ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06116760Updated Mar 12, 2024

Anodal tDCS With Compensatory Audio-visual Training for Acquired Visual Field Defects After Brain Injury

An interventional study of Anodal or sham tDCS and Audio-visual training in Stroke and Hemianopsia, Homonymous, sponsored by Istituto Auxologico Italiano. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-12.

Sponsored by Istituto Auxologico Italiano · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered Oct 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs) following acquired brain lesions affect independent living by hampering several activities of everyday life. Available treatments are intensive and week- or month-long. Transcranial Direct current stimulation (tDCS), a plasticity-modulating non-invasive technique, could be combined with behavioral trainings to boost their efficacy or reduce treatment duration. Some promising attempts have been made pairing occipital tDCS with visual restitution training, however less is knows about which area/network should be best stimulated in association with compensatory approaches, aimed at improving exploratory abilities, such as multisensory trainings.

In the present double-blind, sham-controlled study, we assess the efficacy of a multisensory training combined with tDCS. 3 groups of participants with chronic HVFDs underwent a 10-day (1.5 hrs/day) compensatory audio-visual training combined with either real anodal tDCS applied to the ipsilesional occipital tDCS (Group 1), or the ipsilesional posterior parietal cortex (Group 2), or a sham, placebo, tDCS (Group 3).

The training require the participants to orient their gaze training spatio-temporally congruent, cross-modal, audio-visual stimuli (starting from a central fixation) and press a button as quick as possible upon the detection of the visual stimulus. All stimuli are presented on 2mx2m panel embedded with 48 LEDs and loudspeakers (Bolognini et al., 2010, Brain Research)

All participants underwent a neuropsychological assessment of visuospatial functions prior to the beginning of the training (t0), at the end of the training (t1), and at 1-month (t2) and 4-month follow-up (t3). The assessment includes: a visual detection task, three visual search tasks (EF, Triangles, and Numbers; Bolognini et al., 2005, Brain), and a questionnaire about functional impact of the HVFDs in the activities of daily living.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Hemianopsia, Homonymous

Keywords

  • Homonymous Visual Field Defects
  • Hemianopia
  • Compensatory training
  • Audio-visual multisensory training
  • tDCS
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Istituto Auxologico Italiano is the lead sponsor of 202 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of chronic (>3 months) HVFD according to Neurophtalmological evaluation, due to acquired brain injury (i.e., stroke, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of hemispatial neglect (indexed by pathological asymmetries on paper-and-pencil tests)
  • Disorders of conjugated eye movements
  • Other neurological disorders (e.g., dementia)
  • Exclusion criteria for brain stimulation (i.e., epilepsy or family history of epilepsy; implanted electrodes, stimulators, pacemakers, infusion pumps, or any implanted metal device; pregnancy)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Anodal Occipital tDCS + audio-visual training

    Anodal tDCS on ipsilesional occipital cortex. Anode electrode placed on O1/O2 (10-20 EEG system) and reference electrode placed on the contralateral forehead. Stimulation delivered at 2mA during the first 30 minutes of the audio-visual training.

    Device: Anodal or sham tDCS · Behavioral: Audio-visual training

  • Experimental
    Anodal Parietal tDCS + audio-visual training

    Anodal tDCS on ipsilesional posterior parietal cortex. Anode electrode placed on P3/P4 (10-20 EEG system) and reference electrode placed on the contralateral forehead. Stimulation delivered at 2mA during the first 30 minutes of the audio-visual training.

    Device: Anodal or sham tDCS · Behavioral: Audio-visual training

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tDCS + audio-visual training

    Arm 3: sham tDCS. Half of participants with Group 1 montage, the other half with Group 2 montage. Stimulator is turned off after 30s of the audio-visual training.

    Device: Anodal or sham tDCS · Behavioral: Audio-visual training

Interventions

  • DeviceAnodal or sham tDCS

    Anodal or sham tDCS (see "Arms") is applied during the execution of an audio-visual training.

  • BehavioralAudio-visual training

    90 min/day x 10 days. Participants are seated in front of a 2 m × 2 m training board, at a distance of 1.2 m, in a dimly lit room. The board features 48 red light-emitting diodes (LED, diameter 1 cm, luminance 90 cd m2), distributed in six horizontal rows (eight lights per row). Forty-eight piezoelectric loudspeakers (0.4 W, 8Ω) are located above each light, producing a white-noise (80 dB, duration 100 ms). Spatio-temporally congruent, cross-modal, audio-visual stimuli are presented at one out of 48 possible positions on the board. Participants are instructed to look at the fixation point - at the center of the apparatus - and to move their eyes to detect the presence of the visual stimulus (duration=100 ms) by pressing right button of a wireless mouse.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Accuracy on the EF Task

    Computerized visual search task. Participants have to search for the target letter "F" surrounded by distractors "E"s. Accuracy: the proportion of correct responses (range 0-1).

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 1- and 4-month follow-ups

  2. Change from baseline in Response Times (RTs) on the EF Task

    Computerized visual search task. Participants have to search for the target letter "F" surrounded by distractors "E"s. RTs: median search times (seconds) of correct responses.

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 1- and 4-month follow-ups

  3. Change from baseline in Accuracy on the Triangle Task

    Computerized visual search task. Participants have to report the number of triangles (targets) surrounded by square distractors. Accuracy: the proportion of correct responses (range 0-1).

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 1- and 4-month follow-ups

  4. Change from baseline in RTs on the Triangle Task

    Computerized visual search task. Participants have to report the number of triangles (targets) surrounded by square distractors. RTs: median search times (seconds) of correct responses.

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 1- and 4-month follow-ups

  5. Change from baseline in RTs on the Numbers Task

    Computerized visual search task. Participants have to point to numbers (1 to 15) in ascending order. RTs: median search times (seconds).

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 1- and 4-month follow-ups

  6. Change from baseline in the functional scale assessing the impact of vision loss in everyday life activities

    A scale assessing the impact of HVFDs on nine activities of daily living. For each item, the score ranges from 0 ("No difficulty") to 4 ("Very frequent difficulties").

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 1- and 4-month follow-ups

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Accuracy on the Visual Detection Task

    Detection of visual stimuli presented on the same panel employed for the training. Accuracy (the proportion of detected stimuli; range 0-1) is calculated for both the sighted and the blind hemifields.

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 1- and 4-month follow-ups

  2. Change from baseline in RTs on the Visual Detection Task

    Detection of visual stimuli presented on the same panel employed for the training. RTs: median search times of the detected stimuli are calculated for both the sighted and the blind hemifields.

    Time frame: At baseline (at the beginning of the treatment), at the end of the treatment, at 1- and 4-month follow-ups

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS
    Milan, Lombardia 20122, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bolognini N, Rasi F, Coccia M, Ladavas E. Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio-visual stimulation. Brain. 2005 Dec;128(Pt 12):2830-42. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh656. Epub 2005 Oct 11. PubMed 16219672 ↗
  • Bolognini N, Fregni F, Casati C, Olgiati E, Vallar G. Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills. Brain Res. 2010 Aug 19;1349:76-89. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.06.053. Epub 2010 Jul 1. PubMed 20599813 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual, anonymized, data will be uploaded on Zenodo.

Time frame: Upon the publication of the study

Access criteria: Access to data will be granted upon request

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06116760
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 3, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023
Completion
Dec 31, 2023
Last update
Mar 12, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion