ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05944705Updated Feb 29, 2024

Commercially Available Cannabis Products for Immune Support

An observational study in Influenza, COVID-19 and Common Cold, sponsored by Center For Interventional Pain and Spine. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-29.

Sponsored by Center For Interventional Pain and Spine · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2024, 2 years ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 3 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will be a prospective observation of the use of commercially available hemp and cannabis products marketed for immune support.

Read the detailed description

In the era of COVID-19, there has been much speculation about the risks and benefits of cannabis use for immune support. It is well known that the endocannabinoid system plays a role in the regulation of the immune response and its role in inflammation reduction may be useful in terms of a potential adjunctive therapy for acute infection. Cannabis products vary widely in their composition and may have a varying effect based on the strain and the associated terpenes. Here, we aim to track cannabis and hemp usage during an acute infection to understand it's safety and effects in a symptomatic population.

Given the fast and widespread acceptance and use of cannabis products in the US market, commercial use has outpaced randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thus, carefully designed observational studies are important to understand how these products are affecting consumers. Prospective observational designs allow for real-world examinations of commercialized products with similar effect sizes to RCTs. Although observational designs have some drawbacks, a review covering 1,583 meta-analyses across 228 medical conditions compared the effect sizes from RCTs with those from observational studies for the same medical conditions and found no differences between the two. (1) These data provide evidence that a carefully designed observational study can help us better understand the effects of commonly used products such as cannabis edibles. The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the safety and associated effects of commercially available cannabis products in the US in symptomatic individuals seeking them for immune support.

02

Conditions studied

  • Influenza
  • COVID-19
  • Common Cold
03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,356 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 184 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is below the median of 388 across 332 observational studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

Center For Interventional Pain and Spine is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Individuals who are suffering an acute illness

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 years of age or older
  2. Able to read and write in English
  3. Active participants in the Pennsylvania medical marijuana program (for cannabis product users)
  4. Currently experiencing one or more of the following symptoms due to an acute illness:

    1. Fever or chills
    2. Cough
    3. Fatigue
    4. Muscle or body aches
    5. Headache
    6. Sore throat
    7. Congestion or runny nose
    8. Nausea or Vomiting
    9. Diarrhea
  5. Agrees to consume their chosen hemp or cannabis product (for the cannabis arm) and to not use a different hemp or cannabis product through the duration of the study
  6. Agrees to continue to abstain from using hemp or cannabis (for the non-cannabis/hemp using arm)
  7. Must have smart phone or email and access to the internet
  8. Be able to comply with study requirements including baseline, completion of electronic questionnaires, and study timeline parameters.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant.
  2. Known allergy to any compounds in hemp or cannabis.
  3. Endorses suicidal intent
  4. individuals
  5. Unwilling or unable to comply with study procedures
  6. Terminal Illness with less than 1 year
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Symptomatic individuals using hemp or cannabis products for immune support

    Individuals with symptomatic illness that utilize a proprietary hemp or cannabis product to aid in their recovery

    Dietary Supplement: Immune Support Supplement

  • Symptomatic individuals not currently using hemp or cannabis products for immune support

    Individuals without symptomatic illness that do not utilize the proprietary hemp or cannabis product to aid in their recovery

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementImmune Support Supplement

    Cannabinoid and co-active emulsion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Eventss

    Evaluate the safety of commercially available hemp and cannabis products marketed for immune support through assessment of AEs and SAEs. AEs and SAEs will also be collected for the non-user group

    Time frame: To Study Completion, approximately 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptom Improvement

    Quantify subject-reported changes in symptoms during the course of their illness at baseline, 3-, 5-, 10- 15- and 30-days via electronic survey collection.

    Time frame: 3 days

  2. Symptom Improvement

    Quantify subject-reported changes in symptoms during the course of their illness at baseline, 3-, 5-, 10- 15- and 30-days via electronic survey collection.

    Time frame: 5 days

  3. Symptom Improvement

    Quantify subject-reported changes in symptoms during the course of their illness at baseline, 3-, 5-, 10- 15- and 30-days via electronic survey collection.

    Time frame: 10 days

  4. Symptom Improvement

    Quantify subject-reported changes in symptoms during the course of their illness at baseline, 3-, 5-, 10- 15- and 30-days via electronic survey collection.

    Time frame: 15 days

  5. Symptom Improvement

    Quantify subject-reported changes in symptoms during the course of their illness at baseline, 3-, 5-, 10- 15- and 30-days via electronic survey collection.

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Profile of Mood States (POMS)

    The Profile of Mood States is a subject-reported questionnaire that measures the six different dimensions of mood swings. These dimensions include tension or anxiety, anger or hostility, vigor or activity, fatigue or inertia, depression or dejection, confusion or bewilderment. This scale contains 65 self-report items using the 5-point Likert Scale. Participants can choose from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher scores on the POMS subscales reflect a greater agreement with the mood state during the past week.

    Time frame: 3 days

  7. Profile of Mood States (POMS)

    The Profile of Mood States is a subject-reported questionnaire that measures the six different dimensions of mood swings. These dimensions include tension or anxiety, anger or hostility, vigor or activity, fatigue or inertia, depression or dejection, confusion or bewilderment. This scale contains 65 self-report items using the 5-point Likert Scale. Participants can choose from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher scores on the POMS subscales reflect a greater agreement with the mood state during the past week.

    Time frame: 5 days

  8. Profile of Mood States (POMS)

    The Profile of Mood States is a subject-reported questionnaire that measures the six different dimensions of mood swings. These dimensions include tension or anxiety, anger or hostility, vigor or activity, fatigue or inertia, depression or dejection, confusion or bewilderment. This scale contains 65 self-report items using the 5-point Likert Scale. Participants can choose from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher scores on the POMS subscales reflect a greater agreement with the mood state during the past week.

    Time frame: 10 days

  9. Profile of Mood States (POMS)

    The Profile of Mood States is a subject-reported questionnaire that measures the six different dimensions of mood swings. These dimensions include tension or anxiety, anger or hostility, vigor or activity, fatigue or inertia, depression or dejection, confusion or bewilderment. This scale contains 65 self-report items using the 5-point Likert Scale. Participants can choose from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher scores on the POMS subscales reflect a greater agreement with the mood state during the past week.

    Time frame: 15 days

  10. Profile of Mood States (POMS)

    The Profile of Mood States is a subject-reported questionnaire that measures the six different dimensions of mood swings. These dimensions include tension or anxiety, anger or hostility, vigor or activity, fatigue or inertia, depression or dejection, confusion or bewilderment. This scale contains 65 self-report items using the 5-point Likert Scale. Participants can choose from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher scores on the POMS subscales reflect a greater agreement with the mood state during the past week.

    Time frame: 30 days

  11. Quality of Life and Sleep via Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

    The Subject-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System is a questionnaire that assesses pain intensity in addition to several correlating domains of health. The domains of health assessed include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. The patients' answers to the PROMIS-29 are scored from 1-5 (with the exception of the NRS). The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.

    Time frame: 3 days

  12. Quality of Life and Sleep via Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

    The Subject-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System is a questionnaire that assesses pain intensity in addition to several correlating domains of health. The domains of health assessed include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. The patients' answers to the PROMIS-29 are scored from 1-5 (with the exception of the NRS). The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.

    Time frame: 5 days

  13. Quality of Life and Sleep via Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

    The Subject-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System is a questionnaire that assesses pain intensity in addition to several correlating domains of health. The domains of health assessed include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. The patients' answers to the PROMIS-29 are scored from 1-5 (with the exception of the NRS). The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.

    Time frame: 10 days

  14. Quality of Life and Sleep via Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

    The Subject-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System is a questionnaire that assesses pain intensity in addition to several correlating domains of health. The domains of health assessed include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. The patients' answers to the PROMIS-29 are scored from 1-5 (with the exception of the NRS). The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.

    Time frame: 15 days

  15. Quality of Life and Sleep via Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

    The Subject-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System is a questionnaire that assesses pain intensity in addition to several correlating domains of health. The domains of health assessed include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. The patients' answers to the PROMIS-29 are scored from 1-5 (with the exception of the NRS). The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There is no total score, but each axis forms its own score.

    Time frame: 30 days

  16. Time back to work/normal activities

    Average time back to work/normal activities will be measured by collecting the day at which the individual became ill and missed work/normal activities and collecting the day at which work/normal activities will be resumed.

    Time frame: 3 days

  17. Time back to work/normal activities

    Average time back to work/normal activities will be measured by collecting the day at which the individual became ill and missed work/normal activities and collecting the day at which work/normal activities will be resumed.

    Time frame: 5 days

  18. Time back to work/normal activities

    Average time back to work/normal activities will be measured by collecting the day at which the individual became ill and missed work/normal activities and collecting the day at which work/normal activities will be resumed.

    Time frame: 10 days

  19. Time back to work/normal activities

    Average time back to work/normal activities will be measured by collecting the day at which the individual became ill and missed work/normal activities and collecting the day at which work/normal activities will be resumed.

    Time frame: 15 days

  20. Time back to work/normal activities

    Average time back to work/normal activities will be measured by collecting the day at which the individual became ill and missed work/normal activities and collecting the day at which work/normal activities will be resumed.

    Time frame: 30 days

  21. Concomitant medications and supplements

    All medications taken over the course of the study.

    Time frame: To Study Completion, approximately 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Center for Interventional Pain and Spine
    Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010, United States
    Recruiting
    • Ashley Scherer · Contact
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2024, 12 months after the start.

Of 96 non-industry observational studies under Influenza, Human, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 92. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 133 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 59.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 20, 2023
First posted
Jul 13, 2023
StartActual
Nov 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2024
Last update
Feb 29, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05944705
Lead sponsor
Center For Interventional Pain and Spine
Collaborators
Agronomed LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 13, 2023
Start date
Nov 1, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 29, 2024

Study contacts

Ashley M Scherer, MS
Contact
ashleys@centerisp.com
3027503099
Philip Kim, MD
principal investigator · Center For Interventional Pain and Spine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion