CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05941780Updated Mar 30, 2026

Pain Phenotypes in Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome

An observational study in Fibromyalgia, Primary, Fibromyalgia and Chronic Pain Syndrome, sponsored by Kutahya Health Sciences University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-30.

Sponsored by Kutahya Health Sciences University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
65
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS); is a complex syndrome characterized by many symptoms such as chronic widespread pain, fatigue and sleep disorders, cognitive dysfunctions and psychiatric disorders. It has been stated that there is an urgent need for studies examining the clinicimetric and psychometric properties of the pain phenotype criteria in terms of patients receiving the most appropriate treatment, clinicians deciding on the appropriate treatment, and contributing to the research of scientists. Despite all this, no study has yet been found that describes the pain phenotypes in fibromyalgia syndrome and how different types of pain affect patients.

The primary aim of this study is to determine the chronic pain phenotypes in individuals with FMS. The secondary aim of this study to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the algorithm used in the determination of pain phenotypes and to assessment the clinical effects of different pain phenotypes on individuals with FMS in terms of pain severity, disease severity, quality of life and catastrophe.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fibromyalgia, Primary
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Chronic Pain Syndrome
  • Pain, Neuropathic
  • Nociceptive Pain
  • Central Sensitisation
03

In context

Fibromyalgia

1,336 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibromyalgia; 266 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is below the median of 100 across 270 observational studies indexed under Fibromyalgia.

Browse Fibromyalgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Kutahya Health Sciences University is the lead sponsor of 209 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants meeting the inclusion criteria will be taken for this cross-sectional study. Individuals with FMS who apply to Pamukkale University Rheumatology Clinic will be screened for eligibility by their clinic physicians and will then be asked to participate in this study

Inclusion criteria

  • being diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome according to the criteria of the American Rheumatology Association ,
  • not receiving active treatment related to physiotherapy,
  • volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed endocrine, neuromuscular, infectious and inflammatory diseases,
  • severe mental and psychological disorders, using psychological drugs (SSRIs and SNRIs)
  • illiterate
  • problems with hearing and vision
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPain classification method

    A current clinical algorithm will be used to determine the predominant type of pain in individuals with FMS. The classification to diagnose nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain will based on a recent method developed by Nijs et al. This method consists of seven steps in total. These steps question the following, respectively: duration of pain, pain distribution, presence of nociceptive pain, presence of neuropathic pain, phenomenon of hypersensitivity, presence of hypersensitization and presence of specific comorbidity. Besides, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of pain classification algorithm will be determined by two independent researchers.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantitative sensory test: static tactile mechanical threshold

    Von Frey Monofilaments (2 gr- 26 gr) will be used assessment for the static tactile mechanical detection threshold.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  2. Quantitative sensory test: hot-cold pain threshold

    Coins will be used for the hot-cold pain threshold. The cold sensing test will be done with a coin held at room temperature. The hot sensing test will be done in the form of a coin placed in the pocket and applied to the participant after waiting for 30 minutes.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  3. Quantitative sensory test: static mechanical allodynia

    A digital algometer device (JTech) will be used for static mechanical allodynia (pressure pain threshold). In the device, the pain sensation will be tested by applying 4 kg of pressure to the participant.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  4. Quantitative sensory test: dynamic mechanical allodynia

    A soft brush will be used for dynamic mechanical allodynia. The brush will be gently moved over the skin at a speed of 3-5 cm per second in a fixed direction over the patients primary painful area.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  5. Quantitative sensory test: vibration sense

    128 Hz tuning fork will be used in vibration assessment. The device will be applied over the bony prominences in the painful area of the patient.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  6. Margolis Pain Diagram

    The Margolis Pain Diagram, consists of a dorsal and a ventral drawing body, is used to assess the location and distribution of the pain \[20\]. Participants will ask to point out the place where they experience pain during the preceding 4 weeks for at least 24 hours.

    Time frame: one minute

  7. Numeric pain rating scale

    The NPRS was used to assess the participants' pain levels. In the NPRS, patients are asked to verbally rate the severity of their pain on a scale. The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: one minute

  8. Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

    Disease Severity and perceived physical function will be assessed with the "Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ-R)" consists of 21 questions in total. All questions in this questionnaire are rated on an 11-point numerical scale from 0 to 10, with 10 indicating the worst possible situation.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  9. Short Form 12 (SF-12)

    Quality of Life will be assessed with the SF-12 scale. SF-12, physical functionality (2 items), physical role (2 items), body pain (1 item), general health (1 item), energy (1 item), social functionality (1 item), emotional role (2 items) and mental health (2 items) and includes 8 sub-dimensions and 12 items in total. Both components range from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing better health.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  10. Pain Catastrophe Scale (PCS)

    Catastrophe will be assessed by the Pain Catastrophe Scale (PCS). The PCS is a 13-item self-report scale using a 5-point Likert scale (0-4).

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  11. The interview

    Clinical history and patient interview will be done. The researcher will evaluate the symptoms of hypersensitivity based on the patient's clinical history. Besides, the researcher will evaluate whether the patient has increased sensitivity to odors, lights or sounds. Also, the researcher evaluates the patient's conditions such as fatigue, sleep disorders, and cognitive problems.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Central Sensitization Inventory

    The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) aims to evaluate symptoms thought to be associated with nociplastic pain. It is also accepted as an effective scale used to evaluate patients with chronic pain who are also sensitive to the presence of neuropathic pain. The CSI consists 25 items exploring emotional and somatic disorders associated with CS. Each response is scored from 0 to 4, yielding a total score of 0 to 100 . A score of 40 or higher on the CSI means the presence of nociplastic pain.

    Time frame: 10 minute

  2. Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire

    The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) is one of the questionnaires that can be useful in diagnosing neuropathic pain. It has components of how the pain feels to the patient but also requires the examining health professional to assess whether there is reduced sensation (hypoaesthesia) to touch or pinprick and whether light brushing increases or causes pain (allodynia). The total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items and the cut-off value for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain is a total score of 4/10.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pamukkale University Hospitals
    Denizli, Denizli 20070, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05941780
Lead sponsor
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Responsible party
Ismail Saracoglu (Director, Kutahya Health Sciences University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 12, 2023
Start date
Jul 10, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 28, 2023
Completion
Jan 30, 2025
Last update
Mar 30, 2026

Study contacts

Ismail Saracoglu, P.hD.
principal investigator · Kutahya Health Sciences University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion