ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06056635Updated Sep 25, 2024

A Prospective Study on the Role of Karl Storz Curved and Straight Fetoscopes (11508AAK and 11506AAK) for Fetoscopic Intrauterine Procedures

An interventional study of Karl Storz Curved Scope and Karl Storz Straight Scope in Fetal Conditions, Maternal; Procedure and Pregnancy Related, sponsored by Boston Children's Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-25.

Sponsored by Boston Children's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

In this research study, the investigators want to learn more about the role of new innovative surgical devices, the Karl Storz Curved and Straight Fetoscopes for in-utero surgery. A fetoscope is like a small telescope that can see inside of the uterus (womb) during minimally invasive surgery. The curved scope is used for patients with an anterior placenta (front of uterus), while the straight scope is used for patients with a posterior placenta (back of uterus). The scopes will be used to assist in procedures involving fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP), which is a minimally invasive surgery that uses a small camera (fetoscope) to locate abnormal blood vessel connections in the placenta and seal them off using laser energy. These fetoscopes will be utilized in the diagnosis and management of various fetal conditions that can arise during pregnancy. Outcome data will be reported in a descriptive statistical analysis. The investigators will assess the surgical outcomes, short and long-term morbidity, complications, and gestational age of participants in order to evaluate the benefit of using these devices.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefit of Karl Storz curved (11508AAK) and straight (11506AAK) fetoscopes for in-utero surgery. The investigators will assess the surgical outcomes, short and long-term morbidity, complications, and gestational age of participants who undergo intrauterine procedures with these devices. The scopes will be used to assist in intrauterine procedures across a variety of fetal conditions, such as TTTS (twin-twin transfusion syndrome), TAPS (twin anemia polycythemia sequence), sFGR (selective fetal growth restriction) or TRAP sequence (twin reversed arterial perfusion). Fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP) can also be used during in-utero surgery to correct abnormal vessels in cases like chorioangioma or vasa previa. Other complex congenital anomalies may require fetal intervention or diagnostic fetoscopy using Storz scopes.

Improvements in the technique, experience and equipment have been associated with better maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes in fetal surgery. Smaller fetoscopes are associated with lower rates of premature delivery following FLP. New fetoscopes (11508AAK and 11506AAK) have the potential to improve visualization and the photocoagulation angle. Compared to alternative scopes, these Storz scopes provide a wider angle of view and are longer, enabling better reach to distant areas at the edge of the placenta, especially in cases of higher BMI, higher gestational age, and significant polyhydramnios.

This study is an un-blinded, non-randomized, single arm, feasibility study on a convenience cohort to demonstrate the role of a curved fetoscope device (11508AAK) or straight fetoscope device (11506AAK) among in-utero surgeries. Patients will be enrolled in a consecutive manner and all qualifying, patients who agreed to the use of the curved or straight fetoscopes will be enrolled in the study. Outcome data will be reported as a descriptive statistical analysis. The curved fetoscope (11508AAK) device will be used in monochorionic pregnancies with an anterior placenta requiring in-utero surgery, while the straight fetoscope (11506AAK) will be used in monochorionic pregnancies with a posterior placenta. This device is classified as a significant risk device because it is of substantial importance in diagnosing, curing, mitigating, or treating disease, or otherwise preventing impairment of human health and presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fetal Conditions
  • Maternal; Procedure
  • Pregnancy Related
  • Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome
  • In Utero Procedure Affecting Fetus or Newborn
  • Chorion; Abnormal
  • Twin Reversal Arterial Perfusion Syndrome
  • Twin Monochorionic Monoamniotic Placenta
  • Chorioangioma
  • Vasa Previa

Keywords

  • Fetoscope
  • Fetoscopic Laser Ablation
  • Diagnostic Fetoscopy
03

In context

Fetofetal Transfusion

47 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetofetal Transfusion; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 128 across 32 interventional studies indexed under Fetofetal Transfusion.

Browse Fetofetal Transfusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 608 studies on the registry; 147 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (59%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant patient with a condition requiring in-utero surgery
  • Patient must be eligible for anesthesia
  • Patient and father of the fetus (if available) are able to provide signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or previous adverse reaction to any ancillary medication specified in this protocol that has no alternative
  • Preterm labor, preeclampsia, or uterine anomaly (e.g., large fibroid tumor) in the index pregnancy
  • Suspicion of major recognized congenital syndrome on ultrasound or MRI that is not compatible with postnatal life
  • Pre-pregnancy maternal greater than 40
  • High risk for fetal hemophilia
  • Fetal aneuploidy or variants of known significance if an amniocentesis was performed
  • to abdominal surgery or fetoscopic surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Karl Storz Curved or Straight Scope

    A Karl Storz Curved (11508AAK) or Straight (11506AAK) Fetoscope will be used to provide visualization during in-utero (in the womb) diagnostic and interventional procedures. The curved scope will be used in patients with a placenta that sits at the front of their uterus. The straight scope will be used in patients with a placenta that sits at the back of their uterus.

    Device: Karl Storz Curved Scope · Device: Karl Storz Straight Scope

Interventions

  • DeviceKarl Storz Curved Scope

    The curved fetoscope (11508AAK) will be used to view target areas during in-utero procedures for patients with a placenta that sits at the front of the uterus. There are various fetal conditions that may require use of a fetoscope during minimally invasive surgery. These include the need to seal vessels in order to stop blood flow going in a specific direction during pregnancy, abnormal vessels that may need to be sealed, or to break down scar tissue, extra tissue attachments, or blockages.

  • DeviceKarl Storz Straight Scope

    The straight fetoscope (11506AAK) will be used to view target areas during in-utero procedures for patients with a placenta that sits at the back of the uterus. There are various fetal conditions that may require use of a fetoscope during minimally invasive surgery. These include the need to seal vessels in order to stop blood flow going in a specific direction during pregnancy, abnormal vessels that may need to be sealed, or to break down scar tissue, extra tissue attachments, or blockages.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of completed fetoscopic procedures

    The rate of successfully completed intrauterine procedures (out of 50 total) using the Karl Storz Curved (11508AAK) or Straight (11506AAk) Fetoscope will be measured.

    Time frame: 3 years from study start date

  2. Fetal survival at birth

    The number of fetuses who undergo an intrauterine fetoscopic procedure using these devices and survive at birth will be analyzed.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches birth. Likely to be a bit more than 3 years from study start date.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Successful visualization of all targeted vessels

    The rate of procedures with these fetoscopes in which there is successful visualization of the targeted vessels will be studied. This measure will be at the discretion of the performing surgeon.

    Time frame: 3 years from study start date

  2. Successful coagulation of all targeted vessels

    The rate of procedures with these fetoscopes in which there is successful coagulation of the targeted vessels will be studied. This measure will be at the discretion of the performing surgeon.

    Time frame: 3 years from study start date

  3. The rate of preterm labor

    The rate of preterm labor following a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  4. The rate of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)

    The rate of PPROM following a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  5. The rate of placental abruption

    The rate of placental abruption following a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  6. The rate of choriamniotic separation (CAS)

    The rate of CAS following a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  7. The rate of iatrogenic septostomy

    The rate of iatrogenic septostomy following a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  8. The rate of completed Solomonizations

    The rate of completed Solomonizations (if clinically elected to be performed) during a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: 3 years from study start date

  9. The rate of any perioperative complications (within 24 hours post-procedure)

    The rate of any perioperative complications following a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the last (50th) procedure using these fetoscopes. This will be a bit more than 3 years from study start date.

  10. Fetal survival 48 hours post-procedure

    The rate of fetal survival at 48 hours following a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the last (50th) procedure using these fetoscopes. This will be a bit more than 3 years from study start date.

  11. Rate of TAPS

    In cases of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR), the rate in which twin-anemia-polycythemia (TAPS) was observed following a procedure using these fetoscopes.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  12. Recurrence of TTTS

    In cases of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), the rate in which TTTS recurred following a procedure using these fetoscopes.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  13. Neonatal survival 30 days after birth

    The rate of neonatal survival at 30 days of life following a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches 30 days post-birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  14. Short term need for ECMO

    The rate of ECMO initiation during the first 30 days of life following a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches 30 days post-birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  15. Short term morbidity

    The rate of short term morbidity during the first 30 days of life following a procedure using these fetoscopes will be analyzed. Short-term morbidity includes neurological problems, gastrointestinal problems, respiratory problems, infections, and other problems associated with prematurity including but not limited to: necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches 30 days post-birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  16. Gestational age at delivery

    Gestational age at delivery will be analyzed for study participants who undergo a procedure using these fetoscopes.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  17. Time from procedure to delivery

    Number of days from procedure to delivery will be analyzed for study participants who undergo a procedure using these fetoscopes.

    Time frame: When the last (50th) study participant reaches birth. This is likely to be a bit longer than 3 years from study start date.

  18. Length of procedure

    The length of time (in minutes) of the procedures using these fetoscopes will be analyzed.

    Time frame: 3 years from study start date

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Petersen SG, Gibbons KS, Luks FI, Lewi L, Diemert A, Hecher K, Dickinson JE, Stirnemann JJ, Ville Y, Devlieger R, Gardener G, Deprest JA. The Impact of Entry Technique and Access Diameter on Prelabour Rupture of Membranes Following Primary Fetoscopic Laser Treatment for Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;40(2):100-9. doi: 10.1159/000441915. Epub 2016 Apr 14. PubMed 27073886 ↗
  • Papanna R, Block-Abraham D, Mann LK, Buhimschi IA, Bebbington M, Garcia E, Kahlek N, Harman C, Johnson A, Baschat A, Moise KJ Jr. Risk factors associated with preterm delivery after fetoscopic laser ablation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;43(1):48-53. doi: 10.1002/uog.13206. PubMed 24013922 ↗
  • Diehl W, Diemert A, Grasso D, Sehner S, Wegscheider K, Hecher K. Fetoscopic laser coagulation in 1020 pregnancies with twin-twin transfusion syndrome demonstrates improvement in double-twin survival rate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;50(6):728-735. doi: 10.1002/uog.17520. PubMed 28477345 ↗
  • Senat MV, Deprest J, Boulvain M, Paupe A, Winer N, Ville Y. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 8;351(2):136-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032597. Epub 2004 Jul 6. PubMed 15238624 ↗
  • Deprest JA, Van Schoubroeck D, Van Ballaer PP, Flageole H, Van Assche FA, Vandenberghe K. Alternative technique for Nd: YAG laser coagulation in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome with anterior placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May;11(5):347-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11050347.x. PubMed 9644775 ↗
  • Middeldorp JM, Lopriore E, Sueters M, Klumper FJ, Kanhai HH, Vandenbussche FP, Oepkes D. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome after 26 weeks of gestation: is there a role for fetoscopic laser surgery? BJOG. 2007 Jun;114(6):694-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01337.x. PubMed 17516960 ↗
  • Shamshirsaz AA, Javadian P, Ruano R, Haeri S, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Lee TC, Molohon J, Cass DL, Salmanian B, Mollett L, Moaddab A, Espinosa J, Olutoye OO, Belfort MA. Comparison between laparoscopically assisted and standard fetoscopic laser ablation in patients with anterior and posterior placentation in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a single center study. Prenat Diagn. 2015 Apr;35(4):376-81. doi: 10.1002/pd.4552. Epub 2015 Mar 1. PubMed 25559783 ↗
  • Krispin E, Nassr AA, Espinoza J, Donepudi R, Sun RC, Sanz-Cortes M, Mostafaei S, Belfort MA, Shamshirsaz AA. Outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: An established alternative for inaccessible anterior placenta. Prenat Diagn. 2021 Nov;41(12):1582-1588. doi: 10.1002/pd.5955. Epub 2021 Oct 17. PubMed 34658043 ↗
  • Jarboe MD, Berman DR, Wright T, Treadwell MC, Mychaliska GB. Novel Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasound for Fetoscopic Laser Ablation in Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome with Complete Anterior Placenta. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;41(1):71-75. doi: 10.1159/000439526. Epub 2015 Nov 11. PubMed 26555815 ↗
  • Quintero RA, Chmait RH, Bornick PW, Kontopoulos EV. Trocar-assisted selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels: a technique for the laser treatment of patients with twin-twin transfusion syndrome with inaccessible anterior placentas. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Apr;23(4):330-4. doi: 10.3109/14767050903177177. PubMed 19941443 ↗
  • Quintero RA, Bornick PW, Allen MH, Johson PK. Selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels in severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome in women with an anterior placenta. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Mar;97(3):477-81. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01172-8. PubMed 11256383 ↗
  • Huber A, Baschat AA, Bregenzer T, Diemert A, Tchirikov M, Hackeloer BJ, Hecher K. Laser coagulation of placental anastomoses with a 30 degrees fetoscope in severe mid-trimester twin-twin transfusion syndrome with anterior placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;31(4):412-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.5283. PubMed 18330890 ↗
  • Van Der Veeken L, Couck I, Van Der Merwe J, De Catte L, Devlieger R, Deprest J, Lewi L. Laser for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a guide for endoscopic surgeons. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019 Sep;11(3):197-205. PubMed 32082525 ↗
  • Tollenaar LSA, Slaghekke F, Lewi L, Colmant C, Lanna M, Weingertner AS, Ryan G, Arevalo S, Klaritsch P, Tavares de Sousa M, Khalil A, Papanna R, Gardener GJ, Bevilacqua E, Kostyukov KV, Bahtiyar MO, Kilby MD, Tiblad E, Oepkes D, Lopriore E. Spontaneous twin anemia polycythemia sequence: diagnosis, management, and outcome in an international cohort of 249 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;224(2):213.e1-213.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.041. Epub 2020 Jul 27. PubMed 32730900 ↗
  • Tollenaar LSA, Lopriore E, Faiola S, Lanna M, Stirnemann J, Ville Y, Lewi L, Devlieger R, Weingertner AS, Favre R, Hobson SR, Ryan G, Rodo C, Arevalo S, Klaritsch P, Greimel P, Hecher K, de Sousa MT, Khalil A, Thilaganathan B, Bergh EP, Papanna R, Gardener GJ, Carlin A, Bevilacqua E, Sakalo VA, Kostyukov KV, Bahtiyar MO, Wilpers A, Kilby MD, Tiblad E, Oepkes D, Middeldorp JM, Haak MC, Klumper FJCM, Akkermans J, Slaghekke F. Post-Laser Twin Anemia Polycythemia Sequence: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcome in an International Cohort of 164 Cases. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 5;9(6):1759. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061759. PubMed 32517071 ↗
  • Tollenaar LSA, Slaghekke F, Lewi L, Ville Y, Lanna M, Weingertner A, Ryan G, Arevalo S, Khalil A, Brock CO, Klaritsch P, Hecher K, Gardener G, Bevilacqua E, Kostyukov KV, Bahtiyar MO, Kilby MD, Tiblad E, Oepkes D, Lopriore E; Collaborators. Treatment and outcome of 370 cases with spontaneous or post-laser twin anemia-polycythemia sequence managed in 17 fetal therapy centers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;56(3):378-387. doi: 10.1002/uog.22042. PubMed 32291846 ↗
  • Gratacos E, Lewi L, Munoz B, Acosta-Rojas R, Hernandez-Andrade E, Martinez JM, Carreras E, Deprest J. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;30(1):28-34. doi: 10.1002/uog.4046. PubMed 17542039 ↗
  • Zhao D, Lipa M, Wielgos M, Cohen D, Middeldorp JM, Oepkes D, Lopriore E. Comparison Between Monochorionic and Dichorionic Placentas With Special Attention to Vascular Anastomoses and Placental Share. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016 Jun;19(3):191-6. doi: 10.1017/thg.2016.19. Epub 2016 Apr 12. PubMed 27068823 ↗
  • Zhao DP, de Villiers SF, Slaghekke F, Walther FJ, Middeldorp JM, Oepkes D, Lopriore E. Prevalence, size, number and localization of vascular anastomoses in monochorionic placentas. Placenta. 2013 Jul;34(7):589-93. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Apr 29. PubMed 23639577 ↗
  • Mendez-Figueroa H, Papanna R, Popek EJ, Byrd RH, Goldaber K, Moise KJ Jr, Johnson A. Endoscopic laser coagulation following amnioreduction for the management of a large placental chorioangioma. Prenat Diagn. 2009 Dec;29(13):1277-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.2400. No abstract available. PubMed 19918962 ↗
  • Jones K, Tierney K, Grubbs BH, Pruetz JD, Detterich J, Chmait RH. Fetoscopic laser photocoagulation of feeding vessels to a large placental chorioangioma following fetal deterioration after amnioreduction. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;31(3):191-5. doi: 10.1159/000331944. Epub 2011 Nov 12. PubMed 22086270 ↗
  • Al Wattar BH, Hillman SC, Marton T, Foster K, Kilby MD. Placenta chorioangioma: a rare case and systematic review of literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Jul;27(10):1055-63. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.847424. Epub 2013 Oct 17. PubMed 24460422 ↗
  • Melcer Y, Maymon R, Jauniaux E. Vasa previa: prenatal diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;30(6):385-391. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000478. PubMed 30102606 ↗
  • Chmait RH, Catanzarite V, Chon AH, Korst LM, Llanes A, Ouzounian JG. Fetoscopic Laser Ablation Therapy for Type II Vasa Previa. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47(9):682-688. doi: 10.1159/000508044. Epub 2020 Jul 6. PubMed 32629451 ↗
  • Hosseinzadeh P, Shamshirsaz AA, Cass DL, Espinoza J, Lee W, Salmanian B, Ruano R, Belfort MA. Fetoscopic laser ablation of vasa previa in pregnancy complicated by giant fetal cervical lymphatic malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):507-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.14796. No abstract available. PubMed 25612246 ↗
  • Quintero RA, Kontopoulos EV, Bornick PW, Allen MH. In utero laser treatment of type II vasa previa. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Dec;20(12):847-51. doi: 10.1080/14767050701731605. PubMed 18050017 ↗
  • Van Mieghem T, Al-Ibrahim A, Deprest J, Lewi L, Langer JC, Baud D, O'Brien K, Beecroft R, Chaturvedi R, Jaeggi E, Fish J, Ryan G. Minimally invasive therapy for fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma: case series and systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;43(6):611-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.13315. Epub 2014 May 8. PubMed 24488859 ↗
  • Javadian P, Shamshirsaz AA, Haeri S, Ruano R, Ramin SM, Cass D, Olutoye OO, Belfort MA. Perinatal outcome after fetoscopic release of amniotic bands: a single-center experience and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;42(4):449-55. doi: 10.1002/uog.12510. PubMed 23671033 ↗
  • Gueneuc A, Chalouhi GE, Borali D, Mediouni I, Stirnemann J, Ville Y. Fetoscopic Release of Amniotic Bands Causing Limb Constriction: Case Series and Review of the Literature. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;46(4):246-256. doi: 10.1159/000495505. Epub 2019 Feb 6. PubMed 30726851 ↗
  • Slaghekke F, Lewi L, Middeldorp JM, Weingertner AS, Klumper FJ, Dekoninck P, Devlieger R, Lanna MM, Deprest J, Favre R, Oepkes D, Lopriore E. Residual anastomoses in twin-twin transfusion syndrome after laser: the Solomon randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):285.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 May 9. PubMed 24813598 ↗
  • Shamshirsaz AA, Chmait RH, Stirnemann J, Habli MA, Johnson A, Hessami K, Mostafaei S, Nassr AA, Donepudi RV, Sanz Cortes M, Espinoza J, Krispin E, Belfort MA. Solomon versus selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn. 2023 Jan;43(1):72-83. doi: 10.1002/pd.6246. Epub 2022 Oct 11. PubMed 36184777 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06056635
Responsible party
Eyal Krispin (Attending Physician, Maternal Fetal Care Center, Boston Children's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 28, 2023
Start date
Aug 15, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2024

Study contacts

Brittany Gudanowski
Contact
Brittany.Gudanowski@childrens.harvard.edu
617-919-6658
Eyal Krispin, MD
principal investigator · Fetal Surgeon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion