ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06051045SEE-DUpdated Sep 29, 2023

Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Biomarkers of Bulevirtide Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis D Patients

An observational study in Chronic Hepatitis D, sponsored by Karolinska University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-29.

Sponsored by Karolinska University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim is to assess the efficacy and specific safety in an observational study of patients with Chronic hepatitis D (CHD) with prospective follow-up, with antiviral treatment of 2 mg Bulevirtide (BLV) +/- PEG-IFNα-2a and +/- NA given as part of the patient's routine medical care. Also, explorative endpoints of biomarkers in peripheral blood, saliva, fecal sample and/or intrahepatic markers/signatures, and quality of life outcomes will be assessed.

Read the detailed description

Chronic hepatitis D (CHD) is considered to be the most severe form of hepatitis. It is a rare disease in European Union countries, with status of an orphan disease. Historically, only pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFNα-2a) +/- nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) have been used off-label for treatment of CHD, with insufficient virological response and frequent relapse. The first in class entry inhibitor for treatment of CHD, bulevirtide (BLV), product name Hepcludex) has received status of conditional marketing authorization by the European Medical Agency (EMA) in July 2020.

This conditional approval was based on two phase 2 studies, with limited sample sizes. A phase 3 clinical trial of 150 participants is ongoing.

Besides need of more efficacy and safety data, knowledge about immunological cellular response in BLV treated and identification of biomarkers for treatment response is needed. Observational studies with biological samplings are thus needed.

We aimed therefore to assess the efficacy and specific safety in an observational study with prospective follow-up, with antiviral treatment of 2 mg BLV +/- PEG-IFNα-2a and +/- NA given as part of the patient's routine medical care. Also, explorative endpoints of biomarkers in peripheral blood, saliva, fecal sample and/or intrahepatic markers/signatures, and quality of life outcomes will be assessed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Hepatitis D

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hepatitis D, Chronic

43 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis D, Chronic; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 285 across 10 observational studies indexed under Hepatitis D, Chronic.

Browse Hepatitis D, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 279 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Males and females from the age of 18 diagnosed with chronic hepatitis D

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age > 18 years
  2. Diagnosis of chronic /HDV co-infection.
  3. Have compensated liver disease (presence of portal hypertension without ongoing hepatic decompensation as ascites, variceal bleeding and hepatic encephalopathy allowed).
  4. Have indication for treatment of BLV, or already treated with BLV.
  5. For female* participants:

    1. for at least one year, or
    2. Surgically sterile (total hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, staples, or another type of sterilization), or
    3. Abstinence from heterosexual intercourse throughout the treatment period, or
    4. Willingness to use highly effective (double barrier method or barrier contraception in combination with hormonal or intrauterine contraceptive) throughout the treatment period and for 6 months after last dose of the drugs in the study.
  6. Male participants must agree to use a highly effective contraception (double barrier method or barrier contraception in combination with hormonal or intrauterine contraceptive used by female partners) throughout the treatment period and for 6 months after last dose of the drugs in the study.
  7. Participants who are willing to give written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any to treatment with BLV, including any intolerance or to the active ingredient or other components of BLV.
  2. Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
  3. Patients with predictable difficulties of follow-up according to the investigator.
  4. Any other condition that, in the opinion of Investigator, precludes the patient from taking part in this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • Hepcludex, 2 mg daily subcutaneous injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients with virological response of Hepatitis D virus (HDV) RNA < Limit of Detection (LoD) at FU 12 months after End of Treatment (EOT).

    Measurement of virological response of HDV RNA \< LoD

    Time frame: Continuously, up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients with virological response of HDV RNA < LoD

    Percentage of patients with virological response of HDV RNA \< LoD at at month 1, 3 and every 3 months after treatment start, and FU month 3, 6, and 9 after EOT.

    Time frame: At Baseline, 1 and 3 months, every 3 months after treatment start up to 9 months after date of EOT.

  2. Percentage of patients with Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) < LoD

    Percentage of patients with HBsAg \< LoD at month 1 and 3, and every 3 months after treatment start, and FU month 3, 6, 9 and 12 after EOT.

    Time frame: At Baseline, 1 and 3 months, every 3 months after treatment start up to 12 months after date of EOT.

  3. Change of HBsAg from baseline

    Change of HBsAg from baseline every 3 months during study period.

    Time frame: From Baseline every 3 months until end of study.

  4. Percentage of patients with HDV RNA < LoD or HDV RNA reduction of at least 2 log10 compared to baseline

    Percentage of patients with HDV RNA \< LoD or HDV RNA reduction of at least 2 log10 compared to baseline, at month 1 and 3, and every 3 months after treatment start, and FU month 3, 6, 9 and 12 after EOT.

    Time frame: At Baseline, 1 and 3 months, every 3 months after treatment start up to 12 months after date of EOT.

  5. Percentage of patients with virological relapse, defined as HDV RNA < LoD at EOT and increase of HDV RNA to > LoD after EOT

    Percentage of patients with virological relapse, defined as HDV RNA \< LoD at EOT and increase of HDV RNA to \> LoD after EOT, after EOT, at FU month 3, 6, 9 and 12 after EOT.

    Time frame: At 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after date of EOT.

  6. Percentage of patients with appearance of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs)

    Percentage of patients with appearance of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) at EOT, and FU month 3, 6, 9 and 12 after EOT.

    Time frame: At 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after date of EOT.

  7. Percentage of patients with HBV DNA level < LoD

    Percentage of patients with HBV DNA level \< LoD every 3 months during study period.

    Time frame: From Baseline every 3 months until end of study.

  8. Percentage of patients with biochemical response, defined as normalization of alanine transaminase (ALT)

    Percentage of patients with biochemical response, defined as normalization of alanine transaminase (ALT), at month 1, 3 and every 3 months during treatment, and FU month 3, 6, 9 and 12 after EOT.

    Time frame: At Baseline, 1 and 3 months, every 3 months up to 12 months after date of EOT.

  9. Percentage of patients with combined response, defined as HDV RNA < LoD or HDV RNA reduction of at least 2 log10 compared to baseline and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) normalization

    Percentage of patients with combined response, defined as HDV RNA \< LoD or HDV RNA reduction of at least 2 log10 compared to baseline and ALT normalization, at month 1, 2 and 3, and every 3 months after treatment start, and FU month 3, 6, 9 and 12 after EOT.

    Time frame: At Baseline, at 1, 2 and 3 months, every 3 months up to 12 months after date of EOT.

  10. Change of liver elasticity measurement level and percentage of AE of special interest

    Change of liver elasticity measurement level from baseline compared to the level at every 6 months during on-treatment, EOT, and FU month 6 and 12 after EOT. Percentage of AE of special interest: 1. Liver-related event, defined as new diagnoses of liver cirrhosis, HCC, or hepatic decompensation (ascites, variceal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy); 2. Event of ≥ grade 3 hematological AE (in IFN treated); 3. Event of thyroid disorder (in IFN treated); 4. Event of injection site reaction; 5. Event of≥ grade 3 ALT increase.

    Time frame: At Baseline, every 6 months until 12 months after date of EOT.

  11. Percentage of missed BLV doses during treatment

    Percentage of missed BLV doses during treatment.

    Time frame: Continuously during treatment period until date of EOT.

  12. Percentage of patients with early discontinuation of treatment

    Percentage of patients with early discontinuation of treatment and the reasons.

    Time frame: Continuously during treatment period until date of EOT.

  13. Serious Adverse Events

    Percentage of patients with SAE.

    Time frame: Continuously during study period until end of study.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 29, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06051045
Responsible party
Soo Aleman (Professor, MD, PhD, Karolinska University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 22, 2023
Start date
Sep 27, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 2033 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 29, 2023

Study contacts

Soo Aleman, MD, PhD
Contact
soo.aleman@regionstockholm.se
+46 72-595 72 25

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion