CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05932290Updated Oct 29, 2024Results posted

A Study to Learn About the Effectiveness of the Medicine Called Elranatamab in People With Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma

An observational study in Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Weeks and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-29.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
514
Ages
18 Weeks and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is to understand how well elranatamab (PF-06863135) may be used for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Sometimes MM might improve at first, but then gets resistant to the treatment and starts growing again (known as relapsed refractory). This study medicine will be compared with standard-of-care (SOC) therapies used in real-world clinical practice. For people receiving elranatamab, the investigators will use data from the phase 2 clinical trial (MagnetisMM-3). The investigators will also use data from multiple real-world sources, representing the SOC in clinical practice. This study does not seek any participants for enrollment. The investigators will compare the experiences of people receiving elranatamab to people receiving SOC therapies. This way, it will help the investigators to know how well elranatamab can be used for RRMM treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

  • Myeloma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • relapsed Multiple Myeloma
  • refractory Multiple Myeloma
  • PF-06863135
  • BCMA
  • bispecific
  • bispecific antibody
  • BCMA-CD3 bispecific
  • Elranatamab
  • MagnetisMM-3
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 514 is above the median of 140 across 468 observational studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Weeks and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients treated with elranatamab will come from the MagnetisMM-3 trial. Patients treated with the standard-of-care therapies will come from real-world data sources.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years and older at index date
  • Diagnosis of MM
  • Measurable disease according to IMWG criteria
  • ECOG performance status ≤2
  • Refractory to at least 1 proteasome inhibitor, 1 immunomodulatory drug, and 1 anti-CD38 treatment (ie, triple-class refractory [TCR])
  • At least 1 treatment following their TCR eligibility

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute plasma cell leukemia
  • Amyloidosis
  • Smoldering MM
  • Stem cell transplant within 12 weeks of index or active graft versus host disease (GVHD)
  • Active malignancy within 3 years before index, except for basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ
  • Administration with an investigational drug within 30 days prior to index
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
514 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Elranatamab

    Patients treated with elranatamab from the MagnetisMM-3 trial

    Drug: Elranatamab

  • Standard of care

    Patients treated with standard-of-care therapies from real-world data sources

    Drug: Standard of care

Interventions

  • DrugElranatamab

    BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody

  • DrugStandard of care

    Standard of care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted Analysis

    PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed progressive disease (PD) per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first; b) RWD COTA: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>=25% (Percent) from the lowest response value in any 1 or more of the criteria: serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) with an absolute increase \>0.5 gram/deciliter (g/dL); 24-hour(h) urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) with an absolute increase \>200 microgram (mg)/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein, the absolute increase of \>10 mg/dL in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels; or an absolute bone marrow plasma cell \>10%. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months.

    Time frame: C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 15 months);COTA:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 64.3 months)

  2. PFS: C1071003 Cohort A Versus COTA Cohort- Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW)

    PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first; b) COTA: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>=25% from the lowest response value in any 1 or more of the criteria: SPEP with an absolute increase \>0.5 g/dL; 24-hour UPEP with an absolute increase \>200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein, the absolute increase of \>10 mg/dL in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels; or an absolute bone marrow plasma cell percentage \>10%. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months. Participants without an event were censored at date of last adequate disease assessment or the data cut-off. Kaplan Meier method was used.

    Time frame: C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 15 months);COTA:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 64.3 months)

  3. PFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted Analysis

    PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A, PFS: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. B) Flatiron Health: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>= 25% from baseline/nadir value in any one or more of the following: an absolute increase in serum M-protein by SPEP by \>= 0.5 g/dL; serum M-protein \>= 1 g/dL if the lowest M component was \>= 5 g/dL; an absolute increase in urine M-protein by UPEP by \>=200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, an absolute increase in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels of \>10 mg/dL. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months.

    Time frame: C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first(maximum of 15 months);Flatiron:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/death due to any cause or censoring,whichever occurred first(maximum of 66.9 months)

  4. PFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW Analysis

    PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A, PFS: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. B) Flatiron Health: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>= 25% from baseline/nadir value in any one or more of the following: an absolute increase in serum M-protein by SPEP by \>= 0.5 g/dL; serum M-protein \>= 1 g/dL if the lowest M component was \>= 5 g/dL; an absolute increase in urine M-protein by UPEP by \>=200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, an absolute increase in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels of \>10 mg/dL. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis.

    Time frame: C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first(maximum of 15 months);Flatiron:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/death due to any cause or censoring,whichever occurred first(maximum of 66.9 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted Analysis

    OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; b) COTA Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

    Time frame: C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); COTA: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 64.3 months)

  2. OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using IPTW Analysis

    OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; b) COTA Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

    Time frame: C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); COTA: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 64.3 months)

  3. OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted Analysis

    OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; B) Flatiron Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

    Time frame: C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); Flatiron: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 66.9 months)

  4. OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW Analysis

    OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; B) Flatiron Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

    Time frame: C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); Flatiron: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 66.9 months)

07

Results

Posted Oct 29, 2024
Limitations and caveats
IMWG: International Myeloma Working Group

Participant flow

This retrospective cohort study used participant level data from study C1071003 (NCT04649359), and external control arms identified from real world data (RWD) sources.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneC1071003 Cohort ARWD: COTARWD: Flatiron Health
Started123239152
Completed123239152
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression Free Survival (PFS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted Analysis

PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed progressive disease (PD) per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first; b) RWD COTA: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>=25% (Percent) from the lowest response value in any 1 or more of the criteria: serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) with an absolute increase \>0.5 gram/deciliter (g/dL); 24-hour(h) urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) with an absolute increase \>200 microgram (mg)/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein, the absolute increase of \>10 mg/dL in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels; or an absolute bone marrow plasma cell \>10%. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months.

Time frame:
C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 15 months);COTA:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 64.3 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted Analysis
MonthsC1071003 Cohort ARWD: COTA
Progression Free Survival (PFS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted AnalysisNA (NA to NA)4.70 (3.09 to 5.98)
Statistical analysis
  • C1071003 Cohort A vs RWD: COTA · Regression, Cox · p = <.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.51 · 95% CI 0.37 to 0.71Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using unadjusted Cox proportional hazard models.
PrimaryPFS: C1071003 Cohort A Versus COTA Cohort- Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW)

PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first; b) COTA: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>=25% from the lowest response value in any 1 or more of the criteria: SPEP with an absolute increase \>0.5 g/dL; 24-hour UPEP with an absolute increase \>200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein, the absolute increase of \>10 mg/dL in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels; or an absolute bone marrow plasma cell percentage \>10%. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months. Participants without an event were censored at date of last adequate disease assessment or the data cut-off. Kaplan Meier method was used.

Time frame:
C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 15 months);COTA:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/ death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum of 64.3 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
PFS: C1071003 Cohort A Versus COTA Cohort- Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW)
MonthsC1071003 Cohort ARWD: COTA
PFS: C1071003 Cohort A Versus COTA Cohort- Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW)NA (NA to NA)5.26 (3.25 to 6.28)
Statistical analysis
  • C1071003 Cohort A vs RWD: COTA · Regression, Cox · p = .0003 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.37 · 95% CI 0.22 to 0.64IPTW HRs were estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazard models and confidence intervals were estimated using robust error variances.
PrimaryPFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted Analysis

PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A, PFS: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. B) Flatiron Health: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>= 25% from baseline/nadir value in any one or more of the following: an absolute increase in serum M-protein by SPEP by \>= 0.5 g/dL; serum M-protein \>= 1 g/dL if the lowest M component was \>= 5 g/dL; an absolute increase in urine M-protein by UPEP by \>=200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, an absolute increase in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels of \>10 mg/dL. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months.

Time frame:
C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first(maximum of 15 months);Flatiron:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/death due to any cause or censoring,whichever occurred first(maximum of 66.9 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
PFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted Analysis
MonthsC1071003 Cohort ARWD: Flatiron Health
PFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted AnalysisNA (NA to NA)3.71 (3.02 to 7.13)
PrimaryPFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW Analysis

PFS: a) C1071003 Cohort A, PFS: time from the date of the first dose until confirmed PD per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. B) Flatiron Health: time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM to either the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. IMWG criteria for progression: an increase of \>= 25% from baseline/nadir value in any one or more of the following: an absolute increase in serum M-protein by SPEP by \>= 0.5 g/dL; serum M-protein \>= 1 g/dL if the lowest M component was \>= 5 g/dL; an absolute increase in urine M-protein by UPEP by \>=200 mg/24 h; in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, an absolute increase in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels of \>10 mg/dL. Retrospective data was retrieved and observed in the current study for approximately 1.5 months. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis.

Time frame:
C1071003:First dose to confirmed PD/death due to any cause or censoring whichever occurred first(maximum of 15 months);Flatiron:Initiation of first line post TCR MM to PD/death due to any cause or censoring,whichever occurred first(maximum of 66.9 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
PFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW Analysis
MonthsC1071003 Cohort ARWD: Flatiron Health
PFS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW AnalysisNA (NA to NA)2.79 (1.87 to 5.59)
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted Analysis

OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; b) COTA Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

Time frame:
C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); COTA: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 64.3 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival (OS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted Analysis
MonthsC1071003 Cohort ARWD: COTA
Overall Survival (OS): Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using Unweighted AnalysisNA (NA to NA)11.24 (9.36 to 14.75)
Statistical analysis
  • C1071003 Cohort A vs RWD: COTA · Regression, Cox · p = .0062 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.65 · 95% CI 0.47 to 0.88HRs were estimated using unadjusted Cox proportional hazard models.
SecondaryOS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using IPTW Analysis

OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; b) COTA Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

Time frame:
C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); COTA: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 64.3 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using IPTW Analysis
MonthsC1071003 Cohort ARWD: COTA
OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus RWD COTA Cohort- Using IPTW AnalysisNA (NA to NA)11.24 (8.51 to 14.29)
Statistical analysis
  • C1071003 Cohort A vs RWD: COTA · Regression, Cox · p = .0032 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.46 · 95% CI 0.27 to 0.77IPTW HRs were estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazard models and confidence intervals were estimated using robust error variances.
SecondaryOS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted Analysis

OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; B) Flatiron Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

Time frame:
C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); Flatiron: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 66.9 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted Analysis
MonthsC1071003 Cohort ARWD: Flatiron Health
OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using Unweighted AnalysisNA (NA to NA)11.24 (7.75 to 13.21)
SecondaryOS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW Analysis

OS: a) C1071003 Cohort A: OS was defined as time from the date of the first dose until death due to any cause; B) Flatiron Cohort: OS was defined as time from initiation of the first line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan Meier Method was used for analysis. Participants without an event were censored at the latest available record or the data cut-off.

Time frame:
C1071003: The date of the first dose until death due to any cause or censoring (maximum up to 15 months); Flatiron: First line after participant identified as having TCR MM until the date of death due to any cause or censoring (maximum of 66.9 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW Analysis
MonthsC1071003 Cohort ARWD: Flatiron Health
OS: Study C1071003 Cohort A Versus Flatiron Cohort - Using IPTW AnalysisNA (NA to NA)11.24 (6.31 to 15.41)

Adverse events

Collected over All-cause mortality: During observation period of approximately 15 months for C1071003, 64.3 months for RWD: COTA and 66.9 months for RWD: Flatiron Health; Serious adverse events and other adverse events: not applicable as adverse event data was not collected.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
C1071003 Cohort A55/123 (44.7%)——
RWD: COTA171/239 (71.5%)——
RWD: Flatiron Health90/152 (59.2%)——

Baseline characteristics

Eligible participants whose data was included for observation in this study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)C1071003 Cohort ARWD: COTARWD: Flatiron HealthTotal
Mean67.1 ± 9.468.0 ± 9.469.5 ± 10.068.2 ± 9.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)C1071003 Cohort ARWD: COTARWD: Flatiron HealthTotal
Female5510972236
Male6813080278
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)C1071003 Cohort ARWD: COTARWD: Flatiron HealthTotal
White72175102349
Non-white516450165
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Pfizer
    New York, New York 10001, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 15, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 20, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05932290
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 6, 2023
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 12, 2023
Completion
Jul 12, 2023
Results posted
Oct 29, 2024
Last update
Oct 29, 2024

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion