ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT06092216Updated Mar 31, 2026Results posted

Spesolimab in Pyoderma Gangrenosum

A Phase 2 interventional study of Spesolimab in Pyoderma Gangrenosum, sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The funding sponsor terminated our study and will conduct a multicenter national study in its place.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to assess the feasibility of using spesolimab in participants with moderate to severe pyoderma gangrenosum. Pyoderma gangrenosum is a rare, inflammatory, autoimmune condition which results in ulceration of skin. The study will also investigate the body's immune response to the spesolimab (when the body detects and defends itself against substances that appear unknown and harmful).

Read the detailed description

To date, there is no gold standard for treatment of PG. Patients with pyoderma gangrenosum suffer from severe pain and poor quality of life due to frequent dressing changes and disfiguring lesions. More importantly, rapidly progressing ulcers present an important risk for infection, morbidity, and mortality for patients. Spesolimab is humanized antagonistic monoclonal IgG1 antibody that blocks human IL36R signalling and subsequent downstream pro-inflammatory pathways. The IL-36 receptor blocker was recently approved for generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). The research team hypothesize that targeting IL-36 in refractory, ulcerative postoperative PG may result in regression and resolution of a patient's lesions.

There are, at minimum, a total of 14 or 15 visits which will include physical exams, blood testing and infectious disease testing, completing questionnaires, and photographs and assessment of skin affected by PG. Spesolimab will be administered via a 90-minute infusion every 3 or 4 weeks (depending on response at Visit 4) at 8 or 9 Visits during the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pyoderma Gangrenosum

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pyoderma Gangrenosum

36 studies on the registry are indexed under Pyoderma Gangrenosum; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 10 across 26 interventional studies indexed under Pyoderma Gangrenosum.

Browse Pyoderma Gangrenosum studies →

Lead sponsor

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is the lead sponsor of 776 studies on the registry; 176 are open to participants now.

Of its 125 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 83 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects ≥ 18 years of age at the time of signing the document
  • Subject is able to understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent document prior to participation in any study assessments or procedures
  • Subject is able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
  • Subject has clinically diagnosed ulcerative PG with PARACELSUS score greater than or equal to 10
  • Subject has at least one clinically measurable ulcerative PG lesion on body that has failed to respond to at least one prior therapy such as (but not limited to) topical , intralesional triamcinolone, prednisone, cyclosporine, IL-23 inhibitor, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-1 inhibitors, or TNF-α- blocker therapy
  • Subject has moderate to severe PG as determined by a GPG severity score of ≥3
  • Subject is judged to be in otherwise good overall health as judged by the investigator, based on medical history, limited physical examination, and laboratory testing. (NOTE: The definition of good health means a subject does not have uncontrolled significant co-morbid conditions).
  • Females of (FCBP) must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and Baseline. While on product and for at least 28 days after taking the last dose of investigational product, FCBP who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use one of the approved options described below:

    • Option 1: Any one of the following highly effective contraceptive methods: hormonal contraception (oral, injection, implant, transdermal patch, vaginal ring); intrauterine device (IUD); tubal ligation; or partner's vasectomy.
    • Or option 2: Male or female condom (latex condom or nonlatex condom NOT made out of natural [animal] membrane [for example, polyurethane]). PLUS one additional barrier method:

      • (a) diaphragm with spermicide
      • (b) cervical cap with spermicide;
      • or (c) contraceptive sponge with spermicide.

The female subject's chosen form of contraception must be effective by the time the female subject presents for her Baseline visit (for example, hormonal contraception should be initiated at least 28 days before first spesolimab infusion at Baseline).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a persistent or recurring bacterial infection requiring systemic antibiotics, or viral or fungal or helminth parasitic infections, within 2 weeks of the Screening Visit. Any treatment of such infections must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit and no new/recurrent infections should have occurred prior to the Baseline Visit.
  • Subject with current or history of positive (HIV), or congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (i.e. Common Variable Immunodeficiency [CVID]), or C, or active or untreated latent tuberculosis.
  • Subject has clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) renal, hepatic, hematologic, intestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, immunologic, or other major uncontrolled diseases that will affect the health of the subject during the study, or interfere with the interpretation of study results. Uncontrolled disease defined as hospitalization within 1 month of screening visit or determined by specialist (rheumatologist, gastroenterologist) consulted prior to study start.
  • Subject has presence of acute demyelinating neuropathy
  • Major surgery (according to the investigator's assessment) performed within 12 weeks prior to receiving first dose of spesolimab or planned during trial such as hip replacement, aneurysm removal, stomach ligation, or otherwise determined by investigator
  • Subject has a suspected or active lymphoproliferative disorder or
  • Subject was treated previously with spesolimab or another IL-36R inhibitor biologic
  • Any documented active or suspected malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to screening, except appropriately treatment basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of uterine cervix.
  • Subject has received a ≤ 30 days prior to study initiation.
  • History of adverse systemic or allergic reactions to any component of the study drug.
  • Female subject who is pregnant or breast feeding
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Spesolimab

    900 mg of spesolimab intravenously (IV)

    Drug: Spesolimab

Interventions

  • 900 mg of spesolimab intravenously (IV) administered every 4 weeks at Visits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. If at visit 4 dosing schedule changes to every 3 weeks, Spesolimab will be administered at Visits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Global Pyoderma Gangrenosum (GPG) Severity Score

    Change in GPG severity score at week 16 from baseline in target lesion 0\. Completely clear; evidence of cribriform scarring, re-epithelization and possible residual hyperpigmentation. 0% ulceration apparent, lesion is dry. 1. Almost clear; \<25% of active ulceration present; \> 90% granulation tissue present with mild pink, slightly elevated borders. Some evidence of re-epithelization. Minimal to no purulent drainage at presentation; 2. Mild; \<50% of active ulceration with perceptible border elevation with mild red border. Evidence of granulation tissue without any re-epithelization of skin. Few drops purulence appreciated upon examination. 3. Moderate; \<75% active ulceration with marked red, rolled borders and significant purulence. Some evidence of granulation tissue with multiple purulent drops and significant purulence on ulcer bed at presentation 4. Severe; 100% active ulcer with violaceous, raised rolled borders. Necrotic tissue may be present.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Lesions With Complete Re-epithelization of PG Lesions

    Number of lesions with Complete re-epithelization of PG lesions = GPG Score 0 GPG Score 0 - Completely clear; evidence of cribriform scarring, re-epithelization and possible residual hyperpigmentation. 0% ulceration apparent and lesion is dry

    Time frame: Up to Week 28

  2. Absolute Change in Patient-reported Pain Severity (Pain-VAS) Score

    Absolute change at Week 28 from baseline in patient-reported pain severity (Pain-VAS). Patient Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): Patients will be asked to report pain scores at each visit. Patients will report scores on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 signifies no pain and 10 signifies the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate increased levels of pain.

    Time frame: Baseline and at Week 28

  3. Absolute Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

    Absolute Change at week 28 from baseline in DLQI. The DLQI is a validated questionnaire consisting of 10 questions that has been used in many randomized controlled trials in dermatology. Scoring of each question is as follows: Very much - 3 A lot - 2 A little - 1 Not at all - 0 Not relevant - 0 Question unanswered - 0 The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question with total scale from 0-30. Higher score represents a quality of life that is more impaired. Definition of DLQI Scores 0-1 = no effect at all on patient's life 2-5 = small effect on patient's life 6-10 = moderate effect on patient's life 11-20 = very large effect on patient's life 21-30 = extremely large effect on patient's life A change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered clinically important. Such change suggests that there has actually been a meaningful change in that patient's quality of life since the previous measurement of his/her/their DLQI scores.

    Time frame: Baseline and at Week 28

  4. Number of Recurrence of PG Lesions (GPG >0) After Achieving Complete Re-epithelialization (GPG Score 0) and Spesolimab Cessation

    GPG Severity Score Scale: 0\. Completely clear; evidence of cribriform scarring, re-epithelization and possible residual hyperpigmentation. 0% ulceration apparent, lesion is dry 1. Almost clear; \<25% of active ulceration present; \> 90% granulation tissue present with mild pink, slightly elevated borders. Some evidence of re-epithelization. Minimal to no purulent drainage at presentation 2. Mild; \<50% of active ulceration with perceptible border elevation with mild red border. Evidence of granulation tissue without any re-epithelization of skin. Few drops purulence appreciated upon exam. 3. Moderate; \<75% active ulceration with marked red, rolled borders and significant purulence. Some evidence of granulation tissue with multiple purulent drops and significant purulence on ulcer bed at presentation 4. Severe; 100% active ulcer with violaceous, raised rolled borders. Necrotic tissue may be present. No evidence of granulation tissue. Extensive purulent drops on ulcer bed

    Time frame: Last dose (Week 26 or 28) up to 16 week post-spesolimab last dose

  5. Number of Lesions With Global Pyoderma Gangrenosum (GPG) Severity Score of 1

    Lesions with GPG score of 1 Scale: 0\. Completely clear; evidence of cribriform scarring, re-epithelization and possible residual hyperpigmentation. 0% ulceration apparent and lesion is dry 1. Almost clear; \<25% of active ulceration present; more than 90% granulation tissue present with mild pink, slightly elevated borders. Some evidence of re-epithelization. Minimal to no purulent drainage at presentation 2. Mild; \<50% of active ulceration with perceptible border elevation with mild red border. Evidence of granulation tissue without any re-epithelization of skin. Few drops purulence appreciated upon examination. 3. Moderate; \<75% active ulceration with marked red, rolled borders and significant purulence. Some evidence of granulation tissue with multiple purulent drops and significant purulence on ulcer bed at presentation 4. Severe; 100% active ulcer with violaceous, raised rolled borders. Necrotic tissue may be present. No evidence of granulation tissue

    Time frame: Last dose (Week 26 or 28) up to 16 week post-spesolimab last dose

07

Results

Posted Mar 31, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSpesolimab
Started5
Completed1
Not completed4
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Global Pyoderma Gangrenosum (GPG) Severity Score

Change in GPG severity score at week 16 from baseline in target lesion 0\. Completely clear; evidence of cribriform scarring, re-epithelization and possible residual hyperpigmentation. 0% ulceration apparent, lesion is dry. 1. Almost clear; \<25% of active ulceration present; \> 90% granulation tissue present with mild pink, slightly elevated borders. Some evidence of re-epithelization. Minimal to no purulent drainage at presentation; 2. Mild; \<50% of active ulceration with perceptible border elevation with mild red border. Evidence of granulation tissue without any re-epithelization of skin. Few drops purulence appreciated upon examination. 3. Moderate; \<75% active ulceration with marked red, rolled borders and significant purulence. Some evidence of granulation tissue with multiple purulent drops and significant purulence on ulcer bed at presentation 4. Severe; 100% active ulcer with violaceous, raised rolled borders. Necrotic tissue may be present.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Global Pyoderma Gangrenosum (GPG) Severity Score
score on a scaleSpesolimab
Change in Global Pyoderma Gangrenosum (GPG) Severity Score-3 ± 2
SecondaryNumber of Lesions With Complete Re-epithelization of PG Lesions

Number of lesions with Complete re-epithelization of PG lesions = GPG Score 0 GPG Score 0 - Completely clear; evidence of cribriform scarring, re-epithelization and possible residual hyperpigmentation. 0% ulceration apparent and lesion is dry

Time frame:
Up to Week 28
Reported as:
Number · lesions
Number of Lesions With Complete Re-epithelization of PG Lesions
lesionsSpesolimab
Number of Lesions With Complete Re-epithelization of PG Lesions3
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Patient-reported Pain Severity (Pain-VAS) Score

Absolute change at Week 28 from baseline in patient-reported pain severity (Pain-VAS). Patient Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): Patients will be asked to report pain scores at each visit. Patients will report scores on a scale of 0 to 10. 0 signifies no pain and 10 signifies the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate increased levels of pain.

Time frame:
Baseline and at Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · absolute change of score on a scale
Absolute Change in Patient-reported Pain Severity (Pain-VAS) Score
absolute change of score on a scaleSpesolimab
Absolute Change in Patient-reported Pain Severity (Pain-VAS) Score-5.33 ± 4.62
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

Absolute Change at week 28 from baseline in DLQI. The DLQI is a validated questionnaire consisting of 10 questions that has been used in many randomized controlled trials in dermatology. Scoring of each question is as follows: Very much - 3 A lot - 2 A little - 1 Not at all - 0 Not relevant - 0 Question unanswered - 0 The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question with total scale from 0-30. Higher score represents a quality of life that is more impaired. Definition of DLQI Scores 0-1 = no effect at all on patient's life 2-5 = small effect on patient's life 6-10 = moderate effect on patient's life 11-20 = very large effect on patient's life 21-30 = extremely large effect on patient's life A change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered clinically important. Such change suggests that there has actually been a meaningful change in that patient's quality of life since the previous measurement of his/her/their DLQI scores.

Time frame:
Baseline and at Week 28
Reported as:
Mean · absolute change in score on a scale
Absolute Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
absolute change in score on a scaleSpesolimab
Absolute Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)-7 ± 4.62
SecondaryNumber of Recurrence of PG Lesions (GPG >0) After Achieving Complete Re-epithelialization (GPG Score 0) and Spesolimab Cessation

GPG Severity Score Scale: 0\. Completely clear; evidence of cribriform scarring, re-epithelization and possible residual hyperpigmentation. 0% ulceration apparent, lesion is dry 1. Almost clear; \<25% of active ulceration present; \> 90% granulation tissue present with mild pink, slightly elevated borders. Some evidence of re-epithelization. Minimal to no purulent drainage at presentation 2. Mild; \<50% of active ulceration with perceptible border elevation with mild red border. Evidence of granulation tissue without any re-epithelization of skin. Few drops purulence appreciated upon exam. 3. Moderate; \<75% active ulceration with marked red, rolled borders and significant purulence. Some evidence of granulation tissue with multiple purulent drops and significant purulence on ulcer bed at presentation 4. Severe; 100% active ulcer with violaceous, raised rolled borders. Necrotic tissue may be present. No evidence of granulation tissue. Extensive purulent drops on ulcer bed

Time frame:
Last dose (Week 26 or 28) up to 16 week post-spesolimab last dose
Reported as:
Number · lesions
Number of Recurrence of PG Lesions (GPG >0) After Achieving Complete Re-epithelialization (GPG Score 0) and Spesolimab Cessation
lesionsSpesolimab
Number of Recurrence of PG Lesions (GPG >0) After Achieving Complete Re-epithelialization (GPG Score 0) and Spesolimab Cessation2
SecondaryNumber of Lesions With Global Pyoderma Gangrenosum (GPG) Severity Score of 1

Lesions with GPG score of 1 Scale: 0\. Completely clear; evidence of cribriform scarring, re-epithelization and possible residual hyperpigmentation. 0% ulceration apparent and lesion is dry 1. Almost clear; \<25% of active ulceration present; more than 90% granulation tissue present with mild pink, slightly elevated borders. Some evidence of re-epithelization. Minimal to no purulent drainage at presentation 2. Mild; \<50% of active ulceration with perceptible border elevation with mild red border. Evidence of granulation tissue without any re-epithelization of skin. Few drops purulence appreciated upon examination. 3. Moderate; \<75% active ulceration with marked red, rolled borders and significant purulence. Some evidence of granulation tissue with multiple purulent drops and significant purulence on ulcer bed at presentation 4. Severe; 100% active ulcer with violaceous, raised rolled borders. Necrotic tissue may be present. No evidence of granulation tissue

Time frame:
Last dose (Week 26 or 28) up to 16 week post-spesolimab last dose
Reported as:
Number · lesions
Number of Lesions With Global Pyoderma Gangrenosum (GPG) Severity Score of 1
lesionsSpesolimab
Number of Lesions With Global Pyoderma Gangrenosum (GPG) Severity Score of 12

Adverse events

Collected over Last dose (Week 26 or 28), up to 1 weeks post-spesolimab last dose. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Spesolimab0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)2/3 (66.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSpesolimab
Worsening Pyoderma Gangrosum (PG)Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/3
Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)Blood and lymphatic system disorders1/3
HyperlipidemiaGeneral disorders1/3
Corneal AbrasionEye disorders1/3
HypertensionGeneral disorders1/3
Intermittent Leg SwellingBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/3

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Spesolimab
Mean54 ± 12
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Spesolimab
Female4
Male1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Spesolimab
Hispanic or Latino2
Not Hispanic or Latino3
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Spesolimab
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White4
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be analyzed as aggregated data.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2023 to primary completion in Jan 2025, 15 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2026, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 16, 2023
First posted
Oct 23, 2023
StartActual
Sep 23, 2023
Primary completionActual
Jan 14, 2025
CompletionActual
Jan 14, 2025
Results first posted
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
Mar 31, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06092216
Responsible party
Saakshi Khattri (Associate Professor, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2023
Start date
Sep 23, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 14, 2025
Completion
Jan 14, 2025
Results posted
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Study contacts

Saakshi Khattri, MD
principal investigator · Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Spesolimab

Start the discussion