave Ablation (TMA) Procedure

    Measured by the probe-in/probe-out time and the ablation time.

    Time frame: At completion of TMA

  3. Number of Microwave Ablations Needed to Ablate One Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI)-Visible Lesion

    Count of microwave ablations needed to ablate one mpMRI-visible lesion will be reported

    Time frame: At time of TMA

  4. The Area of the Transperineal Targeted Microwave Ablation (TMA) Induced Tissue Death Assessed by Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) Staining.

    The excised prostate will be sliced at 4 mm intervals. Each slice will be embedded, and a pathologist will examine the slides corresponding to each slice. The pathologist will be blinded to MR and ultrasound imaging results. H\&E staining is performed to determine the dead tissue induced by the TMA.

    Time frame: At time of RP, 30 days after TMA

  5. Difference Between the Ablation Location in the Prostate as Seen in the KOELIS 3-dimensional Map and the Ablation Location Observed Histologically on the Prostatectomy Specimen

    The difference between the ablation location as seen in the KOELIS 3D reconstruction of the prostate ("3D Map") will be compared to the ablation location observed histologically on the prostatectomy specimen.

    Time frame: Up to 1 month

  6. Change in Urinary Functions Assessed by International Prostate Symptoms Score and Uroflowmetry

    Urinary functions will be measured using International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and uroflowmetry. The IPSS can be 0-35 (higher score means worse urinary function). Uroflowmetry evaluates the maximum flow rate, average flow rate, flow time, voided volume, and the waveform of the flow rate.

    Time frame: At baseline and each follow up visit, up to 30 days after RP

  7. Change in Erectile Functions Assessed by International Index of Erectile Function-5 Score

    Erectile functions will be measured using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score. IIEF-5 score can be 5-25 (higher score means better erectile function).

    Time frame: At baseline and each follow up visit, up to 30 days after RP

  8. Change in Quality of Life Assessed by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 Short Form

    Quality of life (QOL) will be measured using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 Short Form score. EPIC-26 includes 13 questionnaires assessing several aspects of QOL. The interpretation of whether a higher numerical value in response to a questionnaire indicates a favorable outcome.

    Time frame: At baseline and each follow up visit, up to 30 days after RP

  9. Difference Between the Treatment Effect Dimensions Measured Histologically on the Prostatectomy Specimen Resected After TMA, Compared to the Predictive Ablation Charts Provided by the Manufacturer

    The comparison of the difference between the treatment effect dimensions measured histologically on the prostatectomy specimen resected after TMA and the predictive ablation charts provided by the manufacturer will be performed.

    Time frame: Day after the TMA procedure

  10. Difference Between the Treatment Effect Dimensions Measured Histologically on the Prostatectomy Specimen Resected One Month After TMA, Compared to Post TMA Dimensions Measured on the Pre-RP mpMRI

    The comparison between the treatment effect dimensions measured histologically on the prostatectomy specimen resected one month after TMA, compared to post TMA dimensions measured on the pre-RP mpMRI will be performed.

    Time frame: At time of RP, 30 days after TMA

07

Results

Posted Nov 28, 2025

Participant flow

Recruitment for this study opened in November 2023 and closed in August 2025. 1 subject was enrolled in the medical clinic at the University of Southern California, but withdrew consent and never began treatment nor study procedures. There was no data collected for this patient.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment (TMA, Radical Prostatectomy)
Started1
Completed0
Not completed1
Withdrew: Patient withdrew consent1

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Area of the Transperineal Targeted Microwave Ablation (TMA) Induced Tissue Death Assessed by Triphenyltetrazolium Chloride (TTC) Staining

The excised prostate will be sliced at 4 mm intervals. Each slice will be embedded, and a pathologist will examine the slides corresponding to each slice. The pathologist will be blinded to MR and ultrasound imaging results. TTC staining is performed to determine the dead tissue induced by the TMA.

Time frame:
At time of radical prostatectomy (RP) immediately after TMA

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryIncidence of Adverse Events

All adverse events graded according to the Clavien Dindo Classification

Time frame:
Up to 30 days after RP

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDuration of Targeted Microwave Ablation (TMA) Procedure

Measured by the probe-in/probe-out time and the ablation time.

Time frame:
At completion of TMA

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Microwave Ablations Needed to Ablate One Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI)-Visible Lesion

Count of microwave ablations needed to ablate one mpMRI-visible lesion will be reported

Time frame:
At time of TMA

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryThe Area of the Transperineal Targeted Microwave Ablation (TMA) Induced Tissue Death Assessed by Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) Staining.

The excised prostate will be sliced at 4 mm intervals. Each slice will be embedded, and a pathologist will examine the slides corresponding to each slice. The pathologist will be blinded to MR and ultrasound imaging results. H\&E staining is performed to determine the dead tissue induced by the TMA.

Time frame:
At time of RP, 30 days after TMA

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDifference Between the Ablation Location in the Prostate as Seen in the KOELIS 3-dimensional Map and the Ablation Location Observed Histologically on the Prostatectomy Specimen

The difference between the ablation location as seen in the KOELIS 3D reconstruction of the prostate ("3D Map") will be compared to the ablation location observed histologically on the prostatectomy specimen.

Time frame:
Up to 1 month

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in Urinary Functions Assessed by International Prostate Symptoms Score and Uroflowmetry

Urinary functions will be measured using International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and uroflowmetry. The IPSS can be 0-35 (higher score means worse urinary function). Uroflowmetry evaluates the maximum flow rate, average flow rate, flow time, voided volume, and the waveform of the flow rate.

Time frame:
At baseline and each follow up visit, up to 30 days after RP

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in Erectile Functions Assessed by International Index of Erectile Function-5 Score

Erectile functions will be measured using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score. IIEF-5 score can be 5-25 (higher score means better erectile function).

Time frame:
At baseline and each follow up visit, up to 30 days after RP

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in Quality of Life Assessed by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 Short Form

Quality of life (QOL) will be measured using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 Short Form score. EPIC-26 includes 13 questionnaires assessing several aspects of QOL. The interpretation of whether a higher numerical value in response to a questionnaire indicates a favorable outcome.

Time frame:
At baseline and each follow up visit, up to 30 days after RP

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDifference Between the Treatment Effect Dimensions Measured Histologically on the Prostatectomy Specimen Resected After TMA, Compared to the Predictive Ablation Charts Provided by the Manufacturer

The comparison of the difference between the treatment effect dimensions measured histologically on the prostatectomy specimen resected after TMA and the predictive ablation charts provided by the manufacturer will be performed.

Time frame:
Day after the TMA procedure

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDifference Between the Treatment Effect Dimensions Measured Histologically on the Prostatectomy Specimen Resected One Month After TMA, Compared to Post TMA Dimensions Measured on the Pre-RP mpMRI

The comparison between the treatment effect dimensions measured histologically on the prostatectomy specimen resected one month after TMA, compared to post TMA dimensions measured on the pre-RP mpMRI will be performed.

Time frame:
At time of RP, 30 days after TMA

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 30 days after last dose of study drug, up to 1.5 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment (TMA, Radical Prostatectomy)———

Baseline characteristics

1 subject was enrolled, but withdrew consent and never began treatment nor study procedures. There was no data collected for this patient.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Treatment (TMA, Radical Prostatectomy)
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years1
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment (TMA, Radical Prostatectomy)
Female0
Male1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment (TMA, Radical Prostatectomy)
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino1
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment (TMA, Radical Prostatectomy)
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White1
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Treatment (TMA, Radical Prostatectomy)
United States1
08

Study locations

1 site
  • USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 16, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06128525
Lead sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 13, 2023
Start date
Nov 10, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 26, 2025
Completion
Aug 27, 2025
Results posted
Nov 28, 2025
Last update
Nov 28, 2025

Study contacts

Andre Luis Abreu, MD
principal investigator · University of Southern California

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion