CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06048055Updated Apr 30, 2025

Effect of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients

An interventional study of Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and selected physical therapy program in Stroke, Ischemic, sponsored by Cairo University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-30.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this interventional study is to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients . The main question is:

•Is there a significant effect of non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation on upper limb motor function in stroke patients? Participants will be assigned into two groups. They will receive 12 sessions of true or sham transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for 30 minutes immediately followed by 30 minutes of selected physical therapy program, three sessions per week for four weeks.

Read the detailed description

Stroke causes several neurological deficits or impairments as hemiparesis, communication disorders, cognitive deficits or disorders in visuo-spatial perception. Approximately 60% of survivors after stroke suffer from upper limb motor impairment, which lead to loss of independence with poor quality of life. These global economic and social costs of chronic disability due to stroke necessitate the development of new methods beside the conventional treatment to induce neuroplasticity in stroke recovery.Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulation therapy, which sends impulses into the neural center to generate corresponding nervous activity. Vagus nerve stimulation is an established treatment in epilepsy, depression, chronic tinnitus, migraine and chronic pain.Vagus nerve stimulation can be invasive or non-invasive. Invasive VNS requires the implantation of a programmable device and electrodes that directly stimulate afferents of the vagus nerve under general anesthesia. Non-invasive method of VNS via transcutaneous stimulation of the peripheral auricular branch of the vagus nerve (taVNS) is safer, better-tolerated method for delivering VNS with the same effect of invasive VNS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Ischemic

Keywords

  • vagus nerve stimulation
  • ischemic stroke
  • taVNS
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Hemiparetic patients with ischemic middle cerebral artery stroke.
  • Duration of illness ranged from at least 6 months after stroke.
  • The patient's age ranged from 45 to 65 years.
  • Spasticity of upper limb muscles ranged from (grade 1:2) according to the Modified Ashworth scale.
  • The patients with unilateral upper limb motor function impairment.
  • Patients with sufficient cognitive abilities that enable them to understand and follow instructions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neurological diseases that affect upper limb function other than stroke (e.g.: Multiple sclerosis, Peripheral neuropathy, Parkinsonism....etc.).
  • Hemorrhagic stroke patients.
  • Patients with previous surgical intervention on the vagus nerve.
  • Patients with pacemakers or other implanted electrical devices.
  • Patients with a history of significant alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Patients with musculoskeletal disorders such as severe arthritis, knee surgery, total hip joint replacement, lower limb fractures or contractures of fixed deformity, and leg length discrepancy after total hip replacement.
  • Patients with cardiovascular problems (unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, significant heart valve dysfunction, or unstable hypertension) or pulmonary or kidney disorders.
  • Patients with visual or auditory impairment affecting their ability to complete the testing.
  • Patients with cognitive impairment.
  • Any current or past history of facial or ear pain, recent ear trauma, or metal implants above the level of the neck.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1 (GA)

    Twenty Egyptian stroke patients from both sex will receive 30 minutes of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation at cymba concha of left ear immediately after a 30 minutes session of selected physical therapy program.

    Other: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation · Other: selected physical therapy program

  • Sham comparator
    Group 2 (GB)

    Twenty Egyptian stroke patients from both sex will receive 30 minutes of sham vagal nerve stimulation at ear lobe of left ear immediately after a 30 minutes session of selected physical therapy program.

    Other: selected physical therapy program

Interventions

  • OtherTranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

    Patients in this group will be treated with 12 sessions of transcutaneous auricular nerve stimulation, three sessions per week for four weeks. The stimulation of the left auricular branch of the vagus nerve will be performed by conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) through a Gamna Duo 200 electrotherapy device with one channel and two electrodes (5mm diameter disposable adhesive stimulation electrodes). The TENS parameters will be used: 30 30-minute treatment time, a pulse width of 200 milliseconds, and a pulse frequency of 20 hertz. The intensity of stimulation will be individually adjusted according to the patient's perceptual threshold. The perceptual threshold (PT) is defined as the minimum amount of electricity required to perceive electrical stimulation on the skin described as a pricking or tingling sensation. The stimulation intensity will be set at super-threshold levels, such as 200% of the patient's perceptual threshold.

  • Otherselected physical therapy program

    The selected physical therapy program session will be from 25 to 30 minutes, three sessions per week for four weeks. The program will be selected mainly for stretching for shortened upper limb muscles, strengthening for weak upper limb muscles, occupational therapy for hand, trunk, and pelvic control exercises, and gait training.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in upper limb function from baseline to four weeks after the beginning of intervention

    Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMT-UE).

    Time frame: four weeks after the beginning of the intervention

  2. Changes in serum levels of neural plasticity factors from baseline to four weeks after beginning of intervention

    serum levels of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF)

    Time frame: four weeks after the beginning of the intervention

  3. Changes in peak muscle torque of upper limb muscles from baseline to four weeks after the beginning of intervention

    Peak muscle torque measured by Biodex System 3 Pro Isokinetic (Biodex Medical Inc., Shirley, New York, USA).

    Time frame: four weeks after the beginning of the intervention

  4. Changes in hand grip strength from baseline to four weeks after the beginning of intervention

    Hand grip strength measured by electronic BASELINE hand dynamometer device.

    Time frame: four weeks after the beginning of the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in gross hand function from baseline to four weeks after the beginning of intervention

    Box and Blocks Test (BBT)

    Time frame: four weeks after the beginning of the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of physical therapy labs at Cairo University
    Giza, 12612, Egypt
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06048055
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Marwa Mostafa Abdel Moneim Afifi (Assistant Lecturer, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2023
Start date
Oct 1, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 3, 2024
Completion
Apr 10, 2024
Last update
Apr 30, 2025

Study contacts

Moshera H Darwish, Professor
study director · Cairo University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion