ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06126887Updated Dec 6, 2024

Evaluation of Efficacy and Comfort: A Trial on the Incrediwear Back Brace in Patients With Chronic Lower Back Pain

An interventional study of Incrediwear Daytime Back Brace and Incrediwear Sham Daytime Back Brace in Low Back Pain and Back Pain, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-06.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators hypothesize that the utilization of Incrediwear's Back Brace, compared to a sham brace and a standard-issue brace, will lead to better brace adherence, increased patient satisfaction, reduced pain medication usage, and improved functional disability among non-surgical chronic LBP patients.

Read the detailed description

Problem: Chronic low back pain (LBP) affects a substantial portion of the population and often leads to decreased functional ability and increased pain medication usage. While back braces have been recommended as part of LBP management, their efficacy and impact on patient outcomes remain uncertain.

Research Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the utilization of Incrediwear's Back Brace, compared to a sham brace and a standard-issue brace, will lead to better brace adherence, increased patient satisfaction, reduced pain medication usage, and improved functional disability among non-surgical chronic LBP patients.

Importance of the Research: This randomized clinical trial aims to assess the efficacy of Incrediwear's Back Brace in improving patient outcomes for chronic LBP. The study will provide valuable insights into the utilization patterns and adherence of back braces, patient satisfaction with treatment protocols, and the impact of brace usage on pain medication consumption and functional disability. By evaluating these factors through a controlled trial, the investigators seek to enhance the understanding of effective LBP management strategies, potentially reducing the burden of chronic LBP on patients and healthcare systems.

The study will be conducted under the guidance of Dr. Akhil Chhatre, Principal Investigator at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. The research will involve 100 non-surgical chronic LBP patients meeting specific inclusion criteria. The patients will be randomly assigned to one of four study groups, and data will be collected through phone calls over a full 4-week duration.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain
  • Back Pain
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,875 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 484 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 2,315 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,809 studies on the registry; 314 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, age > 18
  • Has undergone treatment for an initial episode of nonspecific low back pain (LBP) lasting > 1 month, with one of the following causative "Principle Diagnoses":
  • Disc herniation
  • Facet arthropathy
  • Compression fracture
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Sacroiliac joint dysfunction
  • Scoliosis
  • Mild to moderate central spinal stenosis
  • Lumbar spondylosis
  • Degenerative changes, not otherwise specified
  • Utilize pain medication (including Step I or II analgesics, NSAIDs, Benzodiazepines) at least weekly for their LBP
  • Subject report a VAS pain score at the time of consent greater than three (>3) out of ten (10)
  • Recommended a back brace for LBP management
  • Provide written consent for participation
  • Subject available for phone calls after 6PM

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe central spinal stenosis
  • Focal lower extremity weakness
  • LBP radiating beyond the knee and/or accompanied by neurological signs (including sciatica)
  • Spinal operation within 5 years preceding the study date
  • Secondary LBP due to a work accident (e.g. workers comp)
  • History of spinal arthrodesis
  • LBP with an inflammatory, tumor, or infectious cause
  • Contraindications to: Step I or II analgesics, NSAIDs, Benzodiazepines
  • Diagnosed peripheral arterial disease
  • Diabetes
  • Higher functions do not enable proper comprehension of protocol or reliable data recording
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Incrediwear Daytime

    Incrediwear back brace worn 7AM-7PM (against skin)

    Device: Incrediwear Daytime Back Brace

  • Sham comparator
    Incrediwear Sham Daytime

    Incrediwear sham back brace worn 7AM-7PM (against skin)

    Device: Incrediwear Sham Daytime Back Brace

  • Placebo comparator
    Control Daytime

    Standard-issue brace (e.g. Horizon Lumbar Brace (Aspen Medical Products, LLC)) worn 7AM-7PM

    Device: Control Daytime Back Brace

  • Active comparator
    Incrediwear 24 hour

    Incrediwear back brace worn 7AM-7PM (against skin). Incrediwear waist sleeve worn 7PM-7AM (against skin)

    Device: Incrediwear 24 Hour Back Brace

Interventions

  • DeviceIncrediwear Daytime Back Brace

    Incrediwear Daytime Back Brace

  • DeviceIncrediwear Sham Daytime Back Brace

    Incrediwear Sham Daytime Back Brace

  • DeviceControl Daytime Back Brace

    Control Daytime Back Brace

  • DeviceIncrediwear 24 Hour Back Brace

    Incrediwear 24 Hour Back Brace

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. User Evaluation of Satisfaction as assessed by the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0)

    Satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 \[QUEST 2.0\] score). The score ranges from 1-5 with 1 being not satisfied at all to 5 being very satisfied

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Brace and sleeve utilization

    Self-reported hours worn

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Pain medication name

    The investigators aim to explore the effects of brace utilization on pain medication use. The investigators will document the pain medication name

    Time frame: 1 month

  4. Functional disability status as assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). A total score of 0-4 (no disability), 5-14 (mild disability), 15-24 (moderate disability), 25-34 (severe disability), 35-50 (completely disabled)

    Time frame: 1 month

  5. Pain as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and frequency (ordinal scale). 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as it could possibly be

    Time frame: 1 month

  6. Pain medication dosage used

    The investigators aim to explore the effects of brace utilization on pain medication use. The investigators will document the pain medication dosage used

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins Health Care & Surgery Center - Howard County Medical Center
    Columbia, Maryland 21044, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2024 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 10 months.

Of 1,187 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Low Back Pain, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26. This study's 10 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,246 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 29, 2023
First posted
Nov 13, 2023
StartActual
Jan 9, 2024
Primary completionActual
Nov 30, 2024
CompletionActual
Nov 30, 2024
Last update
Dec 6, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06126887
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 13, 2023
Start date
Jan 9, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2024
Completion
Nov 30, 2024
Last update
Dec 6, 2024

Study contacts

Akhil Chhatre, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion