An interventional study of Straumann BLX implant and Straumann BLT implant in Tooth Loss and Partial-edentulism, sponsored by Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-28.
Sponsored by Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the placement accuracy in immediately placed implants using dynamic navigation between deep-threaded and regular-threaded implants in partially edentulous patients. The main question it aims to answer is: is there a difference in implant placement accuracy between deep-threaded and regular-threaded implants using dynamic navigation? Participants will receive implants placed immediately under dynamic guidance. Researchers will compare type of implant thread (Straumann BLT versus Straumann BLX) to see if there are significant differences in placement accuracy.
The initial visit will comprise a thorough clinical examination and panoramic radiograph acquisition. Hopeless teeth resulting from trauma, periapical abscess, and periodontitis will be evaluated to see if extraction indications are met. When extraction indications were met, patients will be evaluated for suitable bone height for immediate implant placement. When bone height was suitable, patients will be asked to take a preoperative CBCT scan.
After tooth condition and bone volume evaluations, patients with adequate bone volume for immediate implant placement will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two groups: deep-threaded or regular-threaded.
The following implant placement accuracy parameters will be recorded using postoperative intraoral scanning superimposition: Global platform deviation (measured in millimeters), lateral platform deviation (measured in millimeters), global apex deviation (measured in millimeters), apex depth deviations (measured in millimeters), and angular deviation (measured in degrees). Primary implant stability will be measured immediately after implant insertion and measured in both insertion torque value and implant stability quotient. Radiographic bone-implant contact will be measured with a 3D implant model reconstruction method using coDiagnostiX and the contact area will be calculated using 3-matic Research as previously reported. Marginal bone loss will be measured using ImageJ with periapical radiographs taken 3 months and 1-year post-op. Implant survival will be monitored starting from the final prosthesis delivery onwards. Complications (biological, technical, and implant loss) will be recorded accordingly. Patient satisfaction will be documented with a Mandarin Chinese version of the Short Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18) upon final prosthesis delivery.
227 studies on the registry are indexed under Tooth Loss; 49 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 30 is close to the median of 30 across 169 interventional studies indexed under Tooth Loss.
Browse Tooth Loss studies →Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University is the lead sponsor of 162 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Straumann BLX implants
Device: Straumann BLX implant
Straumann BLT implants
Device: Straumann BLT implant
Implant system with a deep fixture thread depth.
Implant system with a regular fixture thread depth.
Placement accuracy measured as global platform deviation in millimeters and assessed by DCarer or coDiagnostiX
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Postoperative (Day 1-5)
Placement accuracy measured as lateral platform deviation in millimeters and assessed by DCarer or coDiagnostiX
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Postoperative (Day 1-5)
Placement accuracy measured as global apex deviation in millimeters and assessed by DCarer or coDiagnostiX
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Postoperative (Day 1-5)
Placement accuracy measured as apex depth deviations in millimeters and assessed by DCarer or coDiagnostiX
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Postoperative (Day 1-5)
Placement accuracy measured as angular deviation in degrees and assessed by DCarer or coDiagnostiX
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Postoperative (Day 1-5)
Level of primary implant stability measured in insertion torque (ITV) using a Torq Control
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Intraoperative (Day 0)
Level of primary implant stability measured in implant stability quotient (ISQ) using an Osstell Beacon
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Intraoperative (Day 0)
Amount of radiographic bone-implant contact measured in millimeters using 3-matic Research
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Postoperative (Day 1-5)
Amount of marginal bone loss measured in millimeters using periapical radiographs
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Postoperative (1 year)
Rate of implant survival measured in percentage
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Postoperative (4 months & 1 year)
Number of participants with biological or technical complications
Sufficiently described in the Title
Time frame: Postoperative (Up to 1 year)
Level of patient satisfaction measured using the Short Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire
Minimum value: 18; Maximum value: 90; Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: Postoperative (4 months & 1 year)
No study locations are listed for this record.
Start is estimated for Dec 2023; primary completion for Dec 2024, 12 months later.
Of 95 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tooth Loss, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 12 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 102 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University →