CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05953194Updated Feb 28, 2024

Effects of Sugary Drinks Counter-marketing Messages

An interventional study of Exposure to counter-marketing messages and Exposure to traditional health messages in Obesity, Weight Prejudice and Weight Gain, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-28.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,184
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to examine consumer responses to traditional and counter-marketing messages discouraging sugary drink consumption, including effects on intentions to consume sugary drinks and perceived weight stigma. Because prior research has suggested that counter-marketing may be especially effective among younger populations, the investigators will examine effects overall and by age group (young adults [ages 18-29 years] vs. middle and older adults [ages 30+ years]).

Read the detailed description

In this online randomized clinical trial, participants will be randomized to one of three arms: 1) Control (neutral) messages, 2) Traditional health messages, and 3) Counter-marketing messages. In each arm, participants will view four messages developed for their randomly assigned arm and answer questions about the messages and their behavioral intentions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Weight Prejudice
  • Weight Gain
  • Dietary Habits

Keywords

  • counter-marketing
  • health communication
  • sugar sweetened beverage
03

In context

Body Weight

1,223 studies on the registry are indexed under Body Weight; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,184 is above the median of 64 across 947 interventional studies indexed under Body Weight.

Browse Body Weight studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years old or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years old
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,184 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control (neutral) messages

    Participants will view control messages approximately matched to the intervention messages on length, but discussing a neutral topic unrelated to sugary drinks (safe driving). Participants will view a total of 4 messages developed for this arm.

    Behavioral: Exposure to control (neutral) messages

  • Experimental
    Traditional health messages

    Participants will view traditional health messages focused on the health consequences of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, using text adapted from prior sugary drink campaigns. Participants will view a total of 4 messages developed for this arm.

    Behavioral: Exposure to traditional health messages

  • Experimental
    Counter-marketing messages

    Participants will view counter-marketing messages about sugary drinks that incorporate principles of effective counter-marketing campaigns, including describing industry manipulation of consumers, appealing to emotions (especially anger), describing health consequences, and criticizing the industry for demographic targeting. Messages include text adapted from prior counter-marketing campaigns. Participants will view a total of 4 messages developed for this arm.

    Behavioral: Exposure to counter-marketing messages

Interventions

  • BehavioralExposure to counter-marketing messages

    Counter-marketing messages about sugary drinks that incorporate principles of effective counter-marketing campaigns, including describing industry manipulation of consumers, appealing to emotions (especially anger), describing health consequences, and criticizing the industry for demographic targeting. Messages include text adapted from prior counter-marketing campaigns. Participants will view a total of 4 messages developed for this arm.

  • BehavioralExposure to traditional health messages

    Traditional health messages focused on the health consequences of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, using text adapted from prior sugary drink campaigns. Participants will view a total of 4 messages developed for this arm.

  • BehavioralExposure to control (neutral) messages

    Control messages approximately matched to the intervention messages on length, but discussing a neutral topic unrelated to sugary drinks (safe driving). Participants will view a total of 4 messages developed for this arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intentions to consume sugary drinks

    We will assess intentions to consume sugary drinks using 2 items: "In the next week, I plan to drink sugary drinks like sodas, sports drinks, or fruit drinks," and "In the next week, I am likely to drink sugar-sweetened beverages like sodas, sports drinks, or fruit drinks". Response options to both items will use a 5-point Likert scale: the first item's response options will range from "definitely not" (1) to "definitely yes" (5), and the second item's response options will range from "not at all likely" (1) to "extremely likely" (5). We will average responses to the 2 items.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived message effectiveness for discouraging sugary drink consumption

    Item: "These messages discourage me from wanting to drink sugary drinks." This variable will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" (1) to "a great deal" (5).

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  2. Negative feelings toward drinking sugary drinks

    Item: "How do these messages make you feel about drinking sugary drinks?" This variable will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "extremely positive" (1) to "extremely negative" (5).

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  3. Anticipated social interactions

    We will examine anticipated social interactions by asking, "How likely are you to talk about these messages with others in the next week?" This item will be scored on a 5-pt Likert scale ranging from "not at all likely" (1) to "extremely likely" (5).

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  4. Attitudes toward sugary drink companies

    We will examine attitudes toward sugary drink companies by asking, "How do you feel about companies that make sugary drinks?" This item will be scored on a 5-pt Likert scale ranging from "dislike them a lot" (1) to "like them a lot" (5).

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  5. Perceived obesity stigma

    We will examine the extent to which participants perceive the messages as contributing to obesity stigma by asking 3 items: "These messages promote negative attitudes about people who have overweight or obesity," "These messages increase blame towards people for being overweight," and "These messages make obesity seem like a much simpler issue than it really is." Each item will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale from "not at all" (1) to "a great deal" (5). We will average responses to these items.

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

  6. Message reactance

    We will examine psychological reactance to the messages by asking 3 items: "These messages are trying to manipulate me," "These messages are overblown" and "How much do these messages make you feel angry?" Each item will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale from "not at all" (1) to "a great deal" (5). We will average responses to these items, assuming sufficient internal consistency (alpha\>=.70).

    Time frame: The survey will take up to 20 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford School of Medicine
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kraak VI, Consavage Stanley K, Harrigan PB, Zhou M. How have media campaigns been used to promote and discourage healthy and unhealthy beverages in the United States? A systematic scoping review to inform future research to reduce sugary beverage health risks. Obes Rev. 2022 May;23(5):e13425. doi: 10.1111/obr.13425. Epub 2022 Feb 9. PubMed 35142020 ↗
  • Boles M, Adams A, Gredler A, Manhas S. Ability of a mass media campaign to influence knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors about sugary drinks and obesity. Prev Med. 2014 Oct;67 Suppl 1:S40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Jul 24. PubMed 25066020 ↗
  • Kite J, Grunseit A, Bohn-Goldbaum E, Bellew B, Carroll T, Bauman A. A Systematic Search and Review of Adult-Targeted Overweight and Obesity Prevention Mass Media Campaigns and Their Evaluation: 2000-2017. J Health Commun. 2018;23(2):207-232. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1423651. Epub 2018 Jan 16. PubMed 29336684 ↗
  • Te V, Ford P, Schubert L. Exploring social media campaigns against sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: A systematic search. Schumacher U, ed. Cogent Medicine. 2019;6(1):1607432. doi:10.1080/2331205X.2019.1607432
  • Bryan CJ, Yeager DS, Hinojosa CP. A values-alignment intervention protects adolescents from the effects of food marketing. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jun;3(6):596-603. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0586-6. Epub 2019 Apr 15. PubMed 30988478 ↗
  • Crandall CS, Reser AH. Attributions and Weight-Based Prejudice. In: Brownell K, Puhl R, Schwartz M, Rudd L, eds. Weight Bias: Nature, Consequences, and Remedies. Guilford Publications; 2005:83-96.
  • Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: a new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychol. 2005 Sep;24(5):517-25. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.5.517. PubMed 16162046 ↗
  • Dixon H, Scully M, Gascoyne C, Wakefield M. Can counter-advertising diminish persuasive effects of conventional and pseudo-healthy unhealthy food product advertising on parents?: an experimental study. BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 25;20(1):1781. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09881-1. PubMed 33238936 ↗
  • Krieger J, Kwon T, Ruiz R, Walkinshaw LP, Yan J, Roberto CA. Countermarketing About Fruit Drinks, Alone or With Water Promotion: A 2019 Randomized Controlled Trial in Latinx Parents. Am J Public Health. 2021 Nov;111(11):1997-2007. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306488. Epub 2021 Oct 28. PubMed 34709859 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The investigators will share statistical analysis plan and analytic code after publication. The investigators will post these items and de-identified data on ResearchBox, a publicly available platform.

Supporting information: Sap, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05953194
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Collaborators
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
Responsible party
Anna Grummon (Assistant Professor, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 20, 2023
Start date
Aug 7, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 7, 2023
Completion
Aug 7, 2023
Last update
Feb 28, 2024

Study contacts

Anna H Grummon, PhD
principal investigator · Stanford School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion