CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06105723Updated Jun 16, 2026

An Effectiveness Evaluation for Pathway to Healthy Aging (Path-HA) Care on Health Status of Older Adults

An interventional study of Pathway to Healthy Aging care in Ageing Well, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-16.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to provide a scientific evaluation on the effects of a protocol-driven Pathway to Healthy Aging (Path-HA) Program on promoting the health-related quality of life and functional abilities of older adults who are at risk of accelerated aging in the community. Participants will be randomized to one of the two study arms: 1) the intervention group to receive a 14-week Path-HA care intervention; and 2) the control group with no Path-HA care intervention.

Read the detailed description

This assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluates the effects of the Pathway to Healthy Aging Program, which is based on the WHO ICOPE model, on the promotion of the health-related quality of life (primary outcome) as well as functional abilities (secondary outcomes) as defined by the WHO-ICOPE among community-dwelling older adults with accelerated aging. Six health domains including locomotor function, vitality, psychological function, cognitive function, social functions, and overall health-related quality of life are measured. A total of 1000 participants will be recruited. Outcome evaluation takes place at baseline, upon the completion of the care program, and at 6 months thereafter to allow the detection of long-term program benefits. In-depth individual interviews will be conducted to solicit the participants' experience and perceived benefits of the program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ageing Well

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Functional ability
  • Care model
  • Community-dwelling
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,262 studies on the registry; 340 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 1) aged 60 or above,
  • 2) with at least two risk factors of accelerating aging defined as including reduced physical functioning, malnutrition, depressed mood, loneliness, poor health perception, and presence of geriatric symptoms (e.g. insomnia, pain, etc), based on their health screening results,
  • 3) community-dwelling,
  • 4) communicable to engage in health education activity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) any who is not at or at only one risk factor of accelerating aging,
  • 2) any who has problems in communicating with the research team.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Path-HA care

    A 14-week care initiative comprising two phases is provided, which are the 2-week ICOPE-based personalized care planning phase, and the 12-week healthy aging empowerment phase.

    Behavioral: Pathway to Healthy Aging care

  • No intervention
    Control

    No care intervention will be provided.

Interventions

  • BehavioralPathway to Healthy Aging care

    The ICOPE-based personalized care planning comprises two home visits. In 1st visit, a comprehensive assessment proposed by the WHO-ICOPE model is conducted to identify eight possible health problems including malnutrition, reduced physical fitness, fall risk, cognitive decline, insomnia, pain, psychological distress and social loneliness. After health problem identification, each participant receives a personalized care prescription. 2nd visit adopts a goal-oriented empowerment 3-step cycle to personalize the care planning: 1) communicating assessment results to increase healthy self-awareness; 2) supporting setting person-directed goals to address health problems; 3) identifying health actions and personalizing goal setting to participants' contexts. The 12-week healthy aging empowerment comprises three core activities for healthy aging promotion, including interactive health education, health message broadcasts, and three case conferences for goal monitoring and health counseling.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life

    Measured by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (scores range from -0.59 to 1.0), with a higher score indicating better quality of life.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hand grip strength

    Measured by hand-held dynamometer in unit of KG. A larger count indicates a greater grip strength.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

  2. Balancing function

    Measured by the Timed Up and Go Test in unit of second. A shorter completion time indicates better mobility and balance.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

  3. Physical mobility level

    Measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (scores range from 0 to 12), with higher scores indicating better physical performance and better mobility functioning.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

  4. Sarcopenia risk

    Measured by Sarcopenia and calf circumference scale (SARC-CalF scale). The score ranges from 0 to 20 points, with a score ≥ 11 points suggestive of sarcopenia.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

  5. Nutritional status

    Measured by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (scores range from 0 to 30), with a lower score indicating a higher risk of malnutrition.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

  6. Sleep quality

    Measured by Insomnia Severity Index questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 28), with higher scores indicating greater severity of insomnia.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

  7. Depressed mood

    Measured by the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (scores range from 0 to 15), with a higher score indicating a higher risk of depression.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

  8. Cognitive functions

    Measured by the 5-minute Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (scores range from 0 to 30). A raw score of \< 25 in well-educated persons (education \> 12 years) or a raw score of \< 23 in less-educated persons (education ≤ 12 years) is defined as impaired cognition.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

  9. Subjective memory

    Measured by Memory Inventory for the Chinese (scores range from 0 to 108), with higher scores indicating more severe subjective memory loss.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

  10. Loneliness

    Measured by The 3-Item UCLA Loneliness Scale (scores range from 3 to 9), with higher scores suggesting a higher level of loneliness.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

  11. Social connectedness

    Measured by The 8-item version of Social Connectedness Scale (scores range from 8 to 48), with a higher score indicating a greater sense of social connectedness.

    Time frame: Changes from baseline to 3-month and 9-month post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Hong Kong
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06105723
Lead sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
Responsible party
Prof. Yu, Doris Sau Fung (Professor (Chair, Research), The University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025
Completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 16, 2026

Study contacts

Doris Sau Fung YU, PhD
principal investigator · The University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion