CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05927636STAPPSUpdated Jul 3, 2023

Systemic Treatment Related Toxicity Identified With a Smartphone APPlication Measuring Step Count

An observational study in Cancer, Systemic Treatment and Physical Activity, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Recruiting at 3 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-03.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2024, 2 years 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
411
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to investigate whether daily physical activities measured with a smartphone are related to the possible side effects or other physical complaints that arise as a result of cancer treatment. The investigators want to test whether the number of steps per day, both before and during treatment, are related to possible side effects or other physical complaints of the treatment using a smartphone. Knowledge about this relationship gives us possible starting points to prevent and/or reduce side effects and improve treatment outcomes. Additional research would then be needed.

The investigators also want to investigate whether these daily measurements are feasible for patients undergoing treatment.

Participation in the study involves measuring daily physical activity from the week before treatment until the first 3 months of treatment have been completed. This is done by tracking daily steps with patients own phone using the OncoSTAPP application.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Systemic treatment of patients with cancer has a multimodal approach with the goal of balancing quantity and quality of life. Treatment decisions are influenced by tumour and patient-related characteristics. Additionally, in clinical practice performance status is used to identify whether a patient is sufficiently fit for systemic treatment, as it has shown to be a valid prognostic factor for survival and adverse events during treatment. However, treatment-related toxicities and hospitalisations occur frequently during systemic treatment.

The disadvantages of performance status assessed with ECOG or Karnofsky, is that it is a subjective measurement which is prone to bias and has high interobserver variability. Also a patient's self-reported physical function is significantly associated with shorter (progression-free) survival, but it is also subjective and is prone to multiple forms of bias. Objective assessment of physical function might be a good alternative to counteract these shortcomings. A higher level of physical activity is associated with a reduction in cancer specific mortality and can be measured with accelerometers, pedometers or multisenor systems like smartphones.

Wearable measured step count assessed with a wrist worn device provided by the investigators has shown to be associated with adverse events. However, these devices cannot be provided to all patients in clinical practice.

Recently, the investigators showed that the smartphones' assessments of physical activity (step count), have excellent agreement with accelerometer assessments of physical activity and good test-retest reliability. Furthermore this smartphone measurements were associated with early trial discontinuation in phase 1/2 cancer trials.

The investigators hypothesize that a low baseline and/or a reduction in physical activity (step count) measured with smartphones will be predictive for clinically relevant adverse events during systemic treatment. Adding objective information of physical function in the process of selecting the best treatment for a patient may help prevent unnecessary adverse events. Additionally, a detection of a decline in physical activity during treatment may identify upcoming adverse events early, allowing timely management/support. This may help to optimize treatment and quality of life.

Objective: Primary objectives: 1) To determine whether baseline physical activity, measured by the number of steps per day with a smartphone, is associated with clinically relevant adverse events during treatment.

  1. To determine whether changes in physical activity, measured by the number of steps per day with a smartphone, are associated with clinically relevant adverse events during treatment.

Clinically relevant adverse events during treatment are defined as hospitalizations, early treatment discontinuation, relative dose intensity below 70% and mortality.

Secondary: Patients' acceptability of the application. The association of physical activity with relative dose intensity, progression free and overall survival. The association between the oncologists' estimates and clinically relevant adverse events during treatment, and the possible added value of objective assessments of physical activity.

Study design: Prospective observational cohort study.

Study population: 411 patients with cancer referred for systemic treatment at the departments of Medical Oncology at participating centres.

Intervention: N/A.

Main study parameters/endpoints: Collection of daily number of steps will start in the week before treatment and will continue for the first 3 months of systemic treatment. Mean number of steps per day will be measured passively with a smartphone application on patients' own smartphones. Primary endpoint is any clinically relevant adverse events during treatment, defined as hospitalizations, significant dose modifications of treatment and mortality.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participation in this study will not cause any additional risks or expected benefits for participants. No extra visits to the hospital will be necessary. It will provide us knowledge, which may be used in the future to better select patients for systemic treatment.

Patients will be asked to carry their smartphone on them during the duration of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer
  • Systemic Treatment
  • Physical Activity
  • Toxicity Due to Chemotherapy

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Systemic treatment
  • Toxicity
  • Physical activity
  • Smartphone
  • wearable
  • Daily step count
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 959 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients with cancer referred for systemic treatment of the outpatient clinic at the departments of Medical Oncology at participating centres.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years;
  • Diagnosis of cancer with an indication of starting systemic treatment
  • Knowledge how to handle smartphone with iOS version 11 or higher or Android version 7.0 or higher.
  • Mastery of Dutch language
  • Able and willing to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive disorders or severe emotional instability
  • Wheelchair-depended at home, or immobile due to for example fracture
  • Already participating in an exercise trial
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
411 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Study population

    Patients with cancer referred for systemic treatment of the outpatient clinic at the departments of Medical Oncology at participating centres.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Physical activity

    Mean number of steps per day measured with a smartphone. At baseline and during treatment

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation period (90 days on systemic treatment)

  2. Number of patients with a hospitalization

    Hospitalizations during treatment related to the therapy; will be combined into Clinically relevant adverse events during treatment

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation period (90 days on systemic treatment)

  3. Number of patients with a treatment discontinuation

    Early treatment discontinuation, within the first 3 months; will be combined into Clinically relevant adverse events during treatment

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation period (90 days on systemic treatment)

  4. Number of patients with a RDI <70%

    Relative dose intensity (RDI) below 70%; will be combined into Clinically relevant adverse events during treatment

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation period (90 days on systemic treatment)

  5. Rate of mortality

    Mortality due to treatment toxicity; will be combined into Clinically relevant adverse events during treatment

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation period (90 days on systemic treatment)

  6. Relative dose intensity (RDI) of systemic treatment

    The percentage of planted dose and time between doses will be retrieved form patients' medical records (EPIC). The RDI will be calculated by total percentage of given dose divided by the proportion of the actual time in relation to the standard time. RDI=(Total percentage of given dose)/((Actual time)/(Standard time))\*100

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation period (90 days on systemic treatment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physician's rated performance status

    The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization Performance Status (ECOG/WHO-PS) will be determined by the treating physician before treatment as stated in the current treatment guidelines of the departments of Medical Oncology. scale 0 to 5, with 0 denoting perfect health and 5 death.

    Time frame: At enrollment

  2. Oncologists' estimates of high toxicity risk during treatment

    Question if patients are defined as at high (\>50%) or low risk of dose limiting (\>25% or discontinuation) toxicity during the first 3 months of systemic treatment. This will be documented in patients' medical records (e.g. EPIC).

    Time frame: At enrollment

  3. Overall survival

    Overall survival is defined as the time between start of trial participation and death of any cause and will be tracked via the patients' medical records (e.g. EPIC).

    Time frame: From enrollment until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 2 years

  4. Progression free survival

    Progression free survival is defined as the time between start of systemic treatment and the clinically or radiologically confirmation of progressive disease (established via RECIST-criteria) and will be tracked via the patients' medical records (e.g. EPIC).

    Time frame: From enrollment until the date of first documented progression assessed up to 2 years

  5. Proportion of patients with correctly collected data

    Validity of the smartphone application will be assesed by the proportion of patients correctly collected the data.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation period (90 days on systemic treatment)

  6. Patients experience with smartphone application

    A consecutive sample of patients will be contacted for a short interview about the use of the smartphone application, until data saturation. Any spontaneously reported reactions about the smartphone application will be collected.

    Time frame: At the end of the observation period (90 days on systemic treatment), or reported spontaniously by the patient

Other outcomes

  1. Patient characteristics, age

    age at enrolement, in years

    Time frame: at enrolement

  2. Patient characteristics, weight

    body weight, in kilograms

    Time frame: at enrolement

  3. Patient characteristics, heigth

    height, in meters

    Time frame: at enrolement

  4. Patient characteristics, comorbidities

    Comorbidities of the patiënt, with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  5. Patient characteristics, tumour

    tumour type and stage, pathology findings.

    Time frame: at enrolement

  6. Patient characteristics, previous treatment

    previous treatments related to current tumour. including surgery, radiotherapy and all systemic treatments

    Time frame: at enrolement

  7. Patient characteristics, treatment

    treatment characteristics, type of systemic treatment

    Time frame: at enrolement

  8. Patient characteristics, number of medication

    Total number of medications before current systemic treatment.

    Time frame: at enrolement

  9. Patient characteristics, Hemoglobin

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Hemoglobin (mmol/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  10. Patient characteristics, Leukocytes

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Leukocytes (10\*\*09/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  11. Patient characteristics, Trombocytes

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Trombocytes (10\*\*09/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  12. Patient characteristics, Neutrophils

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Neutrophils (10\*\*09/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  13. Patient characteristics, Lymphocytes

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Lymphocytes (10\*\*09/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  14. Patient characteristics, Sodium

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Sodium (mmol/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  15. Patient characteristics, Urea

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Urea (mmol/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  16. Patient characteristics, Creatinine

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Creatinine (umol/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  17. Patient characteristics, Creatinine clearance

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Creatinine clearance (ml/min/1.73m2) CKD-EPI-GFR

    Time frame: at enrolement

  18. Patient characteristics, Alanine aminotransferase

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, alanine aminotransferase (U/L) (ALAT)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  19. Patient characteristics, Aspartate aminotransferase

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) (ASAT)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  20. Patient characteristics, Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (U/L) (LDH)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  21. Patient characteristics, Alkaline phosphatase

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Alkaline phosphatase (U/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  22. Patient characteristics, Serum Albumin

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, Serum Albumin (g/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

  23. Patient characteristics, C-reactive protein

    laboratory finding captured as routine care at enrolement, C-reactive protein (mg/L)

    Time frame: at enrolement

07

Study locations

2 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
    Leeuwarden, Friesland 8934 AD, Netherlands
    Recruiting
  • Radboudumc
    Nijmegen, Gelderland 6525GA, Netherlands
    Recruiting
  • Erasmus MC
    Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3015 GD, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — No current plans for data sharing. Patients gave informed consent to share data with studies in line with the current research question. Data availible on request.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05927636
Lead sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Collaborators
Erasmus Medical Center, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 3, 2023
Start date
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 3, 2023

Study contacts

Laurien Buffart, PhD
Contact
laurien.buffart@radboudumc.nl
+31243613674
Calvin Brouwer, Msc
Contact
calvin.brouwer@radboudumc.nl
+31243098205

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion