ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06024824Updated Jul 20, 2025

Dose-Painted Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Pancreas (DP-IMRT Pancreas)

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Dose-Painted Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by Cancer Trials Ireland. Recruiting at 2 sites in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-20.

Sponsored by Cancer Trials Ireland · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective non-randomised Phase I/II Radiotherapy (RT) study with patients recruited to escalated dose cohorts. Patients with resectable or borderline resectable (per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria) pancreatic adenocarcinoma will receive dose-escalated hypofractionated DP-IMRT via Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) / Volume Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT).

Read the detailed description

The study treatment is radiotherapy. Different doses of radiotherapy will be given to patients. The first group of patients will receive the lowest dose (dose level 1) (this is the dose delivered to patients as standard of care). If the treatment does not cause serious side effects, it will be given to the next group of patients enrolled at a higher dose (dose level 2) (this is called 'dose escalation'). If this higher dose of treatment does not cause serious side effects, the next group of patients will receive a higher dose (dose level 3). The doses will continue to increase for every group of patients, as long as no serious side effects occur. If this happens, the study is halted. Once the optimum dose level has been reached, a larger cohort of patients will all receive this dose.

Phase I: A 3+3 dose escalation design is proposed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) defined by the number of radiotherapy-related ≥ Grade 3 acute toxicities assessed up to 4 weeks post RT. Three cohorts of between 3 and 6 patients at each dose level will be accrued in order to establish the MTD (minimum of 6, maximum of 18 patients). The MTD defined in Phase I will be the dose which will be used in Phase II of the trial. Phase II: 49 patients: Once the MTD is established, patients will continue to be recruited at that dose level up to a total of 49 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cancer Trials Ireland is the lead sponsor of 71 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Written obtained prior to any study-related procedures
  2. Age ≥18 years
  3. (European Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status (PS) 0-2
  4. Resectable or borderline resectable per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria (see Appendix H)
  5. Patients with confirmed Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with the following staging: cT1N0-2, cT2N0-2, cT3N0-2 [American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition] (see Appendix C) who are planned for pre-operative systemic chemo-radiotherapy
  6. Imaging with Computed Tomography Thorax Abdomen and Pelvis (CT TAP) and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Abdomen confirms no evidence of disease
  7. Females of (see Appendix G) must not be pregnant (or lactating) and must be prepared to use adequate methods during treatment. Males whose female partners are of child-bearing potential must be prepared to use adequate contraception methods during treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Previous thoracic or abdominal or pelvic radiation therapy (RT)
  2. Previous treatment for regression, other than stenting
  3. Known co-existing or prior within the last 5 years (except for Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) or Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the skin) which is likely to interfere with treatment or assessment of outcomes
  4. Syndromes or conditions associated with increased radiosensitivity
  5. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness that is likely to interfere with treatment or assessment of outcomes, or psychiatric illness/ social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
  6. Evidence of any other significant clinical disorder or laboratory findings that makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study, or if it is felt by the research/ Medical team that the patient may not be able to comply with the protocol and follow up schedule due to psychological, familial, sociological or geographical conditions
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
49 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radiation; IMRT

    Fifteen fractions of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) delivered via IMRT/ VMAT. Cohort 1 (n = 3-6) Single PTV 40.05 Gy/15#, homogenous dose\* Cohort 2 (n = 3-6) High Risk PTV 45 Gy/15# SIB to PTV tumour, Elective PTV 40.05 Gy/15# to nodal regions\* Cohort 3 (n = 3-6) High risk PTV 48 Gy/15# SIB to PTV tumour, Elective PTV 40.05 Gy/15# to nodal regions \* Progression to the next dose in successive cohorts depends on the number of patients experiencing DLTs within 4 weeks post-RT treatment in each patient cohort.

    Radiation: Dose-Painted Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Interventions

  • RadiationDose-Painted Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

    Fifteen fractions of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) delivered via IMRT/ VMAT. Cohort 1 (n = 3-6) Single PTV 40.05 Gy/15#, homogenous dose. Cohort 2 (n = 3-6) High Risk PTV 45 Gy/15# SIB to PTV tumour, Elective PTV 40.05 Gy/15# to nodal regions. Cohort 3 (n = 3-6) High risk PTV 48 Gy/15# SIB to PTV tumour, Elective PTV 40.05 Gy/15# to nodal regions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase 1 - to establish the MTD in a dose-escalated and hypofractionated RT regime delivered via IMRT/VMAT by the number of DLTs

    To establish the MTD in a dose-escalated and hypofractionated RT regime delivered via IMRT/VMAT by the number of DLTs, and the rate of patient withdrawal from trial treatment due to DLTs. Analysis will be performed for each cohort after all patients have been assessed for their 4-week post RT assessment.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Phase 2 - to determine the frequency and severity of DLTs due to AE/Toxicity meeting definition of DLT at 4 weeks post RT

    The rate of DLTs up to 4 weeks post RT will be calculated. This proportion along with the 90% confidence intervals will be reported.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Phase 2 - to determine the rate of patient withdrawal from trial treatment due to AE/Toxicity meeting definition of DLT at 4 weeks post RT

    The rate of withdrawal from trial treatment of patients due to DLTs will be calculated. This proportion along with the 90% Confidence Interval will be reported. Other toxicity data including SAEs will be summarised and presented in tabular format with proportions plus 95% Confidence Interval where appropriate.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. To quantify the percentage of histologically proven R0 resections in the trial patient group (R0 to be defined as a minimal clearance of at least1 mm).

    The percentage of histologically proven R0 resections in this patient group (R0 to be defined as a minimal clearance of at least 1 mm) will be presented with 95% Confidence Interval.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. To determine the rate of failure to progress to surgery due to disease progression during neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and conversely the proportion of patients who do receive surgical resection

    The rate of failure to progress to surgery due to disease progression during neoadjuvant radiotherapy will be presented with 95% Confidence Interval. The rate of progression to surgery will be presented with 95% CI. The proportion of patients who receive surgical resection overall will be presented with 95% Confidence Interval.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. To document the proportion of peri-operative complications

    The proportion of patients with peri-operative complications will be presented with 95% Confidence Interval.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. To evaluate the impact of treatment on OS, overall and by resectability (whether resectable or borderline resectable)

    The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate OS. This will be expressed as median survival with 95% Confidence Interval and will be analysed after patients have been followed for two years after completion of study treatment. The Log-rank test will be used to compare differences in survival between resectable and borderline resectable patients.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. To evaluate the impact of treatment on PFS, overall and by resectability (whether resectable or borderline resectable)

    The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate PFS. This will be expressed as median survival with 95% Confidence Interval and will be analysed after patients have been followed for two years after completion of study treatment. The Log-rank test will be used to compare differences in survival between resectable and borderline resectable patients.

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. To evaluate tumour response on surgically resected patients using resected specimens

    The proportion of surgically resected patients receiving at least 14 fractions of RT with tumour response using the resected specimens will be presented with 95% Confidence Interval.

    Time frame: 2 years

  7. To evaluate Quality of Life

    The mean (and standard deviation) of the overall and domain specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) Quality Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C30 scores at each time point will be reported (pre-chemotherapy, pre-RT, pre-surgery, 6-, 12- and 24-months post RT). The EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire has five functioning subscale scores and nine symptoms subscale scores. Minimum value = 0; Max value = 100 Function Scales: Higher numbers mean better function Symptom Scale: Higher numbers mean more symptoms

    Time frame: 2 years

  8. To evaluate Quality of Life

    The mean (and standard deviation) of the overall and domain specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) Quality Life Questionnaire (QLQ) PAN 26 scores at each time point will be reported (pre-chemotherapy, pre-RT, pre-surgery, 6-, 12- and 24-months post RT). The EOTRC QLQ PAN 26 questionnaire is a tumour specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with pancreatic cancer. Minimum value = 0; Max value = 100 Function Scales: Higher numbers mean better function Symptom Scale: Higher numbers mean more symptoms

    Time frame: 2 years

  9. To evaluate the incidence of late GI toxicities in patients who do not undergo surgical resection

    The incidence of late toxicity at 6-, 12- and 24-months post-RT, in patients who do not undergo surgical resection, will be calculated, summarised and presented in tabular format with proportions plus 95% Confidence Interval where appropriate. Toxicities of ≥ Grade 2 are of specific interest. Counts and frequencies will be provided for the worst grade AE experienced

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 42 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 16, 2023
First posted
Sep 6, 2023
StartActual
Jan 30, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 2031
Last update
Jul 20, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06024824
Lead sponsor
Cancer Trials Ireland
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 6, 2023
Start date
Jan 30, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 20, 2025

Study contacts

Cancer Trials Ireland
Contact
info@cancertrials.ie
+35316677211

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion