ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT06076785ODYSSEYUpdated Nov 7, 2023

Impact of ODYSight in the Management of patientS With imparairEd Visual acuitY

An observational study in Impaired Visual Acuity, sponsored by Tilak Healthcare. Status unknown at 8 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-07.

Sponsored by Tilak Healthcare · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2023), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Previous investigations have demonstrated the agreement between OdySight® and standardised methods in the evaluation of near visual acuity. The app allows for remote monitoring of this parameter with tracking changes. In case of decrease in visual acuity, a notification is sent to both patient and ophthalmologist. The aim of this study is to evaluate the medical relevance of OdySight® features in the management of patients suffering from impaired visual acuity.

Read the detailed description

Near or distance vision impairment is affecting more and more patients each year and the prevalence is about 2.2 billion people around the world. It has been estimated that in almost half of the cases, the vision impairment has not yet been addressed or could have been prevented. The most important causes of vision impairment are:

  • Age-related macular degeneration (AMD),
  • Cataract,
  • Diabetic retinopathy,
  • Glaucoma,
  • Uncorrected refracted errors. Among the strategies setup to address vision impairment, preventive care and follow-up treatment and recurrent vision monitoring are the most performant. Standard clinical care requiring patient to physically attend can be a burden for an effective care.

Remote monitoring of visual acuity and follow-up of patients suffering from visual impairment using home-based solutions have known a great outbreak in the las few years. The use of smartphones and tablets supporting applications developed to monitor and evaluate patient's vision has considerably evolved. Moreover, the recent COVID-19 pandemic underlined the need to develop qualified remote care systems to enhance healthcare access.

In the last decade, several tools were developed in the field of ophthalmology for visual function self assessment. The Visual Acuity (VA) testing is the most performed ophthalmologic examination to evaluate patient's potential visual impairment and can be tested either classically with letters optotype charts and projection systems or more recently with the help of digital tools. These tools allow patients to evaluate their VA using applications designed for smartphones, tablets, or computers.

In the standard clinical practice, the VA testing is mostly performed using a Snellen chart (black letters and optotypes of different sizes printed on a white chart), developed in 1862. This tool has been progressively improved, notably with the development of ETDRS charts, considered more accurate and that are thus used in research. These tools required the patient to physically attend the clinical examination, which is sometimes difficult to achieve considering patient mobility issues (age, disability, lack of transportation…), the lack of clinical practices in some areas, or other reasons.

Digital VA testing tools are an interesting alternative to the standard tests performed in clinic.

Nevertheless, their development implies a clinical validation research and certification, to be used for patient ophthalmic care.

Several studies have proved the reliability of digital systems for VA measurement, in remotely operated systems. In 2012, the equivalence of VA measurement using a computer-based logarithmic (logMAR) chart with the standard examination in the physical presence of an optometrist was shown. There was no statistically significant difference between the median VA measurement assessed by the two methods (physical optometrist or remote computer-based system).

The feasibility and the accuracy of a smartphone-based method for VA testing has been addressed in 2014, in the context of Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing, using the SightBookTM application. The results of the study evidenced test-retest high reliability and concordance with EDTRS distance VA testing and standard near vision testing.

More recently, VA testing methods have been compared using standard ETDRS chart, near chart and a smartphone-based eye chart application. The study concludes in favour of an equivalent efficiency of the three methods, suggesting a potential interest for remote VA-testing especially when standard clinical examination is not possible or difficult.

Another study, evaluating a smartphone-based VA testing (logMAR) reliability for test-retest compared to standard care showed promising results for remote healthcare and accessibility.

Interestingly, remote VA testing has been shown to be efficient in both adults and children.

The COVID-19 pandemic challenged standard ophthalmologic practice and revealed an acute need of remote healthcare access that emphasizes the development of more efficient tools for VA monitoring and clinical visit scheduling when required.

OdySight® is a medical application intended for patients 18 years of age and older for self-evaluation of visual parameters: near visual acuity and symptoms such as metamorphopsia and scotoma. The test results are sent to the doctor.

OdySight® does not provide any interpretation of the test results and is not intended to provide a diagnosis. OdySight® helps patients to determine whether they need to consult a doctor for diagnosis and treatment.

Three clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate the Odysight® application efficiency compared to standard ophthalmologic care.

In 2019, a prospective, open-labelled, single-arm, single-site study has been performed to compare the results of gold standard VA testing (Sloan ETDRS letter chart for near and distance vision testing), contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart), and metamorphopsia/scotoma (Amster Grid). The analysis showed a concordance between the results obtained with the OdySight® VA module and the Sloan ETDRS (near and distance). No significant difference has been shown between the OdySight® Amsler Grid module and standard metamorphopsia/scotoma testing. On the other hand, a broader disagreement has been pointed out for the evaluation of contrast sensitivity between the standard Pelli-Robson test and the OdySight® module, which would require more investigation.

The overall results are in favour of using the OdySight® application for remote monitoring of vision between clinic visits and potential assistance for follow-up scheduling.

In 2021, the implementation and clinical efficacy of the OdySight® application was evaluated in a study involving patients (n=60) with oedematous maculopathies receiving standard care. Patients were offered to use OdySight® to self-evaluate changes in their VA. The use of the application and the processing of notifications for VA decrease by the clinical team was analysed for one year to assess the feasibility and the reliability of the system. In all, about 60% of the patients completed at least one test following the prescription and almost 25% of the patients were still using the application after one month. During this trial, 19 notifications for VA decrease were processed by the clinical team in an average of less than 6 days. The decrease in VA was detected with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 99%.

An observational, retrospective, multicentric study, published in 2022, was conducted to evaluate the additional value of using the OdySight® application in addition to a standard follow-up for the detection of exudatives recurrences in patients suffering from macular oedema. In all, 123 patients (149 eyes) were included in the study. The sensitivity of the alerts for the detection of recurrences was around 30%, and the specificity reached 84%. In total, 12 alerts on 39 detected a recurrence and 8 of them resulted in rescheduling or advancement of intravitreal injection. Although the sensitivity and the specificity appear to be a bit low, exudatives recurrences not being necessarily associated to a decrease in VA, the results of the study confirm that OdySight® use can be of interest in the detection of recurrence in advance and allow an anticipated readjustment of the treatment in addition with a standard care follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Impaired Visual Acuity
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tilak Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Subjects with a near visual acuity between 0.0 and 1.0 logMAR in at least one eye, and binocular VA equal to or better than 0.5 logMAR are targeted for this study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • OdySight® user (between 07/21/2021 and 11/14/2022),
  • Performed at least 3 tests on the same eye (minimum number of tests to trigger an alert).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opposition to personal data collection and processing,
  • Patient's death is documented.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • OdySight users

    OdySight users between 07/21/2021 and 11/14/2022 who performed Visual Acuity testing through OdySight and according to standard practice.

    Device: OdySight

Interventions

  • DeviceOdySight

    At home measurements of visual acuity through a mobile app.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Impact of OdySight® in the management of patients suffering from impaired visual acuity.

    Number of patients concerned by one or more OdySight® notification(s) for visual acuity decrease followed by a visit where at least one of the following situations is noticed: * Visual acuity decrease * Anatomic ophthalmic deterioration * Prescription impact * Second eye newly affected and/or development of the pathology to the second eye

    Time frame: At least 3 months of follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Performances of OdySight® in tracking visual acuity decrease and/or anatomic change.

    Sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predicted Value and Negative Predicted Value of OdySight® in tracking visual acuity decrease and/or anatomic change with subgroups analysis.

    Time frame: At least 3 months of follow-up.

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Centre Ophtalmologique Oculus
    Chambéry, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 73000, France
  • Centre Ophtalmologique Rabelais
    Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 69002, France
  • SELARL Dr Boulet
    Évreux, Normandy 27000, France
  • Clinique Mathilde
    Rouen, Normandy 76000, France
  • Clinique Honoré Cave
    Montauban, Occitanie 82000, France
  • Institut Ophtalmologique de l'Ouest Jules Verne
    Nantes, Pays de la Loire Region 44300, France
  • Institut ophtalmologique Sourdille Atlantique
    Saint-Herblain, Pays de la Loire Region 44800, France
  • Hôpital des XV-XX
    Paris, Île-de-France Region 75012, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. Epub 2020 Dec 1. PubMed 33275949 ↗
  • Claessens JLJ, Geuvers JR, Imhof SM, Wisse RPL. Digital Tools for the Self-Assessment of Visual Acuity: A Systematic Review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(4):715-730. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00360-3. Epub 2021 Jun 25. PubMed 34169468 ↗
  • Srinivasan K, Ramesh SV, Babu N, Sanker N, Ray A, Karuna SM. Efficacy of a remote based computerised visual acuity measurement. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;96(7):987-90. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301751. Epub 2012 Apr 26. PubMed 22539747 ↗
  • Yeung WK, Dawes P, Pye A, Neil M, Aslam T, Dickinson C, Leroi I. eHealth tools for the self-testing of visual acuity: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Aug 22;2:82. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0154-5. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31453377 ↗
  • Williams AM, Kalra G, Commiskey PW, Bowers EMR, Rudolph BR, Pitcher MD, Dansingani KK, Jhanji V, Nischal KK, Sahel JA, Waxman EL, Fu R. Ophthalmology Practice During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: The University of Pittsburgh Experience in Promoting Clinic Safety and Embracing Video Visits. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Sep;9(3):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00255-9. Epub 2020 May 6. PubMed 32377502 ↗
  • Tiraset N, Poonyathalang A, Padungkiatsagul T, Deeyai M, Vichitkunakorn P, Vanikieti K. Comparison of Visual Acuity Measurement Using Three Methods: Standard ETDRS Chart, Near Chart and a Smartphone-Based Eye Chart Application. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 26;15:859-869. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S304272. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33664563 ↗
  • Miller JM, Jang HS, Ramesh D, Gonzalez Marshall MS, Yescas S, Harvey EM. Telemedicine distance and near visual acuity tests for adults and children. J AAPOS. 2020 Aug;24(4):235-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jul 30. PubMed 32739362 ↗
  • Iskander M, Hu G, Sood S, Heilenbach N, Sanchez V, Ogunsola T, Chen D, Elgin C, Patel V, Wronka A, Al-Aswad LA. Validation of the New York University Langone Eye Test Application, a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test. Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Jun 15;2(3):100182. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100182. eCollection 2022 Sep. PubMed 36245756 ↗
  • Kielwasser G, Kodjikian L, Dot C, Burillon C, Denis P, Mathis T. Real-Life Value of the Odysight(R) Application in At-Home Screening for Exudative Recurrence of Macular Edema. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 26;11(17):5010. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175010. PubMed 36078941 ↗
  • Guigou S, Michel T, Merite PY, Coupier L, Meyer F. Home vision monitoring in patients with maculopathy: Real-life study of the OdySight application. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021 Jun;44(6):873-881. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.09.034. Epub 2021 May 20. PubMed 34024655 ↗
  • Brucker J, Bhatia V, Sahel JA, Girmens JF, Mohand-Said S. Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring-A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019 Sep;8(3):461-476. doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-0203-9. Epub 2019 Jul 25. PubMed 31346977 ↗
  • Allen L, Thirunavukarasu AJ, Podgorski S, Mullinger D. Novel web application for self-assessment of distance visual acuity to support remote consultation: a real-world validation study in children. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 30;6(1):e000801. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000801. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34651083 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06076785
Lead sponsor
Tilak Healthcare
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 11, 2023
Start date
Jan 27, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 7, 2023

Study contacts

Bénédicte BROUSSEAU, MD
principal investigator · Centre Ophtalmologique Ophtalliance
Maddalena QUARANTA, MD
principal investigator · Centre Ophtalmologique Rabelais
Vincent GUALINO, MD
principal investigator · Clinique Honoré Cave
Jean-François GIRMENS, MD
principal investigator · Hopital des XV-XX
Isabelle FOURNIER, MD
principal investigator · Institut ophtalmologique Sourdille Atlantique
Marie-Noëlle GUILLEMOT, MD
principal investigator · Institut ophtalmologique Sourdille Atlantique
Jean-François BOULET, MD
principal investigator · Cabinet d'ophtalmologie
Pierre-Olivier LAFONTAINE, MD
principal investigator · Centre Ophtalmologique Oculus
Joël UZZAN, MD
principal investigator · Clinique Mathilde
Viviane VINH, MD
principal investigator · Centre d'Ophtalmologie du Dauphiné

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion