CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06072027VISIOCYT2Updated Mar 19, 2026

Evaluation of VISIOCYT Bladder Cytology in Real Life

An observational study in Bladder Cancer, sponsored by Institut Paoli-Calmettes. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-19.

Sponsored by Institut Paoli-Calmettes · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
701
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will be offered to all consecutive patients undergoing scheduled cystoscopy at the Hospitalisation De Jour (HDJ) Chirurgicale, either as part of a diagnostic approach in the event of suspected bladder tumor (exploration of macroscopic hematuria in particular), or as part of the follow-up of a bladder tumor, according to current recommendations (French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: bladder cancer).

Once non-opposition has been obtained, clinical data at the time of inclusion will be collected and pseudonymized. Urine is collected prior to cystoscopy, on voided urine, for a minimum sufficient quantity of 50 ml. The urine sample is then separated into transport jars, one of which is used for standard cytological analysis, the other for VISIOCYT cytology (sent to a laboratory platform).

In the event of a tumor or suspicious lesion detected at the cystoscopy, a trans-urethral bladder resection (TURB) will be scheduled. Anatomopathological data from this RTUV will also be collected for comparative analysis to establish the diagnostic performance of the test.

The tests performed (apart from the urine sample) are part of the usual care pathway. No additional visits will be specifically requested by the protocol. Data from examinations carried out as part of standard pathology management, or suspected pathology, will be used for this research.

At the same time, prospective questionnaires on patients' preferences with regard to the various diagnostic examinations for bladder tumours (discrete choice analysis) will be given to patients and completed at the time of cystoscopy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Cancer
03

In context

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

1,616 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 421 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 701 is above the median of 180 across 374 observational studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.

Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut Paoli-Calmettes is the lead sponsor of 168 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient to undergo cystoscopy for diagnosis (suspected bladder tumor) or follow-up of bladder tumor

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient over 18 years of age,
  • Signed consent to participate,
  • Affiliation with a social security scheme, or beneficiary of such a scheme,
  • Patient to undergo cystoscopy for diagnosis (suspected bladder tumor) or follow-up of bladder tumor

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients managed or followed up for a bladder tumor of non-urothelial histology,
  • Renal transplant patients,
  • Patient having received pelvic radiotherapy,
  • Pregnant or potentially pregnant women (of childbearing age, without effective contraception) or nursing mothers,
  • Person in an emergency situation, adult under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice), or unable to express consent,
  • Inability to undergo medical follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
701 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. negative predictive value

    negative predictive value of the VisioCyt® Bladder test. The second primary endpoint was the sensitivity of the VisioCyt® Bladder test.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance - VisioCyt® Bladder test

    Diagnostic performance of different algorithmic versions (V1 Versus V2) of the VisioCyt® Bladder ® test (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value)

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Diagnostic performance - standard cytology

    Diagnostic performance of standard cytology (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value)

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Diagnostic performance of cystoscopy

    Diagnostic performance of cystoscopy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value)

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Patient preference

    Patient preference for different diagnostic tests (discrete choices)

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institut Paoli-Calmettes
    Marseille, 13009, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06072027
Lead sponsor
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 10, 2023
Start date
Nov 8, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 4, 2025
Completion
Aug 4, 2025
Last update
Mar 19, 2026

Study contacts

Jihane PAKRADOUNI, PharmD
study director · Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion