ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05997212Updated Feb 10, 2025

Effect of Repetitive TMS on Executive Function in Alcohol Use Disorder

An interventional study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Sham) in Alcohol Use Disorder, sponsored by Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. Recruiting at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 59 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-10.

Sponsored by Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 59 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is a major public health problem that affects the physical, social, family, and mental integrity of the sufferer. Behavioral self-regulation is compromised in AUD, and a benefit has been reported with the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and emotional self-regulation. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of high-frequency rTMS to improve executive functions in patients in abstinence from AUD.

Read the detailed description

It is proposed that individuals predisposed to developing alcohol use disorder (AUD) exhibit alterations in executive functions, resulting from maladaptive cellular homeostatic processes and neuronal circuits activated by substance use. These alterations persist even after substance withdrawal (Nestler \& Aghajanian, 1997). As a multifactorial disorder, AUD has been linked to family history of alcohol use (Khemiri et al., 2020; Peterson et al., 1990; Tarter et al., 1989) and individual traits such as poor cognitive test performance relative to controls (Shnitko et al., 2018; Goudriaan et al., 2011), which may predict heavy alcohol consumption or AUD development.

These executive dysfunctions manifest as persistent negative behaviors that impede adaptive learning and reduced activation of the executive control network, both of which correlate with AUD severity (Mayhugh et al., 2014). Cognitive flexibility, a key executive function, enables adaptive adjustment of thoughts and behaviors in response to environmental demands (Uddin, 2021). Impaired cognitive flexibility is associated with AUD persistence and severity (Stalnaker et al., 2008), though recovery is observed after prolonged abstinence (Rourke \& Grant, 1999). Thus, cognitive flexibility may serve as a promising treatment biomarker.

McLellan et al. (2000) report that 40-60% of AUD patients relapse within the first year post-treatment, while at least 60% relapse within six months (Durazzo \& Meyerhoff, 2017; Kirshenbaum et al., 2009; Maisto et al., 2006a; Meyerhoff \& Durazzo, 2010). Given these challenges, non-invasive neuromodulation techniques like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have emerged as adjunct therapies to standard treatments (Diana et al., 2017). For example, Addolorato et al. (2017) applied high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in AUD patients and observed reduced alcohol consumption and increased abstinent days. Similarly, Del Felice et al. (2016) found that left DLPFC stimulation enhanced inhibitory control, selective attention, and mood in active alcohol users.

Stimulating the DLPFC, a hub of the executive control network, may enhance its functional connectivity and improve cognitive flexibility in AUD patients. These effects align with findings that rTMS bolsters inhibitory control and attention (Del Felice et al., 2016; Diana et al., 2017). To explore this further, we propose a longitudinal study assessing cognitive/behavioral traits in AUD patients that may contribute to disorder development. We will also evaluate rTMS effects using neuropsychological tools and MRI to measure structural/functional brain changes.

This study aims to investigate the short- and long-term clinical and cognitive effects of 10 Hz rTMS applied to the left DLPFC in abstinent AUD patients, alongside associated neurostructural and functional connectivity changes. Abstinent AUD patients will receive daily rTMS for four weeks. Clinical outcomes will be tracked for six months, with cognitive, structural, and functional connectivity measurements taken at baseline, post-intervention (4 weeks), and follow-up (6 months).

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Use Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • mri
  • rtms
  • tms
  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • mexico
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • executive function
03

In context

Alcoholism

1,674 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcoholism; 331 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 44 is below the median of 88 across 1,428 interventional studies indexed under Alcoholism.

Browse Alcoholism studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women of 25 to 59 years old
  • The reading level of at least 6th grade of primary (equivalent to fifth grade of elementary school).
  • Alcohol users with and AUDIT ≥ 20 puntos
  • Abstinence from alcohol consumption from 8 weeks to 5 years, with CIWA-Ar scale scores ≤ 9 points.
  • No disabling neuropsychiatric conditions (i.e. Schizophrenia)
  • No substance use disorders except alcohol and nicotine.
  • BrAC (Breath Alcohol) = 0.00 mg/dl in each of the assessments.
  • No traces of alcohol consumption using urine test strips.
  • No for TMS therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with symptoms of severe agitation or who are unable to cooperate in the study
  • History of epilepsy
  • Sudden onset of stroke, focal neurological findings such as hemiparesis, sensory loss, visual field deficits and lack of coordination.
  • Seizures or gait disturbances
  • History of severe psychiatric disorders.
  • Alterations in a conventional electroencephalogram.
  • Pacemakers or intracranial metallic objects.

Elimination criteria

  • At the subject's request
  • The presence of adverse incidents that deteriorate the subject's health and would limit continuation of rTMS treatment.
  • Exacerbation of cognitive or behavioral symptoms during treatment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active rTMS frequency at 10 Hz

    The intervention will be Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Each patient will receive treatment stimulation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) with a frequency of 10 Hz, that includes 2 sessions per day for 20 consecutive business days for 4 weeks. Each session will consist of the application of rTMS at a frequency of 10 Hz, to 100% of the motor threshold. The lDLPFC target will be determined using their resting state functional connectivity between anterior cingulate cortex and lDLPFC. Our algorithm performs a calculation of the individual localization of the participant's lDLPFC, which will be used for the whole study in that particular participant.

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS frequency at 10 Hz

    The intervention will be Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Sham). For this patients the coil will be located on the vertex. Each patient will receive sham stimulation with a frequency of 10 Hz, that includes 2 sessions per day for 20 consecutive business days for 4 weeks. Each session will consist of the application of rTMS at a frequency of 10 Hz, to 100% of the motor threshold. The lDLPFC target will be determined using their resting state functional connectivity between anterior cingulate cortex and lDLPFC. Our algorithm performs a calculation of the individual localization of the participant's lDLPFC, which will be used for the whole study in that particular participant.

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Sham)

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    The investigators will use a Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator, Airfilled coil (AFC), 8 shape (magnetic field of 0.8 Teslas, 3Kg, pulse 0.5 ms) Each patient will receive high frequency 10 Hz stimulation at 100% of motor threshold over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at 1500 pulses per session with 30 trains of 5 seconds and 0.5 ms stimuli and an inter-train distance of 15 seconds. In 2 daily sessions 4 days a week for 4 weeks.

  • DeviceRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Sham)

    The investigators will use a Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator, Airfilled coil (AFC), 8 shape (magnetic field of 0.8 Teslas, 3Kg, pulse 0.5 ms) Each patient will receive consistent treatment in 2 sessions a day for 20 consecutive business days for 4 weeks. The coil will be placed on the vertex target location.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Wisconsin Card Sorting Task

    Measured by Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) to evaluate cognitive flexibility

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

  2. Change STROOP effect

    Measured by STROOP test to evaluate control inhibition

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

  3. Change Visoespatial Memory

    Measured by Visoespatial Memory test to evaluate visoespatial memory

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Taskswitching Task Switch cost

    Measured by Taskswitching task to evaluate cognitive flexibility

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

  2. Change in Flanker Task Flanker Efect

    Measured by Flanker task to evaluate control inhibition

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

  3. Change in Nback Task accuracy

    Measured by Nback task to evaluate working memory

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

  4. Change in Alcohol Craving (VAS)

    The craving will be measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scales

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  5. Changes in psychopathological symptoms

    Measured by the Symptoms Questionnaire 90 (SCL-90)

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  6. Changes in WHODAS score

    Measured by Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  7. Changes in Anxiety

    Measured by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  8. Changes in Depression

    Measured by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  9. Changes in functional connectivity

    Functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal with the anterior cingulate cortex, measured with fMRI defined by the temporal correlation in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals of the regions. Higher correlations indicate stronger functional connectivity.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Unidad de Resonancia Magnética
    Querétaro City, Queretaro 76230, Mexico
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All clinical and MRI data will be shared with each patient's written consent. Identification information will not be shared, only the RID, and all MRI structural data will be defaced prior to sharing. MRI data will be uploaded to Open Neuro while the clinical data will be uploaded to Zenodo.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Analytic code

Time frame: Data will be shared once the study is finished and published, aproximately in 2027

Access criteria: open access

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05997212
Lead sponsor
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Collaborators
National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico
Responsible party
Eduardo Adrian Garza Villarreal (Assistant Professor, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 18, 2023
Start date
Mar 16, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 10, 2025

Study contacts

Alejandra Lopez Castro, MD, MSc
Contact
alejandraloc@comunidad.unam.mx
+524422381038
Eduardo A Garza-Villarreal, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion