ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05980637Updated Aug 8, 2023

Effectiveness and Safety of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction With Addition on the Sleep-related Leg Cramps

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction with Addition and Placebo in Sleep-related Leg Cramps, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-08.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2025, 1 year 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial using a Chinese Medicine formula in treating Sleep-related Leg Cramps. Subjects will be randomized into a treatment group or placebo group for 4 weeks, and then post-treatment visit at week 6 and week 8.

Read the detailed description

The sleep-related leg cramps (SRLC), also called nocturnal leg cramps (NLC), is a sleep-related limb movement disorder in which painful contractions of the calf or foot muscles occur during sleep, thereby interrupting the patient's rest. It can happen at any ages, but is particularly prevalent among the elderly.

In Chinese medicine, leg cramps, first mentioned in the book of "Huangdi Neijing" (The Yellow Emperor's Cannon of Internal Classic), is characterized by muscular spasm and contracture of a limb resulting in difficulty in relaxation and movement. SRLC is an impediment disease caused by the invasion of wind-cold damp pathogens in the muscles and sinews, together with the dual deficiency of qi and blood that fails to nourish the muscles and sinews, leading to painful contraction of muscles.

Currently, no treatments have been proven both safe and effective for SRLC. Passive stretching and deep tissue massage, which are patient-controlled maneuvers on relieving muscle tension, are usually recommended despite limited proof of effectiveness.

Shaoyao Gancao Decoction was first introduced in the book of "Shang Han Lun" (Treatise on Cold Attack) written by the venerated Physician Zhang Zhongjing in the Eastern Han dynasty. It consists of two herbs, i.e., Paeoniae Radix Alba and Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma Praeparata Cum Melle, and has the therapeutic functions of moderating painful spasms and alleviating pain. It is commonly used in Chinese medicine practice for treating abdominal pain, lack of strength in walking, spasms of the calf muscles, and restless leg syndrome. Modern pharmacological studies showed that Shaoyao Gancao Decoction possesses anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antispasmodic effects. It has been shown that the use of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction could inhibit mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in rats with chronic compressive injury.

In 2009, a prospective observational pilot study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of modified Shaoyao Gancao Decoction on 30 eligible subjects with SRLC in a cohort study and the result is positive.

Based on the positive results of the pilot study, it shows that SGDA is a promising herbal treatment method for SRLC, and propose a randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled trial to scientifically determine the effectiveness and safety of this formula for the treatment of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction with Addition (SGDA) of SRLC. Subjects will be randomized into a treatment group or placebo group for 4 weeks, and then post-treatment visits at week 6 and week 8.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep-related Leg Cramps

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sleep-related Leg Cramps
  • Shaoyao Gancao Decoction with Addition
03

In context

Muscle Cramp

65 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscle Cramp; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Muscle Cramp.

Browse Muscle Cramp studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,454 studies on the registry; 474 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 60 or above of both genders;
  • Complain of muscular spasm and contracture of the lower limb with difficulty in relaxation and movement at night;
  • Meet the diagnostic criteria of The International Classification of Sleep Disorders (3rd Edition) for SRLC [2];
  • Meet the syndrome differentiation of the blood stasis or blood deficiency in Traditional Chinese Medicine.
  • Regular SRLC occurs at least once per week on average within past month;
  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) ≥ 5; and
  • Willing to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known mental disorder or neurologic disorder;
  • Known serious organic disease including severe cardiovascular disease, post-stroke depression, cancer and dementia,;
  • Currently on anticoagulants, antiplatelet medications, hypnotics, anxiolytics, positive inotropic drugs, and estrogenic and testosterone which may interfere with the study medications.
  • Impaired hematological profile and liver / renal function exceeds the upper limit of the reference value by 2 times;
  • Known allergic to Chinese medicines; and
  • Any for taking Chinese medicines in the opinion of the investigators;
  • Known history of lower limb surgery;
  • Known pregnant or breast-feeding.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Shaoyao Gancao Decoction with Addition

    11g of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction with Addition granules twice daily for 4 weeks

    Drug: Shaoyao Gancao Decoction with Addition

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    11g of placebo granules twice daily for 4 weeks

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugShaoyao Gancao Decoction with Addition

    11g twice daily for 4 weeks

    Also known as: SGDA

  • OtherPlacebo

    11g twice daily for 4 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of painfulness

    The VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity which will be self assessed by subjects daily, with the scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. The change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of painfulness

    The VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity which will be self assessed by subjects daily, with the scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: week 2

  2. The change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of painfulness

    The VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity which will be self assessed by subjects daily, with the scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: week 6

  3. The change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of painfulness

    The VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity which will be self assessed by subjects daily, with the scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: week 8

  4. The change in frequency of SRLC

    Frequency of SRLC will be recorded by subjects daily.

    Time frame: week 2

  5. The change in frequency of SRLC

    Frequency of SRLC will be recorded by subjects daily.

    Time frame: week 4

  6. The change in frequency of SRLC

    Frequency of SRLC will be recorded by subjects daily.

    Time frame: week 6

  7. The change in frequency of SRLC

    Frequency of SRLC will be recorded by subjects daily.

    Time frame: week 8

  8. The change in total duration of SRLC per week

    Duration of SRLC will be recorded by subjects daily.

    Time frame: week 2

  9. The change in total duration of SRLC per week

    Duration of SRLC will be recorded by subjects daily.

    Time frame: week 4

  10. The change in total duration of SRLC per week

    Duration of SRLC will be recorded by subjects daily.

    Time frame: week 6

  11. The change in total duration of SRLC per week

    Duration of SRLC will be recorded by subjects daily.

    Time frame: week 8

  12. The change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) score

    The SF-36 is a 36-item scale, which measures eight domains of health status: physical functioning; physical role limitations; bodily pain; general health perceptions; energy/vitality; social functioning; emotional role limitations and mental health. It will be self assessed by subjects. The scores are transformed to range from 0 (where the respondent has the worst possible health) to 100 (where the respondent is in the best possible health).

    Time frame: week 2

  13. The change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) score

    The SF-36 is a 36-item scale, which measures eight domains of health status: physical functioning; physical role limitations; bodily pain; general health perceptions; energy/vitality; social functioning; emotional role limitations and mental health. It will be self assessed by subjects. The scores are transformed to range from 0 (where the respondent has the worst possible health) to 100 (where the respondent is in the best possible health).

    Time frame: week 4

  14. The change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) score

    The SF-36 is a 36-item scale, which measures eight domains of health status: physical functioning; physical role limitations; bodily pain; general health perceptions; energy/vitality; social functioning; emotional role limitations and mental health. It will be self assessed by subjects. The scores are transformed to range from 0 (where the respondent has the worst possible health) to 100 (where the respondent is in the best possible health).

    Time frame: week 6

  15. The change in the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) score

    The SF-36 is a 36-item scale, which measures eight domains of health status: physical functioning; physical role limitations; bodily pain; general health perceptions; energy/vitality; social functioning; emotional role limitations and mental health. It will be self assessed by subjects. The scores are transformed to range from 0 (where the respondent has the worst possible health) to 100 (where the respondent is in the best possible health).

    Time frame: week 8

  16. The change in the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    PSQI measures the quality and pattern of sleep in older adult by measuring seven domains in 19 questions, which will be self-assessed by subjects.The scoring is 0-3 on a Likert scale.

    Time frame: week 2

  17. The change in the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    PSQI measures the quality and pattern of sleep in older adult by measuring seven domains in 19 questions, which will be self-assessed by subjects.The scoring is 0-3 on a Likert scale.

    Time frame: week 4

  18. The change in the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    PSQI measures the quality and pattern of sleep in older adult by measuring seven domains in 19 questions, which will be self-assessed by subjects.The scoring is 0-3 on a Likert scale.

    Time frame: week 6

  19. The change in the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    PSQI measures the quality and pattern of sleep in older adult by measuring seven domains in 19 questions, which will be self-assessed by subjects.The scoring is 0-3 on a Likert scale.

    Time frame: week 8

  20. The score of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    PGIC is a self-reported measure which reflects a patient's impression on the efficacy of treatment. It is a 7-point scale detecting patient's rating on the overall improvement of treatment. The patient can rate from 1 (very much improved) to 4 (no change) to 7 (very much worse).

    Time frame: week 2

  21. The score of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    PGIC is a self-reported measure which reflects a patient's impression on the efficacy of treatment. It is a 7-point scale detecting patient's rating on the overall improvement of treatment. The patient can rate from 1 (very much improved) to 4 (no change) to 7 (very much worse).

    Time frame: week 4

  22. The score of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    PGIC is a self-reported measure which reflects a patient's impression on the efficacy of treatment. It is a 7-point scale detecting patient's rating on the overall improvement of treatment. The patient can rate from 1 (very much improved) to 4 (no change) to 7 (very much worse).

    Time frame: week 6

  23. The score of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    PGIC is a self-reported measure which reflects a patient's impression on the efficacy of treatment. It is a 7-point scale detecting patient's rating on the overall improvement of treatment. The patient can rate from 1 (very much improved) to 4 (no change) to 7 (very much worse).

    Time frame: week 8

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2023; primary completion for Feb 2025, 17 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 21, 2023
First posted
Aug 8, 2023
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Feb 28, 2025
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2025
Last update
Aug 8, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05980637
Responsible party
Prof. Lin Zhixiu (Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 8, 2023
Start date
Sep 1, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 8, 2023

Study contacts

Zhixiu Lin, PhD
Contact
linzx@cuhk.edu.hk
35053476
Tin Muk Ho, Master
Contact
raytmho@cuhk.edu.hk
39433505
Zhixiu Lin, PhD
principal investigator · Hong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion