ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05983731Updated Aug 9, 2023

A Pilot Observational Study to Assess the Ability of Continuous 'Home' EEG to Accurately Diagnose Narcolepsy and Demonstrate Response to Treatment

An observational study in Narcolepsy Type 1 and Hypersomnia, sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-09.

Sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
12 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this pilot observational study is to assess the ability of continuous 'home' EEG to accurately diagnose Narcolepsy in children and young people with hypersomnia. The main question[s]it aims to answer are:

  • can ambulatory home monitoring using a Dreem headband with a 'life as usual' unrestricted protocol allow accurate diagnosis of Narcolepsy, compared to gold standard in-patient PSG and MSLT
  • which EEG derived sleep parameters and study duration yield most diagnostic accuracy

Participants undergoing investigation for hypersomnia will additionally be asked to wear a Dream Headband at night for weeknights, then continuously for 48 hours over the weekend. The data from the headband will then be analysed to see if it can predict the results of the polysomnography and MSLT that form routine clinical care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Narcolepsy Type 1
  • Hypersomnia
03

In context

Disorders of Excessive Somnolence

196 studies on the registry are indexed under Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 104 across 29 observational studies indexed under Disorders of Excessive Somnolence.

Browse Disorders of Excessive Somnolence studies →

Lead sponsor

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 295 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will comprise children and young adults seen in the hypersomnia clinics of the LifeSpan sleep service at Guys and St Thomas' Hospital and The Evelina London Children's Hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants already under investigation within GSTT children and adult sleep service for hypersomnolence
  • Age 12 to 25 years of age at recruitment
  • Participants able to understand patient information (information including DH instructions written only in English for this initial observational study) and who can provide written or assent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any physician diagnosed sleep disorder (e.g. sleep apnea)
  • Any physician diagnosed medical or psychiatric disorder that could explain their excessive daytime sleepiness
  • Regular use of either prescribed or recreational medication that affects sleep
  • Participation in another concurrent research study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of diagnosis of Narcolepsy Type 1 derived by Dreem Headband compared to standard ICSD-3 protocol

    Sensitivity (%) of Dreem headband derived EEG in predicting a final diagnosis of Narcolepsy derived from gold standard in-patient clinical testing with polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test ICSD-3 protocol.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Specificity of diagnosis of Narcolepsy Type 1 derived by Dreem Headband compared to standard ICSD-3 protocol

    Specificity (%) of Dreem headband derived EEG in predicting a final diagnosis of Narcolepsy derived from gold standard in-patient clinical testing with polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test ICSD-3 protocol.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Positive predictive value of diagnosis of Narcolepsy Type 1 derived by Dreem Headband compared to standard ICSD-3 protocol

    Positive predictive value (%) of Dreem headband derived EEG in predicting a final diagnosis of Narcolepsy derived from gold standard in-patient clinical testing with polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test ICSD-3 protocol.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Negative predictive value of diagnosis of Narcolepsy Type 1 derived by Dreem Headband compared to standard ICSD-3 protocol

    Negative predictive value (%) of Dreem headband derived EEG in predicting a final diagnosis of Narcolepsy derived from gold standard in-patient clinical testing with polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test ICSD-3 protocol.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2023; primary completion for Apr 2025, 19 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 17, 2023
First posted
Aug 9, 2023
StartEst.
Sep 2023
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2025
CompletionEst.
Aug 2025
Last update
Aug 9, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05983731
Collaborators
University of Surrey
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 9, 2023
Start date
Sep 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 9, 2023

Study contacts

Thomas Rossor, PhD
Contact
thomas.rossor@gstt.nhs.uk
+442071887188
Paul Gringras
Contact
paul.gringras@gstt.nhs.uk

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion