ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06104410Updated Oct 31, 2023

Optimization of Fractionation Schedules of Heel Spur Radiotherapy Prospective Randomized Open-label Trial

An interventional study of Standard fractioned dose and Experimental single dose in Heel Spur, sponsored by Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Czechia. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-31.

Sponsored by Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2022, registered Oct 2023).
  • Started Sep 2022; still recruiting 4 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
430
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

About 26 000 patients are treated per year with radiotherapy for non-malignant diseases in the Czech Republic, majority of them with heel spur syndrome which prevalence ranges from 8-10% in the general population. Heel spur represents important socioeconomic as well as health care issue. Radiotherapy by orthovoltage X-ray belongs to standard conservative treatment methods with proven antiinflammatory effect. Nevertheless, with increasing incidence of cancer, it may be assumed that availability of radiotherapy service for heel spur patients will be further limited including limitations related to potential pandemic or other emergency situation. This represents upcoming unmet clinical need, where alternative approaches with dramatically abbreviated fractionation schedules are needed in order to keep availability as well as effectivity of heel spur (and other non-malignant disorders) radiotherapy.

The aim to presented single institutional prospective randomized open-lable clinical trial is to evaluate low dose radiotherapy delivered in single fraction manner in the treatment of heel spur syndrome.

The project aims to design a randomized trial that compared fractionated and single fraction radiotherapy (non-inferiority). Patients will be randomized into 6 groups according to the total dose, total of 966 patients will be enrolled. The primary objective is to compare Calcaneodynia sum score at 3 months after radiotherapy between fractionated vs. single fraction radiotherapy.

Read the detailed description

Purpose/Objective The aim of this study is to optimize the fractionation schedules for radiotherapy in the treatment of heel spurs (HSS, plantar fasciitis) through a prospective randomized open-label trial conducted at Department of Radiation Oncology at Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno (MMCI). Low-dose external beam radiotherapy (LD-EBRT), known for its anti-inflammatory effect, offers effective pain relief for HSS patients. Currently, the standard LD-EBRT regimen consists of six fractions of 1 Gray (Gy) administered twice weekly, resulting in a total dose of 6 Gy. This study posits the hypothesis that very low total doses of orthovoltage radiotherapy, delivered in a single fraction, may provide pain relief comparable to that achieved with higher doses of fractionated radiotherapy. The primary goal of this research is to determine whether one-day irradiation (a single fraction) is non-inferior to fractionated radiotherapy over a three-month period in terms of pain relief for HSS patients. This study was supported by grant of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic AZV NU22-10-00479. All patients signed informed consent.

Material/Methods After completing the enrollment process and filling out the SF-36 questionnaire, as well as the Calcaneodynia score (CS) and visual analogue pain score (VAS) forms, patients (pts) meeting specific inclusion criteria (being over 40 years old, having a diagnosed painful unilateral plantar HSS for at least six months, and being suitable for HSS radiotherapy), and fulfilling the main exclusion criteria (having no prior history of radiotherapy for heel spur, no corticosteroid local application in the four weeks leading up to radiotherapy, no systemic rheumatic or collagen vascular diseases, lymphatic edema of the lower limb, or prior trauma and surgery on the ipsilateral foot), were randomized into six groups based on the total dose of radiotherapy. Patients in these groups received a total dose of 6 Gy in 4 fractions of 1.5 Gy twice weekly (arm A), a total dose of 3 Gy in 2 fractions of 1.5 Gy twice weekly (arm B), a single fraction of 0.5 Gy (arm C), a single fraction of 1.0 Gy (arm D), a single fraction of 1.5 Gy (arm E), and a single fraction of 2 Gy (arm F), respectively. The regimen in arm A (6 Gy in 4 fractions) is commonly used in MMCI and considered as the standard arm. In the event of inadequate pain relief, reirradiation was performed with a total dose of 6 Gy in 4 fractions of 1.5 Gy twice weekly after a waiting period of three months in any of the aforementioned groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heel Spur

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heel Spur

32 studies on the registry are indexed under Heel Spur; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 430 is above the median of 60 across 25 interventional studies indexed under Heel Spur.

Browse Heel Spur studies →

Lead sponsor

Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

All patients referred to medical attention for non-malignant radiotherapy at the Department of Radiation oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute (MMCI), will be screened for eligibility, and if all inclusion/exclusion criteria are met, they will be invited to participate in the present study.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

    1. Patients aged over 40 years who have been diagnosed clinically and radiologically to be suffering from a painful unilateral plantar heel spur for at least six months,
    1. indication to heel spur radiotherapy,
    1. 40 years or older patient, good performance status ( index ≥ 70),
    1. exclusion of other local diseases by the orthopaedic surgeon,
    1. willingness of the patient to provide telephone or email contact to maintain follow up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Prior radiotherapy of heel spur (even if prior radiotherapy was performed on the contralateral heel spur because of possible bias given patient's expectations and experiences related to previous radiotherapy,
    1. local application during last 4 weeks prior to planned radiotherapy,
    1. rheumatic or vascular diseases, lymphatic edema of lower limb,
    1. former trauma or surgery of ipsilateral foot,
    1. any systemic illness (collagen vascular diseases) or unstable medical condition that might pose additional risk for performance of radiotherapy including claustrophobia or jactation,
    1. any other factors that, in the opinion of the site investigators, would interfere with adherence to study requirements,
    1. pregnancy or breastfeeding,
    1. inability or unwillingness of subject to sign written .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
430 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm A (standard fractionated dose): Groups A-B

    Arm A contains of 2 groups. Group A: Total dose of 6 Gy in 4 single fractions of 1.5 Gy applied twice weekly (most commonly used regimen, considered standard arm in this trial) Group B: Total dose of 3 Gy in 2 single fractions of 1.5 Gy applied twice weekly

    Radiation: Standard fractioned dose

  • Experimental
    Arm B (experimental single dose): Groups C-F

    Arm B contains of four groups. Group C: Total dose of 0.5 Gy in 1 single fractions of 0.5 Gy Group D: Total dose of 1 Gy in 1 single fractions of 1 Gy Group E: Total dose of 1.5 Gy in 1 single fractions of 1.5 Gy Group F: Total dose of 2 Gy in 1 single fractions of 2 Gy

    Radiation: Experimental single dose

Interventions

  • RadiationStandard fractioned dose

    Total dose of 6 Gy in 2 or 4 single fractions of 1.5 Gy applied twice weekly.

  • RadiationExperimental single dose

    Total dose of 0.5 Gy, 1Gy, 1.5 or 2Gy in 1 single fraction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Non-inferiority of single fraction radiotherapy of heel spur

    Comparison of 2 arms in 3 months after radiotherapy.Follow-up examinations consist of personal examination,questionnaire survey.Calcaneodynia sum score (100=free of symptoms, 0=very intense symptoms) is calculated by evaluation of Pain symptoms (up to 30 points),Use of appliances (up to 15 points),Professional activities (up to 20 points),Daily/leisure activities (up to 15 points) and Gaint/limp (up to 20 points). Complete pain relief will be assumed if patients will be completely free of pain and regained full ability to walk and function well.Insufficient pain relief will be assumed,if the patient's subjective evaluation (VAS score) of improvement of pain will be less than 80% or if the temporal pattern of clinical response will be unsatisfactory (ie, response will be delayed \>3 months or there will be need for second radiotherapy course.Skin toxicity will be evaluated according Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5. VAS and SF36 are described in Outcome 4.

    Time frame: 44 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of different single fraction radiotherapy prescription

    Comparison of Calcaneodynia sum score at 3 months after radiotherapy between different single fraction radiotherapy prescription. Calcaneodynia sum score (100 = free of symptoms, 0 = very intense symptoms) is calculated by evaluation of Pain symptoms (up to 30 points), Use of appliances (up to 15 points), Professional activities (up to 20 points), Daily/leisure activities (up to 15 points) and Gaint/limp (up to 20 points).

    Time frame: 44 months

  2. Comparison of the need for reirradiation till 1 year after radiotherapy between fractionated vs. single fraction radiotherapy

    To compare the need for reirradiation till 1 year after radiotherapy between fractionated vs. single fraction radiotherapy. To compare the need of reirradiation till 1 year after radiotherapy between different single fraction radiotherapy prescription. Evaluated simply by keeping score of patients returning for irradiation till 1 year after radiotherapy.

    Time frame: 44 months

  3. Comparison of quality of life and VAS score at 1.5, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and Calcaneodynia sum score at 1.5, 6, 9 and 12 months between fractionated vs. single fraction radiotherapy and between different single fractions radiotherapy prescription.

    Visual analogue scale (VAS) score is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain." (0 = no pain, 100 = maximum imaginable pain intensity).SF-36 questionnaire score taps eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions and single item that provides an indication of perceived change in health. High values indicates good quality of life.

    Time frame: 44 months

  4. Evaluation of individual (not sum) parts of Calcaneodynia score and individual domains of quality of life

    Evaluation of individual (not sum) parts of Calcaneodynia score and individual domains of quality of life as per outcome 1,2 and 4. Calcaneodynia score form is attached in separate file in this project proposal. Sum score (100 = free of symptoms, 0 = very intense symptoms) is calculated by evaluation of Pain symptoms (up to 30 points), Use of appliances (up to 15 points), Professional activities (up to 20 points), Daily/leisure activities (up to 15 points) and Gaint/limp (up to 20 points).

    Time frame: 44 months

  5. Analysis of the heel spur radiotherapy techniques in Czechia

    Conducting a questionnaire survey analyzing the technique of heel spur radiotherapy at individual workplaces performing this type of treatment in Czechia. The questionnaires will be conducted by Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and sent to other facilities in Czechia. Results will be evaluated.

    Time frame: 44 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dufek V, Zackova H, Kotik L, Horakova I. RESULTS OF CZECH NATIONAL STUDY OF RADIATION EXPOSURE FROM RADIOTHERAPY OF NON-MALIGNANT DISEASES, IN PARTICULAR OF HEEL SPURS. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2019 Dec 31;186(2-3):386-390. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncz237. PubMed 31840171 ↗
  • Buchbinder R. Clinical practice. Plantar fasciitis. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2159-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp032745. No abstract available. PubMed 15152061 ↗
  • DeMaio M, Paine R, Mangine RE, Drez D Jr. Plantar fasciitis. Orthopedics. 1993 Oct;16(10):1153-63. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19931001-13. No abstract available. PubMed 8255812 ↗
  • Heyd R, Tselis N, Ackermann H, Roddiger SJ, Zamboglou N. Radiation therapy for painful heel spurs: results of a prospective randomized study. Strahlenther Onkol. 2007 Jan;183(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s00066-007-1589-1. PubMed 17225939 ↗
  • Barrett SJ, O'Malley R. Plantar fasciitis and other causes of heel pain. Am Fam Physician. 1999 Apr 15;59(8):2200-6. PubMed 10221305 ↗
  • Kriz J, Seegenschmiedt HM, Bartels A, Micke O, Muecke R, Schaefer U, Haverkamp U, Eich HT. Updated strategies in the treatment of benign diseases-a patterns of care study of the german cooperative group on benign diseases. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb 26;3(3):240-244. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.02.008. eCollection 2018 Jul-Sep. PubMed 30197936 ↗
  • Crawford F, Thomson C. Interventions for treating plantar heel pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD000416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000416. PubMed 12917892 ↗
  • Seegenschmiedt MH, Keilholz L, Katalinic A, Stecken A, Sauer R. Heel spur: radiation therapy for refractory pain--results with three treatment concepts. Radiology. 1996 Jul;200(1):271-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657925. PubMed 8657925 ↗
  • Seegenschmiedt MH, Keilholz L, Stecken A, Katalinic A, Sauer R. [Radiotherapy of plantar heel spurs: indications, technique, clinical results at different dose concepts]. Strahlenther Onkol. 1996 Jul;172(7):376-83. German. PubMed 8693404 ↗
  • Trott KR. Therapeutic effects of low radiation doses. Strahlenther Onkol. 1994 Jan;170(1):1-12. PubMed 8303572 ↗
  • Bentzen SM. Radiation therapy: intensity modulated, image guided, biologically optimized and evidence based. Radiother Oncol. 2005 Dec;77(3):227-30. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.001. Epub 2005 Nov 21. No abstract available. PubMed 16300846 ↗
  • Kern P, Keilholz L, Forster C, Seegenschmiedt MH, Sauer R, Herrmann M. In vitro apoptosis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells induced by low-dose radiotherapy displays a discontinuous dose-dependence. Int J Radiat Biol. 1999 Aug;75(8):995-1003. doi: 10.1080/095530099139755. PubMed 10465365 ↗
  • Kern PM, Keilholz L, Forster C, Hallmann R, Herrmann M, Seegenschmiedt MH. Low-dose radiotherapy selectively reduces adhesion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to endothelium in vitro. Radiother Oncol. 2000 Mar;54(3):273-82. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00141-9. PubMed 10738086 ↗
  • Niewald M, Seegenschmiedt MH, Micke O, Graeber S, Muecke R, Schaefer V, Scheid C, Fleckenstein J, Licht N, Ruebe C; German Cooperative Group on Radiotherapy for Benign Diseases (GCGBD) of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). Randomized, multicenter trial on the effect of radiation therapy on plantar fasciitis (painful heel spur) comparing a standard dose with a very low dose: mature results after 12 months' follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 15;84(4):e455-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.06.022. Epub 2012 Jul 25. PubMed 22836057 ↗
  • Ott OJ, Jeremias C, Gaipl US, Frey B, Schmidt M, Fietkau R. Radiotherapy for benign calcaneodynia: long-term results of the Erlangen Dose Optimization (EDO) trial. Strahlenther Onkol. 2014 Jul;190(7):671-5. doi: 10.1007/s00066-014-0618-0. Epub 2014 Mar 26. PubMed 24668250 ↗
  • Rowe CR, Sakellarides HT, Freeman PA, Sorbie C. Fractures of the Os Calcis: A Long-Term Follow-up Study of 146 Patients. JAMA. 1963;184(12):920-923. doi:10.1001/jama.1963.03700250056007

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2025, 32 months after the start.

Of 19 interventional studies with no phase under Heel Spur, half reached primary completion within 8 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 32 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 23, 2023
First posted
Oct 27, 2023
StartActual
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Oct 31, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 31, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06104410
Lead sponsor
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2023
Start date
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completion
May 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 31, 2023

Study contacts

Tomas Kazda, MD
Contact
tomas.kazda@mou.cz
+420543136902
Marek Slavik, MD
Contact
slavik@mou.cz
+420543131187
Pavel Slampa, prof. MD
principal investigator · Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion