CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05943821ALL-VASCORUpdated Jan 6, 2025

The Effect of Allopurinol on the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Cardiovascular Risk

A Phase 3 interventional study of Allopurinol 200 mg and Optional intervention in Cardiovascular Diseases and Uric Acid, sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-06.

Sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,116
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Numerous studies, but not all, have suggested a positive effect of allopurinol on the cardiovascular system. The ALL-VASCOR study aims to evaluate the efficacy of allopurinol therapy for improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients at high and very high cardiovascular risk, excluding ischemic heart disease. This is particularly important due to the high cost of cardiovascular disease treatment and its status as one of the leading causes of death.

Read the detailed description

The ALL-VASCOR study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial that examines the effect of allopurinol therapy (200-500mg of allopurinol daily) versus an equivalent dose of placebo on the risk of cardiovascular events in 1,116 patients aged 40-70, with serum uric acid levels above 5mg/dL and with high and very high risk for cardiovascular disease. The ALL-VASCOR study is further designed to assess the occurrence of long-COVID syndrome. The study is directed toward both primary and secondary as well as additional endpoints. Due to the duration of the study, the planned intervention will end on July 31,2028, unless the Safe Monitoring Board or other applicable authorities decide about it. Participant recruitment for the ALL-VASCOR study is set to begin in August of 2023 and will be conducted only within Poland.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Uric Acid
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

4,904 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 919 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,116 is above the median of 100 across 2,738 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Poznan University of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 143 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age: between 40-70 years old.
  2. Giving informed consent to participate in the study.
  3. Serum UA levels above 5 mg/dl within the last six months before the screening visit.
  4. Meeting at least one of the criteria defining high or very high CV risk includes:

    1. calculated 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk based on SCORE2 >2.5% for patients under 50 years old or ≥5% for patients 50 years old or older
    2. documented occurrence of CV diseases (cerebrovascular disease: ischemic stroke, intracerebral bleeding, TIA; heart failure regardless of the etiology NYHA I - II (without IHD), PAD, atrial fibrillation (de novo or ever)
    3. diabetes or arterial hypertension complicated by organ damage:

      • increase in vascular stiffness: pulse pressure ≥ 60 mmHg, and/or cervicofemoral PWV > 10 m/s;
      • features of left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiography or electrocardiography;
      • increased urine albumin-creatinine ratio (30-300 mg/g);
      • ankle-brachial index \< 0.9.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Taking allopurinol, febuxostat or other hypouricemic drugs.
  2. Contraindications to taking allopurinol.
  3. Pregnant women, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy during the duration of the study.
  4. Hormonal therapy containing oestrogens.
  5. Active cancer process or disease in the last five years, excluding locally malignant tumours.
  6. Uncontrolled hypertension (mean value ≥ 180/110 mmHg seven days before screening visit) in home measurements despite using hypotensive drugs.
    1. Renal insufficiency with an eGFR \<45 ml/ min/1.73m2 (according to 2009 CKD-EPI recommendations: stage G3b, G4 and G5).
  7. Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism not in a state of euthyroidism.
  8. Confirmed coronary artery disease (defined as prior AMI, revascularization of the myocardium, confirmed presence of atherosclerotic plaques in coronary arteries on imaging studies).
  9. Heart failure in NYHA class III and IV.
  10. Taking preparations: azathioprine, mercaptopurine or cyclosporin. Participation in another clinical trial of a medicinal product or medical device within the last three months or five half-lives, whichever period is longer.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,116 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Allopurinol

    The patients will receive allopurinol at an initial daily dose of 200 mg. If insufficient therapy efficacy is noted, the initial allopurinol dose will be increased by 100 mg (up to 300 mg during V2). Similarly, the dose may be increased by another 100 mg at visit 3 and by another 100 mg at the visit 4 (up to 500 mg during V4).

    Drug: Allopurinol 200 mg · Drug: Optional intervention

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    The patients will receive placebo at an initial daily dose of 200 mg. The dose may be increased by another 100 mg at visit 3 and by another 100 mg at the visit 4 (up to 500 mg during V4).

    Drug: Allopurinol 200 mg · Drug: Optional intervention

Interventions

  • DrugAllopurinol 200 mg

    The intervention will occur after randomly allocating participants to the first group (G1), in which patients will receive allopurinol at an initial daily dose of 200 mg, or to the second group (G2), where they will receive a placebo. The placebo will be prepared as tablets with the same shape and appearance as the tested drug tablets, in the appropriate doses, and containing the same excipients. Participants will initially take one tablet of the medication daily in the morning. The physicians will dispense the drugs in packs of 30 tablets for the entire interval between visits (therapy 26 weeks ± 2 weeks). The patients will receive the medications during visit V1. The drugs will be prepared in identical packages, appropriately sealed, with a number for drug identification.

    Also known as: Allopurinol

  • DrugOptional intervention

    Approximately 26 weeks(+/-2 weeks) after the start of the intervention, the efficacy of the treatment will be evaluated at the follow-up visit V2. Efficacy is defined as achieving a serum UA level below 5.0mg/dL for those with baseline levels \>5.0 to 7.0mg/dL or below 5.5mg/dL for those with baseline levels ≥7.0mg/dL. If insufficient therapy efficacy is noted, the initial allopurinol dose will be increased by 100mg (up to 300mg during V2). The dose may be increased by another 100mg at visit 3 and by another 100mg at the visit 4(up to 500mg during V4). In the placebo group, an appropriate preparation will be added so that the number of tablets corresponds to the group with the active substance. This treatment will be continued until the end of the bservation. Patients who meet their UA target concentration at visit V2 or V3, or V4, and those who fail to meet their target concentration at visit V4, will not have their dosing changed until the end of the follow-up.

    Also known as: Please describe in more detail

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)

    The number of all causes of death, cardiac death, stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, coronary angioplasty or revascularization, peripheral arterial angioplasty, hospitalization for unstable angina or worsening heart failure

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants of all-cause death

    Events were adjudicated by researchers as all-cause death. The number of all-cause deaths recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11.

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

  2. Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Death

    Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as cardiac death. The number of all-cause deaths recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11.

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

  3. Percentage of Participants With stroke

    Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as stroke. The number of all-stroke recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

  4. Percentage of Participants With transient ischemic attack

    Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as transient ischemic attack. The number of transient ischemic attack recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

  5. Percentage of Participants With acute coronary syndrome

    Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as acute coronary syndrome,. The number of acute coronary syndrome, recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

  6. Percentage of Participants With coronary angioplasty or revascularization

    Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as coronary angioplasty or revascularization. The number of coronary angioplasty or revascularization, recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

  7. Percentage of Participants With peripheral arterial angioplasty

    Description:Events were adjudicated by researchers as peripheral arterial angioplasty. The number of peripheral arterial angioplasty recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

  8. Percentage of Participants With hospitalization for unstable angina or worsening heart failure

    Events were adjudicated by researchers as endpoint hospitalization (hospitalization and stay in the emergency department due to heart failure, need for intravenous loop diuretics and/or doubling the dose of oral loop diuretics). The number of hospitalization for unstable angina or worsening heart failure recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

  9. Percentage of Participants With Hospitalization

    Events were adjudicated by researchers as endpoint hospitalization. The number of hospitalization for reasons other than the endpoint number 9, recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

Other outcomes

  1. Assessment of progression and/or development of organ complications and atherosclerosis, including: echocardiography

    assessment of echocardiographic parameters - analysis of changes in echocardiographic parameters assessed in transthoracic echocardiographic examination (TTE).Assessment of systolic function (ejection fraction) and left ventricular hypertrophy. Analysis of changes from the baseline

    Time frame: Baseline up to the follow-up visit number 7 - approximately 3 years

  2. Assessment of progression and/or development of organ complications and atherosclerosis, including the assessment of incidence of atrial fibrillation

    the assessment of the incidence of atrial fibrillation in an electrocardiographic examination (documented incident of de novo atrial fibrillation during observation)

    Time frame: Baseline up to the follow-up visit number 7 - approximately 3 years

  3. Assessment of progression and/or development of organ complications and atherosclerosis, including the assessment of end-stage kidney disease

    the assessment of end-stage kidney disease based on eGFR measurements. Analysis of changes from the baseline

    Time frame: Baseline up to the follow-up visit number 7 - approximately 3 years

  4. Assessment of progression and/or development of organ complications and atherosclerosis, including Ultrasound examination

    The assessment of abdominal aorta diameter. Analysis of changes from the baseline

    Time frame: Baseline up to the follow-up visit number 7 - approximately 3 years

  5. Assessment of progression and/or development of organ complications and atherosclerosis, including Doppler ultrasound of carotid arteries

    Assessment of intima-media complex and atherosclerotic plaques. Analysis of changes from the baseline

    Time frame: Baseline up to the follow-up visit number 7 - approximately 3 years

  6. Assessment of progression and/or development of organ complications and atherosclerosis, including the assessment of ankle-brachial index

    Assessment of ankle-brachial index. Analysis of changes from the baseline

    Time frame: Baseline up to the follow-up visit number 7 - approximately 3 years

  7. Assessment of progression and/or development of organ complications and atherosclerosis, including the assessment of pulse wave velocity

    the assessment of pulse wave velocity. Analysis of changes from the baseline

    Time frame: Baseline up to the follow-up visit number 7 - approximately 3 years

  8. Occurrence of long-COVID symptoms

    Occurrence of long-COVID symptoms assessed based on a survey. Analysis of changes from the baseline. The survey will be recorded from visit 0 (screening visit) to the last follow-up visit. Depending on the patient and the time of enrollment into the study, this corresponds to visit 7-11

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

  9. The assessment of treatment efficacy

    Attainment of target serum UA levels of 5 mg/dL or 5.5 mg/dL, depending on baseline values

    Time frame: Baseline up to the follow-up visit number 7- approximately 3 years

  10. Assessment of the laboratory parameters

    Assesment of: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Albumin to creatinine ratio and urinary albuminuria. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Lipid profile. Plasma C-reactive protein concentrations. Activity of aspartate and alanine transaminases (AST, ALT) Analysis all parameters of changes from the baseline

    Time frame: Baseline up to the follow-up visit number 7 - approximately 3 years

  11. Assessment of frequency of side effects

    Proportion of subjects who experienced at least one serious adverse event (SAE) during the study

    Time frame: From the first dose of allopurinol or placebo until the end of the observation period (approximately 3-5 years)

  12. Assessment of changes in participants' cardiovascular risk

    Assessment of changes in participants' cardiovascular risk based on the SCORE 2 scale. Analysis of changes from the baseline

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Poznan University of Medical Sciences
    Poznan, Wielkopolska 60-355, Poland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05943821
Lead sponsor
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 13, 2023
Start date
Sep 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 6, 2025

Study contacts

Paweł Uruski, MD PhD
Contact
puruski@ump.edu.pl
0048618546274
Andrzej Tykarski, Prof MD
study director · Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion