An interventional study of Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602 in Bone Conduction Deafness, Quality of Life and Hearing Loss, Mixed, sponsored by Hospital Universitario La Paz. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-15.
Sponsored by Hospital Universitario La Paz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The Bonebridge (BB) is a partially implantable active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system manufactured by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte Gesellschaft m.b.H. (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria).
The BB augments hearing by providing acoustic input to the inner ear via bone conduction.
In 2017 Hodgetts \& Scollie introduced a new fitting algorithm called DSL-BCD. The DSL-BCD algorithm was developed especially for the characteristics of bone conduction devices (BCD). If there is a benefit on the patient level in hearing outcomes when comparing the application of DSL-BCD in comparison to DSL v5 when using the BB, was not yet investigated.
The aim of this clinical study is to show the improvement in audiological performance and subjective satisfaction with the BCI602 and SAMBA 2 audio processor in patients with conductive hearing loss compared to the unaided condition and to evaluate performance differences through application of 2 different fitting algorithms, namely DSL v5 and DSL-BCD.
Duration of investigation:
Unexperienced users group: Each subject will be actively involved in the study for a period of 4-6 weeks after the first fitting of the audio-processor, 4 visits in total.
Experienced users group: Each subject implanted for at least 3 months will be asked to be involved in the study the day of their following scheduled fitting, 1 visit in total.
We expect the study to conclude within 3 years for study start.
Inclusion criteria:
Fitting condition A: Fitted on study audioprocessor: DSL v5, Acclimatization Level - 100%, First Fit Fitting condition B: Fitted on study audioprocessor: simulated DSL-BCD, simulated on the basis of DSLv5 with adjustments to reach the DSL-BCD Only used in the experienced user group: Fitting condition C: Patients own fitting, with adjustments for best fit, fitted on patients own audioprocessor
Test intervals Prospective design: Subjects will be evaluated in four intervals.
Retrospective design: Subjects will be evaluated in one interval.
st Session The only session takes place the day of the next scheduled fitting (at least 3 months later their first fitting). Patient will be evaluated with their current fitting (DSL v5), and the new fitting condition (DSL-BCD).
The 1st session comprises the following tests:
o unaided: Speech and Spatial Questionnaire (SSQ12) / Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
o Air conduction/Bone conduction under headphone, bilaterally
o Sound field tone audiometry with warble tone in unaided condition
The 2nd session (acute measurements) comprises the following tests:
o BC threshold measurement, bilaterally
o Sound field tone audiometry with warble tone in aided condition, condition A \& B*
o Sound field speech in quiet test in aided condition, condition A \& B*
o Sound field speech in noise in aided condition, condition A \& B*
o Preference A or B questionnaire
o SAMBA 2 will be handed out with the fitting condition according to the randomization plan * If the randomization plan provides the patient with fitting condition B for the first 2-3 weeks, then condition B will be measured first in all acute sound field measurements at visit 2.
The 3rd session (after 2-3 weeks of use) comprises the following tests:
o Optional: BC threshold measurement, bilaterally
o Aided: questionnaires SSQ12 / APHAB
o Wearing time will be noted
The 4th session (after another 2-3 weeks of use) comprises the following tests:
o Aided: questionnaires SSQ12 / APHAB
Release of the patient from the study followed by personalized fitting of BB for the patient
Available data from patients who dropped out of the study at a certain time point or who are lost to follow-up will be used for analysis. Source data will be verified by the investigator.
Data of participants will be pseudonymised for data handling and analysis and anonymised for publication.
Handling of missing data: Missing data will not be replaced but treated as "missing" values. Statistical significance will be set to p\<0.05. SPSS software will be used for all analyses. Graphs will be created in Microsoft Office Excel.
1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 235 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1 is below the median of 40 across 764 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss.
Browse Hearing Loss studies →Hospital Universitario La Paz is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The new way of fitting the audioprocessor
Procedure: Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602
The way of fitting the audioprocessor until now
Procedure: Fitting of the audioprocessor with the auditory implant BCI602
to compare the performance with BB system in two fitting-configurations (active comparator: DSL v5, experimental: DSL-BCD) using audiometric and subjective measures
Audiological performance with both ways of fitting
Standard audiometry Sound field testing will be conducted in quiet with the subject sitting one meter from the loudspeakers. The volume control of the device shall be set at the most comfortable level for the sound field tests.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Speech performance in quiet with both ways of fitting
Speech audiometry in quiet The word recognition score will be measured in quiet. The test in quiet shall be conducted with the speaker at 0° azimuth (S0) with 1 meter distance from the center of the subject's head and at ear level. Spanish speech material (recorded): Cardenas and Marrero balanced word list. 100% will be considered as the maximum outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks
Speech performance in noise with both ways of fitting
Speech audiometry in noise For measuring speech intelligibility in noise the International Matrix Test is used with fixed noise level at 65 dB SPL and speech level at 65 dB SPL from S0N0 (speech and noise coming from the front). One list comprises 20 sentences with 5 words in each sentence. A negative value means, better performance
Time frame: 12 weeks
Subjective satisfaction measured with SSQ12
Questionnaires A hearing specific questionnaire will be filled out per participant, in 3 conditions, unaided (preoperatively), aided with BB in fitting condition A and aided with Bonebridge in fitting condition B. The Spanish version of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire with 12 items (SSQ12) will be used. It is designed to measure self-reported auditory disability across a wide variety of domains, reflecting the reality of hearing in the everyday world. It takes approximately 5 minutes to complete. It consists of 12 questions that the subjects score on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (perfectly). The total score is the sum of all items and can range between 0 and 120. The higher score, the better outcomes.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Subjective satisfaction evaluated by means of APHAB
Questionnaires A hearing specific questionnaire will be filled out per participant, in 3 conditions, unaided (preoperatively), aided with BB in fitting condition A and aided with Bonebridge in fitting condition B. The Spanish version the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) will be used. It is a 24-item questionnaire derived from the original 66-item Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. The self-assessment instrument evaluates hearing impairment in real-life situations with and without hearing aids. Participants have to rate how often a given statement is true in their daily life, based on the following seven response alternatives: always (99%), almost always (87%), generally (75%), half-the-time (50%), occasionally (25%), seldom (12%) and never (1%). In the first three subscales, higher scores suggest less hearing disability, while lower scores indicate less hearing disability in the aversiveness subscale. The APHAB typically requires 10 minutes or less to complete.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Subjective satisfaction assessed by a custom made questionnaire
Questionnaires A hearing specific questionnaire will be filled out per participant, in 3 conditions, unaided (preoperatively), aided with BB in fitting condition A and aided with Bonebridge in fitting condition B. A third, custom made questionnaire, will be filled out at two timepoints, after the acute test of condition A \& B in visit 2 and at the last visit. The questionnaire will ask the patient what condition A or B was preferred in visit 2. At the last visit (for the unexperienced users, and in the only visit for the experienced users) the patient will be asked what condition was preferred in several listening scenarios during the trial time.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hospital Universitario La Paz