ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06102330HomeVENTUpdated Jul 16, 2026

Multicenter HomeVENT: Home Values and Experiences Navigation Track

An interventional study of HomeVENT decision support tool in Pediatric ALL, Respiratory Insufficiency and Communication, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter study to test a decision-making support process for families and clinicians facing decisions about chronic home ventilation for a child. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will increase family preparedness for decision-making and will improve clinician-family shared-decision making. Half of families will be assigned to "usual care" arm and half to the "intervention" arm. Intervention families will view the study website with study staff and will answer questions related to website content. All families will be interviewed and surveyed at 1, 6 and 12 months after enrollment. Each family will designate 1-2 physician involved in the decision about home ventilation; each physician will be interviewed and surveyed at 1 month.

Read the detailed description

Across 4 centers, the investigators will recruit 150 English and/ or Spanish-speaking families (up to 2 parents per family) who are currently facing a decision about tracheostomy and home ventilation for the child. The investigators will also recruit up to 2 clinicians who are central to the decision for each child.

The first 50% of families will be assigned to "usual care" arm and the second 50% of families will be assigned to the "intervention" arm. Intervention families will view the study website with study staff and will answer questions related to website content in an interview that could last up to 2 hours. All families will be interviewed at 1, 6 and 12 months after enrollment (each interview lasts 15-30 minutes). Each family will designate 1-2 physician involved in the decision about home ventilation; each physician will be interviewed at 1 month interviews last \~15 minutes).

This is a controlled trial of a communication intervention and requires careful attention to words used. The investigators support the intention of being inclusive, and have invested considerable effort in creating a Spanish intervention and diversifying the team to include more native Spanish-speakers. However, as a communication randomized control trial (RCT), the investigators are concerned that one-off efforts to translate the website as well as using a translator, may confound the investigators interpretation of the data. Most significantly, the investigators risk not finding differences between the two arms if the investigators include those who do not speak English or Spanish.

Primary endpoints:

The investigators hypothesize that, compared to families who receive usual care related to decision-making about pediatric chronic home ventilation, families who receive the HomeVENT intervention will have increased preparedness for decision-making 1 month later.

The investigators hypothesize that, compared to families who receive usual care related to decision-making about pediatric chronic home ventilation, families who receive the HomeVENT intervention will perceive increased shared decision-making 1 month later.

The investigators hypothesize that, compared to physicians of families who receive usual care related to decision-making about pediatric chronic home ventilation, physicians of families who receive the HomeVENT intervention will perceive increased shared decision-making 1 month later.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pediatric ALL
  • Respiratory Insufficiency
  • Communication

Keywords

  • chronic ventilation
  • decision-making
03

In context

Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

2,584 studies on the registry are indexed under Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; 473 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 40 across 1,952 interventional studies indexed under Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma.

Browse Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,815 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. English- or Spanish-speaking
  2. Males and females; Age 18 and over.
  3. Parent of a child facing a decision about home ventilation within 30 days. A "parent" will be defined as any self-identified primary caregiver (parents, grandparents, etc).

    or Physician of a child whose parents are enrolled in the study; physician must be engaged in the home ventilation decision.

  4. Provision of signed and dated form (parent) or completion of oral consent (physician)
  5. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  6. Access to necessary resources if choose to participate via internet or telephone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Excluding children as they cannot be legal decision-makers
  2. Non-English or Non-Spanish speaking parents, as the intervention website/ videos are only available in those two languages.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    No alteration in care. Will interview families and clinicians at 1 month, and families again at 6 and 12 months

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Will review a web-based decision-making tool with families and simultaneously interview family regarding website topics. Will interview families and clinicians at 1 month, and families again at 6 and 12 months

    Other: HomeVENT decision support tool

Interventions

  • OtherHomeVENT decision support tool

    Web-based decision support tool that describes diverse family experiences with making decisions about pediatric chronic home ventilation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Preparedness for Decision Making among parents making decisions about home ventilation as assessed by the Preparedness for Decision Making scale.

    The Preparedness for Decision Making scale has a possible score range of 0-100. Higher score means more prepared.

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Shared Decision Making among parents making decisions about home ventilation as assessed by the CollaboRATE-Parent version scale

    The CollaboRATE-Parent version scale is a 3 item measure. Score range 0-27. Higher score means better shared decision making.

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Shared Decision Making among parents making decisions about home ventilation as assessed by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS-SDM) survey

    The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scale is an 8 item measure. Score range 0-23. Higher score means better shared decision making.

    Time frame: 1 month

  4. Shared decision making about home ventilation for physicians as assessed by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - Physician (SDM-Q-DOC) version

    The Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - Physician questionnaire is a 9 item measure. Score range 0-54. Higher score meaning better shared decision making.

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in decision making regret among parents who chose for or against home ventilation as assessed by the Decision Regret Scale

    The Decision Regret Scale is a 5 item scale. Score range 1-25, with higher score meaning more regret.

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

  2. Change in Quality of Life expected vs. actual, among parents who faced choice about home ventilation as assessed by the Pediatric Quality of Life Family Impact Module (PEDSQL) scale

    The Pediatric Quality of Life Family Impact Module (PEDSQL) Score range 0-100. Higher score better quality of life.

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

  3. Change in Impact of decision about home on daily life of child/ family as assessed by a qualitative interview

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Only aggregate data will be shared

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06102330
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2023
Start date
Feb 6, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Study contacts

Renee D Boss, MD
Contact
rboss1@jhu.edu
4106146444
Fiona Jardine, RN
Contact
fjardin1@jhu.edu
410-955-5232
Renee Boss, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion