CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06119230Updated Sep 1, 2026

The Active Transition Home Post-Stroke Program

An interventional study of Activity Counselling in Stroke, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Post-stroke participants will wear wearable sensors for one week at 1-week prior to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, 3- and 7- weeks post-discharge and 3-months post-discharge. All participants will wear sensors but only participants in the intervention group will receive sensor-informed activity feedback (e.g., activity, sleep and sedentary behaviour) and feedback informed goal setting sessions with a physiotherapist. The feedback forms will be co-created with physiotherapists working at GF Strong. Focus group(s) will be conducted to collect the opinions of clinicians with respect to measures to be included in the feedback form. At 3-months post-discharge, participants will be interviewed regarding their experience with the sensors. This study will explore the feasibility and initial benefits of using wearable sensors paired with goal setting to assist in the maintenance of activity levels during a difficult period for stroke survivors (transitioning home from rehab).

Read the detailed description

Purpose: This study will explore the benefits of using wearable sensor informed feedback and associated goal setting sessions for increasing activity levels during the transition home from stroke rehab.

Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that 1) wearable sensors are a feasible intervention for monitoring activity levels during the transition home, 2) participants receiving activity feedback and goal setting sessions will maintain higher activity levels compared to participants who only receive standard of care and 3) participants will report an overall positive experience with the use of sensor-informed feedback and goal setting sessions during the first 3 months of their transition.

Justification: The feasibility of using wearable sensor informed feedback and goal setting sessions has not yet been explored during the transition from inpatient stroke rehabilitation to home. This is an important period for recovery. Evidence shows that the first six months post-stroke are foundational to forming healthy activity patterns that encourage continued recovery, prevent the occurrence of poor secondary health outcomes, recurrent stroke, and optimize quality of life.

Objectives: The objectives will be to 1) explore the feasibility of using sensor-informed activity feedback to guide the establishment of activity patterns during the transition, 2) evaluate the preliminary efficacy of sensor-informed activity feedback to improve activity patterns during the transition and 3) qualitatively explore the perceptions of patients regarding their experiences with the wearable sensors and associated activity feedback forms for daily activity tracking.

Research Design: This study is a feasibility randomized control trial (RCT). All participants will wear sensors on each ankle and wrist (total of 4 sensors) for one week at 4 different time points-1 week prior to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, 3- and 7- weeks post-discharge and 3-months post-discharge. There will be a control group and an intervention group. Only participants randomized into the intervention group will receive Health and Activity Reports (HARs), feedback forms developed with input from physiotherapists in the the stroke program at GF Strong (via focus groups). The HARs will have detailed information regarding the participant's activity patterns (i.e., sedentary behavior, gait, and sleep), and will be used to inform their goal setting sessions with their Physiotherapist (PT). The last time point of collection (3 months post discharge) represents the post-intervention assessment, participants in the intervention group will not receive their activity reports until completing the close-out interviews. This interview will qualitatively assess the participants experiences with the sensors and the associated goal setting sessions. Controls will have the option to look at their HARs across all time points at the end of the study only.

Statistical Analysis: Transcripts from the focus group(s) with the physiotherapists will be qualitatively analyzed to generate the HAR's prior to its use with patients. Feasibility will be assessed using recruitment and retention rate, compliance rate, and number of technical and adverse events. Between intervention and control group differences will be investigated at 3 months post-discharge in use of stroke-affected upper extremity, walking and general activity levels, sedentary behaviour and sleep which will reveal the preliminary efficacy of this intervention. Lastly, transcripts from the close out interviews with the participants will be qualitatively analyzed to assess participant experiences with the sensors and associated goal setting sessions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Wearable sensors
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • inertial measurement units
  • activity counselling
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,013 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 5,366 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,309 studies on the registry; 253 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Physiotherapists for focus group participation

  • Age of 18 or older
  • Registered Physiotherapist at GF Strong (inpatient or outpatient)
  • 1 year of work experience in stroke rehabilitation (acute or chronic)

Patient Group

  • Age of 18 or older
  • Had a stroke resulting in hemiparesis
  • English speaking or living with an English-speaking family member to assist with interpretation/goal setting with PT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Physiotherapist Focus Group:

- \<1 year of experience in stroke rehabilitation

Patient Group:

- presents with any other unstable medical conditions that would impact activity (e.g., unstable cardiac condition, recent fracture)

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Sensors only

    Participants will only wear the sensors for a one week period during the 4 different time points.

  • Experimental
    Sensors and Activity Counselling

    Participants will wear the sensors for a one week period and receive a goal setting session with a physiotherapist at baseline, 3-and 7-weeks post discharge.

    Behavioral: Activity Counselling

Interventions

  • BehavioralActivity Counselling

    Participants will receive a one hour goal setting session with a physiotherapist where they will use the feedback forms to create activity goals for the upcoming week of collection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment Rate

    \# of participants per month

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Sensor Wear Adherence

    Participant adherence to wearing sensors

    Time frame: From enrolment to end of study

  3. Participant Adherence to Intervention

    \# of activity counselling sessions attended by the participants

    Time frame: From enrolment to end of study

  4. Acceptability of sensors for remote monitoring and intervention

    semi-structured interviews

    Time frame: 3 months post-discharge

  5. Technical Issues/Events

    \# of issues that occurs with the remote monitoring equipment

    Time frame: From enrolment to end of study

  6. Adverse Events

    \# of adverse events

    Time frame: From enrolment to end of study

Secondary outcomes

  1. Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test

    functional mobility

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  2. 10 Meter Walk Test

    Gait Speed

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  3. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

    Upper limb function

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  4. 6 Minute Walk Test

    functional exercise capacity

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 Months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 2G9, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06119230
Lead sponsor
University of British Columbia
Responsible party
Courtney Pollock (Assistant Professor, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
Start date
Feb 1, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 23, 2026
Completion
Apr 23, 2026
Last update
Sep 1, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion