ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05971238Updated Aug 2, 2023

Eye Movement Behaviour and Pupil Size in Natural Outdoor and Indoor Scenes

An interventional study of Indoor vs. outdoor scenes in Light Sensitivity, sponsored by Technical University of Munich. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-02.

Sponsored by Technical University of Munich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2023, 3 years 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2023; still recruiting 3 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, the researchers will be using eye tracking and detailed lighting measurements to understand how different types of indoor and outdoor lighting affect the eye movements and pupil sizes of our participants. Participants will be paired up and undergo six eye tracking sessions, split across two appointments. Each appointment will involve viewing either indoor or outdoor scenes, and before each session, participants will spend time adapting to the lighting conditions. Overall, each participant will spend 24 minutes being tracked, and the entire study will take about 2-3 hours to complete. The investigators expect differences in eye movements and pupil size between indoor and outdoor scenes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Light Sensitivity

Browse trials for

03

In context

Photophobia

43 studies on the registry are indexed under Photophobia; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 43 across 36 interventional studies indexed under Photophobia.

Browse Photophobia studies →

Lead sponsor

Technical University of Munich is the lead sponsor of 320 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • No previous eye-surgeries or ocular impairments like anisometropia, amblyopia, strabism, cataract, watery eyes or hanging eye lids
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity (+3dpt. to -5dpt.)
  • Normal colour vision
  • Normal binocular vision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any use of medications or drugs that influence photosensitivity or the ability to concentrate
  • Excessive alcohol and/or drug use
  • Presence of psychiatric disorders
  • Poor sleep quality
  • Diagnosed with epilepsy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Eye-tracking, pupillometry and scene rating indoors & outdoors

    Other: Indoor vs. outdoor scenes

Interventions

  • OtherIndoor vs. outdoor scenes

    Light conditions in indoor (artificial light) and outdoor (daylight) settings

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Saccade frequency - Indoor scene 1

    Number per second \[n/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Saccade frequency - Indoor scene 2

    Number per second \[n/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Saccade frequency - Indoor scene 3

    Number per second \[n/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Saccade frequency - Outdoor scene 1

    Number per second \[n/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Saccade frequency - Outdoor scene 2

    Number per second \[n/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Saccade frequency - Outdoor scene 3

    Number per second \[n/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Saccade amplitude - Indoor scene 1

    Mean angular distance traveled \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Saccade amplitude - Indoor scene 2

    Mean angular distance traveled \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Saccade amplitude - Indoor scene 3

    Mean angular distance traveled \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Saccade amplitude - Outdoor scene 1

    Mean angular distance traveled \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Saccade amplitude - Outdoor scene 2

    Mean angular distance traveled \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  12. Saccade amplitude - Outdoor scene 3

    Mean angular distance traveled \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  13. Saccade velocity - Indoor scene 1

    Mean peak velocity \[°/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  14. Saccade velocity - Indoor scene 2

    Mean peak velocity \[°/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  15. Saccade velocity - Indoor scene 3

    Mean peak velocity \[°/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  16. Saccade velocity - Outdoor scene 1

    Mean peak velocity \[°/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  17. Saccade velocity - Outdoor scene 2

    Mean peak velocity \[°/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  18. Saccade velocity - Outdoor scene 3

    Mean peak velocity \[°/s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  19. Fixation duration - Indoor scene 1

    Mean fixation duration \[s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  20. Fixation duration - Indoor scene 2

    Mean fixation duration \[s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  21. Fixation duration - Indoor scene 3

    Mean fixation duration \[s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  22. Fixation duration - Outdoor scene 1

    Mean fixation duration \[s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  23. Fixation duration - Outdoor scene 2

    Mean fixation duration \[s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  24. Fixation duration - Outdoor scene 3

    Mean fixation duration \[s\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  25. Fixation frequency - Indoor scene 1

    Number per minute \[n/min\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  26. Fixation frequency - Indoor scene 2

    Number per minute \[n/min\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  27. Fixation frequency - Indoor scene 3

    Number per minute \[n/min\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  28. Fixation frequency - Outdoor scene 1

    Number per minute \[n/min\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  29. Fixation frequency - Outdoor scene 2

    Number per minute \[n/min\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  30. Fixation frequency - Outdoor scene 3

    Number per minute \[n/min\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  31. Pupil size - Indoor scene 1

    Mean pupil size \[mm\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  32. Pupil size - Indoor scene 2

    Mean pupil size \[mm\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  33. Pupil size - Indoor scene 3

    Mean pupil size \[mm\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  34. Pupil size - Outdoor scene 1

    Mean pupil size \[mm\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  35. Pupil size - Outdoor scene 2

    Mean pupil size \[mm\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  36. Pupil size - Outdoor scene 3

    Mean pupil size \[mm\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  37. Melanopic irradiance - Indoor scene 1

    Irradiance \[W/(sqm\*nm)\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  38. Melanopic irradiance - Indoor scene 2

    Irradiance \[W/(sqm\*nm)\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  39. Melanopic irradiance - Indoor scene 3

    Irradiance \[W/(sqm\*nm)\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  40. Melanopic irradiance - Outdoor scene 1

    Irradiance \[W/(sqm\*nm)\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  41. Melanopic irradiance - Outdoor scene 2

    Irradiance \[W/(sqm\*nm)\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  42. Melanopic irradiance - Outdoor scene 3

    Irradiance \[W/(sqm\*nm)\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  43. Photopic illuminance - Indoor scene 1

    Illuminance \[lux\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  44. Photopic illuminance - Indoor scene 2

    Illuminance \[lux\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  45. Photopic illuminance - Indoor scene 3

    Illuminance \[lux\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  46. Photopic illuminance - Outdoor scene 1

    Illuminance \[lux\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  47. Photopic illuminance - Outdoor scene 2

    Illuminance \[lux\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  48. Photopic illuminance - Outdoor scene 3

    Illuminance \[lux\]

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective scene ratings - Indoor scene 1

    * Unabbreviated scale titles (1)., min. and max, values (2.), score assessment (3.): * 1. "How beautiful is this scene to you?" 2. "1 = not beautiful at all; 10 = extremely beautiful" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the brightness of this scene?" 2. "1 = dimly lit room; 10 = bright sunny day" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How visually comfortable did you find this scene?" 2. "1 = No discomfort; 10 = Very uncomfortable" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the complexity of the scene (e.g. colour contrasts, different object identities, moving objects)?" 2. "1 = very simple; 10 = Very complex" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How sleepy do you currently feel" 2. "1 = Extremely alert; 10 = Extremely sleep, can't keep awake" 3. Lower score is better

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Subjective scene ratings - Indoor scene 2

    * Unabbreviated scale titles (1)., min. and max, values (2.), score assessment (3.): * 1. "How beautiful is this scene to you?" 2. "1 = not beautiful at all; 10 = extremely beautiful" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the brightness of this scene?" 2. "1 = dimly lit room; 10 = bright sunny day" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How visually comfortable did you find this scene?" 2. "1 = No discomfort; 10 = Very uncomfortable" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the complexity of the scene (e.g. colour contrasts, different object identities, moving objects)?" 2. "1 = very simple; 10 = Very complex" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How sleepy do you currently feel" 2. "1 = Extremely alert; 10 = Extremely sleep, can't keep awake" 3. Lower score is better

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Subjective scene ratings - Indoor scene 3

    * Unabbreviated scale titles (1)., min. and max, values (2.), score assessment (3.): * 1. "How beautiful is this scene to you?" 2. "1 = not beautiful at all; 10 = extremely beautiful" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the brightness of this scene?" 2. "1 = dimly lit room; 10 = bright sunny day" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How visually comfortable did you find this scene?" 2. "1 = No discomfort; 10 = Very uncomfortable" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the complexity of the scene (e.g. colour contrasts, different object identities, moving objects)?" 2. "1 = very simple; 10 = Very complex" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How sleepy do you currently feel" 2. "1 = Extremely alert; 10 = Extremely sleep, can't keep awake" 3. Lower score is better

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Subjective scene ratings - Outdoor scene 1

    * Unabbreviated scale titles (1)., min. and max, values (2.), score assessment (3.): * 1. "How beautiful is this scene to you?" 2. "1 = not beautiful at all; 10 = extremely beautiful" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the brightness of this scene?" 2. "1 = dimly lit room; 10 = bright sunny day" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How visually comfortable did you find this scene?" 2. "1 = No discomfort; 10 = Very uncomfortable" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the complexity of the scene (e.g. colour contrasts, different object identities, moving objects)?" 2. "1 = very simple; 10 = Very complex" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How sleepy do you currently feel" 2. "1 = Extremely alert; 10 = Extremely sleep, can't keep awake" 3. Lower score is better

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Subjective scene ratings - Outdoor scene 2

    * Unabbreviated scale titles (1)., min. and max, values (2.), score assessment (3.): * 1. "How beautiful is this scene to you?" 2. "1 = not beautiful at all; 10 = extremely beautiful" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the brightness of this scene?" 2. "1 = dimly lit room; 10 = bright sunny day" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How visually comfortable did you find this scene?" 2. "1 = No discomfort; 10 = Very uncomfortable" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the complexity of the scene (e.g. colour contrasts, different object identities, moving objects)?" 2. "1 = very simple; 10 = Very complex" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How sleepy do you currently feel" 2. "1 = Extremely alert; 10 = Extremely sleep, can't keep awake" 3. Lower score is better

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Subjective scene ratings - Outdoor scene 3

    * Unabbreviated scale titles (1)., min. and max, values (2.), score assessment (3.): * 1. "How beautiful is this scene to you?" 2. "1 = not beautiful at all; 10 = extremely beautiful" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the brightness of this scene?" 2. "1 = dimly lit room; 10 = bright sunny day" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How visually comfortable did you find this scene?" 2. "1 = No discomfort; 10 = Very uncomfortable" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How would you rate the complexity of the scene (e.g. colour contrasts, different object identities, moving objects)?" 2. "1 = very simple; 10 = Very complex" 3. No better or worse outcome * 1. "How sleepy do you currently feel" 2. "1 = Extremely alert; 10 = Extremely sleep, can't keep awake" 3. Lower score is better

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Geographical scene location - Indoor scene 1

    Longitude and latitude \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Geographical scene location - Indoor scene 2

    Longitude and latitude \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Geographical scene location - Indoor scene 3

    Longitude and latitude \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Geographical scene location - Outdoor scene 1

    Longitude and latitude \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Geographical scene location - Outdoor scene 2

    Longitude and latitude \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  12. Geographical scene location - Outdoor scene 3

    Longitude and latitude \[°\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  13. Ambient temperature - Indoor scene 1

    Temperature \[°C\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  14. Ambient temperature - Indoor scene 2

    Temperature \[°C\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  15. Ambient temperature - Indoor scene 3

    Temperature \[°C\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  16. Ambient temperature - Outdoor scene 1

    Temperature \[°C\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  17. Ambient temperature - Outdoor scene 2

    Temperature \[°C\]

    Time frame: Baseline

  18. Ambient temperature - Outdoor scene 3

    Temperature \[°C\]

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Alexander Hahn · Contact
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 2, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05971238
Collaborators
Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Responsible party
Manuel Spitschan (Assistant Professor of Chronobiology & Health, Technical University of Munich) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 2, 2023
Start date
Jul 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 2, 2023

Study contacts

Alexander Hahn
Contact
alexander.hahn@tuebingen.mpg.de
+49(0)70716011670
Manuel Spitschan, PhD
Contact
manuel.spitschan@tuebingen.mpg.de
Manuel Spitschan, PhD
principal investigator · Technical University of Munich & Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion