ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05938621Updated Sep 22, 2025Results posted

Estamos Juntos (We Are Together): Improving HIV Care Delivery by Capacitating Health Care Providers

An interventional study of behavioral therapy and education in Hiv, sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Mozambique. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-22.

Primary conditionAcquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?The registry often attaches Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28,448
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Health care workers' negative behavior towards patients (likely a reflection of low job satisfaction, frustration with delivering HIV care and treatment in extremely resource-limited settings, and burnout) is one of the primary reasons people living with HIV abandon treatment in Mozambique. The purpose of this proposal is to test the impact and implementation of a provider resilience intervention and an anti-stigma intervention, individually and in combination, using a randomized controlled trial design at four health facilities. This potentially high-impact intervention offers the opportunity to test a low-cost, provider-focused approach to improving HIV treatment that, if proven effective at increasing adherence and retention in care, could be tested in a fully powered R01 trial in Mozambique.

Read the detailed description

Mozambique has made progress towards their 95-95-95 goals, yet only 65% of people newly initiated in HIV treatment remain in care at 12 months. HIV treatment adherence has been undermined by a lack of compassionate health care service delivery. People living with HIV in our study region of Zambezia province report being treated disrespectfully by health care workers as one of the leading causes of treatment abandonment. Common complaints include insulting patients' intellectual capacity, ignoring concerns with side effects or co-occurring infections, and refusing to treat patients seen as "unworthy". While health care worker behavior is appalling, it is likely a reflection of high rates of burnout, job dissatisfaction, and frustration with patients they perceive to be uncooperative.

The implementation of Estamos Juntos (We are Together) will allow us to test a multiprong intervention designed to address provider-barriers to delivering compassionate care via two synergistic components: (1) Resilience and well-being training for health care providers who have expressed low job satisfaction, frustration with delivering care in an extremely resource-limited setting, and burnout; and (2) Anti-stigma training for health care providers who see those with low socioeconomic status, low levels of education, and those living with HIV as "lesser-than" themselves. We propose to pilot test the implementation and impact of each psychosocial intervention individually, and in combination, using a randomized controlled trial design at four health facilities. We hypothesize that the facility where health care workers receive both resilience and anti-stigma training will see the greatest change in health care worker outcomes, including decreased stigmatizing attitudes, emotional exhaustion, and depersonalize of their patients, as well as increased resilience and job satisfaction. Patients receiving care and treatment from intervention providers will show increased retention and medication adherence, as well as improvements in health care services satisfaction, medical mistrust, and perceived stigma from health care providers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hiv

Browse trials for

03

In context

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Unverified

3,035 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 306 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28,448 is above the median of 96 across 2,251 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 833 studies on the registry; 155 are open to participants now.

Of its 125 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (74%) have results posted.

Compared within Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Provider Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult individuals, 18 years of age or older;
  • working as physicians, nurses, medical technicians, health counselors, community health care workers, or other clinical and non-clinical staff (e.g., receptionists, data entry clerk) who provide health services to adults living with at one of the four study sites;
  • willing to be followed as a study participant during the 6-month study period, and does not intend to transfer to another health facility (HF) during the study period (per investigator's assessment at time of recruitment), as self-reported.
  • Be able to read and write in Portuguese, as self-reported.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who are not permanent members of the health facility staff (i.e., floating providers that work at multiple sites in a given week);
  • Any clinical or mental condition, including the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of study recruitment, that as per the investigator's opinion/assessment, would preclude the provision of or make study participation unsafe or unethical;
  • Individuals working in the health facility but from the following cadres: drivers, security personnel, and workers with no patient-facing roles.

Patient Criteria

Inclusion:

  • Adult individuals, 18 years of age or older
  • Active in care (i.e., not in default)
  • Receiving HIV care and treatment at one of the four study sites.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28,448 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care

    Health care providers in this arm will receive no intervention

  • Experimental
    Resilience intervention

    Providers in this arm will receive training to improve their resilience and well-being

    Behavioral: behavioral therapy and education

  • Experimental
    Resilience and Stigma group

    Providers in this group will receive training to improve their resilience and well-being as well as receive sessions about the impact of stigmatizing their patients.

    Behavioral: behavioral therapy and education

  • Experimental
    Anti-stigma group

    Providers in this group will receive sessions focusing on the impact that stigmatizing patients can have on themselves and their patients. Strategies to minimize negative feelings will be developed.

    Behavioral: behavioral therapy and education

Interventions

  • Behavioralbehavioral therapy and education

    Sessions that focus on developing self-awareness and strategies to improve well-being will be the focus of the interventions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Burnout

    We assessed burnout using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) at baseline and again at 6 months. Higher numbers indicate greater levels of burnout. We are reporting the change in burnout scores from baseline to 6 months post-intervention. The scores can range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. We are reporting changes in scores, so some numbers are negative.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 22, 2025

Participant flow

We recruited 25 health care workers from each of four health facilities. Health care workers consented to participate and interacted with the study team. All eligible patients who they treated during the subsequent 6 months were included in the clinical outcome data.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard of CareResilience InterventionResilience and Stigma GroupAnti-stigma Group
Started25252525
Number of patients receiving care45971290463244523
Completed24202323
Not completed1522
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1522

Outcome measures

PrimaryBurnout

We assessed burnout using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) at baseline and again at 6 months. Higher numbers indicate greater levels of burnout. We are reporting the change in burnout scores from baseline to 6 months post-intervention. The scores can range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. We are reporting changes in scores, so some numbers are negative.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Burnout
units on a scaleStandard of CareResilience InterventionResilience and Stigma GroupAnti-stigma Group
Burnout-2.0 (-10.9 to 9.5)-5.9 (-8.2 to -2.0)-5.3 (-13.8 to 2.0)-3.9 (-13.8 to 2.0)

Adverse events

Collected over The data were collected from providers over a six-month period. Per protocol, adverse event data were not collected from patients.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard of Care0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Resilience Intervention0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Resilience and Stigma Group0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Anti-stigma Group0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Provider Baseline Data and Patient Data are collapsed together here.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard of CareResilience InterventionResilience and Stigma GroupAnti-stigma GroupTotal
Mean33.5 ± 7.0933.8 ± 8.8835.2 ± 8.1833.7 ± 6.6734.1 ± 7.67
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard of CareResilience InterventionResilience and Stigma GroupAnti-stigma GroupTotal
Mean32.3 ± 10.6029.7 ± 18.8632.11 ± 10.4930.6 ± 10.1130.8 ± 14.91
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard of CareResilience InterventionResilience and Stigma GroupAnti-stigma GroupTotal
Female1613191563
Male91261037
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard of CareResilience InterventionResilience and Stigma GroupAnti-stigma GroupTotal
Female304490584379292619407
Male15533846194515978941
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard of CareResilience InterventionResilience and Stigma GroupAnti-stigma GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian00000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American4622129296349454828448
White00000
More than one race00000
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Standard of CareResilience InterventionResilience and Stigma GroupAnti-stigma GroupTotal
Mozambique4622129296349454828448
Number of Years Working in this Health Facility
Number of Years Working in this Health Facility(years)Standard of CareResilience InterventionResilience and Stigma GroupAnti-stigma GroupTotal
Mean3.4 ± 1.956.1 ± 6.055.5 ± 3.704.2 ± 3.094.8 ± 4.07
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Ministry of Health
    Quelimane, Zambezia Province, Mozambique
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Mozambique is in the process of determining what IPD can be shared to researchers not on the approved study team. Once we know their new legal process we will update this plan.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2023 to primary completion in Feb 2025, 14 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2025, 6 months after primary completion.

Of 641 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 45. This study's 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 647 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 28, 2023
First posted
Jul 10, 2023
StartActual
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Feb 27, 2025
CompletionActual
Feb 27, 2025
Results first posted
Sep 22, 2025
Last update
Sep 22, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05938621
Responsible party
Carolyn Audet (Associate Professor of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2023
Start date
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 27, 2025
Completion
Feb 27, 2025
Results posted
Sep 22, 2025
Last update
Sep 22, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion