ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05934669Updated Jun 28, 2024

IN Midazolam vs IN Dexmedetomidine vs IN Ketamine During Minimal Procedures in Pediatric ED

A Phase 4 interventional study of Intranasal Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine in Laceration of Skin, Anxiety and Discharge Time, sponsored by University of Oklahoma. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 5 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-28.

Primary conditionAnxiety Disorders(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by University of Oklahoma · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year to 5 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pain in young children has been universally under-recognized due to their inability to describe or localize pain. Improvements in pharmacological interventions are necessary to optimize patient and family experience and allow for successful and efficient procedure completion. This is the first study that will compare three intranasal medications (Intranasal Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, and Ketamine) to evaluate the length of stay after medication administration along with patient and provider satisfaction. The objective of this study is to demonstrate superior intranasal anxiolysis for pediatric laceration repairs with the shortest emergency department stay and highest patient and provider satisfaction. Based on previous studies and medication pharmacokinetics, we hypothesize that Intranasal Ketamine will have the shortest Emergency Department (ED) stay followed by Midazolam and then Dexmedetomidine with the longest stay; however, Dexmedetomidine will have the highest patient and provider satisfaction followed by Ketamine and then Midazolam.

Read the detailed description

Children commonly present to ED with injuries requiring procedures that can be painful or require a child to be absolutely still. Pain in young children has been universally under-recognized due to their inability to describe or localize pain. Multiple surveys of parents and families have showed that ED satisfaction is highly dependent on the degree of pain a patient experiences and the efforts made to alleviate the pain. Therefore, improvements in pharmacological interventions are necessary to optimize patient and family experience and allow for successful and efficient procedure completion.

Intranasal Midazolam is widely used for minimal procedural anxiolysis in pediatric population. Intranasal medication delivery has the highest parent and provider satisfaction with the advantage of avoiding painful needle stick and faster absorption compared to oral or intramuscular medication. Midazolam is a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonist that can provide anxiolysis and amnesia but no analgesia. Intranasal Midazolam has a rapid onset of 5-10 minutes with peak at 30 minutes. There have been limited studies evaluating the length of stay or time to discharge after medication administration with an average length of stay of about 30 minutes. It has been shown to be safe and effective in children for minor procedures; however, intranasal Midazolam is notoriously noxious and irritating to nasal mucosa and requires larger volumes for intranasal dosing. Main side effects include respiratory depression and hypotension. It is also known to cause paradoxical reaction with hyperactivity, agitation, and restlessness especially in developmentally delayed or children with Autism or behavioral concerns. Therefore, several new studies have evaluated other newer intranasal medications for minor procedures including intranasal Dexmedetomidine and intranasal Ketamine.

Dexmedetomidine is an alpha 2 agonist that mirrors sleep in children and can provide anxiolysis and minimal analgesia. Intranasal dosages that have provided adequate minimal sedation is 2-4mcg/kg (max dosage 100-200mcg) with wide range of onset 10-45 mins with average 30 minutes and peak at 90 minutes. Unlike Midazolam, it preserves airway reflexes without clinically significant hemodynamic instability in children. Studies have also shown that it is well tolerated by children and preferred in children with Autism and behavioral concerns.

Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist that provides both anxiolysis and analgesia. It is widely used in ED settings for intravenous procedural sedation; however, intranasal route provides non-invasive method of medication administration. Gutherie et al conducted a study demonstrating intranasal Ketamine providing safe and successful anxiolysis and analgesia in pediatric patients in an ED setting. Intranasal dosage of 3-5mg/kg (max dosage 100-200mg) provides optimal onset of action within 10 minutes with peak at 15-20 minutes and duration of 45-60 minutes. It has few significant side effects including the rare laryngospasm and recovery agitation, however, it preserves airway reflexes and favorable in hemodynamic instability.

Previous Studies:

Limited studies have demonstrated anxiolysis with patient and provider satisfaction or time to discharge after medication administration comparing intranasal Midazolam to intranasal Dexmedetomidine or intranasal Ketamine in a pediatric emergency medicine setting. Neville et al conducted a study comparing intranasal Dexmedetomidine and intranasal Midazolam prior to laceration repair in a pediatric emergency department and concluded that patients who received Dexmedetomidine had less anxiety at the time of positioning for the procedure. Several other studies have demonstrated similar outcomes with better patient and provider satisfaction in pre-operative settings, imaging, and dental settings. Surendar et al is the only study that compared all three intranasal medications. The study included uncooperative pediatric patients in a dental setting. Although overall differences were not statistically significant, the onset of sedation was rapid among Intranasal Ketamine and Midazolam groups but overall success was highest in Dexmedetomidine group.

Objective/Aims/Hypothesis:

This is the first study that will compare all three intranasal medications to evaluate the length of stay after medication administration along with patient and provider satisfaction. The objective of this study is to demonstrate superior intranasal anxiolysis for pediatric laceration repairs with the shortest emergency department stay and highest patient and provider satisfaction. The primary outcome will measure the time to discharge after medication administration. Other measurements with include patient's anxiety using previously validated scale Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) and physician and parent satisfaction using 5 point Likert scale. Based on previous studies and medication pharmacokinetics, we hypothesize that Ketamine will have the shortest ED stay followed by Midazolam and then Dexmedetomidine with the longest stay; however, Dexmedetomidine will have the highest patient and provider satisfaction followed by Ketamine and then Midazolam.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laceration of Skin
  • Anxiety
  • Discharge Time

Browse trials for

03

In context

Anxiety Disorders Unverified

7,207 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 80 across 6,062 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Oklahoma is the lead sponsor of 432 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Of its 42 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (38%) have results posted.

Compared within Anxiety Disorders, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 5 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 1-5 years old
  • Presents to the ED for suture repair for lacerations less than or equal to 5cm in length
  • Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) speak English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 12 months of age or older than 5 years old
  • Suture repair needed for lacerations are greater than 5cm in length
  • Known allergy or adverse effect to Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, or any other sedatives
  • Any abnormal vital signs for age, especially heart rate and blood pressure
  • History of Cardiac, respiratory, renal, or liver disease
  • Known electrolyte abnormalities
  • Any ocular trauma, nasal injury, nasal deformity, significant nasal congestion, abnormalities in the nasal or oral mucosa, facial deformity, or facial injury
  • Home medications include beta blockers or any other blood pressure lowering agents Classified III and above
  • Known or anticipated difficult airway
  • Abnormal neurological exam
  • Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) do not speak English
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intranasal Midazolam

    Dose/Concentration: 5mg/ml of 0.4mg/kg Midazolam (max dose 10mg). Adverse side effects include respiratory depression and hypotension. Intranasal Midazolam is standard of care for minimal procedures in pediatric ED.

    Drug: Intranasal Midazolam

  • Experimental
    Intranasal Dexmedetomidine

    Dose/Concentration: 100mcg/ml of 2mcg/kg Dexmedetomidine (max dose 100mcg). Adverse side effects include Hypotension and Bradycardia at high dosages. IV Dexmedetomidine is FDA approved and widely used in sedation. IN form isn't FDA approved; however, it has been approved to conduct research studies that have showed its efficacy in pre-operative settings, imaging-CT or MRI, dental procedures, and much more. Specifically, in a pediatric ED setting, Neville et al conducted a study comparing intranasal Dexmedetomidine and intranasal Midazolam prior to laceration repair in a pediatric emergency department and showed safe administration of Dexmedetomidine.

    Drug: Intranasal Dexmedetomidine

  • Experimental
    Intranasal Ketamine

    Dose/Concentration: 100mg/ml of 3mg/kg Ketamine (max dose 100mg). Adverse side effect include Laryngospasm. IV Ketamine is FDA approved and widely used in procedural sedation in pediatric EDs. IN form isn't FDA approved in pediatric population; however, it has also been approved to conduct research studies especially in combination with other medications. Gutherie et al conducted a study demonstrating intranasal Ketamine providing safe and successful anxiolysis in pediatric patients in an ED setting.

    Drug: Intranasal Ketamine

Interventions

  • Using a computer-generated randomization schedule by the research pharmacist, all 90 subjects will be divided into 3 even groups to receive either medication A (intranasal Midazolam), B (intranasal Dexmedetomidine), or C (intranasal Ketamine). Based on the randomization schedule, the pharmacist will dispense medication A, B, or C to the chronological number provided in the order. The total amount of the medication will be based on the patient's charted weight. Small volumes of less than 1ml per nostril are preferred for reliable absorption; therefore, the medication will be dispensed in a 1ml syringe and the barrel of the syringe will be covered by the pharmacist. All the syringes sent from the pharmacy will appear the same, regardless of the volume of the medication.

    Also known as: Intranasal Versed

  • See above

    Also known as: Intranasal Precedex

  • See above

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome will measure the time to discharge after intranasal medication administration

    The nurse will document the time the medication is administered and the time of discharge once the patient meets American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) criteria of discharge. AAP discharge criteria includes cardiovascular function and airway potency satisfactory; arousable and protective reflexes are intact; able to talk appropriately for age; able to sit up appropriately for age; and state of hydration is adequate

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. The secondary outcome will measure patient's anxiety using the previously validated scale mYPAS and physician and parent satisfaction using a 5-point Likert scale

    Once the pharmacy dispenses the medication, the nurse will fill out an 18-point scale survey (Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale \[mYAS\]) to assess the patient's anxiety level. At the end of the procedure, both the physician and the parent will answer a question using a 5-point Likert scale and the nurse will fill out the same mYAS survey utilized prior to medication administration. The mYAS scale evaluates four domains including activity, vocalizations, emotional expressivity, and state of apparent arousal. The scoring is combined into a total anxiety score between 23.3 and 100 with a patient scoring less than or equal to 30 being categorized as not anxious. The scores on 5-point Likert scale are categorized into very satisfied, satisfied, no difference, unsatisfied, very unsatisfied for 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively.

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shaw KN, Bachur RG, editors. Fleisher & Ludwig's Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Medicine. 8th Edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, e129, 2021
  • Zempsky WT, Cravero JP; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1348-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1752. PubMed 15520120 ↗
  • Everitt IJ, Barnett P. Comparison of two benzodiazepines used for sedation of children undergoing suturing of a laceration in an emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002 Apr;18(2):72-4. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200204000-00002. PubMed 11973494 ↗
  • Iirola T, Vilo S, Manner T, Aantaa R, Lahtinen M, Scheinin M, Olkkola KT. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after intranasal administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;67(8):825-31. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1002-y. Epub 2011 Feb 12. PubMed 21318594 ↗
  • Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, Yao TJ, Wong GL, Yuen MK. Optimal timing for the administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine for premedication in children. Anaesthesia. 2010 Sep;65(9):922-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06453.x. PubMed 20645951 ↗
  • Carlone G, Trombetta A, Amoroso S, Poropat F, Barbi E, Cozzi G. Intramuscular Dexmedetomidine, a Feasible Option for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders Needing Urgent Procedural Sedation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jun;35(6):e116-e117. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001776. No abstract available. PubMed 31157751 ↗
  • Azizkhani R, Heydari F, Ghazavi M, Riahinezhad M, Habibzadeh M, Bigdeli A, Golshani K, Majidinejad S, Mohammadbeigi A. Comparing Sedative Effect of Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam for Sedation of Children While Undergoing Computerized Tomography Imaging. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2020 Jul-Sep;15(3):245-251. doi: 10.4103/jpn.JPN_107_19. Epub 2020 Nov 6. PubMed 33531939 ↗
  • Guthrie AM, Baum RA, Carter C, Dugan A, Jones L, Tackett T, Bailey AM. Use of Intranasal Ketamine in Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1001-e1007. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001863. PubMed 31290798 ↗
  • Neville DN, Hayes KR, Ivan Y, McDowell ER, Pitetti RD. Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Intranasal Midazolam as Anxiolysis Prior to Pediatric Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;23(8):910-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12998. PubMed 27129606 ↗
  • Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Cicchetti DV, Bagnall AL, Finley JD, Hofstadter MB. The Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale: how does it compare with a "gold standard"? Anesth Analg. 1997 Oct;85(4):783-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199710000-00012. PubMed 9322455 ↗
  • Gyanesh P, Haldar R, Srivastava D, Agrawal PM, Tiwari AK, Singh PK. Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Anesth. 2014 Feb;28(1):12-8. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1657-x. Epub 2013 Jun 26. PubMed 23800984 ↗
  • Surendar MN, Pandey RK, Saksena AK, Kumar R, Chandra G. A comparative evaluation of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine for their sedative and analgesic properties: a triple blind randomized study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):255-61. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.l828585807482966. PubMed 25095322 ↗
  • Cravero JP, Askins N, Sriswasdi P, Tsze DS, Zurakowski D, Sinnott S. Validation of the Pediatric Sedation State Scale. Pediatrics. 2017 May;139(5):e20162897. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2897. PubMed 28557732 ↗
  • Tug A, Hanci A, Turk HS, Aybey F, Isil CT, Sayin P, Oba S. Comparison of Two Different Intranasal Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Children for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation. Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Dec;17(6):479-85. doi: 10.1007/s40272-015-0145-1. PubMed 26323489 ↗
  • Marra P, Di Stadio A, Colacurcio V, Scarpa A, La Mantia I, Salzano FA, De Luca P. Sedation with Intranasal Dexmedetomidine in the Pediatric Population for Auditory Brainstem Response Testing: Review of the Existing Literature. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 1;10(2):287. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020287. PubMed 35206901 ↗
  • Lewis J, Bailey CR. Intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children; a review. J Perioper Pract. 2020 Jun;30(6):170-175. doi: 10.1177/1750458919854885. Epub 2019 Jun 27. PubMed 31246159 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Research records for this study will be maintained for three years following its completion to allow for inspection by government agencies, the sponsor, the University, and other applicable entities.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Three years after the completion of the study

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2025, 18 months after the start.

Of 52 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Anxiety Disorders, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 59 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 16, 2023
First posted
Jul 7, 2023
StartActual
Nov 14, 2023
Primary completionEst.
May 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 2025
Last update
Jun 28, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05934669
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 7, 2023
Start date
Nov 14, 2023
Primary completion
May 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 28, 2024

Study contacts

Gavely Toor, DO
Contact
gavely-toor@ouhsc.edu
405-271-2429
Ryan Mckee, MD
principal investigator · University of Oklahoma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Midazolam · Dexmedetomidine · Intranasal Ketamine

Start the discussion