CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06104332Updated Mar 11, 2025

PMCF to Assess Real-life Usage Effectiveness, Safety and Patient Satisfaction of a Range of Hypertonic Seawater-based Decongestant Nasal Sprays

An observational study in Allergic Rhinitis and URTI, sponsored by Laboratoire de la Mer. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 3 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-11.

Sponsored by Laboratoire de la Mer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
534
Ages
3 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The brief of this observational study is to evaluate usage, efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of a range of hypertonic seawater-based decongestant nasal sprays in general population.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Usage,
  • Efficacy,
  • Safety,
  • Satisfaction, in real-life usage with children, adults and pregnant or breastfeeding women. Participants will use the nasal spray as usual habits and complete daily questionnaires.
02

Conditions studied

  • Allergic Rhinitis
  • URTI

Keywords

  • Medical device
  • Hypertonic seawater-based nasal spray
03

In context

Rhinitis

1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 534 is above the median of 141 across 172 observational studies indexed under Rhinitis.

Browse Rhinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Laboratoire de la Mer is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

General population coming to pharmacy for spontaneous purchase of a hypertonic seawater-based decongestant nasal spray for URTI or allergic rhinitis.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject coming to pharmacy for spontaneous purchase of one of the medical device under investigation.
  • Subject willing to buy one of the medical device under investigation following advice from pharmacist, general practitioner or any other health care professionals.
  • Adult and children from 3 years old in compliance with the information for use.
  • Subject presenting moderate nasal congestion or more.
  • Subject agreeing to follow the study requirements during the whole study period.
  • Subject having daily access to internet in order to answer online questionnaire.
  • Subject able to understand verbal and written local language and in capacity to fill-in questionnaire himself.
  • Subject able to give inform consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject with contraindications according to the information for use.
  • Hypersensitivity or know allergy to any component of the product.
  • Subject taking part in another clinical study or being in the exclusion period of another clinical study.
  • Subject already included once in this study or having a family member already included in this study for the same indication.
  • Vulnerable subject (except children, pregnant and breastfeeding women).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
534 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • ProRhinel Naturel spray nasal/ Allergic Rhinitis

    Device: ProRhinel Naturel spray nasal/ Allergic rhinitis

  • ProRhinel Naturel spray nasal/ URTI

    Device: ProRhinel Naturel spray nasal/ URTI

  • ProRhinel EXTRA Eucalyptus spray nasal/ URTI

    Device: ProRhinel EXTRA Eucalyptus spray nasal

  • RESPIMER Enfant/ URTI

    Device: RESPIMER Enfant

  • Phytosun Aroms spray nasal MAX/ URTI

    Device: Phytosun Aroms spray nasal MAX

  • PHYSIOMER RHUME TRIPLE ACTION/ URTI

    Device: PHYSIOMER RHUME TRIPLE ACTION

  • Phytosun Aroms spray nasal decongestionnant/ URTI

    Device: Phytosun Aroms spray nasal decongestionnant

Interventions

  • DeviceProRhinel Naturel spray nasal/ Allergic rhinitis

    ProRhinel Naturel spray nasal: 21 days; 1 spray per nostril; 3 to 6 times per day

  • DeviceProRhinel EXTRA Eucalyptus spray nasal

    ProRhinel EXTRA Eucalyptus spray nasal: until resolution of symptoms (period of 14 days maximum) ; 2 to 3 sprays per nostril; 6 times per day maximum

  • DeviceRESPIMER Enfant

    RESPIMER Enfant: until resolution of symptoms (period of 14 days maximum) ; 1 spray per nostril; 4 times per day maximum

  • DevicePhytosun Aroms spray nasal MAX

    Phytosun Aroms spray nasal MAX: until resolution of symptoms (period of 14 days maximum) ; 1 spray per nostril; up to 4-6 times per day

  • DevicePHYSIOMER RHUME TRIPLE ACTION

    PHYSIOMER RHUME TRIPLE ACTION: until resolution of symptoms (period of 14 days maximum) ; 1 spray per nostril; up to 4-6 times per day

  • DevicePhytosun Aroms spray nasal decongestionnant

    Phytosun Aroms spray nasal decongestionnant : until resolution of symptoms (period of 14 days maximum) ; 1 spray per nostril; 6 times per day maximum

  • DeviceProRhinel Naturel spray nasal/ URTI

    ProRhinel Naturel spray nasal: until resolution of symptoms (period of 14 days maximum) ; 1 spray per nostril; 3 to 6 times per day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. URTI population : Effectiveness to improve nasal congestion

    URTI: Assess effectiveness to improve nasal congestion in real world usage (6-point Likert scale) 6-point-Likert scale: 0 (None) - 1 (Very mild) - 2 (Mild) - 3 (Moderate) - 4 (Strong) - 5 (Very strong). Higher score means a worse outcome

    Time frame: URTI: 3 days

  2. AR population: Effectiveness to improve nasal congestion

    Allergic Rhinitis (AR) : Assess effectiveness to improve nasal congestion in real world usage (6-point Likert scale) 6-point-Likert scale: 0 (None) - 1 (Very mild) - 2 (Mild) - 3 (Moderate) - 4 (Strong) - 5 (Very strong). Higher score means a worse outcome

    Time frame: AR: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness to improve overall nasal symptoms (daytime)

    URTI: Assess effectiveness (daytime) to improve overall nasal symptoms in real world usage (6-point Likert scale)

    Time frame: URTI: Day 0 - Day 14

  2. Effectiveness to improve overall nasal symptoms (daytime)

    AR: Assess effectiveness (daytime) to improve overall nasal symptoms in real world usage (6-point Likert scale)

    Time frame: AR: Day 0 - Day 21

  3. Effectiveness to improve overall nasal symptoms (night-time)

    URTI: Assess effectiveness (night-time) to improve overall nasal symptoms in real world usage (6-point Likert scale)

    Time frame: URTI: Day 0 - Day 14

  4. Effectiveness to improve overall nasal symptoms (night-time)

    AR: Assess effectiveness (night-time) to improve overall nasal symptoms in real world usage

    Time frame: AR: Day 0 - Day 21

  5. Effectiveness to improve quality of life

    URTI: Assess effectiveness to improve quality of life in real world usage (RQLQ self-administered questionnaire)

    Time frame: URTI: Day 0 - Day 14

  6. Effectiveness to improve quality of life

    AR: Assess effectiveness to improve quality of life in real world usage (RQLQ self-administered questionnaire)

    Time frame: AR: Day 0 - Day 21

  7. Relief of nasal symptoms

    AR : assessment of nasal symptoms relief (7-point Likert scale)

    Time frame: AR: Day 1 - Day 21

  8. Relief of nasal symptoms

    URTI: assessment of nasal symptoms relief (7-point Likert scale)

    Time frame: URTI: Day 1 - Day 14

  9. Onset of action & Duration

    URTI: Assess Onset of action \& Duration (2 closed questions)

    Time frame: URTI: Day 0 - Day 14

  10. Onset of action & Duration

    AR: Assess Onset of action \& Duration (2 closed questions)

    Time frame: AR: Day 0 - Day 21

  11. Safety of the medical device

    URTI: occurence of incidents and deficiencies

    Time frame: URTI: Day 0 - Day 14

  12. Tolerance

    URTI: 1 question (numeric scale : 0-10)

    Time frame: URTI: Day 14

  13. Safety of the medical device

    AR: occurence of incidents and deficiencies

    Time frame: AR: Day 0 - Day 21

  14. Tolerance

    AR: 1 question (numeric scale: 0-10)

    Time frame: AR: Day 10 + Day 21

  15. Usage

    URTI: number of day of use, number of use/ day, number of puff/ nostril, moment of use

    Time frame: URTI: Day 0 - Day 14

  16. Usage

    AR: number of day of use, number of use/ day, number of puff/ nostril, moment of use

    Time frame: AR: Day 0 - Day 21

  17. Patient satisfaction

    URTI: 10 questions on Satisfaction (numeric scale: 0-10)

    Time frame: URTI: Day 14

  18. Patient satisfaction

    AR: 10 questions on Satisfaction (numeric scale: 0-10)

    Time frame: AR: Day 10 + Day 21

  19. Sensory profile

    URTI: 4 questions on sensory profile (numeric scale: 0-10)

    Time frame: URTI: Day 14

  20. Sensory profile

    AR: 4 questions on sensory profile (numeric scale: 0-10)

    Time frame: AR: Day 10 + Day 21

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Alexandra Crevecoeur
    Honfleur, France
  • Annie Le Gall
    Vern-sur-Seiche, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06104332
Lead sponsor
Laboratoire de la Mer
Collaborators
Slb Pharma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2023
Start date
Nov 4, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 13, 2025
Completion
Feb 25, 2025
Last update
Mar 11, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion