ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06039488Updated Sep 15, 2023

Effectiveness of a Cancer Exercise Program

An interventional study of Exercise in Cancer, sponsored by University of South Carolina. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-15.

Sponsored by University of South Carolina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2021, registered Sep 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators are examining the impact of an 8-week multi-modal exercise program (resistance and cardiovascular training) delivered 2 times per week on physical function adults (>18 years old) with cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer

Keywords

  • Exercise
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,610 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,508 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 50 across 7,429 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 196 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults > 18 diagnosed with cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unwilling to come to the on-site clinic for exercise sessions
  • any neuromuscular, cardiovascular, or psychological condition precluding safe exercise
  • unable to read/understand English.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exercise

    2 days/week of resistance and cardiovascular exercise for 8-weeks

    Behavioral: Exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralExercise

    A combination of resistance exercise and cardiovascular exercise (performed 2 days per week for 8-weeks) is tailored to each individual in accordance with their medical/cancer-related history, baseline assessments of physical function, and overall goals. Resistance exercise includes 6-8 exercises targeting major muscle groups. The first week of the program is used to familiarize participants to the exercises of the program, provide coaching on safe and appropriate technique, and identifying initial load for 2 sets of 12 repetitions (equivalent to \~65% 1 repetition maximum), with a goal of working towards 4 sets of 8 reps. Additionally, participants are asked to perform 20-30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic activity (approximately 60-85% age-predicted heart rate maximum) via walking, jogging, or cycling each session.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bellarmine Norton Assessment Tool (2-minute Step Test)

    2-minute Step Test: Number of times an individuals' knee reaches a predetermined heigh during a 2-minute period of marching

    Time frame: 0 and 8-weeks

  2. Bellarmine Norton Assessment Tool (Timed Arm Curl)

    Timed Arm Curl: Number of repetitions an arm curl individuals can complete in 30 seconds)

    Time frame: 0 and 8-weeks

  3. Bellarmine Norton Assessment Tool (30 second Chair Stand)

    Chair Stand: Number of times participants can stand from a sitting position and return to sitting in 30 seconds

    Time frame: 0 and 8-weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fatigue

    The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale: The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item scale that will be used to assess cancer-related fatigue. The FACIT-Fatigue scale is scored on a 0-4 response scale from 0 = "not at all" to 4 "very much", regarding items related to fatigue and energy in the past 7 days. Lower score indicates greater fatigue

    Time frame: 0 and 8-weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of South Carolina
    Columbia, South Carolina 29205, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bottone GL, Anderson KS, Brooks AM, Harrington SE, Nakfoor B, Jackson KE, Scott BM, Fairman CM. Evaluating the Test-Retest Reliability and Measurement Error of a Sit-Stand-Power Test in Individuals Treated for Cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2026 Jan-Dec;25:15347354261442462. doi: 10.1177/15347354261442462. Epub 2026 Apr 23. PubMed 42026875 ↗
  • Fairman CM, Harrington SE, Schumpp AR, Brooks AM, Jones MJ, Kim J, Kennedy MA. Planning and evaluating an integrated clinical exercise oncology service: an exploratory mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1318. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11797-0. PubMed 39478564 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2026, 53 months after the start.

Of 1,358 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 71. This study's planned 53 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,404 studies reached it within 38 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 71.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 5, 2023
First posted
Sep 15, 2023
StartActual
Aug 15, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 2027
Last update
Sep 15, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06039488
Responsible party
Ciaran Fairman (Assistant Professor, University of South Carolina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2023
Start date
Aug 15, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2023

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion