CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06024005Updated Sep 5, 2023

Comparison of the Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation and Drug Treatment' Effects in Women With Overactive Bladder

An interventional study of Oral Solifenacin 5mg and Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS) in Overactive Bladder and Overactive Bladder Syndrome, sponsored by Ege University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-05.

Sponsored by Ege University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a symptom complex characterized by sudden urgency, frequent urination, nocturia, and urge incontinence without any identifiable organic cause, significantly impacting the quality of life. One of the most prominent symptoms is the urgency to urinate accompanied by a sudden sensation of bladder fullness.

There are various treatment options available for managing OAB, including conservative therapy, pharmacotherapy, and surgical management. High-level evidence supports solifenacin as the standard medical treatment for OAB, offering advantages such as not being affected by food intake, efficacy regardless of gender, and high bioavailability. However, it is known to cause discontinuation of treatment in many cases due to the occurrence of side effects. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a neuromodulation technique that has been internationally recognized and proven effective in the treatment of OAB, providing several advantages. It can be applied through two methods: percutaneous (PTNS) and transcutaneous (TTNS). PTNS is an invasive method that requires specialized equipment and a trained healthcare professional, which limits its routine use due to treatment costs.

In the literature, it is stated that in the treatment of OAB, alone or combined PTNS applications are superior to drug monotherapies, but there are limited studies on this subject. Therefore, the study aim was to compare the efficacy, side effects and quality of life of solifenacin and TTNS.

Read the detailed description

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 34 female patients with OAB were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 17 individuals in each group. Patients with odd case numbers were assigned to the Oral Solifenacin group, while those with even case numbers were assigned to the TTNS group.

Prior to treatment, the sociodemographic characteristics, birth history, and past treatment information of all participants were recorded. Basic urogynecological evaluation, pelvic floor ultrasound, and urine culture were performed. To assess symptoms and quality of life, the Overactive Bladder Assessment Form (OAB-V8), Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (I-QQL), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), and a three-day bladder diary were used. After 6 weeks of treatment, all evaluations were repeated. The treatment regimen consisted of once-daily oral solifenacin for the medication group and 2 sessions per week, 30 minutes per session, for 12 sessions using the Urostim-2 device for the TTNS group. The stimulation intensity was increased until a motor or sensory response was obtained, and the threshold value was determined. The entire TTNS procedure was performed under the supervision of an expert physician at the Urogynecology Outpatient Clinic of Ege University Hospital. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 20.0.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder
  • Overactive Bladder Syndrome

Keywords

  • Overactive Bladder
  • Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
  • Neuromodulation
  • Urge Urinary Incontinence
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

855 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 125 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 72 across 652 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Ege University is the lead sponsor of 365 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients with a diagnosis of OAB and unresponsive to first-line treatment,
  • Absence of genito-urinary system malformations that may cause pollacullaire,
  • Volunteering to participate in the research,
  • To be literate in Turkish

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a urinary tract infection,
  • Having pelvic organ prolapse greater than stage 2,
  • To be diagnosed with stress type urinary incontinence,
  • Having narrow-angle glaucoma, myasthenia gravis and severe gastro-intestinal diseases,
  • Patients undergoing hemodialysis,
  • Having severe liver or kidney failure,
  • Pregnancy,
  • Having a pacemaker
  • Presence of epilepsy,
  • The presence of built-in metal in the ankle
  • Open ankle wound
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Device Group

    Transcutaneous device group with Urostim 2

    Device: Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS)

  • Active comparator
    Drug Group

    Drug Group with Kinzy 5 mg

    Drug: Oral Solifenacin 5mg

Interventions

  • DrugOral Solifenacin 5mg

    Oral solifenacin (Kinzy 5mg) use once a day for 6 weeks

    Also known as: Kinzy 5mg

  • DeviceTranscutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS)

    Application of TTNS twice a week for 6 weeks, with each session for 30 minutes

    Also known as: Urostim 2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Total Daily Incontinence Episodes

    It was obtained using a three-day bladder diary. Objective. Meaningful for patients. Correlates with patients' daily activities. It may not be directly related to the severity of urine leakage. Subject to variability. Requires patient compliance. Day and night urine leakages were recorded separately by the patient for three days. The mean total score for a day was calculated.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Evaluation of Quality of Life

    The Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (I-QOL), consisting of 22 questions, was used to analyze the improvement in quality of life. It is a validated questionnaire. Higher scores indicate a better level of quality of life compared to lower scores. It is meaningful for patients. It is standardized. It takes into account the patient's daily activities. Subjective. Subject to variability. Not correlated with the severity of urine leakage.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptom Assessment

    Overactive Bladder Assessment Form (OAB-V8), was used for symptomatic evaluation and to assess the impact of symptoms on quality of life. It is a validated questionnaire. A higher score means a worse outcome. Meaningful for patients. It is standardized. The patient's daily activities are taken into account. Subjective. Subject to variability. Not correlated with the severity of urine leakage.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Symptom Assessment

    Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), was used for symptomatic evaluation and to assess the impact of symptoms on quality of life. It is a validated questionnaire. A lesser score means a better outcome. Meaningful for patients. It is standardized. The patient's daily activities are taken into account. Subjective. Subject to variability. Not correlated with the severity of urine leakage.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Symptom Assessment

    Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), was used for symptomatic evaluation and to assess the impact of symptoms on quality of life. It is a validated questionnaire. A lesser score means a better outcome. Meaningful for patients. It is standardized. The patient's daily activities are taken into account. Subjective. Subject to variability. Not correlated with the severity of urine leakage.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ege University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    İzmir, 35100, Turkey
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 5, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06024005
Lead sponsor
Ege University
Responsible party
Ahmet Ozgur Yeniel (Professor, Ege University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 5, 2023
Start date
Apr 18, 2023
Primary completion
May 24, 2023
Completion
May 24, 2023
Last update
Sep 5, 2023

Study contacts

Ahmet Ozgur OY Yeniel
principal investigator · Ege University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion