CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05934903Updated Apr 4, 2025

Feasibility Study: tDCS for Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus

An interventional study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Status Epilepticus and Refractory Status Epilepticus, sponsored by Yale University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-04.

Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

Why this study was terminated
Unable to meet adequate enrolment numbers for feasibility.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Status epilepticus, or recurrent seizures without return to baseline, is a neurologic emergency. Refractory status epilepticus occurs when seizures are resistant to multiple first line anti-seizure medications. The ability to quickly stop seizures is paramount. Transcranial direct current simulation is a non-invasive, easily administered therapy that can potentially help reduce seizure burden.

The goal of this feasibility study is to assess the ability of the study site to enroll patients admitted with refractory seizures or those with abnormal brain wave patterns to take part in a study looking to use transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjunctive treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the recruitment capability of the study site?
  • How well can the study site adhere to study protocol?
  • Are there any adverse effects of using the transcranial direct current stimulation device?
  • How do patients' brain wave studies respond to the stimulation? Participants will be asked to consider joining the study. Once joined, researchers will randomly assign participants to compare transcranial stimulation versus sham stimulation to see if this will affect the participant's brain wave patterns.
Read the detailed description

This is study is designed to determine the feasibility of implementing a double-blinded tDCS in inpatients with status epilepticus and other abnormal EEG (electroencephalography) patterns. The study includes assessments of recruitment capability, the ability to implement the study procedures, the safety profile, and preliminary evaluation of participant response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) therapy, to see which clinical outcome measures are most practical.

Patients who are admitted to Yale New Haven Hospital with refractory status epilepticus or EEG patterns falling on the ictal-interictal continuum (IIC, rhythmic or periodic patterns with rates more than 1Hz and less than or equal to 2.5Hz) will be recruited, starting from August 1st 2023 until July 31st 2025, or until 60 total participants, whichever is sooner. Those who are eligible will be randomized into two groups: stimulation or sham, all while receiving standard of care according to their primary teams.

Each subject will receive up to 3 sessions of tDCS over a 72 hour period with at least 24 hours between each session. Each session will consist of 30 minutes of stimulation (or sham), a 30 minute break and a second 30 minute of stimulation (or sham). Stimulation will be applied using the ActivaDose II device (Caputron). Saline soaked sponges will be prepared, with the cathode being placed on the area corresponding to the seizure focus or point of maximal epileptic potential as defined on the international 10-20 EEG system. The anode will be placed on the contralateral shoulder. During each session, a maximum of total injected current across the electrodes of 2mA will be used, as conventional tDCS with 2mA is well-tolerated in adults and children. Sham stimulation includes application of the electrodes and timing the device to deliver 0mA of injected current.

The patients will not be aware of their randomization arm. The research staff analyzing the EEG data will not be aware of the patient's treatment arm.

The study schedule will include:

  1. Screening and Consent visit
  2. Stimulation Sessions - 3 one-hour stimulation sessions, distributed over 72 consecutive hours, and no less than 24 hours apart.
  3. Follow up visit at 30 days after intervention.
02

Conditions studied

  • Status Epilepticus
  • Refractory Status Epilepticus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
  • Ictal-Interictal Continuum
  • Neurostimulation
  • Seizures
  • Epilepsy
03

In context

Status Epilepticus

126 studies on the registry are indexed under Status Epilepticus; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 4 is below the median of 70 across 74 interventional studies indexed under Status Epilepticus.

Browse Status Epilepticus studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.

Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with refractory status epilepticus (RSE), or supra-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), or electroencephalographic (EEG) characteristics > 50% of the time on the ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) or epilepsia partialis continua for at least 12 hours.

    • A patient with RSE is defined as having seizure(s) refractory to first line benzodiazepines and second-line antiseizure medications (ASMs; phenytoin, levetiracetam, valproate).
    • A patient with SRSE is defined as:

      • requiring at least 24 hours of a third-line intravenous anesthetic therapy (IVAT) such as propofol, midazolam, or ketamine, and
      • failing at least one previous wean of an IVAT.
    • A patient with epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is defined as:

      • having focal seizure(s) refractory to first line benzodiazepines and second-line ASMs and
      • repeated episodes lasting more than one hour
    • A patient on the IIC is defined as:

      • having periodic discharges or rhythmic patterns at a rate at more than 1Hz and less than 3Hz and
      • IIC patterns for more than 50% of the time (IIC burden = 50%) within any prior 12 hour interval.
  • access to continuous EEG monitoring
  • brain imaging (Computerized Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging) within 1 year of presentation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Damaged skin on scalp as determined by the primary team that prevents reasonably accurate electroencephalography monitoring and which may interfere with tDCS stimulation.
  • Cranial metal implants (>1 mm thick epicranial titanium skull plates and metal dental fillings) or medical devices (i.e. cardiac pacemaker, deep brain stimulator, medication infusion pump, cochlear implant).
  • Previous surgeries opening the skull leaving skull defects capable of allowing the insertion of a cylinder with a radius greater or equal to 5 mm.
  • Presence of any disease, medical condition or physical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigators, may adversely impact the safety of the subject or the integrity of the data
  • Those who are pregnant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
4 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stimulation

    The tDCS device will stimulate with a 2mA current during sessions. Both arms receive application of the device for 3 sessions of 2x 30 minute active application with 30 minutes rest in between.

    Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation

    The tDCS device will stimulate with a 0mA current during sessions (sham). Both arms receive application of the device for 3 sessions of 2x 30 minute active application with 30 minutes rest in between.

    Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

    Cathodal direct current stimulation at 0 or 2mA will be applied to subjects

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment capability of the study site- Incidence

    Recruitment capability of the study site will be assessed as the incidence of patients admitted with RSE/SRSE or IIC burden \> 50% within a 24 month period. Participants admitted undergoing cEEG monitoring will be screened for having RSE or IIC burden \>50% on a weekly basis.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  2. Recruitment capability of the study site- Prevalence

    Recruitment capability of the study site will be assessed as the prevalence of patients admitted with RSE/SRSE or IIC burden \> 50% within a 24 month period. Participants admitted undergoing cEEG monitoring will be screened for having RSE or IIC burden \>50% on a weekly basis. Prevalence will be calculated against weekly average patient census.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  3. Recruitment capability of the study site- Percent Eligible

    Recruitment capability of the study site will be assessed as the percent of eligible study participants compared to all patients admitted with RSE or IIC burden \>50% within a 24-month period.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  4. Recruitment capability of the study site- Percent Consent

    Recruitment capability of the study site will be assessed as the percent of eligible participants who consent for study

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  5. Recruitment capability of the study site- Percent Withdraw

    Recruitment capability of the study site will be assessed as the percent of consented participants who withdraw consent.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ability to implement protocol at study site

    Ability to implement protocol at the study site will be assessed as the percent of patients able to complete the stimulation protocol and drop out causes.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  2. Ability to implement protocol at study site- Protocol Deviations

    Ability to implement protocol at the study site will be assessed as the percent of protocol deviations including un-blinding, contamination, truncation or extension of stimulation protocol, and qualitative causes of protocol deviations.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  3. Ability to implement protocol at study site- Participants Lost to Follow Up

    Ability to implement protocol at the study site will be assessed as the percent of participants lost to follow up.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  4. Ability to implement protocol at study site- Device Failures

    Ability to implement protocol at the study site will be assessed as the percent of device failure compared to total number of stimulation sessions.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  5. Safety profile of tDCS by number of adverse events.

    Safety profile of tDCS will be assessed as the number of adverse events.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  6. Safety profile of tDCS by number of serious adverse events.

    Safety profile of tDCS will be assessed as the number of serious adverse events.

    Time frame: up to 24 months

  7. Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in Time to resolution of status epilepticus

    Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed as time to resolution of status epilepticus in patients admitted with RSE and SRSE (hours) in either study arm. Time to resolution of status epilepticus is defined as the time from first stimulation session until cessation of electrographic status epilepticus for more than 8 hours.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days

  8. Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in Seizure Burden

    Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed using EEG assessments to determine seizure burden before, during, and after intervention. Assesments will be conducted by study personnel on a post-hoc basis and quantified using both automatic spike detection software (Persyst) and manual methods.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days

  9. Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in IIC burden

    Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed using EEG assessments to determine IIC burden before, during, and after intervention. Assessments will be conducted by study personnel on a post-hoc basis and quantified using both automatic spike detection software (Persyst) and manual methods.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days

  10. Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in ASM burden

    Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed by the ASM burden at baseline, 12 hours, 7 days, and 30 days after intervention. Anti-seizure medication burden is defined as the sum total of all antiseizure medication ratios. Antiseizure medication ratios are defined as the prescribed total daily dose given over the maximal allowed daily dose of each given antiseizure medication as defined by the World Health Organization as the typical daily dose for a given ASM. ASM burden = Σ (ASM total daily dose/ASM total daily max dose).

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days

  11. Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score

    Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed using the APACHE II Score. Each variable is weighted from 0 to 4, with the range of the total score from 0 to 71. Higher scores correspond to more severe disease and a higher risk of death.

    Time frame: Baseline and 7 days

  12. Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in modified Rankin Score

    Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed using the modified Rankin Score. It is a 6 point disability scale with possible scores ranging from 0 (no disability) to 5.(disability requiring constant care for all needs); 6 is death.

    Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Yale New Haven Hospital
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Trinka E, Rainer LJ, Granbichler CA, Zimmermann G, Leitinger M. Mortality, and life expectancy in Epilepsy and Status epilepticus-current trends and future aspects. Front Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 23;3:1081757. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1081757. eCollection 2023. PubMed 38455899 ↗
  • Fisher RS, McGinn RJ, Von Stein EL, Wu TQ, Qing KY, Fogarty A, Razavi B, Venkatasubramanian C. Transcranial direct current stimulation for focal status epilepticus or lateralized periodic discharges in four patients in a critical care setting. Epilepsia. 2023 Apr;64(4):875-887. doi: 10.1111/epi.17514. Epub 2023 Feb 7. PubMed 36661376 ↗
  • Ng MC, El-Alawi H, Toutant D, Choi EH, Wright N, Khanam M, Paunovic B, Ko JH. A Pilot Study of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Refractory Status Epilepticus: The SURESTEP Trial. Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Jan;20(1):181-194. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01317-5. Epub 2022 Nov 2. PubMed 36323975 ↗
  • Matsumoto H, Ugawa Y. Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2016 Dec 21;2:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2016.12.003. eCollection 2017. PubMed 30214966 ↗
  • Yang D, Wang Q, Xu C, Fang F, Fan J, Li L, Du Q, Zhang R, Wang Y, Lin Y, Huang Z, Wang H, Chen C, Xu Q, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhao X, Zhao X, Li T, Liu C, Niu Y, Zhou Q, Zhou Q, Duan Y, Liu X, Yu T, Xue Q, Li J, Dai X, Han J, Ren C, Xu H, Li N, Zhang J, Xu N, Yang K, Wang Y. Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces seizure frequency in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, and three-arm parallel multicenter study. Brain Stimul. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 24. PubMed 31606448 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05934903
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 7, 2023
Start date
Aug 31, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2025
Completion
Mar 31, 2025
Last update
Apr 4, 2025

Study contacts

Imran Quraishi, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion