CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06000007Updated Mar 31, 2026Results posted

Digital Therapeutic for Chronic Pain Feasibility Study

A Phase 2 interventional study of 2Morrow Chronic Pain Self-Management Program - digital therapeutic mobile app and Treatment as usual in Chronic Pain, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators will conduct a 2-arm randomized control feasibility study to evaluate: 1) the feasibility of using the mobile app and an optional activity tracker, 2) the feasibility of conducting a 2-arm trial, and 3) estimate the effect size for planning for a larger efficacy trial based on our primary outcomes. The intervention arm will test a mobile app that aims to help people reduce pain interference who have chronic pain, as well as mental health issues with depression and anxiety. Participants in the intervention arm will also have the option to sense health data with a tracker that integrates with the app, which will inform the feasibility of this feature.

Read the detailed description

This study will evaluate the existing 2Morrow Chronic Pain Self-Management Program, in the form of a mobile app, as a digital therapeutic for improving patients' pain self management and function who suffer from chronic pain. Specifically, the investigators will conduct a 2-arm randomized control feasibility study to evaluate: 1) the feasibility of using the mobile app and an optional activity tracker, 2) the feasibility of conducting a 2-arm trial, and 3) estimate the effect size for planning for a larger efficacy trial based on our primary outcomes. The intervention arm will test a mobile app that aims to help people reduce pain interference who have chronic pain, as well as mental health issues with depression and anxiety. Participants in the intervention arm will also have the option to sense health data with a tracker that integrates with the app, which will inform the feasibility of this feature.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • primary care
  • digital therapeutic
  • mobile app
  • pain function
  • pain interference
  • psychotherapy
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 108 is above the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,397 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 132 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • >=18 years old
  • at least one ICD pain related diagnosis noted in the electronic health record (EHR)
  • at least 2 visits in a primary care clinic with at least one in the last 12 months
  • willing to use a mobile app in English
  • T-score for the PROMIS brief pain inventory of >= 55
  • access to a smartphone
  • willing to download and use a mobile app daily

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current cancer related diagnosis (to exclude cancer related chronic pain)
  • plans for surgery in next 3 months
  • pregnant
  • currently receiving hospice care
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment as usual

    Treatment as usual arm entails the patients continuing to receive care from their primary care provider and any specialists they choose to get involved in their care.

    Other: Treatment as usual

  • Active comparator
    Intervention arm

    Intervention arm includes access to the digital therapeutic mobile app in addition to treatment as usual

    Device: 2Morrow Chronic Pain Self-Management Program - digital therapeutic mobile app

Interventions

  • Device2Morrow Chronic Pain Self-Management Program - digital therapeutic mobile app

    2Morrow Chronic Pain Self-Management Program is delivered via a mobile app that engaged patients in evidenced based psychotherapy for chronic pain, including Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy based activities, to improve a patient's pain self management. The mobile app also offers the ability to track activities, screen for other problems, support for communicating with medical providers, and access a coach via texting.

  • OtherTreatment as usual

    Treatment as usual entails continuing with treatment for chronic pain with the patient's primary care provider and any potential specialists they choose to engage with.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PROMIS Pain Interference Scale - Short Form 6b

    This self-report questionnaire consists of is a six-item that assesses the impact of pain on various aspects of a person's life (e.g., social, cognitive, emotional, physical and recreational activities) over the last 7 days. Responses are scored using a 5-point ordinal rating scale from 1 to 5 (1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much). Raw score totals are converted to T-score using the scoring manual. T-score of 50 is the mean for the U.S. general population with a standard deviation of 10; the higher the T-score, the worse the pain interference.

    Time frame: will be measured at baseline, 1-month, 3-month, and 6 month intervals

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)

    This self-report questionnaire consists of 9 items assessing depressive symptoms consistent with criteria for Major Depressive Disorder over the past two weeks. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 1 = several days, 2 = more than half the days, 3 = nearly every day). Item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms (worse outcome). A typical cut-off score for probable depression is ≥ 10 points. The measure has demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including high levels of sensitivity and specificity for identifying major depressive disorder.

    Time frame: will be measured at baseline, 1-month, 3-month, and 6 month intervals

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7)

    anxiety symptom measure; scores range from 0-21; higher scores are worse

    Time frame: will be measured at baseline, 1-month, 3-month, and 6 month intervals

07

Results

Posted Mar 31, 2026

Participant flow

Eligibility: aged \>=18, pain experience current and present for \>=3 months, \>=1 ICD code for common pain related condition, \>=2 primary care visits within last 12 months at time of recruitment, PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 6b T-score \>=55, daily smartphone access, ability to download an app, willingness to engage in a 3-month chronic pain self-management program administered via an app, speak English, and consented. Exclusions: cancer pain surgery within 3 months, pregnant, on hospice.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment as UsualIntervention Arm
Started4349
Completed4038
Not completed311

Outcome measures

PrimaryPROMIS Pain Interference Scale - Short Form 6b

This self-report questionnaire consists of is a six-item that assesses the impact of pain on various aspects of a person's life (e.g., social, cognitive, emotional, physical and recreational activities) over the last 7 days. Responses are scored using a 5-point ordinal rating scale from 1 to 5 (1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much). Raw score totals are converted to T-score using the scoring manual. T-score of 50 is the mean for the U.S. general population with a standard deviation of 10; the higher the T-score, the worse the pain interference.

Time frame:
will be measured at baseline, 1-month, 3-month, and 6 month intervals
Reported as:
Mean · T-score - difference scores between arms
PROMIS Pain Interference Scale - Short Form 6b
T-score - difference scores between armsTreatment as UsualIntervention Arm
baseline difference scores62.1 ± 5.562.1 ± 4.2
1-month different scores62.8 ± 5.760.8 ± 5.6
3-month difference61.9 ± 6.261.2 ± 5.6
6-month difference61.0 ± 6.159.9 ± 5.7
SecondaryPatient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)

This self-report questionnaire consists of 9 items assessing depressive symptoms consistent with criteria for Major Depressive Disorder over the past two weeks. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 1 = several days, 2 = more than half the days, 3 = nearly every day). Item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms (worse outcome). A typical cut-off score for probable depression is ≥ 10 points. The measure has demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including high levels of sensitivity and specificity for identifying major depressive disorder.

Time frame:
will be measured at baseline, 1-month, 3-month, and 6 month intervals
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)
units on a scaleTreatment as UsualIntervention Arm
baseline difference8.2 ± 6.18.5 ± 5.1
1-month difference8.3 ± 6.48.7 ± 5.3
3-month difference8.8 ± 5.87.9 ± 5.9
6-month difference7.7 ± 5.78.6 ± 5.4
SecondaryGeneralized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7)

anxiety symptom measure; scores range from 0-21; higher scores are worse

Time frame:
will be measured at baseline, 1-month, 3-month, and 6 month intervals
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7)
units on a scaleTreatment as UsualIntervention Arm
baseline difference6.6 ± 5.68.2 ± 5.3
1-month difference6.9 ± 6.18.0 ± 5.5
3-month difference6.8 ± 5.27.2 ± 5.9
6-month difference6.3 ± 577.0 ± 5.4

Adverse events

Collected over from enrollment until end of follow-up, at 6 months post baseline. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment as Usual0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)
Intervention Arm0/49 (0%)0/49 (0%)0/49 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Change in score on the PROMIS Pain Interference Scale - Short Form 6b from baseline will be the primary outcome measure

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Treatment as UsualIntervention ArmTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years343872
>=65 years91120
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Treatment as UsualIntervention ArmTotal
Gender000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment as UsualIntervention ArmTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian4711
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander022
Black or African American6713
White222143
More than one race9817
Unknown or Not Reported246
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment as UsualIntervention ArmTotal
Hispanic or Latino10919
Not Hispanic or Latino324072
Unknown or Not Reported101
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Washington Primary Care
    Seattle, Washington 98116, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Stephens, K. A., Ma, K., Keiser, B., Prado, M., Zhang, Y., West, I., Hsu, C., Anastas, T., Zbikowski, S., Waters, D., & Masterson, J. (2024, August). Improving chronic pain through use of a digital behavioral health app. Abstract and poster presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Seattle, WA.

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 23, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be made upon request after evaluation for appropriateness by principal investigator as an appropriate research request by individuals seeking to do further research. All data will be de-identified to protect participant privacy.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06000007
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
Responsible party
Kari Stephens (Professor of Family Medicine, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2023
Start date
Aug 25, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2024
Completion
Jul 30, 2024
Results posted
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Study contacts

Kari A Stephens, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion