ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06042946Updated Aug 21, 2024

Microsurgical Resection of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Metastases

An observational study in Spinal Cord Metastasis, Spinal Cord Tumor Malignant Intramedullary and Functional Outcome, sponsored by Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-21.

Sponsored by Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2025, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to establish a multi-center, retrospective database for patients with intramedullary spinal cord metastases (ISCM) and analyse the functional outcome in surgically treated ISCM patients.

The hypothesis is that the surgical treatment of selected ISCM patients does not lead to persistent morbidity and does not increase mortality, compared to patients that are treated non-operatively.

Secondary objectives are to assess pre- to postoperative neurological deficits, ambulatory status, and overall survival of surgically treated ISCM patients.

The investigators intend to include a control cohort of patients with ISCM from participating centers, who underwent non-surgical oncological treatment (radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy). This control cohort of patients will be used to match patients with and without surgical treatment.

Primary endpoint (analysed in surgically treated ISCM patients):

Functional outcome at 90 days after treatment initiation, measured by the modified McCormick Scale. This is a score for grading of neurological function in spinal cord conditions.

The McCormick scale ranges from Grade I (neurologically intact) to grade V (paraplegic or quadriplegic). The McCormick scale is suitable for our retrospective study because of its good reproducibility and comparability.

Secondary endpoints (analysed in surgically treated ISCM patients and analysed in matched patients with and without surgical treatment):

  • Functional outcome by the McCormick scale and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) at 6 and 12 months. This is a score evaluating motor function of upper and lower extremities, sensory function of upper extremities and sphincter function / voidance. The mJOA ranges from 0 - 18 points, with higher score values representing better functional outcome. The minimum clinically important difference of the mJOA is 1-2 points, and scores lower than 14 indicate moderate myelopathy, scores lower than 11 indicate severe myelopathy.
  • Ambulatory status and continence at 90 days, 6 \& 12 months (determined by mJOA subscores)
  • Neurological outcome, measured by American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA)
  • Impairment Scale at 90 days, 6 and 12 months
  • Rate \& type of complications at 90 days after treatment according to The Novel Therapy
  • Disability-Neurology Grade (TDN grade)16
  • Overall survival (in days)
02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Metastasis
  • Spinal Cord Tumor Malignant Intramedullary
  • Functional Outcome
  • Radiotherapy; Complications
  • Spinal Cord Neoplasms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Spinal cord metastasis
03

In context

Spinal Cord Neoplasms

105 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Neoplasms; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 150 across 31 observational studies indexed under Spinal Cord Neoplasms.

Browse Spinal Cord Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen is the lead sponsor of 79 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of patients who have undergone treatment for ISCM at one of the participating hospitals in the period from 2017 to 2023. The study period is chosen, as electronic documentation is available at all hospitals in this time-period. Patients will be identified by generated lists from neurosurgery (microsurgical procedures for ISCM) and radiooncology (radiotherapy for ISCM).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients admitted to one of the participating centres and treated for ISCM
  • Available documentation of admission and postoperative status

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under the age of 18
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • iscm_resection

    -Adult patients admitted to one of the participating centres and treated for ISCM between 2017 and 2023 by resection of the ISCM with or without adjuvant radiotherapy

    Procedure: Microsurgical resection of ISCM

  • iscm_radiotherapy

    -Adult patients admitted to one of the participating centres and treated for ISCM between 2017 and 2023 by radiotherapy without resection of the ISCM

Interventions

  • ProcedureMicrosurgical resection of ISCM

    Microsurgical resection of ISCM defines the surgical removal of cancerous tumors that have spread to the spinal cord, using advanced microsurgical techniques and equipment like ultrasound, neuromonitoring, ultrasonic aspirator to prevent damage to the spinal cord.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional outcome at 90 days after treatment initiation

    measured by the modified McCormick Scale. This is a score for grading of neurological function in spinal cord conditions. The McCormick scale ranges from Grade I (neurologically intact) to grade V (paraplegic or quadriplegic). The McCormick scale is suitable for our retrospective study because of its good reproducibility and comparability.

    Time frame: at 90 days after treatment initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional outcome

    modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (mJOA) Range 0-18, with lower scores indicate a more sever myelopathy

    Time frame: at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation

  2. Neurological outcome

    measured by American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) A: Complete. No sensory or motor function is preserved in sacral segments S4-S5, no sacral sparing B: Sensory Incomplete. Sensory but not motor function is preserved below the neurological level and includes sacral segments S4-S5, AND No motor function is preserved more than three levels below the motor level on either side of the body C: Motor Incomplete. Motor function is preserved below the neurological level AND More than half of the key muscle functions below the neurological level of injury have a muscle grade of less than 3 (Grades 0-2) D: Motor Incomplete. Motor function is preserved below the neurological level AND At least half (half or more) of the key muscle functions below the neurological level of injury have a muscle grade ≥ 3 E: Normal. If sensation and motor function are graded as normal in all segments AND the patient had prior SCI-related deficits

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation

  3. Rate & type of complications

    Therapy-Disability-Neurology Grade (TDN Grade) Range: Grade 1-5 The Therapy-Disability-Neurology (TDN) grading system is a novel multidimensional classification of complications severity. higher Grades indicate higher severity of complication

    Time frame: within 90 days after treatment initiation

  4. Functional outcome

    measured by the modified McCormick Scale. This is a score for grading of neurological function in spinal cord conditions. The McCormick scale ranges from Grade I (neurologically intact) to grade V (paraplegic or quadriplegic). The McCormick scale is suitable for our retrospective study because of its good reproducibility and comparability.

    Time frame: at 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Neurosurgery
    Saint Gallen, 9000, Switzerland
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06042946
Lead sponsor
Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Collaborators
University Hospital, Zürich, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern, University Hospital, Geneva, Kantonsspital Aarau, Kantonsspital Winterthur KSW, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Klinikum rechts der Isar Technische Universität München, University Hospital Muenster, University of Toronto, Stanford University
Responsible party
Felix C. Stengel, MD (Junior Attending Neurosurgeon, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2023
Start date
Sep 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2024

Study contacts

Martin N. Stienen, PD, MD
Contact
martin.stienen@kssg.ch
+41 71 494 2183
Felix C. Stengel, MD
Contact
felix.stengel@kssg.ch
+41 71 494 2184
Martin N. Stienen, PD, MD
principal investigator · Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion