An interventional study of Sprint PNS system and Radiofrequency Ablation in Facet Joint Pain, sponsored by Penn State University. Suspended at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-10.
Sponsored by Penn State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Radiofrequency ablation of the medial nerve is the current surgical treatment for back pain originating from the facet joints in the spine. However, this procedure causes denervation of spinal muscles. Peripheral nerve stimulation is another treatment for facet joint pain that may not cause damage to the spinal muscles. This study will compare both treatments in terms pain relief and spine biomechanics.
Penn State University is the lead sponsor of 263 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.
Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (77%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a procedure used to relieve chronic back pain by targeting the nerves responsible for transmitting pain signals from the back to the brain. It is a minimally invasive approach that aims to disrupt the pain signals and provide pain relief.
Device: Sprint PNS system
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the current standard of care for facet joint pain. It is a minimally invasive procedure used to relieve chronic back or neck pain caused by issues with the small joints in the spine called facet joints.
Procedure: Radiofrequency Ablation
Temporary electrical stimulation of the medial nerve with implanted wires and wearable stimulator
Thermal ablation of the medial nerve
Multifidus muscle activity
Muscle contraction quantification via shear wave elastography
Time frame: pre-treatment
Multifidus muscle activity
Muscle contraction quantification via shear wave elastography
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
Multifidus muscle activity
Muscle contraction quantification via shear wave elastography
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
Pain Intensity
Visual Analog Scale, scale range 1 - 10, 10 being worse possible pain.
Time frame: pre-treatment
Pain Intensity
Visual Analog Scale, scale range 1 - 10, 10 being worse possible pain.
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
Pain Intensity
Visual Analog Scale, scale range 1 - 10, 10 being worse possible pain.
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
Oswestry Disability Index
Survey evaluating disability level, 0 - 4 No disability 5 - 14 Mild disability 15 - 24 Moderate disability 25 - 34 Severe disability 35 - 50 Completely disabled
Time frame: pre-treatment
Oswestry Disability Index
Survey evaluating disability level, 0 - 4 No disability 5 - 14 Mild disability 15 - 24 Moderate disability 25 - 34 Severe disability 35 - 50 Completely disabled
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
Oswestry Disability Index
Survey evaluating disability level, 0 - 4 No disability 5 - 14 Mild disability 15 - 24 Moderate disability 25 - 34 Severe disability 35 - 50 Completely disabled
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
PROMIS-29 v2.0
Survey assessing pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance)
Time frame: pre-treatment
PROMIS-29 v2.0
Survey assessing pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance)
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
PROMIS-29 v2.0
Survey assessing pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance)
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
isometric back strength
Measurement of peak force generated by the torso in extension in Newtons
Time frame: pre-treatment
Isometric back strength
Measurement of peak force generated by the torso in extension in Newtons
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
isometric back strength
Measurement of peak force generated by the torso in extension in Newtons
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
Functional Reach
distance between the length of an outstretched arm in a maximal forward reach, 10"/25 cm or greater Low risk of falls, 6"/15cm to 10"/25cm Risk of falling is 2x greater than normal, 6"/15cm or less Risk of falling is 4x greater than normal, Unwilling to reach Risk of falling is 8x greater than normal.
Time frame: pre-treatment
Functional Reach
distance between the length of an outstretched arm in a maximal forward reach, 10"/25 cm or greater Low risk of falls, 6"/15cm to 10"/25cm Risk of falling is 2x greater than normal, 6"/15cm or less Risk of falling is 4x greater than normal, Unwilling to reach Risk of falling is 8x greater than normal.
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
Functional Reach
distance between the length of an outstretched arm in a maximal forward reach, 10"/25 cm or greater Low risk of falls, 6"/15cm to 10"/25cm Risk of falling is 2x greater than normal, 6"/15cm or less Risk of falling is 4x greater than normal, Unwilling to reach Risk of falling is 8x greater than normal.
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
Repetitive Trunk Rotation
Time to complete 20 rotations, seconds, longer times are worse performance.
Time frame: pre-treatment
Repetitive Trunk Rotation
Time to complete 20 rotations, seconds, longer times are worse performance.
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
Repetitive Trunk Rotation
Time to complete 20 rotations, seconds, longer times are worse performance.
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
Repeated Chair Stands
Time to perform 5 repeated chair stands, higher times mean worse outcomes.
Time frame: pre-treatment
Repeated Chair Stands
Time to perform 5 repeated chair stands, higher times mean worse outcomes.
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
Repeated Chair Stands
Time to perform 5 repeated chair stands, higher times mean worse outcomes.
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
Pfirmmann grade
Degeneration of lumbar discs at the treated level, grade 1 - 5, 1 is normal and 5 is completely collapsed disc.
Time frame: pre-treatment
Pfirmmann grade
Degeneration of lumbar discs at the treated level, grade 1 - 5, 1 is normal and 5 is completely collapsed disc.
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
Pfirmmann grade
Degeneration of lumbar discs at the treated level, grade 1 - 5, 1 is normal and 5 is completely collapsed disc.
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
t2-relaxation time
T2 relaxation time of the disc at the treated level. Lower values indicate more degeneration.
Time frame: pre-treatment
t2-relaxation time
T2 relaxation time of the disc at the treated level. Lower values indicate more degeneration.
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
t2-relaxation time
T2 relaxation time of the disc at the treated level. Lower values indicate more degeneration.
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
2-point dixon MRI
Intramuscular fat percentage, higher percentage means worse outcome.
Time frame: pre-treatment
2-point dixon MRI
Intramuscular fat percentage, higher percentage means worse outcome.
Time frame: within two weeks of treatment completion
2-point dixon MRI
Intramuscular fat percentage, higher percentage means worse outcome.
Time frame: 12 months after pre-treatment measurement
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is suspended, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Penn State University