ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06026098Updated Sep 23, 2026

Evaluation of Impact of AI Assistance on Workload Associated w Preparation of Rare Tumor Case Repts

An interventional study of Artificial Intelligence in Cognitive Burden and Cognitive Symptom, sponsored by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to explore cognitive burden perceptions among physicians in relation to case report writing. Furthermore, this study evaluates the use of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance as a tool to reduce cognitive burden among providers preparing and submitting case reports. If an AI-tool is helpful in this setting, it may potentially help increase reporting of rare medical events and thereby improve the evidence base for care of these patient populations. This study will occur at a single time point which is expected to last approximately 2 hours. This session will include reviewing two rare tumor cases and then writing a clinical vignette with and without AI assistance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Burden
  • Cognitive Symptom

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • case report
03

In context

Neurobehavioral Manifestations

130 studies on the registry are indexed under Neurobehavioral Manifestations; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 74 across 96 interventional studies indexed under Neurobehavioral Manifestations.

Browse Neurobehavioral Manifestations studies →

Lead sponsor

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 429 studies on the registry; 97 are open to participants now.

Of its 33 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 26 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject is a physician, medical student, or postdoctoral student.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Case Report with Artificial Intelligence

    Medical students, resident physicians, or attending physicians report rare cases with using Artificial Intelligence.

    Behavioral: Artificial Intelligence

  • No intervention
    Case Report without Artificial Intelligence

    Medical students, resident physicians, or attending physicians report rare cases without using Artificial Intelligence.

Interventions

  • BehavioralArtificial Intelligence

    Participants will use the Artificial Intelligence assistance tool for case reports.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Subjective Cognitive workload (CWL)

    Subjective Cognitive workload (CWL) will be measured while interviews using The National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load (NASA TLX) index is a tool for measuring and conducting a subjective mental workload (MWL) assessment. The NASA-TLX is a subjective measure of CWL and is used across many disciplines. The NASA-TLX considers six dimensions-Mental, Physical, and Temporal Demands, Frustration, Effort, and Performance. NASA-TLX scores ≥55 have been associated with reduced performance in numerous settings. NASA-TLX is considered to be the most used subjective measure of CWL. The validated two-stage process with participants performing 15 separate pair-wise comparisons between 6 dimensions of NASA-TLX will be used. A workload score will be marked from low and high for each dimension. Score values from 0 -100. The Interpretation Score of NASA TLX for Low 0-9, Medium 10-29, Somewhat high 30-49, High 50-79, and Very high 80-100

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 hours

  2. Perceived cognitive load

    The perceived cognitive load will be measured using System Usability Scale (SUS). SUS is a validated post-test questionnaire that measures user satisfaction. Further, studies confirm that SUS is predictive of the impacts of changes to the user interface on usability when multiple changes to a single product were made over a large number of iterations. SUS is composed of 10 questions- five positive and five negative statements, each having a five-point scale that ranges from strongly disagree to strongly agree. SUS provides a score (range, 0-100) based on the participant's rating of 10 statements regarding usability with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with usability.

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06026098
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 6, 2023
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Shivani Sud
Contact
shivani.sud@unchealth.unc.edu
984-987-1072
Victoria Xu
Contact
victoria_xu@med.unc.edu
984-974-8744
Shivani Sud
principal investigator · UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion