ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05960630MIRRORS-RCTPUpdated Nov 18, 2023

MIRRORS-RCT Pilot: Role of Robotic Interval Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer

An interventional study of MIRRORS Protocol and Standard Open Cytoreductive Surgery in Ovarian Cancer, Ovarian Neoplasm and Ovarian Neoplasm Epithelial, sponsored by Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-18.

Sponsored by Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2023; still recruiting 3 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 292 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms with a site in United Kingdom — 54 open to participants now, 85 under way, 24 of them phase 3. Ovarian Neoplasms · United Kingdom.

Planned enrollment
234th of 248
20 · median 159
Started
2023
with 10 others
No phase
15 of 292
3 open now
Primary completion
2024-12
later than 10 of 84 live
Registered
249th of 292
by date

Among the 292 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms with a site in United Kingdom, this one is the 234th largest by planned enrollment of the 248 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 11 that started in 2023, is one of 15 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 10 of the 84 other live ones, and was the 249th registered.

Ovarian Neoplasms

3,381 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms; 790 are open to participants now.

Browse Ovarian Neoplasms studies →

Open to participants now

54 of the 292 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms with a site in United Kingdom are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

49 more — sign in →

All 54 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United Kingdom have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United Kingdom →

Who these studies take

Of the 606 Ovarian Neoplasms studies recruiting now, 443 (73%) set no upper age limit and 107 (18%) stop at 75 or younger; 39 take children under 18; 45 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 292 studies in Ovarian Neoplasms with a site in United Kingdom, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The survival of ovarian cancer patients is dependent on the stage at diagnosis; more than 70% of patients present with advanced stage disease (stage III/IV). In England, one-year survival is 98.7% at stage I and 51.4% at stage IV and five-year survival is 93.3% and 13.4% respectively. Standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer involves surgery to remove all visible tumour and chemotherapy. Removal of all visible disease, so no tumour deposits are visible to the naked eye at the end of first-line surgery, is one of the strongest predictors of overall survival.

A majority of the women presenting with advanced disease are older and frail. Extensive open surgery discriminates against such women as they may not be well enough for the surgery offered. A recent national audit in England found that 60.1% of women over the age of 79yrs diagnosed with ovarian cancer received no cancer treatment at all. The ability to provide the same surgery via a minimally invasive route such as robotic surgery potentially widens access to cancer treatment.

The MIRRORS Feasibility study (NCT04402333) completed recently at the Royal Surrey County Hospital in Guildford showed significantly enhanced recovery with short length of stay and reduced blood loss enabling faster recommencement of chemotherapy in women with advanced disease undergoing robotic surgery compared to open surgery (requiring a cut in the abdomen).

In the current proposed study funded by Intuitive Foundation and GRACE Charity, the investigators will establish the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial and collect data from three hospital sites to inform a future phase 3 randomised controlled trial. The aim will be to to improve patient experience, access to surgery, recovery, reduce morbidity and reduce time to chemotherapy by incorporating robotic cytoreductive surgery into the ovarian cancer treatment pathway for women with a pelvic mass \</=8cm

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis: in selected cases of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, robotic surgery is safe and acceptable, facilitates maximal debulking surgery and is associated with improved patient outcomes.

MIRRORS- RCT Pilot is a Randomised controlled trial (RCT) to establish whether; the MIRRORS protocol can operate successfully as an RCT at other sites, that patients are willing to be recruited and randomised, before commencing a national multicentre trial. The aim is to provide proof of the concept that a larger adequately powered multi-centre RCT is feasible.

All Women with Stage 3c or greater EOC with a pelvic mass ≤8cm will be identified at diagnosis from the first MDT discussion. All patients will have a CT at presentation which will be used to screen women as suitable or not for inclusion. Potential eligible participants will be offered inclusion and provided with a participant information leaflet and study consent form to consider for at least 24 hours prior to review in clinic. Participants opting to participate will then undergo the consent process. They will sign the study consent form following discussion and have the opportunity to ask any questions they wish. This consent process will be carried out with an experienced member of the clinical team who is authorised, trained and competent to do so. Participants will then be asked to complete baseline questionnaires.

All screened patients will have the following anonymised basic information collected: date of birth, age, ethnicity, reason not eligible and reason for declining if eligible but declined.

Participants found to have progressive disease will not be offered cytoreductive surgery and will then be excluded from the trial.

Following recruitment to the study, eligible patients will be randomised by the PI or delegated member of the clinical investigating team at local sites in a 2:1 ratio MIRRORS vs standard management (SM) using the Sealed Envelope randomisation service. Eligibility and consent will be verified before each patient is randomised.

The two arms of the study are:

MIRRORS Protocol (Diagnostic Laparoscopy proceed to either robotic or open Interval cytoreductive surgery with conversion to open at any point should this be required to remove all visible disease).

Standard Open Interval Cytoreductive Surgery (Surgery will proceed directly with standard open interval cytoreductive surgery through an extended midline incision).

A surgery date will be arranged enabling all randomised patients are booked onto an appropriate theatre list (robotic or open) with an appropriately experienced surgeon. This will ensure that robotic resources and theatre time is not wasted.

Patients, surgeons and treating physicians will not be blinded to the treatment. However, the statistician conducting the analysis will be blinded to the treatment allocation.

At the second MDT review, following a CT performed after 2 or 3 cycles of chemotherapy, some randomised patients may have to be excluded from the study at this point; for example, due to disease progression. It is expected that the attrition will be balanced between treatment arms, but it is possible that given the relatively small numbers included in the study, there may be some imbalance in the groups at the end of the recruitment period.

As is standard practice, the surgery will be discussed in detail and informed consent for the surgery will be undertaken during the participant's next clinic visit. Consent will be re-confirmed on the morning of surgery. All participants who join the study are free to change their mind and withdraw at any time during the study. The decision will not affect their care in any way. The anonymised data that is collected up to the point of withdrawing can still be used in the final analysis of the results unless the participant does not wish this to happen. In such cases, the investigators will destroy the data. Participant's GP will be informed that they are taking part in the study. Consent for informing the GP forms part of the study consent form.

At the time of surgery, the standard practice for advanced ovarian cancer would be to proceed with an extended vertical cut on the abdomen to remove as much tumour as possible. Participants who are randomised to MIRRORS protocol will start the surgery with an initial laparoscopic assessment (a camera inserted though the belly button). This visual assessment is used to determine whether it is feasible to proceed with surgery robotically or whether full cytoreductive surgery to zero macroscopic residual disease would be best carried out through an open surgical approach.

If an open surgical approach is considered the optimum treatment for the patient and they have consented for this, then this will be done. If there is disease that cannot be removed robotically after starting by this route but can be removed via an open incision, the surgery will be converted to an open procedure if it is safe to do so. If there are any complications, the investigators may also need to convert to open surgery. Participants randomised to standard cytoreductive surgery will receive standard cytoreductive surgery through a midline laparotomy. The aim of the surgery whether by robotic or open is to remove all visible disease safely.

The study will involve questionnaires relating to recovery and quality of life and pain (these are established validated questionnaires); two are from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: "EORTC QLQ C30" \& "EORTC QLQ OV28."Another is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale which is used to assess levels of anxiety and depression that a person is experiencing. The EQ5D-5L questionnaire will be used to gather health economic data. Lastly, the investigators will be using a simple 11-point pain scale (0-10) to assess participants' pain. These questionnaires will be completed at certain time points starting at baseline and then following on from surgery.

Study participants will be followed up during their normal scheduled appointment times as per the standard of care. There will be no additional screening bloods or investigations beyond that already done as part of the surgical work up. If necessary, questionnaires can be completed by telephone (included in the study consent form).

Collection of PROMs will be carried out via the web-based portal using computers, tablet or smartphone devices. Data security is paramount with regular penetration testing. Information is stored according to national standards and no identifiable data is stored on internet connected devices/database. Account details are stored on internally hosted servers and authenticated through SSL encrypted web services. Upon consent, participants will be provided with a login to facilitate their access to the platform and offered access to the Database. This is provided in an email triggered by initial participant registration following initial contact in clinic.

The email provides a unique identifier which allows participants to access their assigned PROMs surveys for completion. Once the appropriate PROMs questionnaire is completed, the data is then stored in the platform; additionally, a notification is sent to the research team system so that they can confirm completion status for their participants. It is also possible for participants, who do not have an email address, to be recruited into the study by allocating them with a username and password, and if they don't have their own computer, they can use it with either a Trust computer, or a public device, e.g. in a library.

At least one face to face or remote proctoring session will be carried out to vet all new sites enrolled in MIRRORS RCT (pilot) to ensure that surgeons participating in the MIRRORS protocol arm of MIRRORS-RCT (pilot) are suitably experienced regarding the MIRRORS-Protocol and trained to do so.

The investigators aim to recruit 20 women across 3 sites within a 6-8 months recruitment window. The sample size is set pragmatically to give precision in the estimate of pre-defined feasibility criteria parameters such as consent rate, robotic operation rate and success rate (target debulking of R=0 achieved) with timely recruitment. Inclusion of 20 women is sufficient to ensure these rates can be estimated within a standard error of less than 10%, providing maximal confidence intervals for percentage estimates of +/-20%.

03

Conditions studied

  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Ovarian Neoplasm
  • Ovarian Neoplasm Epithelial
  • Fallopian Tube Cancer
  • Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
  • Peritoneal Cancer
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with Stage IIIc-IVb epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) (including cancer of the fallopian tube \& peritoneum) undergoing chemotherapy
  • Pelvic mass ≤8 cm on CT
  • Age ≥18years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A Pelvic Mass >8cm
  • Not Suitable for interval cytoreductive surgery.
  • Lacks capacity to understand or complete trial documentation.
  • Patients not suitable for laparoscopy,
  • Specialist surgical support is required and open surgery is recommended by the speciality team involved.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MIRRORS Protocol

    Diagnostic Laparoscopy proceed to either robotic or open Interval cytoreductive surgery with conversion to open at any point should this be required to remove all visible disease.

    Procedure: MIRRORS Protocol

  • Active comparator
    Standard Care

    Standard Care - Open Interval Cytoreductive Surgery Surgery will proceed directly with standard open interval cytoreductive surgery through an extended midline incision

    Procedure: Standard Open Cytoreductive Surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureMIRRORS Protocol

    Diagnostic laparoscopic assessment proceeding to either robotic (if considered appropriate following laparoscopic assessment) or open Interval cytoreductive surgery with conversion to open at any point should this be required to remove all visible disease.

  • ProcedureStandard Open Cytoreductive Surgery

    Extended midline incision. Open surgical approach to interval cytoreductive surgery with the aim of removing all visible disease.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment

    Number of patients consented compared to the number offered inclusion expressed as a percentage.

    Time frame: Assessed at close of recruitment 6-8 months (recruitment period)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of conversion to open surgery

    Percentage of patients converted to open surgery after being deemed suitable for Robotic interval debulking surgery following initial diagnostic laparoscopy. Success criteria: Conversion to open surgery rate is less than 50% of the patient group deemed suitable for Robotic interval debulking surgery following initial diagnostic laparoscopy.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Blood loss

    blood loss during surgery in mililitres

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Maximal macroscopic cytoreduction rate (R=0 rate)

    Percentage of patients undergoing MIRRORS protocol who achieve maximal macroscopic debulking i.e. no macroscopic residual disease present (R=0 rate) vs standard open interval cytoreductive surgery

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Surgical complications

    Intraoperative complications will be recorded. Post operative complications will be recorded and classified by Clavien-Dindo Classification. Success criteria: Complication rate is not higher for MIRRORS protocol compared to standard open interval cytoreductive surgery.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Length of stay

    Days from operation date. Operation date=day 0

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  6. Days to chemotherapy

    Days from operation date. Operation date=day 0

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  7. Cost of MIRRORS protocol vs standard interval cytoreductive surgery

    Cost comparison focusing on resources used in hospital (surgery, length of stay, readmissions, outpatients, A\&E) and in the community post discharge (primary and community care). Contacts with services and professionals will be converted to costs using validated national tariffs and NHS Reference costs. The primary health-related outcome for the economic analysis will be EQ-5D-5L, completed by participants at baseline and at each assessment point. Responses will be used to estimate the patients' health related quality of life (utility level) at each time point. This will be done by scoring the EQ-5D 5L using a validated national tariff. The utility scores will be integrated over time to provide the Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), accrued by each participant over the duration of the trial. A comparison of the difference in costs and difference in QALYs over the trial period will be conducted using appropriate statistical tests to assess significance.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  8. Pain assessment

    Numeric rating scale (NRS11) 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain) At baseline and post-operatively; day 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 6 weeks

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  9. Quality of life following surgery (generic) expressed as QALY gain using EQ5D-5L

    At baseline and post-operatively; day 1, 3, 7, 10, 14,21,6 weeks

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  10. Quality of life following surgery (cancer specific)

    Assessed using patient reported outcome measure (PROM) European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Validated quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) for ovarian cancer (QLQ-C30/QLQ-OV28). This validated questionnaire consists of the core module and its associated ovarian cancer specific module. Completed at baseline, day 3 post surgery, 3 weeks post-surgery and 6 weeks post surgery.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  11. Mental wellbeing

    Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) A (Anxiety) and D (Depression) scores are calculated separately. 0-7 = Normal, 8-10 = Borderline, 11-21 = Abnormal (case) Completed at baseline, day 3 post surgery, 3 weeks post-surgery and 6 weeks post surgery.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Uwins C, Assalaarachchi H, Bennett K, Read J, Tailor A, Crawshaw J, Chatterjee J, Ellis P, Skene SS, Michael A, Butler-Manuel S. MIRRORS: a prospective cohort study assessing the feasibility of robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Jun 3;34(6):886-897. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005265. PubMed 38561194 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The datasets generated from this current study will be available upon request from Miss Christina Uwins (Christina.Uwins@nhs.net) as raw anonymised data for up to 5 years following completion and publication of the study. Participants have given their consent for the information collected from this study to be used to support other research in the future and to be shared anonymously with other researchers.

Time frame: up to 5 years following completion and publication of the study

Access criteria: The datasets generated from this current study will be available upon request from Miss Christina Uwins (Christina.Uwins@nhs.net) as raw anonymised data

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 13 months after the start.

Of 282 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ovarian Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 76. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 293 studies reached it within 46 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 76.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 17, 2023
First posted
Jul 27, 2023
StartActual
Oct 2, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Nov 18, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05960630
Lead sponsor
Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Miss Christina Uwins (Sub-Speciality Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology and Associate PI, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 27, 2023
Start date
Oct 2, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 18, 2023

Study contacts

Christina M Uwins, MRCS MRCOG
Contact
christina.uwins@nhs.net
01483571122 ext. 4115
Laura Gordon
Contact
rsc-tr.ResearchAndDevelopment@nhs.net
01483688660
Simon Butler-Manuel, MD
principal investigator · Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion