ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06032533RESCUE-SAHUpdated Oct 3, 2025

Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Aneurysmal SAH

An interventional study of Remote Ischemic Conditioning with Automatic Tourniquet Device and Sham Remote Ischemic Conditioning with Automatic Tourniquet Device in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia, sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-03.

Sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 22 studies in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with a site in Denmark — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage · Denmark.

Planned enrollment
6th of 13
100 · median 90
Started
2023
with 2 others
No phase
7 of 22
1 open now
Registered
22nd of 22
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 22
Aarhus University Hospital

Among the 22 studies in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with a site in Denmark, this one is the 6th largest by planned enrollment of the 13 interventional ones, is one of 3 that started in 2023, is one of 7 with no phase, and was the 22nd registered.

By phase

22 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Observational9 · 0 open
No phasethis study7 · 1 open
Phase 33 · 0 open
Phase 11 · 0 open
Phase 21 · 0 open
Phase 41 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2006; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2023.

Size and results

Median enrollment 90 across the 13 interventional studies, 70 across the 9 observational. Of the 16 that completed or were terminated, 1 (6%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 22 studies in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with a site in Denmark, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the effect of limb occlusion therapy (remote ischemic conditioning, RIC) in subjects with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

The main question it aims to answer is whether RIC can improve long-term recovery in participants with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Researchers will compare levels of functional independence in participants in the RIC-group to participants in the sham-group.

Read the detailed description

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is one of the most devastating types of stroke. Half of the patients die during the acute ictus, and those who survive have a poor prognosis as 20-30% are disabled or eventually die from the disease. In the acute phase after aSAH, the most devastating complication is rebleeding, whereas in the late phase, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is another feared complication, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Symptoms of DCI occur in 30 % of patients and 15-20 % of patients will develop a disabling stroke due to DCI. DCI typically occurs between days 4 and 14 after the initial bleeding. The cause of DCI is not fully understood. Cerebral vasospasms (CVS) are commonly seen on angiography in the first 4-14 days after initial bleeding, and have been linked to late onset of symptoms of focal ischaemia since the 60s. Modern research suggests that the pathophysiology is multifactorial, but CVS is still thought to be a major contributor. Other contributing factors are thought to be microthrombosis, microvascular spasm, oxidative stress, cortically spreading depolarizations, cell death, breakdown of blood-brain barrier, among others. Treatment with nimodipine is standard-of-care and is the only pharmacological intervention that has been shown to improve outcome in aSAH patients, although it has no impact on large-vessel CVS[.

The need for developing effective methods for prevention or treatment of DCI persists, and an effective prophylactic treatment may have a large impact on the general outcome of aSAH.

Ischemic conditioning is a potent activator of endogenous protection against ischemic injury. RIC can be applied as repeated short-lasting ischemia in a distant tissue that results in protection against subsequent long-lasting ischemic injury in the target organ. This protection can be applied prior to or during a prolonged ischemic event as remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPreC) and perconditioning (RIPerC), respectively.

RIC is commonly achieved by inflation of a blood pressure cuff to induce 5-minute cycles of limb ischemia alternating with 5 minutes of reperfusion. RIC activates several protective mechanisms, through humoral and neural pathways and shows promise in the setting of acute stroke.

Inflammation initiated by cerebral ischemia can contribute to secondary brain injury and is correlated with poor outcome. Following ischemia there is a harmful excess leukocyte infiltration in the brain parenchyma, and in experimental studies on aSAH, pharmacological inhibition of cytokines has been associated with improved outcome. RIC has been demonstrated to reduce inflammation and downregulate inflammatory markers. In addition, RIC has protective effects on cerebral endothelial function and induces vasodilation, increasing cerebral blood flow (CBF).

Angiogenesis, erythropoietin and nitric oxide (NO) are suggested to induce neuroprotection and stimulation of these strategies by conditioning including inhibition of inflammation has the potential to play an important part in treatment of patients after aSAH.

The effect of RIC on blood and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers has never been explored in the setting of aSAH.

To-date, no serious adverse events have been documented in RIC. The procedure has been applied in numerous cardiovascular ischemic patients and in patients suffering from ischemic stroke and cerebral hemorrhage (ICH/SAH).

A recent smaller randomized trials of RIPreC after aSAH showed promising results with regards to functional outcomes and incidence of cerebral oxygen desaturation, likewise without adverse effects of RIC.

RIC is a non-pharmacologic and non-invasive treatment without noticeable discomfort that has neuroprotective potential worldwide.

Aneurysmal SAH and subsequent DCI represents a unique clinical opportunity to test RIC as DCI typically manifests within the first 14 days after ictus and is often a significant contributor to neurological injury. The treatment is feasible, safe, and rooted in well-explored physiological concepts. There is a clear scientific gap and opportunity to explore RIC in the setting of aSAH and DCI in larger randomized trials.

03

Conditions studied

  • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal
  • Delayed Cerebral Ischemia

Keywords

  • Remote Ischemic Conditioning
  • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
  • Aneurysm
  • Delayed Cerebral Ischemia
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage confirmed by computed tomography (CT) with aneurysm origin confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA)
  • Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage symptom-onset ≤ 3 days
  • Aneurysm protected by clipping or coiling
  • Independent in daily living before symptom onset (mRS ≤ 2)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by a lesion other than cerebral aneurysm
  • Symptomatic vasospasm at the time of enrollment
  • Previous cerebral lesion e.g. symptomatic cerebral infarction (>2cm), multiple sclerosis, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, tumour, prior neurosurgery (excluding prior clipping or coiling of cold aneurysms without complications).
  • History of severe peripheral vascular disease or signs of severe peripheral vascular disease on physical examination
  • History of deep vein thrombosis or signs of deep vein thrombosis on physical examination
  • Kidney involvement or prior kidney disease with an estimated (eGFR) below safe levels for contrast infusion in relation to CT-perfusion.
  • Pregnancy (Women of child-bearing age will have serum-Humane Choriogonadotropine taken prior to final inclusion. If pregnancy cannot be ruled out,the patient can't be included. Women with a safe method will be encouraged to use this method during the entire period of active treatment.)
  • Concomitant other acute life-threatening medical or surgical condition
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Remote Ischemic Conditioning

    After randomization a large thigh blood pressure cuff will be placed on the lower limb. The cuff will be inflated to a pressure 30 mm Hg greater than the systolic arterial blood pressure measured by the patient's arterial line or upper limb blood pressure cuff. The adequate level of inflation will be confirmed by the absence of pulse in the ipsilateral pedal artery detected by palpation. If the pulse signal is still present, the cuff will be inflated further until it disappears. The cuff will remain inflated for 5 minutes. Then the cuff will be deflated and the limb allowed to re-perfuse for 5 minutes. The procedure will be repeated five times followed by reperfusion. The first session will be performed 24-72 hours after the initial hemorrhage, within the first 24 hours after treatment of aneurysm, and repeated every 24 hours, between 8-10 am, until post hemorrhagic day 14.

    Device: Remote Ischemic Conditioning with Automatic Tourniquet Device

  • Sham comparator
    Sham-RIC

    After randomization a large leg blood pressure cuff will be placed on the lower limb. This cuff will be inflated to 50 mm Hg only. The device will the be operated by trained staff. The cuff will remain inflated for 5 minutes, then the cuff will be deflated for 5 minutes. The procedure will be repeated for five cycles. The first session will be performed 48-72 hours after the initial hemorrhage, at least 24 hours after treatment of aneurysm and repeated every 24 hours, between 8-10 am, until post hemorrhagic day 14.

    Device: Sham Remote Ischemic Conditioning with Automatic Tourniquet Device

Interventions

  • DeviceRemote Ischemic Conditioning with Automatic Tourniquet Device

    5 Cycles of Remote Ischemic Conditioning performed on the leg. One cycle consists of 5 minutes of arterial occlusion followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion. The above is repeated daily for 14 days or until patient is discharged. Patients are randomized to either active Remote Ischemic Conditioning or Sham-treatment.

  • DeviceSham Remote Ischemic Conditioning with Automatic Tourniquet Device

    5 Cycles of sham-treatment performed on the leg. One cycle consists of 5 minutes of sham-treatment followed by 5 minutes of pause. The above is repeated daily for 14 days or until patient is discharged. Patients are randomized to either active Remote Ischemic Conditioning or Sham-treatment.

    Also known as: Sham

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical outcome after 6 months measured by modified Rankin scale score (0-6, Higher score indicates worse outcome)

    Assessed by telephone interview. Patient assessor is blinded to intervention

    Time frame: Assessed 6 months after initial aneurysm rupture.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in Infarct growth

    Assessed by MRI, measured by segmentation and calculation of infarct volume.

    Time frame: MRI performed 4-6 weeks after initial hemorrhage.

  2. Clinical outcome after 14 days measured by modified Rankin scale score (0-6, Higher score indicates worse outcome)

    Assessed by clinician in charge of patient discharge.

    Time frame: 14 days after initial hemorrhage.

  3. Occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia

    Neurological deterioration after aSAH where DCI is deemed most likely cause, supported by angiography/perfusion CT.

    Time frame: Within first 14 days after initial hemorrhage.

  4. Mortality after 3 months

    Assessed via patient records. Assessor is blinded to intervention.

    Time frame: Assessed at 3 months post initial hemorrhage

  5. Mortality after 12 months

    Assessed via patient records. Assessor is blinded to the intervention.

    Time frame: Assessed at 12 months post initial hemorrhage

  6. Presence of angiographic vasospasm on CT angiography baseline vs 8-day scan

    Evaluated by a neuro-radiologist with more than 10 years of experience in intracerebral angiography. Assessor is blinded to intervention.

    Time frame: 8-9 days post initial hemorrhage.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus N, Danmark DK-8200, Denmark
    Recruiting
    • Jens Christian H Sørensen, Prof., MD · Contact
    • Arzu Bilgin-Freiert, MD, PhD · Contactarzbil@rm.dk · +4529474197
    • Kim M Ørskov, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hess DC, Blauenfeldt RA, Andersen G, Hougaard KD, Hoda MN, Ding Y, Ji X. Remote ischaemic conditioning-a new paradigm of self-protection in the brain. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015 Dec;11(12):698-710. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.223. Epub 2015 Nov 20. PubMed 26585977 ↗
  • Gonzalez NR, Connolly M, Dusick JR, Bhakta H, Vespa P. Phase I clinical trial for the feasibility and safety of remote ischemic conditioning for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2014 Nov;75(5):590-8; discussion 598. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000514. PubMed 25072112 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article after de-identification of participants

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: Beginning 3 moths and ending 5 years following publication of results

Access criteria: Proposals should be directed to kimoer@rm.dk. To gain access data requestors will need to sign a data processing agreement.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2027, 50 months after the start.

Of 57 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 50 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 67 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 5, 2023
First posted
Sep 13, 2023
StartActual
Sep 9, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
Last update
Oct 3, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06032533
Responsible party
Grethe Andersen (Professor, Consultant Neurologist, MD, Aarhus University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 13, 2023
Start date
Sep 9, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 3, 2025

Study contacts

Kim M Ørskov, MD
Contact
kimoer@rm.dk
+4542791933
Grethe Andersen, Prof., MD
principal investigator · Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital
Arzu Bilgin-Freiert, MD, PhD
study director · Department of Neurosurgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion