ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05930106Updated Apr 23, 2025

Carotid Doppler Peak Velocity Variation in Liposuction Fluid Management

An interventional study of Intraoperative fluid ratio and Carotid Artery Doppler Peak Velocity Variation in Lipodystrophy, sponsored by TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-23.

Sponsored by TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare the hemodynamic parameters, postoperative plethysmography variability index, the total amount of postoperative intravenous fluid administration needed, and the urine output of two methods of fluid resuscitation during liposuction surgery. One method involves using carotid artery Doppler peak velocity variation, while the other is the conventional fluid ratio.

Read the detailed description

The research will involve 50 female participants who have undergone liposuction and will be divided into two groups.

Group 1: Fluid administration will be determined by the intraoperative fluid ratio. This ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous fluid by the total aspirate volume. Depending on the aspiration volume, it will be maintained at 1-1.4.

Group 2: Participants will be given a fluid maintenance rate of 1.5 ml/kg/h. To determine fluid responsiveness, the carotid artery peak velocity variation (ΔVPeak-CA) will be measured before, during, and after the procedure. If the ΔVPeak-CA goes above 15%, the patient will receive a fluid bolus of lactated ringer solution at a rate of 4-6 ml/kg over 10-15 minutes, and the team will re-measure fluid responsiveness 10 minutes after each ΔVPeaK-CA.

During the examination, a single cardiothoracic anesthesiologist will use a 13-6 MHz linear probe (Fujifilm Sonosite M-Turbo) to measure the peak velocity of the carotid artery on the left side. The sample volume will be positioned at the center of the lumen, 2 cm from the bulb, and a pulsed wave Doppler examination will be conducted.

To measure the ΔVPeak-CA, the investigators will calculate the maximum and minimum values during one respiratory cycle. This will be done by using the formula: 100x (maximum peak velocity - minimum peak velocity) / [(maximum peak velocity + minimum peak velocity)/2].

Surgical technique

The superwet tumescence technique will be the only method utilized for infiltration during the procedure. All participants will undergo power-assisted liposuction, and a single surgeon will operate. The wetting solution will contain 1000cc of normal saline and 2mg of epinephrine in a 1:500,000 ratio. The total Infiltration volume will depend on the patient.

The total amount of aspiration will depend on the patient and surgery plan and can vary between 2500 to 5000 ml

During the surgical procedure, the investigators will monitor vital signs such as blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, oxygen levels, and urine output. Additionally, the investigators will track the amount of fluids given and removed, and the volume of blood aspirated.

Following surgery, participants will be hospitalized for 24 hours. During this time, the investigators will closely monitor the plethysmography variability index (PVI) in both groups. If the PVI exceeds 15%, participants will receive a ringer lactate fluid bolus of 4-6 ml/kg. Additionally, the investigators will keep track of their urine output, total fluid intake, and vital signs

02

Conditions studied

  • Lipodystrophy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • liposuction
  • carotid artery doppler peak velocity variation
  • plethysmography variability index
  • fluid ratio
03

In context

Lipodystrophy

139 studies on the registry are indexed under Lipodystrophy; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 46 across 97 interventional studies indexed under Lipodystrophy.

Browse Lipodystrophy studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients between 21 and 60 years old
  • Liposuction with or without abdominoplasty
  • Ӏ \& ӀӀ.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous liposuction surgery
  • III
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Cardiopulmonary disorders
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group Intraoperative fluid ratio

    The intraoperative fluid ratio will determine fluid administration. This ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous fluid by the total aspirate volume. Depending on the aspiration volume, it will be maintained at 1-1.4.

    Other: Intraoperative fluid ratio

  • Experimental
    Group Carotid Artery Peak Velocity Variation

    Patients will be given a fluid maintenance rate of 1.5 ml/kg/h. To determine fluid responsiveness, the carotid artery peak velocity variation (ΔVPeak-CA) will be measured before, during, and after the procedure. If the ΔVPeak-CA goes above 15%, the patient will receive a fluid bolus of lactated ringer solution at a rate of 4-6 ml/kg over 10-15 minutes, and the team will re-measure fluid responsiveness 10 minutes after each ΔVPeaK-CA.

    Device: Carotid Artery Doppler Peak Velocity Variation

Interventions

  • OtherIntraoperative fluid ratio

    This ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of procedure subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous fluid by the total aspirate volume during surgery

  • DeviceCarotid Artery Doppler Peak Velocity Variation

    Patients will be given a fluid maintenance rate of 1.5 ml/kg/h. To determine fluid responsiveness, the carotid artery peak velocity variation (ΔVPeak-CA) will be measured before, during, and after the procedure. If the ΔVPeak-CA goes above 15%, the patient will receive a fluid bolus of lactated ringer solution at a rate of 4-6 ml/kg over 10-15 minutes, and the team will re-measure fluid responsiveness 10 minutes after each ΔVPeaK-CA.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Postoperative PVi

    Following surgery, patients will be hospitalized for 24 hours. Throughout this period, the investigators will keep a close eye on the Plethysmography Variability Index (PVi) in both groups. The PVi is a dynamic index that measures the relative variability of the plethysmography waveform detected noninvasively from a pulse oximetry sensor, ranging from 0 to 100. By automatically calculating the dynamic changes that occur during the respiratory cycle, it uses the detected amplitudes. A higher variability in the plethysmography waveform has been linked to preload dependence and fluid responders. If the PVi exceeds 15%, the patient will receive a fluid bolus of lactated ringer solution at a rate of 4-6 ml/kg over 10-15 minutes.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Postoperative intravenous fluid balance

    Following surgery, patients will be hospitalized for 24 hours. During the postoperative period, the investigators will keep track and document the exact volume of fluid administered in milliliters.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. The intraoperative total volume of urine in the patient's catheter bag

    During the intraoperative period, the investigators will measure and record the total volume of urine accumulated in the patient's catheter bag over the surgery period and will report urine output measured in milliliters per kilogram per hour.

    Time frame: the duration of the surgery

  2. The postoperative total volume of urine in the patient's catheter bag

    During the postoperative period, the investigators will measure and record the total volume of urine accumulated in the patient's catheter bag over a 24-hour period and will report urine output measured in milliliters per kilogram per hour.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Mean arterial blood pressure during hospitalization

    Following surgery, patients will be hospitalized for 24 hours. During this time, the investigators will monitor Mean arterial pressure

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. The intraoperative intravenous fluid balance

    Throughout the surgical procedure, the investigators will meticulously monitor and record the precise amount of fluid administered in milliliters.

    Time frame: the duration of the surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • TJ Plast out patient, S.A. de C.V.
    Tijuana, Baja California 9288, Mexico
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wang G, Cao WG, Zhao TL. Fluid management in extensive liposuction: A retrospective review of 83 consecutive patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(41):e12655. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012655. PubMed 30313055 ↗
  • Song Y, Kwak YL, Song JW, Kim YJ, Shim JK. Respirophasic carotid artery peak velocity variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):61-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu057. Epub 2014 Apr 9. PubMed 24722322 ↗
  • Ibarra-Estrada MA, Lopez-Pulgarin JA, Mijangos-Mendez JC, Diaz-Gomez JL, Aguirre-Avalos G. Respiratory variation in carotid peak systolic velocity predicts volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: a prospective cohort study. Crit Ultrasound J. 2015 Dec;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13089-015-0029-1. Epub 2015 Jun 26. PubMed 26123610 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers interested in liposuction fluid management. Data will be coded, and approval consent forms it's a prerequisite.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: 2 months after publication and for 24 months

Access criteria: Qualified researchers can request access to IPD, and will be provided following the review and approval of the research proposal

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2023 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 12 months.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Lipodystrophy, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 23. This study's 12 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 9, 2023
First posted
Jul 5, 2023
StartActual
Nov 20, 2023
Primary completionActual
Nov 20, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 20, 2024
Last update
Apr 23, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05930106
Lead sponsor
TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery
Responsible party
Sergio Soto Hopkins (Principal Investigator, TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 5, 2023
Start date
Nov 20, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 20, 2024
Completion
Dec 20, 2024
Last update
Apr 23, 2025

Study contacts

Sergio Soto Hopkins, M.D.
principal investigator · TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery
Hector Milla, M.D.
study chair · TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery
Israel Espino Gaucin, M.D.
study director · TJ Plast Advanced Center for Plastic Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion