ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06010316Updated Aug 24, 2023

A Prospective Single-center Cohort Study of Surgical Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

An observational study in Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis), Cohort Study and Evidence-based Medicine, sponsored by Beijing Tongren Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-24.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Disease)No conditionIs this wrong?Disease describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by Beijing Tongren Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2025, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common and frequent disease in otorhinolaryngology. The main symptoms of patients include nasal congestion, runny nose, swelling pain of the frontal area and decreased sense of smell. Chronic rhinosinusitis refers to chronic rhinosinusitis with symptoms lasting ≥12 weeks and can be divided into two subgroups: chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps. Chronic rhinosinusitis has a complex pathogenesis, there are three main pathogenic factors: infection, allergy and nasal and sinus anatomic abnormalities, these factors are often not a single existence, but often intertwined. In addition, environmental factors, genetic factors, osteitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, respiratory ciliary system defects, systemic immune dysfunction and other secondary risk factors.

For patients with chronic sinusitis, these symptoms, such as nasal congestion, runny nose, swelling pain and decreased sense of smell, often seriously affect their quality of life, and even evolve into more serious complications as the disease progresses. At present, the conventional treatment methods mainly include drug conservative treatment and nasal endoscopic surgery. Functional nasal endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is the main method of further surgical treatment for patients with no obvious effect of drug treatment. In FESS, the current emphasis is on removing diseased tissue and restoring sinus drainage on the premise of preserving the normal mucosa and physiological structure of the nasal and nasal sinuses as much as possible.

Up to now, there have been many studies on surgical treatment of CRS, and the quality of the studies varies. However, in view of the postoperative efficacy and long-term prognosis of different subtypes of CRS, different treatment methods during surgery and different drug therapy regimens, our research group believes that it is necessary to accumulate a large amount of clinical data support through in-depth research and comprehensive analysis. Thus more reliable conclusions can be drawn. In this study, patients undergoing CRS surgery in the research ward of the Department of rhinosinusitis will be actively included through a prospective single-center cohort study to provide evidence for evidence-based medicine and better guide clinical rhinologists to make surgical treatment decisions for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)
  • Cohort Study
  • Evidence-based Medicine

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lead sponsor

Beijing Tongren Hospital is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with chronic sinusitis in the research ward of the Department of Rhinology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • (1) Meeting the CRS diagnostic criteria in the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Sinusitis (2018); (2) The effect of conservative drug treatment is not good or there are indications of surgery; (3) Good compliance, able to complete clinical observation. Compliance with guidelines

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) The patient has conditions or co-existing diseases that may preclude the primary efficacy endpoint evaluation, such as benign or malignant tumors of the nasal cavity; (2) co-existing diseases that may interfere with clinical efficacy results, including but not limited to: Cystic fibrosis, eosinophilic granuloma with polyvasculitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome), granuloma with polyvasculitis (Wegener's granuloma), Young's synthesis, tuberculosis or other pathogen infection, , etc. (3) The patient had other medical or non-medical conditions that the investigator considered unsuitable for participation in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS).

    TNSS is used to assess the severity of nasal symptoms (runny nose, nasal congestion, hyposmia, sneezing): 0 = asymptomatic; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms. The sum of the scores of each symptom is used as the TNSS.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 1 year after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. The changes in VAS score.

    The visual Analogue Scale (VAS) can be used to assess symptom severity, with a score of 0 representing no distress and a score of 10 representing the most severe distress imaginable. 0\~2 was classified as mild, 3\~7 as moderate, 8\~10 as severe. A score above 5 indicates an impact on quality of life.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 1 year after surgery

  2. The changes in SNOT-22 score.

    The 22-item Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22) was used to evaluate the changes in symptoms of patients. According to the severity of symptoms caused by RCRS, each item was divided into 6 levels: 0 = no distress ,1 = mild distress, 2 = mild distress, 3 = moderate distress, 4 = severe distress, 5 = very severe distress. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms, and the final total score of the item is counted.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 1 year after surgery

  3. The changes in asthma ACQ score.

    For patients with asthma, we assessed the change of asthma symptoms through the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). Each question was scored on a scale of 0 to 6 according to the severity. The result score of each item was averaged. A score of \<0.75 indicated that the asthma had been completely controlled; a score of 0.75-1.5 indicates well-controlled asthma; a score of \>1.5 indicates that asthma is not controlled.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 1 year after surgery

  4. The changes in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) score.

    Bilateral polyp volume size described using the NPS (0 - 4 points per side: 0 = no polyp; 1 = small polyp in the middle meatus, not reaching the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = small polyp in the middle meatus, reaching the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyp protruding from the middle meatus, not reaching the inferior border of the inferior turbinate; 4 = large polyp that almost causes most or complete obstruction of the nasal cavity).

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 1 year after surgery

  5. The changes in sinus CT score.

    The Lund-Mackay imaging scoring system was used for the CT scan results of the sinuses (0, 1, and 2 were used for each frontal sinus, anterior ethmoid sinus, posterior ethmoid sinus, maxillary sinus, and sphenoid sinus, indicating no opacity, partial opacity and all turbidity of the sinus cavity respectively; 0 and 2 were used for each side of the sinus complex to indicate no blockage and presence of blockage) to calculate the total score and E/M value (bilateral ethmoid total score/bilateral maxillary sinus total score), etc.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 1 year after surgery

  6. The changes in olfactory symptom score.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 1 year after surgery

  7. The changes of eosinophils in peripheral blood

    The changes of eosinophils in peripheral blood were different from pre-operation.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 1 year after surgery

  8. The changes of IgE in peripheral blood.

    The changes of IgE in peripheral blood were different from pre-operation.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 1 year after surgery

  9. The changes in biomarkers in nasal exfoliated cells and nasal secretion swabs.

    Changes in expression levels of T1, T2, T3 factors and T2 inflammatory markers CST1 and CLC in nasal brush exfoliated cells and nasal secretions.

    Time frame: Pre-operation, 1 year after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06010316
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 24, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 24, 2023

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion