ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05979090Updated Jul 10, 2026

Mastery Learning in Communication Skills

An interventional study of Mastery learning in communication skills in Communication Research, Communication, Personal and Burnout, Professional, sponsored by Heather Ballard. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by Heather Ballard · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered Jul 2023).
  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to determine whether mastery learning in communication skills can improve skills in a simulated environment and have translational improvements in outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does mastery learning improve skills in the simulation laboratory? 2. Does mastery learning improve clinical skills as seen by milestone performance? and 3 Does mastery learning improve burnout levels? The study is a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial of anesthesiology residents from five different residency programs. Participants will be randomized to mastery training in communication skills and standard of care, which is vicarious learning. Researchers will compare these two groups to see if mastery learning improves skills and translational outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Communication Research
  • Communication, Personal
  • Burnout, Professional
03

In context

Communication

719 studies on the registry are indexed under Communication; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 144 across 571 interventional studies indexed under Communication.

Browse Communication studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Heather Ballard as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Anesthesiology residents rotating at Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant refusal
  • Study participants who have already undergone the mastery learning in difficult conversations course.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mastery Learning Group

    Behavioral: Mastery learning in communication skills

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care Group

Interventions

  • BehavioralMastery learning in communication skills

    Participants will undergo simulation-based mastery learning curriculum in difficult conversations.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Communication skills

    Post test checklist skills scores, a 16-item checklist was developed using the modified Delphi technique with possible scores of 0 (lowest) to 16 (highest). All items in the checklist are graded dichotomously and (1 if done correctly and 0 if not done or done incorrectly.

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Milestones Performance

    The ACGME interpersonal and communication core competency is subdivided into three Anesthesiology Milestones: Patient and Family-centered communication, Interprofessional and Team Communication, and Communication within Health Care Systems. Each milestone is graded on a score of 1 (novice) to 5 (expert) by each residency program's Clinical Competency Committee (CCC).

    Time frame: two years

  2. Burnout levels

    The Maslach Burnout Inventory Scale (MBI-9) will be used to estimate the levels of burnout prior to participation in the intervention, immediately after course completion, and at 2 and 6 months after training. The MBI is a measure of job burnout defined by three subscales: emotional exhaustion (EE) (9 items), depersonalization (DP) (5 items), and professional accomplishment (PA) (8 items), each with 7-point Likert-type, frequency response scale (0 = never, 1 = a few times a year or less, 2 = once a month or less, 3 = a few times a month, 4 = once a week, 5 = a few times a week, 6 = every day) \[1, 2\]. Scales are scored such that higher scores indicate more of each construct. Higher scores on the EE and DP subscales indicate a higher burnout symptom burden; lower scores on the PA subscale indicate a higher burnout symptom burden.

    Time frame: 1.5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Northwestern University Simulation Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — de-identified study data will be available upon request when study is completed and published

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05979090
Lead sponsor
Heather Ballard
Responsible party
Heather Ballard (Principal Investigator, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 7, 2023
Start date
Jan 18, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Study contacts

Heather Ballard, MD
Contact
hballard@luriechildrens.org
3122275170
Heather Ballard, MD
principal investigator · Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion