An observational study in Keloid, sponsored by Chongqing Medical University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-13.
Sponsored by Chongqing Medical University · Observational
Skin keloids are common dermatological conditions that can lead to physical limitations, functional impairments, and deformities. Beyond the physiological implications, the aesthetic ramifications of keloids can also result in significant psychological distress, including anxiety and depression, causing both physical and emotional suffering to the affected individuals. The incidence of keloids is high, characterized by their chronicity, resistance to treatment, and high recurrence rate. They have become one of the most challenging conditions to treat across burn surgery, plastic surgery, and dermatology disciplines. The lack of standardized clinical treatment guidelines globally, combined with an absence of a well-defined standardized evaluation system, means that the effectiveness of various treatments is not consistently and objectively assessed, creating significant challenges in clinical applications. This project integrates traditional high-frequency ultrasound with cutting-edge technologies like real-time shear wave elastography and ultra-micro blood flow imaging. By using multimodal ultrasound, investigators aim to observe the therapeutic response of 90Sr-90Y patch treatment on skin keloids. Investigators seek to determine the objectivity and quantification role of multimodal ultrasound data and indicators in assessing keloid severity, including blood flow information and elasticity hardness. Another goal is to obtain quantitative data on keloid thickness, volume, stiffness, and microvascular distribution before and after treatment to monitor the therapy response. This would address the current limitations of subjective keloid scoring scales. It would also serve as an objective assessment standard for precise diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of keloids in a clinical setting, thereby standardizing the clinical diagnosis and treatment of keloids.
Currently, no one-size-fits-all approach exists and a universally accepted, standardized evaluation and treatment protocol remains elusive, making it challenging to determine which method is the most effective. Commonly used methods for assessing keloids, such as the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), rely heavily on subjective evaluations based on observer perception and patient-reported experiences. These methods lack objective quantitative evaluation indicators and the ability to visualize subcutaneous tissues, limiting their individual clinical applicability. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) is the most established questionnaire used for the evaluation of pathological scarring. This scale evaluates aspects of scar vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, and height, with the scoring system ranging from 0 to 15, where 0 is the least severe and 15 is the most severe. In the study, keloids were classified into three categories based on the VSS score: mild (0-5), moderate (6-9), and severe (10-15).
138 studies on the registry are indexed under Keloid; 26 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 100 across 23 observational studies indexed under Keloid.
Browse Keloid studies →Chongqing Medical University is the lead sponsor of 78 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
34 outpatients (mean age 43 ± 10.4 years, 14 male, 20 female) with untreated 63 keloids in different anatomical locations and 63 corresponding normal skin sites was performed
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) is the most established questionnaire used for the evaluation of pathological scarring. This scale evaluates aspects of scar vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, and height, with the scoring system ranging from 0 to 15, where 0 is the least severe and 15 is the most severe.All the keloids in the study were classified into three categories based on the VSS score: mild (0-5), moderate (6-9), and severe (10-15). For treatment assessment, investigators further divided the treated participants into two groups: a good response group (showing an improvement of 5 or more points in the VSS score) and a poor response group (less than 5 points improvement in the VSS score)
Diagnostic Test: multimodal ultrasound · Radiation: radioisotope applicator therapy
The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) is the most established questionnaire used for the evaluation of pathological scarring. This scale evaluates aspects of scar vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, and height, with the scoring system ranging from 0 to 15, where 0 is the least severe and 15 is the most severe. All the keloids in the study keloids were classified into three categories based on the VSS score: mild (0-5), moderate (6-9), and severe(10-15). For treatment assessment, investigators further divided the treated participants into two groups: a good response group (showing an improvement of 5 or more points in the VSS score) and a poor response group (less than 5 points improvement in the VSS score)
Diagnostic Test: multimodal ultrasound · Radiation: radioisotope applicator therapy
An Aixplorer ultrasound machine (SuperSonic Imaging, Ltd, Aixen-Provence, France), equipped with AngioPLUS(AP) and shear wave elastography(SWE) functions, was used for all examinations using a 4-15MHz linear probe.AP function can detect microvessels of lesions,SWE can evaluate the stiffness of lesions and high frequency ultrasound can measure the thickness and volume of keloid.
The radioisotope applicator therapy utilized 90Sr-90Y(0094SR814975) isotope, customized by the China Atomic Energy Research Institute. The element therapy instrument used had overall dimensions of 2.8cm x 2.8cm, with an effective treatment area of 2.0cm x 2.0cm. It delivered a radiation dose of 5.0Gy/h. Each patient received superficial radiation therapy through a single 90Sr source, administered in repeated doses. The isotope therapy instrument was customized to fit the exact size of the keloid, ensuring coverage the irradiation range extending 0.5cm beyond the keloid's edge. During treatment, the surface of the applicator was aligned with the irradiated area and directly contact the surface of the keloid tissue. The treatment was carried out low-dose irradiation method, over 5 sessions, with each session delivering a dose of 2Gy. Each irradiation lasted for 25min.
Change in stiffness measured by SWE
The difference of stiffness in good response group and poor response group
Time frame: from baseline to 6 months
Change in microvessel signal grade measured by AP
The difference of microvessel signal grade in good response group and poor response group
Time frame: from baseline to 6 months
Change in thickness measured by high frequency ultrasound
The difference of thickness in good response group and poor response group
Time frame: from baseline to 6 months
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Chongqing Medical University