ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06032520FASTUpdated Jun 1, 2026

The Effectiveness of Forensic Outpatient Systemic Therapy: a Multiple Case Experimental Design

An observational study in Conduct Disorder, Antisocial Behavior and Aggression, sponsored by Utrecht University. Completed at 2 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-01.

Sponsored by Utrecht University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
21
Ages
12 Years to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and mediators of Forensic Outpatient Systemic Therapy (FAST).

Read the detailed description

Forensic Outpatient Systemic Therapy (in Dutch: Forensische Ambulante Systeem Therapie; FAST) is a promising treatment for juveniles showing severe antisocial behavior, including aggression, (domestic) violence, and delinquent behavior. FAST has a flexible intensity and length, addresses individual and systemic risk and protective factors, and is responsive to the abilities of the client (system), intervention characteristics all considered crucial for effective treatment. The current study will investigate whether FAST is effective in reducing aggression of the juvenile, in reaching client formulated subgoals, and in improving family functioning (i.e., reducing juvenile-caregiver conflict and increasing caregiver responsiveness). In addition, processes of change will be examined, as well as mediation by reaching client formulated subgoals and improved family functioning. A Multiple Case Experimental Design (MCED) with an ABC design will be performed (A = baseline, B = intervention, and C = follow-up). Juveniles with primary aggression and/or anger problems (N = 15) and their caregiver(s) will be recruited.

02

Conditions studied

  • Conduct Disorder
  • Antisocial Behavior
  • Aggression
  • Behavioral Disorder

Keywords

  • Multiple Case Experimental Design
  • Forensic Outpatient Systemic Therapy
  • Antisocial Behavior
  • Aggression
  • Mediation
  • Effectiveness
03

In context

Conduct Disorder

101 studies on the registry are indexed under Conduct Disorder; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 230 across 17 observational studies indexed under Conduct Disorder.

Browse Conduct Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Utrecht University is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes juveniles that will receive FAST. FAST is offered by de Waag, an outpatient forensic mental health care center in the Netherlands.

Eligibility criteria

FAST therapists determine whether clients meet inclusion and exclusion criteria of FAST during the standard intake procedure of FAST. The FAST inclusion criteria are:

  1. Juvenile has an estimated IQ-score of 80 or higher and/or sufficient adaptive skills to benefit from FAST;
  2. Juvenile is aged 12 to 21 years old at the start of the intervention;
  3. Juvenile exhibits externalizing behavior resulting in problems in at least two life areas (family, school, or leisure time), determined by clinical impressions based on information from intake and/or referrer information;
  4. Juvenile has a medium to high recidivism risk, measured by the Risk Assessment Instrument for Outpatient Forensic Mental Health Care Youth (RAF GGZ Youth);
  5. Presence of juvenile-caregiver relationship problems, measured by the RAF GGZ Youth;
  6. Juvenile has a diagnosis of a behavioral disorder, which is determined using a new diagnostic process or case file analysis;
  7. Juvenile and caregiver(s) cannot be motivated to follow treatment at the treatment site after multiple attempts by the therapist;
  8. Juvenile resides with their caregiver(s) or is expected to return to residing with their caregiver(s) within the first two months of FAST.

The FAST exclusion criteria are:

  1. Juvenile exhibits severe psychiatric symptoms requiring admission;
  2. Problem behavior of the juvenile is caused primarily by substance abuse problems and it is expected that treatment of the substance abuse problems will decrease the problem behavior;
  3. The safety of the family members or therapist cannot be sufficiently guaranteed.

To be eligible for participation in this study, one modified study inclusion criterium applies, i.e., the juvenile has primary aggression and/or anger problems (approximately 80% of referred juveniles). In addition, one study exclusion criterium applies, i.e., the juvenile is in secure residential care or confined in a correctional or detention facility at start of the intervention.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Forensic Outpatient Systemic Therapy (FAST)

    FAST is a promising treatment for juveniles showing severe antisocial behavior, including aggression, (domestic) violence, and delinquent behavior. FAST has a flexible intensity and length, addresses individual and systemic risk and protective factors, and is responsive to the abilities of the client (system), intervention characteristics all considered crucial for effective treatment.

    Behavioral: FAST

Interventions

  • BehavioralFAST

    FAST includes around 3 hours of face-to-face direct treatment time weekly and consists of a maximum of 10% online direct treatment time (i.e., treatment via phone, video-calling or texting). The treatment stage of FAST lasts five to nine months depending on the individual goals of the juvenile and the caregiver(s) and is followed by a period of aftercare.

    Also known as: Forensic Outpatient Systemic Therapy, Forensische Ambulante Systeem Therapie

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Aggression assessed by the Aggressive Behavior scale of the Youth Self Report (YSR)

    The YSR is a self-reported instrument. The Aggressive Behavior scale contains 19 items assessing aggression. Possible scores range from 1 (never) to 100 (always).

    Time frame: Twice a week during phase A, up to 5 weeks; every other week during phase B, up to 8 months; weekly during phase C, 6 weeks

  2. Change in Aggression assessed by the Aggressive Behavior scale of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)

    The CBCL is a caregiver-reported instrument. The Aggressive Behavior scale contains 19 items assessing aggression. Possible scores range from 1 (never) to 100 (always).

    Time frame: Twice a week during phase A, up to 5 weeks; every other week during phase B, up to 8 months; weekly during phase C, 6 weeks

  3. Change in Client Formulated Subgoals assessed by the FAST Goal list

    The FAST Goal list is a self-report instrument for juveniles and caregivers. It contains 21 items with possible scores ranging from 0 (not true at all) to 100 (definitely true). The FAST Goal lists are used in an idiographic and client-guided approach. The first questionnaire in phase A contains the entire FAST Goal list and a follow-up question asks participants to prioritize their top three FAST goals. In the subsequent measurements, only the items measuring the three prioritized goals are administered. Added to these three items, a fourth item measures whether prioritization or goals have changed. If so, the participant is asked to state their new prioritization or goals, and the questions about the new goals are added in the subsequent measurements.

    Time frame: Twice a week during phase A, up to 5 weeks; every other week during phase B, up to 8 months; weekly during phase C, 6 weeks

  4. Change in Juvenile-Caregiver Conflict assessed by the Network of Relationship Inventory (NRI)

    The NRI is a self-reported instrument for juveniles and caregivers. The NRI contains six items with possible scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 100 (the most).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); twice a week during phase A, up to 5 weeks; every other week during phase B, up to 8 months; T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months; weekly during phase C, 6 weeks

  5. Change in Caregiver Responsiveness assessed by the the Responsiveness Scale of the Nijmeegse Parenting Questionnaire (NPQ)

    The NPQ is a self-reported instrument for juveniles and caregivers. The the Responsiveness Scale contains eight items with possible scores ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 100 (completely agree).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); twice a week during phase A, up to 5 weeks; every other week during phase B, up to 8 months; T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months; weekly during phase C, 6 weeks

  6. Change in Additional Criminogenic Needs assessed by individualized items

    If severe truancy, substance use, contact with deviant peers, or delinquent behavior are reported at T1 but not prioritized in the top three goals, single items will be administered on these problems as well.

    Time frame: Twice a week during phase A, up to 5 weeks; every other week during phase B, up to 8 months; weekly during phase C, 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Externalizing Behavior assessed by the Youth Self Report (YSR)

    The YSR is a self-reported instrument. The Externalizing scale contains 30 items assessing aggression and delinquency. Possible scores range from 0 (never) to 2 (often).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  2. Change in Externalizing Behavior assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)

    The CBCL is a caregiver-reported instrument. The Externalizing scale contains 36 items assessing aggression and delinquency. Possible scores range from 0 (never) to 2 (often).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  3. Change in Delinquency assessed with the Self-Report Delinquent Behavior (SDB)

    The SDB is a self-reported instrument, assessing how many times the juvenile has done certain (rule-breaking) things in the past year. The SDB contains 30 items.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  4. Percentage of Participants with Out of Home Placement assessed using File Analysis

    A participant is viewed as being placed out of home when they do not reside with their primary family, either temporarily or permanently, and either voluntarily or involuntarily. Out of home placement is registered by therapists during treatment as part of the standard FAST procedure.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  5. Percentage of Participants with Out of Home Placement assessed using an Out of Home Placement Questionnaire

    A participant is viewed as being placed out of home when they do not reside with their primary family, either temporarily or permanently, and either voluntarily or involuntarily. Out of home placement will be assessed using a questionnaire measuring living situation, which is filled in by juveniles and caregivers. The questionnaire contains one item assessing where the juvenile lives most days of the week.

    Time frame: T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  6. Change in Recidivism Risk assessed with the RAF GGZ Youth

    The RAF GGZ Youth is an extensive risk assessment instrument and includes items measuring recidivism risk. The RAF GGZ Youth is filled in by the therapist as part of the standard FAST procedure. Possible scores range from 1 (low) to 5 (high).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  7. Change in Substance Use assessed with the Peilstation Middelengebruik

    Peilstation Middelengebruik is a self-reported instrument. It contains five items assessing frequency and intensity of substance use.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  8. Change in Substance Use assessed with the RAF GGZ Youth

    The RAF GGZ Youth is an extensive risk assessment instrument and includes items measuring substance use. The RAF GGZ Youth is filled in by the therapist as part of the standard FAST procedure.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  9. Change in Substance Use assessed with the FAST Goal list

    The FAST Goals List is filled in by juveniles, caregivers, and therapists as part of the standard FAST procedure, and assess the achievement of FAST goals in the past two months. The list includes 1 item on change in substance use. Possible scores range from 1 (not true at all) to 10 (absolutely true).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  10. Change in Contact with Deviant Peers assessed with the Basic Peer Questionnaire (BPQ)

    The BPQ is a self-reported instrument with 13 items. Possible scores differ per question, for instance measuring amount of friends, or 0 (never) to 4 (5 times or more).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  11. Change in Social Support assessed by the Parental Support Questionnaire (PSQ)

    The PSQ is a caregiver self-reported instrument and contains 15 items. Possible scores range from 0 (no) to 1 (yes), and 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (satisfied).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  12. Change in Caregiver-Adolescent Relationship Quality assessed by the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA)

    The IPPA is a juvenile self-reported instrument and contains 12 items per caregiver. Possible scores range from 1 (almost never) to 4 (almost always).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  13. Change in Caregiver-Adolescent Relationship Quality assessed by the Nijmeegse Parenting Stress Index (NPSI)

    The NPSI is a caregiver self-reported instrument and contains nine items. Possible scores range from 1 (not applicable at all) to 6 (completely applicable).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  14. Change in Caregiver Consistency assessed by the Consistency Scale of the Parenting Dimensions Inventory (PDI)

    The PDI is a juvenile and caregiver self-reported instrument. The Consistency scale contains eight items. Possible scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  15. Change in Behavioral Control assessed by the Parenting Practices

    The Parent Practices is a juvenile and caregiver self-reported instrument and contains six items. Possible scores range from 1 (never) to 5 (always).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  16. Change in Discipline Practices assessed by the Parenting Dimensions Inventory (PDI)

    The PDI is a juvenile and caregiver self-reported instrument and contains three hypothetical situations with six items each. Possible scores range from 1 (very improbable) to 6 (very probable).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  17. Change in Psychological Control assessed by the Psychological Control Scale Youth Self-Report (PCS-YSR)

    The PCS-YSR is a self-reported instrument and contains eight items. Possible scores range from 1 (not applicable at all) to 5 (completely applicable).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  18. Change in Caregiver Competence assessed by the Nijmeegse Parenting Stress Index (NPSI)

    The NPSI is a caregiver self-reported instrument and contains 15 items. Possible scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  19. Change in Parental Monitoring assessed by the Parental Monitoring Scale

    The Parental Monitoring Scale is reported on by juveniles. It contains five items and one additional item measuring parental knowledge about school grades. Possible scores range from 1 (nothing) to 4 (everything).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  20. Change in Cognitive Distortions assessed by the Brief Irrational Thoughts Inventory (BITI)

    The BITI is a self-reported instrument and is filled in by juveniles as part of the standard FAST procedure. The BITI contains 18 items with possible scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  21. Demographics assessed by a Demographic Information Questionnaire

    The Demographic information questionnaire contains items about gender, age, and occupation. The questionnaire contains nine items for juveniles, 19 for caregivers, and eight for therapists.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline)

  22. Primary Diagnosis assessed by Therapist File Search

    The therapist file contains the primary diagnosis of the juvenile.

    Time frame: T1 (baseline)

  23. Change in Personality assessed by the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU)

    The ICU is reported by juveniles and caregivers and contains 24 items. Possible scores range from 1 (completely untrue) to 4 (always true).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline)

  24. Change in Personality assessed by the Narcissism and Impulse Control scales of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD)

    The APSD is reported by juveniles and caregivers. The scales contain 12 items for juveniles and 16 items for caregivers. Possible scores range from 1 (completely true) to 4 (always true).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline)

  25. Caregiver Psychopathology assessed by the RAF GGZ Youth

    The RAF GGZ Youth is an extensive risk assessment instrument and includes items measuring caregiver psychopathology. The RAF GGZ Youth is filled in by the therapist as part of the standard FAST procedure. Possible scores range from 0 (problems not present) to 2 (problems definitely present).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline)

  26. Treatment Integrity assessed by the FAST Evaluation Forms

    The FAST evaluation forms are filled in by juveniles, caregivers, and therapists as part of the standard FAST procedure. Possible scores range from 0 (no) to 1 (yes), and 1 (very bad, never) to 10 (very good, always).

    Time frame: T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months from baseline

  27. Treatment Completion assessed by Therapist File Search

    Treatment completion will be assessed by coding whether FAST completion was registered as positive or negative.

    Time frame: T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months from baseline

  28. Treatment Duration assessed by Therapist File Search

    Treatment duration will be calculated based on the registered direct treatment time by therapists in their appointment agendas. Treatment duration will be measured in weeks.

    Time frame: T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months from baseline

  29. Treatment Intensity assessed by Therapist File Search

    Treatment intensity will be calculated based on the registered direct treatment time by therapists in their appointment agendas. Treatment intensity will be measured in average hours of direct treatment time per week.

    Time frame: T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months from baseline

  30. Therapist-Client Alliance assessed by the Relationship with Interventionist

    The Relationship with Interventionist is a juvenile and caregiver self-reported instrument and contains 12 items. Possible scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree).

    Time frame: T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months from baseline

  31. Change in Treatment Motivation assessed by the Treatment Motivation Scales for Forensic Outpatient Treatment (TMS-F)

    The TMS-F is reported on by juveniles and caregivers and contains 16 items. Possible scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline); T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months

  32. Treatment Expectancies assessed by the Parent Expectancies for Therapy Scale (PETS)

    The PETS is a caregiver self-reported instrument and contains seven items. Possible scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).

    Time frame: T1 (baseline)

  33. Treatment Cooperation assessed by the Cooperation Scale

    The Cooperation Scale is reported on by juveniles, caregivers, and therapists and contains five items. Possible scores range from 1 (completely disagree) to 6 (completely agree).

    Time frame: T2 (post-intervention) up to 9 months from baseline

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • de Waag
    Utrecht, Netherlands
  • Utrecht University
    Utrecht, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The details on which parts of the data will be shared still have to be discussed.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2023 to primary completion in Dec 2025, 27 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 28, 2023
First posted
Sep 13, 2023
StartActual
Aug 25, 2023
Primary completionActual
Dec 18, 2025
CompletionActual
Dec 18, 2025
Last update
Jun 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06032520
Lead sponsor
Utrecht University
Collaborators
De Waag
Responsible party
Marjolein van Cappellen (PhD Student, Utrecht University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 13, 2023
Start date
Aug 25, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 18, 2025
Completion
Dec 18, 2025
Last update
Jun 1, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion